Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4483

More smartness about morality..

Show key headers only | View raw

Hello....

Read this:


More smartness about morality..

Like Philosopher Sir Immanuel Kant you can define morality as
being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason
and of empirical moral inferred from experience.

You will say that this definition is a "general" definition.

Now what about my definitions of morality ?

We have to be more smart..

I think that morality can not be morality if it is not good
for us ! i think this is inherent to morality, and you will
notice that this "good for us" can be "not" yet absolute "perfection",
but we have to speak about a constraint over morality,
that morality can not be called morality if the living conditions are
too bad !  so this will abstract more correctly the definition
of morality, so now we can say that my definition of morality
as being performance and reliability is correct, also empiricism tells 
us that the essence of our life shows us that to be able to "survive"
we have to be also this performance and this reliability, and
when i say reliability is inherent to my definition of morality, that
means it is the "right" reliability because it is also inherent to it, 
so my definition is also correct, and this apllies also to my other 
definitions of morality that i think are correct. So i think my logical 
proof is valid, so reread my following thoughts to understand better:


I am a white arab and a more serious computer programmer that has 
invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations and
i will sell some of them to Microsoft or to Google or to Embarcadero.

Now about the right abstraction of morality

What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?

This is a good question in philosophy !

It is like mathematics , you have to be more "logical" and be more 
"measure" and be more "precise", and being more logical and more measure 
and more precise is like doing mathematics !

Why have you seen me defining and explaining to you what is morality ?

It is a very serious subject, and you have to be smart to understand it !

Because philosophy, like the philosophy of the philosopher that is Sir 
Immanuel Kant, must be a philosophy that is more "precise" calculations 
with logic and measure that has as a goal to make us understand what is 
all about morality ! this is what also i am doing ! and i will continu 
to do it in front of your eyes..

So my question of today is:

What is it a more correct abstraction of morality ?

A more  correct abstraction of morality is first a definition
of morality that is sufficient and necessary to be able to see
more the big picture of what is morality, and if you are
like the philosopher Sir Immanuel Kant, you will define morality as
being a composition of a priori pure moral inferred from reason
and of empirical moral inferred from experience, but i think that
this definition is too much abstraction that doesn't show us the big
picture of what is morality, so we have to be more smart , this
is why you have seen me thinking more smartly to find what is morality,
and you have noticed that my first definition of morality was that 
morality is: Performance and reliability or is by just one word 
reliability, and i have also defined  morality by saying that it is: 
perfection and strongness , and i have finally explained and give 
another definition of morality that is: morality is contineous 
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, this 
abstraction is more correct also , i explain:

So when i said that morality is: performance and reliability, is it
a correct definition ?

It is like philosophy that i am doing..

So notice that i have proved it this way:

==

 From where can we infer that "performance" is inherent to morality ?

Philosophically we can say that the essence of organization is:  we are 
organizing because of our weaknesses to transcend our weaknesses, so 
from this we can feel the essence of our humanity and we can feel our 
essence , because the essence of humanity that is perfection and 
strongness is dictated by survival too ! and is dictated by the fact 
that we must transcend our living conditions towards a better world ! so 
this is part of morality, so then we can say that performance is 
inherent to morality.

So my way of thinking and proving shows better what must be the 
conception of our organization as a society, it must also be based on 
"performance".

===


So as you have noticed that this proves the part of my definition
of morality that it is also "performance", now the second part
of the definition of morality is that morality is also "reliability",
and i have "proved" it like this:

==

What is the essence of reliability ?

What is reliability ?

We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the 
"reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is
also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the 
measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right
"perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability",
and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right
perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be
a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be
able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous 
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i 
say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is 
"possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids 
"extremism" that is too violent. So it
is like mathematics.

==

So now you are seeing more the big picture of what is morality,
because the essence of reliability is solving problems and
the essence of perfection is also the same , it is solving problems,
and "performance" is inherent to the concept of reliability ,
because to be able to solve problems,  reliability must
be also performance or strongness, this is why i said that
the definition of morality can be also only: RELIABILITY ,
or it can be also Performance and reliability or it can
be perfection and strongness, but we have to be more
precise with a more correct "abstraction" this is
why you have seen me speaking about "idealism" in
my previous post, and i have said with a more correct
abstraction that morality is also "darkness" and it is also
"diversity", because perfection is not only light but it is also 
darkness and it is also diversity, read all my following thoughts as
my proof of what i am saying to be able to understand my smartness:

About the wisdom of my poems..

You will notice that my poems are like "wisdom", or like philosophy,
also because i am in reality a "gentleman" type of person, and i am
in reality like a "wise" type of person, and my poems are "smart" !
so i continu to explain to you my poems, as you have notice i have 
posted one of my poem in my last post and i have explained it to you 
more, you can read it bellow, you will notice also that
this poem is smart, because like my wisdom bellow
it get "out" you from "idealism" without getting into
pessimism and violence, because i have talked about idealism of racism 
of neo-nazism or idealism of socialism and i have explained that
they are "not" correct morality, and i have explained to you what
is morality also, so thus notice in my poem bellow
that i am saying that "perfection" that has an essence "solving"
problems, because i think we say we are perfection and reliable if we 
can solve problems, and if we are xcapable of solving all the problems
we wsay that we are absolute perfection or complete realiability, so 
morality also is contineous perfection as i have explained, so notice
with me that in my poem bellow i said that perfection is also 
"diversity" or perfection is also "darkness" of weakness or suffering, 
and i said that perfection is also the strong that needs the weak and 
weak that needs the strong, and i said also also in my poem that:

"But the weak becomes better
Because our civilization is not a decoy"


So as you have noticed my poem is smart because in my poem i am getting 
out of idealism without being pessimism and violence, this is why i have 
said the following on one of my previous post:


My wisdom of today..

A better politics..

Now you know me more by my writings, and now i will give you an
important wisdom:

One of my previous important wisdom in politics was:

Today we have to know how to get out from "idealism" without being 
pessimistic or without getting into pessimism and violence.

My other wisdom of today is:

A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force
and to know how with a minimum brute force to score and to succeed.


This is why i told you before another wisdom by saying the following:

Violence is "easy" today, so destruction is easy, but "wisdom"
is to know how to transcend our living conditions by being
discipline of technology and science and by being sophistication
of technology and science and by being wisdom that knows
how to guide our world and humanity in the right and wise way.

This wisdom looks like my above one that says:

A better martial art in politics is to avoid at best "brute" force
and to know how with minimum brute force to score and to succeed.

So you have to be smart , this is what i am learning with my writings.



So here is my poem and read it again:

Here is the explanation bellow of my following poem, you have to be 
smart to understand it correctly ! here it is and read
my explanation of it bellow:


We are past and present

Because time is like a balance

Because time is perfection

Because perfection is the scale

But how perfection can be only light ?

Perfection is also darkness

Because we are strong and weak

Even silence is strong and weak

Eventhough silence is divine

Because even love is effervescence

Bees know about time

That time is relativity

And relativity is diversity

But what is perfection?

Perfection is also diversity

Diversity is also immensity

Because time is relativity

The weak needs the strong

And the strong needs the weak

But the weak becomes better

Because our civilization is not a decoy

Since diversity is the seed

Since the scale creates consciousness

Because the scale creates abundance

Since diversity is also seasons

Who creates wisdom and reason

So hello to you my dear and beautiful

With your lovely pretty eyes

You carry me on the wind and the Rainbow

To drive us to a beautiful island

Like our love and tenderness

Rather for goods never I leave you!

My sweet and beautiful goddess

My sweet spring and my sweet princess

Our hearts finally beat in unison

Like a nice thrill and a nice song

I do not want to hurt you

Because you are like the pretty flower that can not die!

As if both of us were as one

Let's be the flower and the perfum!

And may infinity and depth bring us together

Since our destiny is infinite

Since our destiny has understood

That the pretty fir is not cursed

Because Christmas is divine

As silence is a pretty parfum

Because in the depth of your pretty eyes

Who reminds me of our beautiful raft

Who defies storms and seasons

Since life is not a gift

And because destiny and reason are our passion

Because beauty reminds us

That she can not be violence and hatred

Since relativity of time is like a mason

Since the weather is seasons that brings reason

So, hello to you man of reason!


Amine Moulay Ramdane.

===


First to understand better, you have to understand that rationalism 
alone is not enough, and empiricism alone is not enough, so
you have to be both rationalism and empiricism to be better and
to understand my poem, this is also the "fondation" of my poem, because 
my poem is also like "philosophy", and it is like a Labyrinth , you have 
to be smart to find its meaning, so i start to explain:

When i say in my poem the following:

"We are past and present
Because time is like a balance"

When i say we are past and present it must be measured by
my overall poem, you can not measure it alone, so my poem
is about life , that it is both weak and strong and it is
both beautiful and not beautiful and it is suffering and
not suffering, and this conditions of living of suffering
and not beautifulness and weakness are also like "inherited" from
the "past", so they contains savagery etc. of the past, this is the 
meaning in the "context" of my overall poem of: "We are past and present"

And now about the following part of my poem:

"Because time is like a balance"

I mean that "time" needs "causality", thus the consequences need
the causes, this is why time is like a balance.


And about the other parts of my poem, we read this:

"Because time is perfection
Because perfection is the scale"


Here again you have to be smart to understand the meaning,
it is like rationalism and empiricism , you can not understand
the meaning by just being rationalism ! you have to be both rationalism
and empiricism to understand, so when you are both you will understand
by empiricism, that time is perfection, because the "small" cause of the
Big Bang has given the "immensity" of the Universe that is perfection,
and life also has started from "small" to "much" bigger that is 
perfection, and when i say that: "Because perfection is the scale", that 
means that for example the Universe and life have been perfected and it 
is the scale, because the Universe has balanced more and life has 
balanced more to be perfection.

Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:

"But how perfection can be only light ?
Perfection is also darkness"


I mean that perfection needs the weak also, because we notice it
in our lives that the strong needs the weak, and life needs suffering, 
this is why it is also "darkness".

Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:

"Because we are strong and weak
Even silence is strong and weak
Eventhough silence is divine"


I mean by silence that it is complete silence of our thoughts , so 
complete silence is not having consciousness, it is like a piece of 
paper, a piece of paper is also complete silence, because it is not 
consciousness, so a piece of paper is like divine, because it is very 
"strong" because it doesn't feel suffering and it doesn't have 
difficulties , but it is also weak if we take the measure and the 
reference as being it much much less complex than other very complex 
objects.

Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:

"And relativity is diversity"

You need both empiricism and rationalism to understand it,
i mean the overall "set" contains empiricism, so from
experience we can say that: "And relativity is diversity".

Now about the rest of my poem, we read this:

"Perfection is also diversity
Diversity is also immensity
Because time is relativity"

Here again, you need both empiricism and rationalism to understand it,
i mean the overall "set" contains empiricism, so from
experience we can say the above.

And i think that now it is more easy to understand all my poem above.



thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

More smartness about morality.. Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-07-17 17:33 -0400

csiph-web