Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2533
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming, comp.programming.threads |
| Subject | Re: To Melzzzzz |
| Date | 2014-06-29 16:39 +0200 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <lop8fk$9ui$3@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <longtm$bkp$1@dont-email.me> <lonsia$ea2$1@solani.org> <lop839$ute$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 10:33:41 -0700 Ramine <ramine@1.1> wrote: > On 6/28/2014 7:10 PM, Melzzzzz wrote: > > On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 15:51:59 -0700 > > Ramine <ramine@1.1> wrote: > > > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have looked at your matrix multiplication using > >> SSE2 and AVX that you have posted on assembler.x86 forum, > >> i just wanted to tell you that you don't need to write > >> it in assembler, cause GCC do auto-vectorize the floating > >> point calculation and it auto-vectorize also the Matrix > >> multiplication even at -O1 optimization... > > > > as I see it it don't.... > > > > > I am using the newest version of tdm-gcc and auto-vectorization is > working even at -O1 level optimization. > > > You can download tdb-gcc from here and try it yourself: > > http://tdm-gcc.tdragon.net/ That is based on gcc 4.8.1 , Im using 4.9 and trunk versions and there is no vectorization of matrix multiplication (even for 4x4 matrices). Care to show compiler output of assembly and c source code so I can see what I am missing? > > > > > Thank you, > Amine Moulay Ramdane. > > > > > > > > > > > and GCC do > >> auto-vectorize beautifully since the GCC auto-vectorization > >> have given a good results on scimark2 benchmark too. > > > > Care to share example? > > > >> > >> > >> Thank you, > >> Amine Moulay Ramdane. > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > -- Click OK to continue...
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
To Melzzzzz Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-28 15:51 -0700
Re: To Melzzzzz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2014-06-29 04:10 +0200
Re: To Melzzzzz Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-29 10:33 -0700
Re: To Melzzzzz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-06-29 16:39 +0200
Re: To Melzzzzz Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-29 10:47 -0700
Re: To Melzzzzz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-06-29 17:00 +0200
Re: To Melzzzzz Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-29 11:14 -0700
Re: To Melzzzzz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-06-29 17:20 +0200
Re: To Melzzzzz Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-29 11:23 -0700
Re: To Melzzzzz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-06-29 17:31 +0200
Re: To Melzzzzz Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-29 11:32 -0700
Re: To Melzzzzz Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-29 11:38 -0700
Re: To Melzzzzz Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-29 10:41 -0700
Re: To Melzzzzz Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.invalid> - 2014-06-29 16:46 +0200
Re: To Melzzzzz Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-29 10:54 -0700
csiph-web