Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2547

Re: FPC 64-bit 2.7.1

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Hello,


FreePascal 2.7.1 64-bit is much faster than Delphi XE4 64-bit

Here is the results on my Quadcore Q6600:


For Delphi XE4 64-bit we have:

Mininum running time = 2.00 seconds
Composite Score MFlops:   310.22
FFT             Mflops:   410.41    (N=1024)
SOR             Mflops:   446.88    (100 x 100)
MonteCarlo:     Mflops:   110.83
Sparse matmult  Mflops:  482.42    (N=1000, nz=5000)
LU              Mflops:  1065.42    (M=100, N=100)

For FreePascal 2.7.1 we have:

Mininum running time = 2.00 seconds
Composite Score MFlops:   578.95
FFT             Mflops:   393.07    (N=1024)
SOR             Mflops:   717.27    (100 x 100)
MonteCarlo:     Mflops:   113.03
Sparse matmult  Mflops:   814.43    (N=1000, nz=5000)
LU              Mflops:   856.94    (M=100, N=100)



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.



On 6/29/2014 1:06 PM, Ramine wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have benchmarked FPC 2.7.1 64-bit against the newest version
> of tdm-gcc 64-bit and the FreePascal scimark2 benchmark is much better:
>
>
> Here is the scimark2 results on my Quadcore Q6600:
>
>
> FPC 2.7.1 64-bit gives:
>
> Mininum running time = 2.00 seconds
> Composite Score MFlops:   578.95
> FFT             Mflops:   393.07    (N=1024)
> SOR             Mflops:   717.27    (100 x 100)
> MonteCarlo:     Mflops:   113.03
> Sparse matmult  Mflops:   814.43    (N=1000, nz=5000)
> LU              Mflops:   856.94    (M=100, N=100)
>
>
> And tdm-gcc 64-bit gives:
>
> Using       2.00 seconds min time per kenel.
> Composite Score:          754.95
> FFT             Mflops:   664.22    (N=1024)
> SOR             Mflops:   720.90    (100 x 100)
> MonteCarlo:     Mflops:   223.05
> Sparse matmult  Mflops:   985.50    (N=1000, nz=5000)
> LU              Mflops:  1181.08    (M=100, N=100)
>
>
> So  if you have noticed on LU there a 38% difference in performance
> and on Sparse matmult there is a 21% difference in performance
> and on SOR it's the same performance
> and on FFT there is 69% difference in performance.
> and on the overall Composite Score there is only 30% difference in
> performance.
>
>
> So i think that FPC 2.7.1 64-bit is much better and i think
> FPC will get much better on performance in the future.
>
> You can download FPC 2.7.1 64-bit from here:
>
> ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/snapshot/trunk/
>
>
> FPC 2.7.1 64-bit is much better on scimark benchmark than Delphi XE 64-bit
>
>
> Thank you,
> Amine Moulay Ramdane.
>
>
>
>
>
>

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

FPC 64-bit  2.7.1 Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-29 13:06 -0700
  Re: FPC 64-bit  2.7.1 Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-29 14:20 -0700
    Re: FPC 64-bit  2.7.1 Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-29 15:14 -0700
  Re: FPC 64-bit  2.7.1 Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-29 14:30 -0700
    Re: FPC 64-bit  2.7.1 JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2014-06-30 02:46 +0700
      Re: FPC 64-bit  2.7.1 Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-29 16:18 -0700
        Re: FPC 64-bit  2.7.1 JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2014-06-30 14:58 +0700
  Re: FPC 64-bit  2.7.1 Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-29 15:14 -0700

csiph-web