Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4032

About efficient morZlity

Show all headers | View raw

Hello..

Read this:

I have defined efficient morality as being: Performance and reliability.

But is it a correct definition?

Because morality is all about what is bad and what is good, so
what is bad is like a bug that causes the system to be bad, so
if it is bad, it is like a bug that makes the system not reliable, this 
is why i have said that efficient morality is Performance and reliable.

Please read the rest of my post to understand better:

I will get into political philosophy..

Here is my new post about the essence of a group and how it's related
to the general morality..

I will first remember you about my last writing about the essence
of humanity:

And what is the essence of humanity ?

This is a good question in political philosophy.

When you will become more smart you will know how to answer this 
question, and when you will become smarter you will try to find fast the 
shortest path to the solution, so to be able to find the shortest path 
to the solution of the above question, you have to transform the 
question on a similar question, and the similar question is: what is the 
important ingredients that describe what is the essence of humanity? it 
is how you will answer the above question, so what is those important 
ingredients ?

I think the ingredients are:

Perfection and Strongness.

The essence of humanity is that we are becoming more perfection and at 
the same time we are becoming more Strong and at the same time we are 
becoming more organized and less disorganized.


This is the essence of humanity, we are becoming more perfection.


And this brings also hope.


I have explained that the essence of a human and the essence of humanity
is perfection.

Am i stupid to say that ?

If you have noticed i have said that we can not content ourselves with
"nothing", we must evolve from nothing to more perfection to better
survive etc.

So human is composed of body and culture or spirit or what's in the 
brain of a human, but the body was constrained by the constrains of 
nature to be more "perfection", this is why perfection is its essence 
also, and the body must organize from not moving into moving and that's 
"perfection" also, and the spirit of a human or culture of a human or 
what's in the brain of a human  evolve from nothing to something better 
to be able to do something to survive etc. and this is
what we call "perfection", so human being and humanity is constructed 
and guided by the essence of humanity that is perfection, and better we 
can say that the essence of human and humanity is perfection.

Now here is my new post about the essence of a group and how it's 
related to the general morality:

Now i have explained that the essence of humanity is "Perfection" and 
also Strongness, and perfection and strongness is also the essence of a 
group, because we are also grouping together into different groups to be 
more perfection and more strong, but this essence of humanity that is 
Perfection and strongness
must adhere to the general morality that must be an efficient morality, 
but if it is not in accordance with the general morality, we must 
enforce also general morality by laws, it is why we are managing our 
societies by laws.

But what is also an efficient morality ?

About the essence of communism

You have not to fear communism, because empirical moral does constrain 
it, it is like a general mathematical proof, communism must adhere
to optimization , because optimization is efficient morality, and
efficient morality is Liberty, and corruption of morality must
be measured by optimization itself that knows how to be optimization,
communism is finally being more conscious of itself, because
it is also more conscious of empirical moral.

What is the essence of philosophy ?

It is a very important question:

So we have to be smartness to answer this question:

Efficient morality is optimization and it is Liberty.

Philosophy is a magical word , like Liberty.

It is a generalization, it is like a general mathematical proof,
this is the essence of philosophy, philosophy must be efficient 
morality, because it is a generalization, the word Philosophy is like
the King, it must adhere to the act of optimization, and optimization
is performance and reliability, now the essence of philosophy is more
clear and it shows that the essence of Beauty and the essence of 
Happiness are the same , they are generalizations that must
take into account the guidance of moral and a priori pure
moral and empirical moral, and corruption of morality is measured
by optimization, and optimization must be an effort , because
Liberty is: discipline, progress and stableness, so the definition of 
Liberty that is discipline and progress and stableness is a soft way 
that ensure more the effort to realize this goal of Liberty, thus this 
has to be enforced by the hard way too, that means by laws.

I have defined efficient morality as being performance and reliability 
that includes security, so beauty is part of reliability because 
reliability is the quality of performing consistently well, and to 
perform consistently well, you have to be beauty and you have to be 
social etc. please read my following political philosophy to understand 
better my thoughts:

About the essence of optimization

I have defined optimization as being:

Performance and reliability.

But can we clear more that ?

Efficiency is part of optimization, efficiency is: you have the 
ressources that is our universe(we are part of the universe) and our 
other universes, and you have to produce an output from this input that 
is our universe or universes that is performant, it is performance.

But if you define optimization like just being performance, that's
a dangerous definition that lacks abstraction.

Please read all the following to understand better:


What is the essence of organization ?

Those are the questions that we ask in courses of philosophy.

Now i have to be smartness and rationality and logic to answer this 
question. Smartness is an important requirement that fulfill this
goal.

And you have to learn how to think Sir and Madam..

So how can we attack this problem ?

When you start thinking it is like also abstracting to the essentials to 
be able to simplify our thinking..

So this process of abstraction needs also my smartness to decompose 
efficiently...

Smartness is also a fast process that finds fast the shortest path to
the solution or that finds the solution to the problem..

So my smartness will answer like this:

Look at our essence, we are a composition of consciousness and physical 
body..

But we can try to say that we are guided by the process of survival of 
fittest..

But this is not good abstraction..

We have to be smartness..

So why do we need to organize ?

You will say that we have to be organized because of the process 
survival of the fittest..

But this is a narrow view..

Because it is a definition that is pejorative and not efficient..

Because of the following question:

Why we need to survive better ?

It is because of our weaknesses.

But i say that it is still not a correct answer , because
it is too much abstration that lacks efficiency.

Because our weaknesses need to be organized by optimization.

This is the magical word, it is optimization.

Why do we optimize ? to be more powerful and more reliability and 
correctness.

You will ask a question such as:

Is optimization: reliability and correctness ?


My answer:

When you are not reliable and/or correctness you are less
efficient, so efficiency is also reliability and correctness.

This is why i have abstracted the essence of organization to the process 
of optimization.

But that's lacking Abstration.

Because we have to look at the composition of optimization.

Optimization is performance and reliability.

So that the essence of organization is the composition of optimization 
that is performance and reliability.

So the essence of optimization is not only performance , but it is 
reliability.

And that's also efficient morality, and efficient morality is Liberty
and Liberty is efficient morality.

So now my answer is not finished:

Because the optimization is constrained..

Because corruption of morality is related to optimization..

So how can we measure corruption of morality ?

What is corruption of morality ?

This is an interesting subject..

It's like abstracting, you have to decompose and compose..

You can say for example what are the causes of corruption of morality?

You can say what is the consequences of corruption ?

You can define efficiently morality to be able to know about corruption.

So if you define morality you will define it as a composition of:

Guidance of moral, and a priori pure moral and empirical moral.

And now you see that the difficulty is how to set the reference to be 
able to measure corruption of morality with it.

What is the reference of morality ?

The reference must be optimization that knows how to be optimization.

I mean that optimization can not set itself as being performance alone.

And optimization can not set itself to be extreme justice that lacks 
optimization, like ignoring the optimization by the "heuristic" of
"tolerance" that optimizes the economic system and the social system.

And optimization must be an effort to maintain stableness and 
reliability of the system, that means reliability of the system, this is 
related to security, and security is also related to compassion and love 
and respect, because neglecting compassion , love and respect do cause
extremism and violence that hurt the system.

How optimization must be this effort ? because discipline and progress 
are inherent to Liberty, so you have to enforce them efficiently and 
wisely by the hard way, that means by laws and by the soft way
that i talked about..

So all in all the schema seems to be more clear and seems to indicate
to us more what is corruption of morality, and it indicate to us
what is the essence of organization..


Getting more rational...

Today i will ask a question of: what is love ?

And the answer must be more rational.

So we have to use smartness..

Like the theorems of Kurt Gödel, there is something that seems happening..

If you say that there is still some suffering in your life..

You can come to a deductive conclusion that it is not love.

But if you choose a reference as being one person that is suffering more 
than you, you will conclude that your "some" suffering is considered to 
be part of good, and this good is part of love.

So as you have noticed there seems like there is a contradiction in the 
system..

But this is just our senses, my rationality says that if the reference 
is individual morality, so the person above will say that some suffering
is not love.

But if the reference is general morality of the society, you will say
that this some suffering is considered to be part of good, so it is part 
of love.

So this relativeness to the general reference that is general of 
morality of the society is a good measure i think.

It is like when we are asking the questions of:

What is the essence of corruption ? and how can we measure corruption ?

I have said that optimization measures corruption of morality.

How it can measure it?

Optimization is performance and reliability, and Efficiency is part of 
optimization, efficiency is: you have the ressources that is our 
universe(we are part of the universe) and our other universes, and you 
have to produce an output from this input that is our universe or 
universes that is performant, it is performance, so it is related to
the essence of quality, so today because of our own essence that
knows also about quality, we are measuring corruption of morality
by the level or degree of quality, that means by performance and 
reliability, and we are measuring craziness and foolishness by the level 
or degree of quality, that means by performance and reliability, so if 
the level or degree of quality is lower  and not tolerable, we say that 
it is corruption of morality or it is craziness or foolishness.

How can we measure the level and degree of quality ?

It is like saying that such thing is relative to such thing, also it is
a process that is dynamic, so if our civilization is at time t1 is
more performant and more reliable, we say that this degree of more 
reliable and more performant is the level or degree of quality that 
measures corruption of morality. So optimization that is performance and 
reliability measures corruption of morality in a such way.

I give you an example..

If at time t1 our civilization has only one machine or robot, and this
civilization and one robot or one machine are capable of being more 
performance and more reliability with this one robot or one machine, but 
they are doing less performance and less reliability, we call this 
corruption of morality.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.








Hello,


I will get into political philosophy..

Here is my new post about the essence of a group and how it's related
to the general morality..

I will first remember you about my last writing about the essence
of humanity:

And what is the essence of humanity ?

This is a good question in political philosophy.

When you will become more smart you will know how to answer this 
question, and when you will become smarter you will try to find fast the 
shortest path to the solution, so to be able to find the shortest path 
to the solution of the above question, you have to transform the 
question on a similar question, and the similar question is: what is the 
important ingredients that describe what is the essence of humanity? it 
is how you will answer the above question, so what is those important 
ingredients ?

I think the ingredients are:

Perfection and Strongness.

The essence of humanity is that we are becoming more perfection and at 
the same time we are becoming more Strong and at the same time we are 
becoming more organized and less disorganized.


This is the essence of humanity, we are becoming more perfection.


And this brings also hope.


I have explained that the essence of a human and the essence of humanity
is perfection.

Am i stupid to say that ?

If you have noticed i have said that we can not content ourselves with
"nothing", we must evolve from nothing to more perfection to better
survive etc.

So human is composed of body and culture or spirit or what's in the 
brain of a human, but the body was constrained by the constrains of 
nature to be more "perfection", this is why perfection is its essence 
also, and the body must organize from not moving into moving and that's 
"perfection" also, and the spirit of a human or culture of a human or 
what's in the brain of a human  evolve from nothing to something better 
to be able to do something to survive etc. and this is
what we call "perfection", so human being and humanity is constructed 
and guided by the essence of humanity that is perfection, and better we 
can say that the essence of human and humanity is perfection.

Now here is my new post about the essence of a group and how it's 
related to the general morality:

Now i have explained that the essence of humanity is "Perfection" and 
also Strongness, and perfection and strongness is also the essence of a 
group, because we are also grouping together into different groups to be 
more perfection and more strong, but this essence of humanity that is 
Perfection and strongness
must adhere to the general morality that must be an efficient morality, 
but if it is not in accordance with the general morality, we must 
enforce also general morality by laws, it is why we are managing our 
societies by laws.

But what is also an efficient morality ?

About the essence of communism

You have not to fear communism, because empirical moral does constrain 
it, it is like a general mathematical proof, communism must adhere
to optimization , because optimization is efficient morality, and
efficient morality is Liberty, and corruption of morality must
be measured by optimization itself that knows how to be optimization,
communism is finally being more conscious of itself, because
it is also more conscious of empirical moral.

What is the essence of philosophy ?

It is a very important question:

So we have to be smartness to answer this question:

Efficient morality is optimization and it is Liberty.

Philosophy is a magical word , like Liberty.

It is a generalization, it is like a general mathematical proof,
this is the essence of philosophy, philosophy must be efficient 
morality, because it is a generalization, the word Philosophy is like
the King, it must adhere to the act of optimization, and optimization
is performance and reliability, now the essence of philosophy is more
clear and it shows that the essence of Beauty and the essence of 
Happiness are the same , they are generalizations that must
take into account the guidance of moral and a priori pure
moral and empirical moral, and corruption of morality is measured
by optimization, and optimization must be an effort , because
Liberty is: discipline, progress and stableness, so the definition of 
Liberty that is discipline and progress and stableness is a soft way 
that ensure more the effort to realize this goal of Liberty, thus this 
has to be enforced by the hard way too, that means by laws.

I have defined efficient morality as being performance and reliability 
that includes security, so beauty is part of reliability because 
reliability is the quality of performing consistently well, and to 
perform consistently well, you have to be beauty and you have to be 
social etc. please read my following political philosophy to understand 
better my thoughts:

About the essence of optimization

I have defined optimization as being:

Performance and reliability.

But can we clear more that ?

Efficiency is part of optimization, efficiency is: you have the 
ressources that is our universe(we are part of the universe) and our 
other universes, and you have to produce an output from this input that 
is our universe or universes that is performant, it is performance.

But if you define optimization like just being performance, that's
a dangerous definition that lacks abstraction.

Please read all the following to understand better:


What is the essence of organization ?

Those are the questions that we ask in courses of philosophy.

Now i have to be smartness and rationality and logic to answer this 
question. Smartness is an important requirement that fulfill this
goal.

And you have to learn how to think Sir and Madam..

So how can we attack this problem ?

When you start thinking it is like also abstracting to the essentials to 
be able to simplify our thinking..

So this process of abstraction needs also my smartness to decompose 
efficiently...

Smartness is also a fast process that finds fast the shortest path to
the solution or that finds the solution to the problem..

So my smartness will answer like this:

Look at our essence, we are a composition of consciousness and physical 
body..

But we can try to say that we are guided by the process of survival of 
fittest..

But this is not good abstraction..

We have to be smartness..

So why do we need to organize ?

You will say that we have to be organized because of the process 
survival of the fittest..

But this is a narrow view..

Because it is a definition that is pejorative and not efficient..

Because of the following question:

Why we need to survive better ?

It is because of our weaknesses.

But i say that it is still not a correct answer , because
it is too much abstration that lacks efficiency.

Because our weaknesses need to be organized by optimization.

This is the magical word, it is optimization.

Why do we optimize ? to be more powerful and more reliability and 
correctness.

You will ask a question such as:

Is optimization: reliability and correctness ?


My answer:

When you are not reliable and/or correctness you are less
efficient, so efficiency is also reliability and correctness.

This is why i have abstracted the essence of organization to the process 
of optimization.

But that's lacking Abstration.

Because we have to look at the composition of optimization.

Optimization is performance and reliability.

So that the essence of organization is the composition of optimization 
that is performance and reliability.

So the essence of optimization is not only performance , but it is 
reliability.

And that's also efficient morality, and efficient morality is Liberty
and Liberty is efficient morality.

So now my answer is not finished:

Because the optimization is constrained..

Because corruption of morality is related to optimization..

So how can we measure corruption of morality ?

What is corruption of morality ?

This is an interesting subject..

It's like abstracting, you have to decompose and compose..

You can say for example what are the causes of corruption of morality?

You can say what is the consequences of corruption ?

You can define efficiently morality to be able to know about corruption.

So if you define morality you will define it as a composition of:

Guidance of moral, and a priori pure moral and empirical moral.

And now you see that the difficulty is how to set the reference to be 
able to measure corruption of morality with it.

What is the reference of morality ?

The reference must be optimization that knows how to be optimization.

I mean that optimization can not set itself as being performance alone.

And optimization can not set itself to be extreme justice that lacks 
optimization, like ignoring the optimization by the "heuristic" of
"tolerance" that optimizes the economic system and the social system.

And optimization must be an effort to maintain stableness and 
reliability of the system, that means reliability of the system, this is 
related to security, and security is also related to compassion and love 
and respect, because neglecting compassion , love and respect do cause
extremism and violence that hurt the system.

How optimization must be this effort ? because discipline and progress 
are inherent to Liberty, so you have to enforce them efficiently and 
wisely by the hard way, that means by laws and by the soft way
that i talked about..

So all in all the schema seems to be more clear and seems to indicate
to us more what is corruption of morality, and it indicate to us
what is the essence of organization..


Getting more rational...

Today i will ask a question of: what is love ?

And the answer must be more rational.

So we have to use smartness..

Like the theorems of Kurt Gödel, there is something that seems happening..

If you say that there is still some suffering in your life..

You can come to a deductive conclusion that it is not love.

But if you choose a reference as being one person that is suffering more 
than you, you will conclude that your "some" suffering is considered to 
be part of good, and this good is part of love.

So as you have noticed there seems like there is a contradiction in the 
system..

But this is just our senses, my rationality says that if the reference 
is individual morality, so the person above will say that some suffering
is not love.

But if the reference is general morality of the society, you will say
that this some suffering is considered to be part of good, so it is part 
of love.

So this relativeness to the general reference that is general of 
morality of the society is a good measure i think.

It is like when we are asking the questions of:

What is the essence of corruption ? and how can we measure corruption ?

I have said that optimization measures corruption of morality.

How it can measure it?

Optimization is performance and reliability, and Efficiency is part of 
optimization, efficiency is: you have the ressources that is our 
universe(we are part of the universe) and our other universes, and you 
have to produce an output from this input that is our universe or 
universes that is performant, it is performance, so it is related to
the essence of quality, so today because of our own essence that
knows also about quality, we are measuring corruption of morality
by the level or degree of quality, that means by performance and 
reliability, and we are measuring craziness and foolishness by the level 
or degree of quality, that means by performance and reliability, so if 
the level or degree of quality is lower  and not tolerable, we say that 
it is corruption of morality or it is craziness or foolishness.

How can we measure the level and degree of quality ?

It is like saying that such thing is relative to such thing, also it is
a process that is dynamic, so if our civilization is at time t1 is
more performant and more reliable, we say that this degree of more 
reliable and more performant is the level or degree of quality that 
measures corruption of morality. So optimization that is performance and 
reliability measures corruption of morality in a such way.

I give you an example..

If at time t1 our civilization has only one machine or robot, and this
civilization and one robot or one machine are capable of being more 
performance and more reliability with this one robot or one machine, but 
they are doing less performance and less reliability, we call this 
corruption of morality.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

About efficient morZlity Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com> - 2018-01-22 14:48 -0500

csiph-web