Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #878
| From | "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads, comp.programming |
| Subject | Parallelhashlist was updated to version 1.31 ... |
| Date | 2012-05-18 18:47 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jp6ji4$s0t$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Hello, In my previous version of ParallelHashList even if i have used lock striping , synchronizing access to the counter that computes the number of entries in the hashtable was reintroducing the scalability problem of exclusive locking, this counter was called a hot field because every mutative operation needs to access it. In version 1.31, parallelhashlist maintains an independant counter , that counts the number of entries , for each segment of the hashtable and it uses a lock for each counter and this is better for scability. also i have changed parallelhashlist to use only 100 lightweight MREWs (multiple-readers -exclusive-writer) this will lower the memory consumption and this allows multiple threads to write and read concurently. I am using lock striping with 100 lightweight MREWs (multiple-readers -exclusive-writer) and this allows up to 100 parallel writes, but this upper bound on parallel writes will not affect parallel reads, so this will give a good performance and a good scalability . Description: A parallel HashList with O(1) best case and O(log(n)) worst case access that uses lock striping and 100 lightweight MREWs (multiple-readers -exclusive-writer) , this allows multiple threads to write and read concurently. I am using lock striping with 100 lightweight MREWs (multiple-readers -exclusive-writer) and this allows up to 100 parallel writes, but this upper bound on parallel writes will not affect parallel reads, also parallelhashlist maintains an independant counter , that counts the number of entries , for each segment of the hashtable and uses a lock for each counter, this also for better scalability. You can download parallelhashlist version 1.31 from: http://pages.videotron.com/aminer/ Language: FPC Pascal v2.2.0+ / Delphi 5+: http://www.freepascal.org/ Operating Systems: Win , Linux and Mac (x86). and please take a look at the benchmarks here: http://pages.videotron.com/aminer/parallelhashlist/queue.htm Note: When i have done those benchmarks , there was not enough/much items organized as a self-balancing tree in the individual chains of the hashtable, so , almost all the items was found and inserted in O(1) , so the parallel part in the Amdahl equation was not much bigger compared to to the serial part. But you will notice in pratice that as soon as you will have more items on the chains of the Hashtable, organized as self-balancing tree, with a worst case log(n) , the parallel part will become bigger in the Amdahl equation and you will have better performance and scalability than the numbers in the graph of the benchmarks ... Thank you. Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Parallelhashlist was updated to version 1.31 ... "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-05-18 18:47 -0500 Re: Parallelhashlist was updated to version 1.31 ... "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-05-18 18:58 -0500 Re: Parallelhashlist was updated to version 1.31 ... "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-05-20 10:53 -0500
csiph-web