Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4302

There is still a problem with C++ and C

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>
Newsgroups comp.programming.threads
Subject There is still a problem with C++ and C
Date Sat, 19 May 2018 13:00:32 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 40
Message-ID <pdpl7h$6pr$4@dont-email.me> (permalink)
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Injection-Date Sat, 19 May 2018 17:00:33 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info h2725194.stratoserver.net; posting-host="6f94b6e509dff52dedc1c2c93682a33f"; logging-data="6971"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18PzeHZfACbGcNvSnYLQl+Z"
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
Cancel-Lock sha1:dK9nTucZvbxuedFF/ZYEaHcsnRY=
Content-Language en-US
X-Mozilla-News-Host news://news.eternal-september.org:119
Xref csiph.com comp.programming.threads:4302

Show key headers only | View raw


Hello...


There is still a problem with C++ and C

About Escher C++ Verifier, read carefully:

"Escher C Verifier enables the development of formally-verifiable 
software in a subset of C (based on MISRA-C 2012)."

Read here:

http://www.eschertech.com/products/index.php


So it verifies just a "subset" of C, so that's not good for C++
because for other applications that are not a subset of C , it can
not do for example Run-time checks, so we are again into
this problem again, so read the following carefully:

I think that Delphi and FreePascal like ADA come with range checking and 
Run-time checks that catch conversion from negative signed to unsigned , 
and catch out-of-bounds indices of dynamic and static arrays and catch 
arithmetic overflow etc. and you can also dynamically catch this 
exception of ERangeError etc.

But C++ and C don't have range checking etc. so that's not good in C++ 
and C because it is not good for safety-critical systems.

You can carefully read the following, it is very important:

https://critical.eschertech.com/2010/07/07/run-time-checks-are-they-worth-it/


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.



Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

There is still a problem with C++ and C Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-05-19 13:00 -0400

csiph-web