Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #3754
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | rami17 <rami17@rami17.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | My Parallel Sort Library |
| Date | Sat, 6 May 2017 17:43:18 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 28 |
| Message-ID | <oelfri$99a$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Sat, 6 May 2017 21:40:02 -0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ec33f296fa4b991c65b44a52e3723406"; logging-data="9514"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19iU/XRl/1csVbQGRWA10ti" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 |
| X-Mozilla-News-Host | news://news.eternal-september.org:119 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:+1u5hoMZbSVoJedMnxwKWSyQBGg= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.programming.threads:3754 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hello...... I have implemented a Parallel hybrid divide-and-conquer merge algorithm that performs 0.9-5.8 times better than sequential merge, on a quad-core processor, with larger arrays outperforming by over 5 times. Parallel processing combined with a hybrid algorithm approach provides a powerful high performance result. The idea: Let's assume we want to merge sorted arrays X and Y. Select X[m] median element in X. Elements in X[ .. m-1] are less than or equal to X[m]. Using binary search find index k of the first element in Y greater than X[m]. Thus Y[ .. k-1] are less than or equal to X[m] as well. Elements in X[m+1..] are greater than or equal to X[m] and Y[k .. ] are greater. So merge(X, Y) can be defined as concat(merge(X[ .. m-1], Y[ .. k-1]), X[m], merge(X[m+1.. ], Y[k .. ])) now we can recursively in parallel do merge(X[ .. m-1], Y[ .. k-1]) and merge(X[m+1 .. ], Y[k .. ]) and then concat results. And now ParallelSort library gives better performance and scalability. You can download my powerful Parallel Sort Library from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/parallel-sort-library Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
My Parallel Sort Library rami17 <rami17@rami17.net> - 2017-05-06 17:43 -0400
csiph-web