Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming.threads > #5182
| Newsgroups | comp.programming.threads |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-09-15 07:12 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <65508a9e-8ddc-454d-9f8d-c7dca08a3d15@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Yet about Rust.. |
| From | aminer68@gmail.com |
Hello, Yet about Rust.. You will notice by reading the following that by taking a mutable referenced to a variable, you will notice that you can not after that read or write to the variable, and i think that this will lesser parallelism in scenarios that you have more parallelism, so it is like the Reade-Write Lock pattern, so i think to higher parallelism in those scenarios you have to go to unsafe Rust and this is not good. Read the following to noticed it: https://manishearth.github.io/blog/2015/05/17/the-problem-with-shared-mutability/ Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Yet about Rust.. aminer68@gmail.com - 2019-09-15 07:12 -0700
csiph-web