Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4435
| From | Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | About C# |
| Date | 2018-07-05 18:12 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <phm54a$7pt$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Hello, I have just thought more about C#, and i think that when you work with "threads" you are not able to get the native "handles" and "IDs" of the threads, this is why managed code of C# is not "flexible", so with C# you can not ooptimize the threads to use more than 64 logical processors under windows and with C# you can not optimize more for NUMA, this is why i will not port my Delphi and FreePascal projects to C#, because many of my projects are optimized for NUMA and optimized to use more than 64 logical processors. Read the following about C# to notice it: "A machine can have larger than 64 logical processors. In such cases the processors are grouped into chunks of 64. Each such group is called a processor group. .NET framework can only access the first processor group, so maximum number that this property can return is 64 (or 32 for 32-bit machines)." Read more here: http://www.volatileread.com/Thread/Browse?pg=3&type=newest&tags=multithreading&questionType=1&customPageId=1 Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
About C# Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-07-05 18:12 -0400
csiph-web