Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #2389
| From | aminer <aminer@toto.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads, comp.programming |
| Subject | About ParallelVafiler |
| Date | 2014-05-30 19:31 -0700 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <lmb4bg$u8v$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Hello, My ParallelVarfiler is more powerful than the following Persistent Hashtable: http://www.developer.com/java/ent/article.php/600531/The-Persistent-Hashtable-A-Quick-and-Dirty-Database.htm 1/ Cause it is parallel When you use a file name in the constructor, many readers and one writer can proceed concurrently. But when you pass an empty file name to the constructor, many writers and many readers can proceed concurrently in memory. and when you read a data item it only use the parallel hashtable in memory, hardisk is not used. 2/ Cause You can collect Strings, Integers and Dates, in fact everything that can be stored in a variant. In addition you can collect Streams. 3/ Cause it's fault tolerant to power failures etc You can download the Parallelvarfiler version 1.4 from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/parallel-varfiler Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
About ParallelVafiler aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2014-05-30 19:31 -0700
csiph-web