Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2609

Scalable locks...

From Ramine <ramine@1.1>
Newsgroups comp.programming.threads
Subject Scalable locks...
Date 2014-10-21 18:10 -0700
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <m26ljh$8fu$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


Hello,


Please read the following paper to know why i have invented my
scalable MLock:


http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/papers/linux:lock.pdf


But you have to be carefull, the Ticket spinlock with a proportional
backoff is not good, cause if there is more context switch the thread
that is scheduled has to use all its quantum time and this will slow
a lot the Ticket spinlock with a proportional backoff , so you have
to use a Sleep(0) just after the proportional backoff to solve this 
problem, but i have benchmarked it by adding the sleep(0) and i have 
noticed that my scalable MLock will give better performance than
the Ticket spinlock with a proportional backoff and with a sleep(0)
just after the proportional backoff, so i advice you to use my scalable 
MLock instead cause it's faster and better.


You can download my scalable MLock from:

https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.


Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Scalable locks... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-21 18:10 -0700
  Re: Scalable locks... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-10-21 18:39 -0700

csiph-web