Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4523
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | More about Parallel ForEach nad Parallel For.. |
| Date | Fri, 3 Aug 2018 23:35:06 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 39 |
| Message-ID | <pk2orc$m55$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Fri, 3 Aug 2018 23:35:08 -0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="92dc855e8c34d9fc5ac13e27bbb14a7c"; logging-data="22693"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/YmW/Tu3tnYg//UePIyKEV" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:Fp7x9X84imCxgObCh1MxQ2r1cIg= |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| X-Mozilla-News-Host | news://news.eternal-september.org:119 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.programming.threads:4523 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hello.. More about Parallel ForEach nad Parallel For.. I think i have made a mistake, because i think that this Parallel ForEach and Parallel For are like futulities, because they don't bring "enough" high level abstraction to consider them interesting, because i think my Threadpool with priorities that scales very well is capable of easily simulating Parallel ForEach with "priorities" and ParallelFor with "priorities" that scale very well, so no need to implement Parallel ForEach or Parallel For. Here is my powerful Threadpool with priorities that scales very well, read about it and download it from here: https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well It is a very powerful Threadpool, because: More precision about my efficient Threadpool that scales very well, my Threadpool is much more scalable than the one of Microsoft, in the workers side i am using scalable counting networks to distribute on the many queues or stacks, so it is scalable on the workers side, on the consumers side i am also using lock striping to be able to scale very well, so it is scalable on those parts, on the other part that is work stealing, i am using scalable counting networks, so globally it scales very well, and since work stealing is "rare" so i think that my efficient Threadpool that scales very well is really powerful, and it is much more optimized and the scalable counting networks eliminate false sharing, and it works with Windows and Linux. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
More about Parallel ForEach nad Parallel For.. Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-08-03 23:35 -0400
csiph-web