Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2511

Scalability prediction

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Ramine <ramine@1.1>
Newsgroups	comp.programming, comp.programming.threads
Subject	Scalability prediction
Date	Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:14:50 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	24
Message-ID	<lnihgl$48u$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Date	Sat, 14 Jun 2014 22:14:45 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="e281ca90e9159d28c18fb165a1575356"; logging-data="4382"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/926GjkuR8+lkSWkm0EYRW"
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
Cancel-Lock	sha1:ziWq9RHGTLByIPtJ6do3RSwM98Y=
Xref	csiph.com comp.programming:4609 comp.programming.threads:2511

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Hello,


I have done a scalability prediction of my scalable RWLocks
on very small critical sections and on 3% of writes, using only an 
increment on a variable on the writer side of the critical section and 
reading this same variable on the reader side, and using the Amdahl law 
it has given a 50X scalability , that's good, and  you have to know that 
as the time under the reader side section grows this will even scale 
better than 50X.


This is why i tell you that my scalable RWLocks are still useful
and good and scalable even at 3% of writes on read mostly scenarios.


You can download my scalable RWLocks from here:

https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/scalable-mlock


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Scalability prediction Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-14 15:14 -0700

csiph-web