Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4073
| From | computer45 <computer45@cyber.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | About nationalism and the future.. |
| Date | 2018-03-07 17:07 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <p7pnrn$r9b$13@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Hello.... About nationalism and the future.. I think we are making a big mistake, because Donald Trump is like nationalism that is returning back, but this is inferior thinking, because science does say that in 12 years or 15 years from now the world will be different as the difference between now and year 1750, so since science and technology can become dangerous so we have to start to think the world differently and far from nationalism and violence and hate, and start to be more security that knows how to manage itself Read the following to understand better.. It’s most intuitive for us to think linearly, when we should be thinking exponentially "If Kurzweil and others who agree with him are correct, then we may be as blown away by 2030 as our 1750 guy was by 2015—i.e. the next DPU might only take a couple decades—and the world in 2050 might be so vastly different than today’s world that we would barely recognize it." Please read this to understand better: https://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revolution-1.html Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane. I think we are making a big mistake, because Donald Trump is like nationalism that is returning back, but this is inferior thinking, because science does say that in 12 years or 15 years from now the world will be different as the difference between now and year 1750, so since science and technology can become dangerous so we have to start to think the world differently and far from nationalism and violence and hate, and start to be more security that knows how to manage itself Read the following to understand better.. It’s most intuitive for us to think linearly, when we should be thinking exponentially "If Kurzweil and others who agree with him are correct, then we may be as blown away by 2030 as our 1750 guy was by 2015—i.e. the next DPU might only take a couple decades—and the world in 2050 might be so vastly different than today’s world that we would barely recognize it." Please read this to understand better: https://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revolution-1.html Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane,.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
About nationalism and the future.. computer45 <computer45@cyber.com> - 2018-03-07 17:07 -0500
csiph-web