Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2609
| From | Ramine <ramine@1.1> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | Scalable locks... |
| Date | 2014-10-21 18:10 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <m26ljh$8fu$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Hello, Please read the following paper to know why i have invented my scalable MLock: http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/papers/linux:lock.pdf But you have to be carefull, the Ticket spinlock with a proportional backoff is not good, cause if there is more context switch the thread that is scheduled has to use all its quantum time and this will slow a lot the Ticket spinlock with a proportional backoff , so you have to use a Sleep(0) just after the proportional backoff to solve this problem, but i have benchmarked it by adding the sleep(0) and i have noticed that my scalable MLock will give better performance than the Ticket spinlock with a proportional backoff and with a sleep(0) just after the proportional backoff, so i advice you to use my scalable MLock instead cause it's faster and better. You can download my scalable MLock from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/ Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Scalable locks... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-21 18:10 -0700 Re: Scalable locks... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-21 18:39 -0700
csiph-web