Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4302
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | There is still a problem with C++ and C |
| Date | Sat, 19 May 2018 13:00:32 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 40 |
| Message-ID | <pdpl7h$6pr$4@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Sat, 19 May 2018 17:00:33 -0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | h2725194.stratoserver.net; posting-host="6f94b6e509dff52dedc1c2c93682a33f"; logging-data="6971"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18PzeHZfACbGcNvSnYLQl+Z" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:dK9nTucZvbxuedFF/ZYEaHcsnRY= |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| X-Mozilla-News-Host | news://news.eternal-september.org:119 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.programming.threads:4302 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hello... There is still a problem with C++ and C About Escher C++ Verifier, read carefully: "Escher C Verifier enables the development of formally-verifiable software in a subset of C (based on MISRA-C 2012)." Read here: http://www.eschertech.com/products/index.php So it verifies just a "subset" of C, so that's not good for C++ because for other applications that are not a subset of C , it can not do for example Run-time checks, so we are again into this problem again, so read the following carefully: I think that Delphi and FreePascal like ADA come with range checking and Run-time checks that catch conversion from negative signed to unsigned , and catch out-of-bounds indices of dynamic and static arrays and catch arithmetic overflow etc. and you can also dynamically catch this exception of ERangeError etc. But C++ and C don't have range checking etc. so that's not good in C++ and C because it is not good for safety-critical systems. You can carefully read the following, it is very important: https://critical.eschertech.com/2010/07/07/run-time-checks-are-they-worth-it/ Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
There is still a problem with C++ and C Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-05-19 13:00 -0400
csiph-web