Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming.threads > #4022

Here is my final extended post on the essence of humanity and the essence of evil..

From Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com>
Newsgroups comp.programming.threads
Subject Here is my final extended post on the essence of humanity and the essence of evil..
Date 2018-01-15 15:01 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <p3j1ao$7mf$8@dont-email.me> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


Hello,

Read this:


Here is my final extended post on the essence of humanity and the 
essence of evil..

We have to be smarter..

I have previously defined the essence of evil by the law of nature

So to be smarter we have to define it also by the law of general 
morality, so for general morality a weak human that doesn't hurt the 
others is not evil, because this is inferred from the reference that is 
general morality of the group, so the essence of evil is defined 
relatively to the general morality of the group.

And here is how i have defined the essence of evil by the law of nature..

What is the essence of evil ?

This is a good question in political philosophy or in philosophy..

So you have to be smart to answer this question..

The essence of evil comes from the essence of humanity that i have 
explained bellow and that has as its essence Perfection and Strongness, 
so if you are not perfect and strong you are evil, but you have to 
define evil, there is evil that is big evil and there is evil that is 
small evil and there is evil that doesn't hurt, so if a human is weak 
and he doesn't hurt, he is the evil that doesn't hurt, but if he is a 
violence that hurts he is evil that hurts. This is political philosophy.

Here comes again an interesting subject..

I will start it by a question:

Above  you have noticed that i have defined the essence of evil by the 
law of nature and by general morality of the group, but what
is that has forced general morality to define a weak human that doesn't 
hurt the others as not an evil ?

This is a smart question..

I think that general morality is constrained by empirical moral, because
morality is composed from a priori pure moral that is inferred from 
reason and from also empirical moral inferred from experience, so
general morality is constrained by the fact that it must know how to be
compassion to not hurt the system and cause violence in the system,
this is why general morality of today has defined for example a
weak human that doesn't hurt the others as not evil etc. to not cause
counter-powers to retaliate with violence, contrary to
the law of nature that define a weak human that doesn't hurt the others 
as evil.

And what is the essence of humanity ?

This is a good question in political philosophy.

When you will become more smart you will know how to answer this 
question, and when you will become smarter you will try to find fast the 
shortest path to the solution, so to be able to find the shortest path 
to the solution of the above question, you have to transform the 
question on a similar question, and the similar question is: what is the 
important ingredients that describe what is the essence of humanity? it 
is how you will answer the above question, so what is those important 
ingredients ?

I think the ingredients are:

Perfection and Strongness.

The essence of humanity is that we are becoming more perfection and at 
the same time we are becoming more Strong and at the same time we are 
becoming more organized and less disorganized.


This is the essence of humanity, we are becoming more perfection.


And this brings also hope.



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Here is my final extended post on the essence of humanity and the essence of evil.. Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com> - 2018-01-15 15:01 -0500

csiph-web