Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4467

What has to be politics ?

Show all headers | View raw

Hello..

Read this:

What has to be politics ?

I said about morality that:

Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute 
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that 
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this 
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent.

Read for example this:

"Now, an even greater threat is coming. Forrester predicts that by 2025, 
technologies like robots, artificial intelligence (AI), machine 
learning, and automation will replace 7% (or 22.7 million) jobs in the 
US alone."

https://www.atlassian.com/it-unplugged/best-practices-and-trends/automation-and-ai-are-coming-for-it-jobs-here-s-how-to-keep-yours

So what about this problem ?

Since i said that the essence of perfection is the essence of 
"reliability", there essence is that they solves problems,
and since perfection today is a hard sacrifice of for example scientists
and engineers that wants to do there best to help humanity, and since
progress of science and technology are in many parts an exponential 
progress, not a linear progress, and don't forget too about the law of 
accelerating returns that, so i think that in about 15 years or
20 years(and that's a near future) science and technology will be so
powerful that that it will be necessary for us humans to be united
over this earth, so in this near future we have to rethink politics,
so we have not to waste our time with inferior thinking of neo-nazism or 
nationalism.


Read the rest of my thoughts:

Politics is also like playing chess, you have to be smart to be
able to succeed, but politics is constrained by "perfection",
and as you have noticed it is also like philosophy that i am doing, but 
this perfection must be perfection that knows how to "drive", so how 
must we drive ? i think we have to find the "best" possible way that
guides us towards our goals, so i was thinking more and i think
that we have to cease to be inferior "thinking" of neo-nazism
or nationalism because it is archaism as i have explained,
so what is the right way then ?  i think a necessary requirement
in politics is to do politics knowing in advance that science
and technology are in many parts advancing exponentially, not linearly,
and that also we have to be aware of the law of accelerating returns,
because of that, in about 15 years or 20 years science and technology 
will be able of enhancing our genetics and make us more smart
and more beautiful and more strong, and in about 15 years or 20 years we
will be capable of doing much more than that, so this is why politics 
must be aware of this exponential progress of science and 
technology(please read more about it on internet), and this is why 
politics must not be neo-nazism or nationalism and it must be more 
responsable and politics must think differently our world , because in 
about 15 years or 20 years science and technology
will be really really powerful that we must rethink our world in this
near future, because in about 15 years or 20 years we have to cease to 
think like racial nationalism that is inferior thinking, because in 
about 15 years or 20 years science and technology will be really really 
powerful that we have to become more united because this science and 
technology of the near future will permit us to solve much much better 
our world problems.

Please read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:

Is morality tolerance and compassion ?

You have to be smart because it is like philosophy..

As i said morality that:

Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute 
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that 
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this 
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like 
mathematics that i am doing.


So i think compassion and tolerance is inherent to perfection,
because perfection is also a hard "sacrifice" to help the people of 
humanity, and also because the reality proves that perfection is doing 
its best to help humanity, we can notice it by the behavior of 
scientists and engineers and even by the behavior of Google and DeepMind 
and other high tech companies and such , because they are more 
responsable of the well being of humanity as a whole, and this proves 
the "theory" of my definition of morality because perfection is also a 
hard hard "sacrifice" to help people of humanity, this is why morality 
is also "beautiful", so you have not to be pessimistic
because also progress of science and technology are in many parts an
exponential progress and in about 15 year or 20 years technology
and science will be really really powerful and we will
be able to do really great things such as enhancing our genetics
and become more beautiful and more smart and more strong
and we will be capable of doing much more than that ! so don't
waste your time with neo-nazism or nationalism..


This is why i said before the following , read the rest of my thoughts
to understand better my thoughts:

Is morality beautiful ?

That's a really an interesting an important question:

I said that morality is:

Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute 
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that 
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this 
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like 
mathematics that i am doing.


So i think morality is also beautiful because the hard sacrifice to 
bring perfection is done by for example scientists and engineers , and
the essence of perfection is the same as the essence of reliability,
because there essence is the fact that they solves problems so
they perfect us, so for example scientists and engineers are doing
there best to bring the best to our humanity and to help humanity, so we 
have to "honor" there sacrifice , Google and DeepMind are also doing a 
great sacrifice to bring the best to humanity and to help humanity , 
this "perfection" is the essence of morality and it is morality that 
they are doing , there sacrifice is great ! so i am not pessimistic 
because i believe in morality that brings perfection that helps humanity 
like is helping us Google and DeepMind that wants to be in accordance 
with morality.  And beautifulness of Google and DeepMind is like my 
following beautiful poem that i invite you to read:


I am strong like patience

I am passionate like romance

I am right as the nuance!

I am compassionate as hope

It's like flowers and bees bringing honey

As our life is made of light and Rainbow

I am like love, joy and smiles

Who are also like diamond and sapphire

Who are also like Satin and Velvet

Since it's like the Elixir of love

Since our love is divine

As dawn is beautiful and comes back

With its sky and its stars and its divine silence

Who plunges us into the secrets of our beautiful garden

Like your emerald, ruby, sapphire and diamond eyes

We are sun and heat like lovers

Your soul is a sea of pretty perfumes

Where love and hope are intertwined

Like flowers and bees

Like the taste of honey

You are like the beauty of dawn that comes back

And who bathes me in the depths of our destiny

Of our love which is divine



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

-- 


And read the rest of my thoughts to understand better:


About the essence of nazism and neo-nazism

Neo-nazism and nazism is not only national socialism
but it is also racism inside its group and outside its group,
it is racism inside its group of white europeans because
nazism and neo-nazism wants to "perfect" the white european race,
it is why we say that nazism and neo-nazism are idealism of
socialism that is a failure as i have explained(read bellow),
and nazism and neo-nazism are "idealism" of racism, because
it's too much idealism that wants to "perfect" without taking into
account the constrains of the realities, so neo-nazism
and nazism are not pragmatic or realistic, neo-nazism and nazism is what 
we call too much "perfection" that is not correct morality, and you can 
easily notice it when neo-nazism says that all arabs are bad or
all Israel is bad, without recognizing that it is not
truth and that it is illogical because not all Israel is bad
and not all arabs are bad, so we have not to waste our
time with this idealism of neo-nazism and nazism.

Read the rest to understand better my thoughts:

About the essence of perfection..

What is the essence of perfection ?

Because i explained and defined morality as:

Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute 
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that 
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this 
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like 
mathematics that i am doing.

The essence of perfection needs a "reference" of measure, so we have to 
think about the reference of measure of perfection and defined it more 
correctly, first you have to recognize that i am speaking about 
perfection as general related to the definition of morality,
so i think that the reference of measure of perfection is like
the reference of measure of "reliability", because i think
you are "reliable" if you solve problems, perfection is the same
because you are perfection when you solve problems, and when you
are capable of solving "all" the problems we say that you are
absolute perfection.

To be more convinced by my writings, look at France and its
Liberty, equality and fraternity that is the national motto of France 
and the Republic of Haiti, and is an example of a tripartite motto. 
Although it finds its origins in the French Revolution, it was then only 
one motto among others and was not institutionalized until the Third 
Republic at the end of the 19th century.It is also the motto of the 
Grand Orient de France and the Grande Loge de France.

Read more here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libert%C3%A9,_%C3%A9galit%C3%A9,_fraternit%C3%A9


This Liberty, equality and fraternity of France is too much "idealism",
like the idealism of socialism, so it is not pragmatic because it is not
realistic. USA is more like Liberty like the statue of Liberty in USA , 
and Liberty is Morality and Morality is contineous perfection that is 
possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that is 
possible", that means that "compassion" when it is "possible" is also 
inherent to morality, so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too 
violent. So it is like mathematics that i am doing.

Read the rest:

What is the essence of Liberty ?

If i ask you a question:

Is idealism a morality ?

If you are smart you will immediatly recognize that idealism
like idealism of socialism is like belonging to the set of
solving the problem "locally", it doesn't belong to the "set"
of solving the problems globally, it is as it is not a "general"
theorem in mathematics, idealism is as in artificial intelligence
you are blocking in a local minimum and you are not able to
go to the global minimum that we require in artificial intelligence
such as Deep learning in artifical intelligence, so from those analogies 
you will be able to understand that idealism of socialism
is not "reliability", because more scientifically i
have defined reliability as being:

What is the essence of reliability ?

What is reliability ?

We can simply say that we measure reliability by the fact that the 
"reference" of measure is the fact that we want to solve and it is
also the fact that what we have do solve or not, if it solves that's the 
measure that permit us to say that it is reliable, so being the right
"perfection" that solves our problems is also "reliability",
and being this right perfection is also "morality", and being this right
perfection is dependent also on the standard of quality, so to be
a correct morality we have to be high standards of quality to be
able to solve and to succeed, and as i said Morality is contineous 
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i 
say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is 
"possible" is also inherent to morality,so this definition avoids 
"extremism" that is too violent. So it
is like mathematics.

What is corruption of morality ?

How to measure correctly corruption of morality ?

First you have to notice that morality is "contineous" "perfection",
so i think that if perfection is "possible" you have to make it , if you 
don't make it that's "corruption" of morality.

So you are able now to understand that idealism or more idealism of
socialism is not reliability , so it is not the right perfection that
solves problems , so it is not Morality that is contineous perfection 
that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i say "that 
is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is "possible" is also 
inherent to morality,so this definition avoids "extremism" that is too 
violent.

So now you are more capable of seeing what is Liberty, Liberty is
also  Morality, because you can not be Liberty if you are not Morality 
that is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute 
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that 
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality,so this 
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent.


Read the rest:


About morality...

I have explained that:

Morality is contineous perfection that is possible towards the absolute 
perfection, and when i say "that is possible", that means that 
"compassion" when it is "possible" is also inherent to morality, so this 
definition avoids "extremism" that is too violent. So it is like 
mathematics that i am doing.

This is a serious subject, because morality is what gives us
politics and laws etc. so we have to take it seriously, but you will 
have the tendency, like idealism of socialism, to say that what i am 
doing is like "mathematics" or like "logic" or like  "optimization", so
you will ask a question: where is compassion and where is love and where 
is tolerance in my definition of morality, i will answer that it is
the essence of morality , because i have made you understand what is 
morality, and i have made you understand that "extremism" is constrained 
by morality , so morality says to extremism that it is "bad", this is 
also what gives tolerance and compassion and love, but if you ask a 
question such as: Is morality safe ? it is as you are asking a question
such as: are we today "completely" safe from "diseases"? because  you
know for sure that we are still not completely safe from diseases, this 
is the same for morality, because you have to be smart and know that 
morality is also constrained by economy and other factors.

And here is what i said about idealism to be able for you to understand
more life:

One of my previous important wisdom in politics was:

"Today we have to know how to get out from "idealism" without being 
pessimistic or without getting into pessimism and violence."

I want to comment on it more:

I said before that:

"Socialism comes from weakness and insecurity and it wants to have 
"compassion" on its people that are more weak and more insecure , but
its idealism comes from the fact that compassion is put as a "high" 
priority that bring socialism , but at the same time optimization and 
efficiency of economy and the system is "postponed" again and again in 
favor of compassion of the social side. And the idealism of those acts
of socialism is the fact that socialism is thinking "love" and
compassion , but it is not being "pragmatism" and  "responsability" of 
efficiency and optimization like in UK."


So socialism is also too much idealism, but if socialism says that
"its" compassion is morality, this "kind" of compassion of socialism 
belongs to the "set" of "locally" solving the problem, it doesn't belong 
to the "set" of globally solving the problem in the system, so
we can not call it "reliability" that is also the right "perfection" 
that solves problems and we can not call it Morality that is contineous 
perfection that is possible towards the absolute perfection, and when i 
say "that is possible", that means that "compassion" when it is 
"possible" is also inherent to morality, so this definition avoids 
"extremism" that is too violent. So it is like mathematics that i am 
doing , because it is more rigor of logic.



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

What has to be politics ? Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-07-16 14:32 -0400

csiph-web