Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2492
| From | aminer <aminer@toto.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads, comp.programming |
| Subject | Sequential consistency |
| Date | 2014-06-11 07:44 -0700 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <lnapk3$4eu$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Hello, Why have i not spook about sequential consistency and memory models ? Cause that is not a difficult subject for me... On strong memory models like the x86 architecture , you have to take care of the following: There is one important non-guarantee listed in the x86 spec: "Loads may be reordered with older stores to different locations" So i have taking care of that and i have imnplemented my parallel projects taking care of sequential consistency on strong memory model like x86. But on weaker memory models that's not so difficult for me, but i have not decided to port my parallel projects and scalable synchronization algorithms on other memory models than x86 architecture. Thank you for your attention. Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Sequential consistency aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2014-06-11 07:44 -0700
csiph-web