Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming.threads > #3683

Read again, i correct

Show all headers | View raw

Hello.......


Usefulness of my work also...

I am also creating my jobs as a consultant by setting the usefulness
of my work.

You have to be smart..

I give you an example:

When you say: 2 + 2 = 4

When you know this fact of 2 + 2 = 4 without being conscious from where 
it comes from, this is also the base for creating new jobs, this is how 
i am working my way, this is how you must be smart also, i have already
worked as a consultant in computer programming, and i know what i am
talking about, working like this as consultant is like being the 
director of companies like Boeing or Intel, i mean that you are creating 
a new job by for example just directing the team using your experience, 
this is how i have worked in many companies, i have not worked as a 
programmer, i have brought my experience to the team by
directing more efficiently the team, this is why i am inventing
many algorithms and softwares to be able to help the team of programmers 
of software companies by directing them more efficiently, i am not 
seeking to work as a programmer , because i have more experience that 
can profit to software companies like i am explaining to you, so you 
have to be smart at how convincing software companies that you are a 
useful consultant to them.

Now read the rest of my thoughts to understand my views on many
subject:

Usefulness is the cause to creating new jobs.

if you say for example: 2 + 2 = 4

If you know that and you are not conscious from where it come from,
this is also usefulness that can create new jobs, because computer 
programming is not just computer programming, it's also verification
and validation (V&V) and it's debugging and it's becoming a consultant 
that brings directives or efficient experience , so it is why usefulness 
is the way also to creating new jobs, and this is why i have
worked as a consultant to bring my experience to the team,
this is how it works also in operational research, i have done
also operational research and operational research can have this
same property ... and since i have accumulated knowledge in
operational research and mathematics and informatics and
since i have invented many new algorithms and softwares,
i am more apt at making the team more efficient in doing
parallel programming and more efficient at bringing my experience.

Knowledge sets your perception..

When you set the tree of the causes and consequences right, you will
set your perception more correctly, and knowing the consequences
from the tree allows you mostly to define more correctly the things,
this is mandatory in political philosophy, and to be able to
find the causes and consequences we use mathematical statistics
like finding mathematical correlations and  search for the causes, so 
political philosophy that has founded itself on mathematical
statistics is like doing science, but how do we define usefulness ?
usefulness is the cause to creating new jobs, so computer programming 
for example can by more experience attain a higher degree of quality 
that don't use programming , but just be the director that manage
more correctly software projects and that sets its perception correctly,
but we have to enlarge our view by noticing that new jobs can be created 
from the fact that you have invented new algorithms like i have invented 
many new algorithms, and this can be profitable because you can create a 
new job as a consultant by using your new algorithms
and your new experience that you have accumulated by designing
and implementing those new algorithms and new softwares as i have done 
it, so be optimistic and realize with me that usefulness that creates 
jobs also comes from this reality that you have been able to invente 
many new algorithms and softwares...

Is what you see what you see ?

This question is very important..

Seing is like doing science or like inventing smart algorithms,
you have to know the prerequisites to be able to see correctly,
and that's the same prerequisites for science, you have for example
to do mathematical correlations but that's not sufficient, because is
a strong correlation a cause ? no, it can be many variables that causes 
the cause, so you have to search for the truth, that means you have to 
search for those variables that are the cause, this is how works
perception and this is how works inventing efficient algorithms,
and this is how works science, you have to accumulate efficient
knowledge to be able to find the truth to be able to see correctly
and think correctly, this is how works intelligence also, to get smarter 
is the same as to setting your perception right, you have
to accumulate efficient knowledge to become smarter, this is
how i have done it to become smarter. this is as magical, because
when you will set your perception right you will notice
that it is as magical, it is the same when you get smarter.

And is computer programming a science ?

It is like emulating a software...

Efficient and disciplined computer programming with mathematics and 
efficient rules and efficient methods is more intelligence and high
quality that is the goal of science, science also uses intelligence to 
attain a higher degree of quality, it's by analogy like emulating 
softwares, since the goal that is a higher degree of quality is attained 
by efficient and disciplined computer programming , so efficient and 
disciplined computer programming is like doing science.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Read again, i correct Ramine <toto@toto.net> - 2017-03-16 21:55 -0400

csiph-web