Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4494

I am for a smart capitalism..

Show all headers | View raw

Hello....

Read this:


I am for a smart capitalism..

But what is a smart capitalism ?

It is first a capitalism that can convince you smartly !

As you have noticed i am explaining to you what is
capitalism of USA and you are feeling more capitalism
, i am doing it also to be able for you to be more tolerance
with capitalism, also i am "trying" to learn capitalism to be smarter !
and i think that the essence of capitalism must be defined
better to be able to feel it more ! here is how i will define it:

Capitalism belong to the "set" of humanity and
capitalism "is" or is "composed" of capitalism of "today" and capitalism
of the "future" , so capitalism must know how to "balance"
with responsability taking into account the present and the future of 
our world and being responsable for present and future generations !
but i am saying it and showing you an important constrain that shows you 
the way to tolerance towards capitalism, and here it is, read
about the following constraint:

Morality is also "diversity"

I said it to be able to be more correct abstraction,
i give you an example: if you say like neo-nazism that "all" of us that 
are not handicaped have to work "hard" to not be a parasite of the 
system, i think that's lack of maturity that doesn't recognize that 
there is also "constrains" that we have to deal with, and saying like 
neo-nazism that all that are not handicaped have to work hard to not be 
a parasite is also an "idealism"
that is not correct morality, this is why you have to be more "maturity"
that is pragmatism, that means that is realistic to be able to be an 
appropriate morality,  today because of our world is
not a perfect world, competitiveness and prioritization dictate
that high IQ individuals can group together (like Google)
and make "much" "much" more money than the less smart individuals,
and also because of Risks and competitiveness we are allowing
the Banks to make more and more money, this is also morality that
takes into account the constrains, but how in this context can we take 
more money from the rich and give it to the poorer ? i think
that capitalism such as the one of USA knows also about pragmatism, 
because capitalism of USA is a policeman that doesn't want capitalism to 
be changed in more favor of the poorer because it fears imperfections
of humans and it fears the "mess" of socialism and it fears
the "mess" of communism and it fears the mess of other ideologies
like neo-nazism or nationalism, this is why capitalistic systems are 
"conservatism" of there capitalism.

Read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:


What is the essence of tolerance and compassion ?

There essence are the same as the essence of a group, we are grouping 
because of our weaknesses to become more strong and more perfection to 
be able to survive better ! the essence of tolerance and compassion is 
the same , we need compassion and tolerance because its inherent to 
morality ! because morality is maximizing at best excellence or quality 
! but this maximization knows about our weaknesses , so since there is 
still weaknesses there
is still compassion and tolerance ! thus logically weaknesses do
engender tolerance and compassion on the other and on the other races 
because of weaknesses of our own and because compassion and tolerance 
are also defined by the consequences that are the same as compassion and 
tolerance, because by a good approximation and we are in fuzzy logic, 
the consequences of wise egoism as i have explained lesser egoism of 
nationalism ! for example wise egoism that is the consumer confidence 
index or economic growth that
attract the investment from abroad can be approximated as compassion and 
tolerance, and notice that if we were Gods we will need less
to group and we will need less compassion and tolerance ! this is
the essence of morality.

So read more about the rest of my thoughts to understand better:

Yet more about the essence of morality and the essence of our civilization:

I have to be more smart..

I have given many definitions of morality and i have explained them to you..

Here is another definition that says that morality is: maximizing 
"quality" or the degree of "excellence" at best.

Now we know what is quality, quality is the degree of excellence
of something..

But what is reliability ?

We say in computer science that if we increase the mean time between 
failures, we increase reliability, but is reliability only increasing
the mean time between failures ? i don't think so, because we can say,
if we put the reference as being "perfect", that less performance
is like a "bug" or a "bad" that "hurts" the system compared to being
perfect. So being more performance is being more reliability too, also
being less beautifulness can be considered as a state that can
make us less well being, so it is like a "bug" in the system that  hurts 
to a certain level, so we can say that being more beautiful is being 
more reliability, and being less perfection can be considered as a state 
that can make us less well being, so it is like a "bug" in the system, 
so perfection is reliability, and perfection is quality,
so reliability is quality, but what is morality? i think morality
is maximizing the degree of excellence at best , so then morality
is quality that too maximizes the degree of quality at best,
so from the above we can say that morality is perfection and perfection 
is reliability and then morality is reliability. This is in accordance
with my proof bellow, so since morality is quality and morality is
perfection, then how can we avoid extremism of perfection or quality
that hurts the system ? i think morality is constrained by people
of the system or by Democracy that is the tool to avoid extremism
of perfection and quality that hurts.

More profond about philosophy now..

I said before that:

cleanliness generate morality

But what about Donald Trump that said that:

Haiti and many african countries are shithole countries.

Is Donald Trump "cleanliness" to say so ?

You have to understand better "cleanliness", cleanliness
is knowing how to "balance" the "requirements", so
you have to take into account "security" and be less
provocative than Donald Trump, this is why Donald Trump is
not the right requirement of "security" to say the above
about many african countries and about haiti, because
Donald Trump is more "virility" that is more "violent"
and that does not balance with the other requirements
of "sensibility" and "morality" to be better security.

Now i give you another example:

Neo-nazism is saying that arabs  are not
as beautiful as white europeans, so they want to discriminate
them and to be more violent with them, but this neo-nazism is an 
immature morality, because we have to know how to transcend it towards
a better world that takes into account "usefulness" and
"security" and "economy", so this is why the requirements
of today is to have a more interconnected economies
around the world, even with arabs and with africans,
this is because we have to take into account
the economic growth of arab and african countries that
is for example more attractive for economic investment,
also we have to take into account the consumer
confidence index globally and locally,
so we have to know how to be "respect" towards arabs
and africans, and we have also to take into
account the "usefulness" of arabs and africans, because
many western countries bring arab and african immigrants
because they are useful for jobs and because they are also
useful for low birth rate of white europeans , and also you have to 
know, like have said Fordism, how to give the necessary wages to 
others(even globally) to be able for them to buy
your products and services, so i have also proved and said that: 
cleanliness generate morality,  but as i have just explained that 
"cleanliness" must know how to take into account the right requirements 
as i said above, and it must know how to balance the "requirements".


More precision about philosophy..

We have to get into more "calculations" and more "precision" to 
understand better, this is what we call also philosophy, so i said 
before that:

==
And the "set" of morality contains: cleanliness.

And from cleanliness we get decency and cleanliness generate also
a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to
know how to think better, and from cleanliness we get security too,
and cleanliness generate morality.
==


Here is my logical proof about: cleanliness generate morality

Since morality is all about what is bad and what is good,
so a weaker definition of morality is the act of distinguishing
between the good and bad, but this is a "weaker" definition,
because to be able to distinguish between the good and the bad
we have to be more rationality and/or more science, but
as i said before that "cleanliness" generate also
a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to
know how to think better, so by less espressiveness we can
say that cleanliness contains the "requirement" of being a more
scientific mind, this is like "inherent" to cleanliness, because
"cleanliness" needs to be more and more "perfect" so that to avoid
the "bad" of imperfection or weakness, so this is why
the right requirements are inherent to "cleanliness", so it makes my
following affirmation correct and true:  cleanliness generate morality


I will get into more philosophy..

As you have noticed i have said that morality is defined as: reliability
or by more expressiveness by: performance and reliability.

Now to "model" better humans, we have the following:

sensibility, morality, rationality, virility, intelligence, and language

And the "set" of morality contains: cleanliness.

And from cleanliness we get decency and cleanliness generate also
a more scientific mind, because to be more cleanliness we have to
know how to think better, and from cleanliness we get security too,
and cleanliness generate morality,

Now from "sensibility" we get love and we get security too.

And from "rationality" we get a mind that is more rational and more logic.

from "virility" we get more performance , but if virility is not 
"constrained" by the others such as morality and sensibility and 
rationality, we can get violence and insecurity.

I think this is how we can "model" better humans both "genetically" and 
"culturally".

Here is my other new thoughts..

What i am doing is finding the essence of things like in philosophy
and i am using the tool of logic that permits also to "measure"
and to "calculate" precisely like in mathematics and it permits to 
reason better, so what is my new thoughts of today ? as you have noticed 
i have defined previously what is morality, it is like finding its 
"essence" that i have done in my previous post, now an important
question is inferred from this act of thinking, is that what is
the essence of our "civilization" ? finding its essence with more
"precise" thinking is an act of "philosophy", so what is its essence ?
i think its essence is coming from the fact that a process or a thing 
can have an advantage and a disadvantage, and the general "reference" is
morality that is, by more expressiveness, "performance" and 
"reliability"(as i have proved bellow), or simply "reliability"(as i 
have proved bellow) that can model morality correctly as i have proved 
it in my previous post, so the essence of our civilization is the act of 
coordinating and organizing those advantages
and disadvantages on each of us or on each thing or in each process to 
be capable of giving an efficient morality that has as an essence 
"performance" and "reliability", and as a validation of my model, you 
will notice that we are decentralizing "governance", and each of the 
decentralized parts of the governance are grouping the "advantages" and 
trying to minimize the disadvantages of each of us that do the 
governance , democracy is also the same , because democracy is a system 
that wants to escape a "local" maximum towards a global maximum
like in artificial intelligence, and democracy is doing it by
applying itself to selecting the best among the actors of
politics etc. to govern us, this is the essence of civilization,
is the act of maximizing the benefits or the advantages by optimization, 
as i have just explained to you, so hope you are understanding
my new thoughts of today.


And here is my other thoughts about morality(with my other definitions 
about morality):

Morality is also "diversity"

I said it to be able to be more correct abstraction,
i give you an example: if you say like neo-nazism that "all" of us that 
are not handicaped have to work "hard" to not be a parasite of the 
system, i think that's lack of maturity that doesn't recognize that 
there is also "constrains" that we have to deal with, and saying like 
neo-nazism that all that are not handicaped have to work hard to not be 
a parasite is also an "idealism"
that is not correct morality, this is why you have to be more "maturity"
that is pragmatism, that means that is realistic to be able to be an 
appropriate morality,  today because of our world is
not a perfect world, competitiveness and prioritization dictate
that high IQ individuals can group together (like Google)
and make "much" "much" more money than the less smart individuals,
and also because of Risks and competitiveness we are allowing
the Banks to make more and more money, this is also morality that
takes into account the constrains, but how in this context can we take 
more money from the rich and give it to the poorer ? i think
that capitalism such as the one of USA knows also about pragmatism, 
because capitalism of USA is a policeman that doesn't want capitalism to 
be changed in more favor of the poorer because it fears imperfections
of humans and it fears the "mess" of socialism and it fears
the "mess" of communism and it fears the mess of other ideologies
like neo-nazism or nationalism, this is why capitalistic systems are 
"conservatism" of there capitalism.

Please read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:

More smartness about morality..

Like Philosopher Sir Immanuel Kant you can define morality as
being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason
and of empirical moral inferred from experience.

You will say that this definition is a "general" definition.

Now what about my definitions of morality ?

We have to be more smart..

I think that morality can not be morality if it is not good
for us ! i think this is inherent to morality, and you will
notice that this "good for us" can be "not" yet absolute "perfection",
but we have to speak about a constraint over morality,
that morality can not be called morality if the living conditions are
too bad !  so this will abstract more correctly the definition
of morality, so now we can say that my definition of morality
as being performance and reliability is correct, also empiricism tells 
us that the essence of our life shows us that to be able to "survive"
we have to be also this performance and this reliability, and
when i say reliability is inherent to my definition of morality, that
means it is the "right" reliability because it is also inherent to it, 
so my definition is also correct, and this apllies also to my other 
definitions of morality that i think are correct. So i think my logical 
proof is valid, so reread my following thoughts to understand better:


I am a white arab and a more serious computer programmer that has 
invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations and
i will sell some of them to Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero.

Now about the right abstraction of morality

What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?

This is a good question in philosophy !

It is like mathematics , you have to be more "logical" and be more 
"measure" and be more "precise", and being more logical and more measure 
and more precise is like doing mathematics !

Why have you seen me defining and explaining to you what is morality ?

It is a very serious subject, and you have to be smart to understand it !

Because philosophy, like the philosophy of the philosopher that is Sir 
Immanuel Kant, must be a philosophy that is more "precise" calculations 
with logic and measure that has as a goal to make us understand what is 
all about morality ! this is what also i am doing ! and i will continu 
to do it in front of your eyes..

So my question of today is:

What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?

A more  correct abstraction of morality is first a definition
of morality that is sufficient and necessary to be able to see
more the big picture of what is morality, and if you are
like the philosopher Sir Immanuel Kant, you will define morality as
being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason
and of empirical moral inferred from experience, but i think that
this definition is too much abstraction that doesn't show us the big
picture of what is morality, so we have to be more smart , this
is why you have seen me thinking more smartly to find what is morality,
and you have noticed that my first definition of morality was that 
morality is: Performance and reliability or is by just one word 
reliability, and i have also defined  morality by saying that it is: 
perfection and strongness , and i have finally explained and give 
another definition of morality that is: morality is contineous 
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, this 
abstraction is more correct also , i explain:

So when i said that morality is: performance and reliability, is it
a correct definition ?

It is like philosophy that i am doing..

So notice that i have proved it this way:

==

 From where can we infer that "performance" is inherent to morality ?

Philosophically we can say that the essence of organization is:  we are 
organizing because of our weaknesses to transcend our weaknesses, so 
from this we can feel the essence of our humanity and we can feel our 
essence , because the essence of humanity that is perfection and 
strongness is dictated by survival too ! and is dictated by the fact 
that we must transcend our living conditions towards a better world ! so 
this is part of morality, so then we can say that performance is 
inherent to morality.

So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the 
conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on 
"performance".

===


So as you have noticed that this proves the part of my definition
of morality that it is also "performance", now the second part
of the definition of morality is that morality is also "reliability",
and i have "proved" it like this:

==

What is the essence of reliability ?

What is reliability ?

We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the 
"reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is
also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the 
measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right
"perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability",
and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right
perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be
a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be
able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous 
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i 
say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is 
"possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids 
"extremism" that is too violent. So it
is like mathematics.

==

So now you are seeing more the big picture of what is morality,
because the essence of reliability is solving problems and
the essence of perfection is also the same , it is solving problems,
and "performance" is inherent to the concept of reliability ,
because to be able to solve problems,  reliability must
be also performance or strongness, this is why i said that
the definition of morality can be also only: RELIABILITY ,
or it can be also Performance and reliability or it can
be perfection and strongness, but we have to be more
precise with a more correct "abstraction" this is
why you have seen me speaking about "idealism" in
my previous post, and i have said with a more correct
abstraction that morality is also "darkness" and it is also
"diversity", because perfection is not only light but it is also 
darkness and it is also diversity, read all my following thoughts as
my proof of what i am saying to be able to understand my smartness:

About the wisdom of my poems..

You will notice that my poems are like "wisdom", or like philosophy,
also because i am in reality a "gentleman" type of person, and i am
in reality like a "wise" type of person, and my poems are "smart" !
so i continu to explain to you my poems, as you have notice i have 
posted one of my poem in my last post and i have explained it to you 
more, you can read it bellow, you will notice also that
this poem is smart, because like my wisdom bellow
it get "out" you from "idealism" without getting into
pessimism and violence, because i have talked about idealism of racism 
of neo-nazism or idealism of socialism and i have explained that
they are "not" correct morality, and i have explained to you what
is morality also, so thus notice in my poem bellow
that i am saying that "perfection" that has an essence "solving"
problems, because i think we say we are perfection and reliable if we 
can solve problems, and if we are xcapable of solving all the problems
we wsay that we are absolute perfection or complete realiability, so 
morality also is contineous perfection as i have explained, so notice
with me that in my poem bellow i said that perfection is also 
"diversity" or perfection is also "darkness" of weakness or suffering, 
and i said that perfection is also the strong that needs the weak and 
weak that needs the strong, and i said also also in my poem that:

"But the weak becomes better
Because our civilization is not a decoy"


So as you have noticed my poem is smart because in my poem i am getting 
out of idealism without being pessimism and violence, this is why i have 
said the following on one of my previous post:


My wisdom of today..

A better politics..

Now you know me more by my writings, and now i will give you an
important wisdom:

One of my previous important wisdom in politics was:

Today we have to know how to get out from "idealism" without being 
pessimistic or without getting into pessimism and violence.

My other wisdom of today is:

A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force
and to know how with a minimum brute force to score and to succeed.


This is why i told you before another wisdom by saying the following:

Violence is "easy" today, so destruction is easy, but "wisdom"
is to know how to transcend our living conditions by being
discipline of technology and science and by being sophistication
of technology and science and by being wisdom that knows
how to guide our world and humanity in the right and wise way.

This wisdom looks like my above one that says:

A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force
and to know how with minimum brute force to score and to succeed.

So you have to be smart , this is what i am learning with my writings.

So here is my poem and read it again:

Here is the explanation bellow of my following poem, you have to be 
smart to understand it correctly ! here it is and read
my explanation of it bellow:


We are past and present

Because time is like a balance

Because time is perfection

Because perfection is the scale

But how perfection can be only light ?

Perfection is also darkness

Because we are strong and weak

Even silence is strong and weak

Eventhough silence is divine

Because even love is effervescence

Bees know about time

That time is relativity

And relativity is diversity

But what is perfection?

Perfection is also diversity

Diversity is also immensity

Because time is relativity

The weak needs the strong

And the strong needs the weak

But the weak becomes better

Because our civilization is not a decoy

Since diversity is the seed

Since the scale creates consciousness

Because the scale creates abundance

Since diversity is also seasons

Who creates wisdom and reason

So hello to you my dear and beautiful

With your lovely pretty eyes

You carry me on the wind and the Rainbow

To drive us to a beautiful island

Like our love and tenderness

Rather for goods never I leave you!

My sweet and beautiful goddess

My sweet spring and my sweet princess

Our hearts finally beat in unison

Like a nice thrill and a nice song

I do not want to hurt you

Because you are like the pretty flower that can not die!

As if both of us were as one

Let's be the flower and the perfum!

And may infinity and depth bring us together

Since our destiny is infinite

Since our destiny has understood

That the pretty fir is not cursed

Because Christmas is divine

As silence is a pretty parfum

Because in the depth of your pretty eyes

Who reminds me of our beautiful raft

Who defies storms and seasons

Since life is not a gift

And because destiny and reason are our passion

Because beauty reminds us

That she can not be violence and hatred

Since relativity of time is like a mason

Since the weather is seasons that brings reason

So, hello to you man of reason!


Amine Moulay Ramdane.

===


First to understand better, you have to understand that rationalism 
alone is not enough, and empiricism alone is not enough, so
you have to be both rationalism and empiricism to be better and
to understand my poem, this is also the "fondation" of my poem, because 
my poem is also like "philosophy", and it is like a Labyrinth , you have 
to be smart to find its meaning, so i start to explain:

When i say in my poem the following:

"We are past and present
Because time is like a balance"

When i say we are past and present it must be measured by
my overall poem, you can not measure it alone, so my poem
is about life , that it is both weak and strong and it is
both beautiful and not beautiful and it is suffering and
not suffering, and this conditions of living of suffering
and not beautifulness and weakness are also like "inherited" from
the "past", so they contains savagery etc. of the past, this is the 
meaning in the "context" of my overall poem of: "We are past and present"

And now about the following part of my poem:

"Because time is like a balance"

I mean that "time" needs "causality", thus the consequences need
the causes, this is why time is like a balance.


And about the other parts of my poem, we read this:

"Because time is perfection
Because perfection is the scale"


Here again you have to be smart to understand the meaning,
it is like rationalism and empiricism , you can not understand
the meaning by just being rationalism ! you have to be both rationalism
and empiricism to understand, so when you are both you will understand
by empiricism, that time is perfection, because the "small" cause of the
Big Bang has given the "immensity" of the Universe that is perfection,
and life also has started from "small" to "much" bigger that is 
perfection, and when i say that: "Because perfection is the scale", that 
means that for example the Universe and life have been perfected and it 
is the scale, because the Universe has balanced more and life has 
balanced more to be perfection.

Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:

"But how perfection can be only light ?
Perfection is also darkness"


I mean that perfection needs the weak also, because we notice it
in our lives that the strong needs the weak, and life needs suffering, 
this is why it is also "darkness".

Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:

"Because we are strong and weak
Even silence is strong and weak
Eventhough silence is divine"


I mean by silence that it is complete silence of our thoughts , so 
complete silence is not having consciousness, it is like a piece of 
paper, a piece of paper is also complete silence, because it is not 
consciousness, so a piece of paper is like divine, because it is very 
"strong" because it doesn't feel suffering and it doesn't have 
difficulties , but it is also weak if we take the measure and the 
reference as being it much much less complex than other very complex 
objects.

Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:

"And relativity is diversity"

You need both empiricism and rationalism to understand it,
i mean the overall "set" contains empiricism, so from
experience we can say that: "And relativity is diversity".

Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:

"Perfection is also diversity
Diversity is also immensity
Because time is relativity"

Here again, you need both empiricism and rationalism to understand it,
i mean the overall "set" contains empiricism, so from
experience we can say the above.

And i think that now it is more easy to understand all my poem above.



thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

I am for a smart capitalism.. Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-07-18 20:22 -0400

csiph-web