Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4070
| From | computer45 <computer45@cyber.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | It’s most intuitive for us to think linearly, when we should be thinking exponentially |
| Date | 2018-03-07 11:49 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <p7p56e$87d$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Hello, It’s most intuitive for us to think linearly, when we should be thinking exponentially "If Kurzweil and others who agree with him are correct, then we may be as blown away by 2030 as our 1750 guy was by 2015—i.e. the next DPU might only take a couple decades—and the world in 2050 might be so vastly different than today’s world that we would barely recognize it." Please read this to understand better: https://waitbutwhy.com/2015/01/artificial-intelligence-revolution-1.html Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane,.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
It’s most intuitive for us to think linearly, when we should be thinking exponentially computer45 <computer45@cyber.com> - 2018-03-07 11:49 -0500
csiph-web