Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming.threads > #438

Re: Interlocked operations, volatile

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de>
Newsgroups comp.programming.threads
Subject Re: Interlocked operations, volatile
Date Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:20:31 +0200
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 11
Message-ID <4E1F093F.DBB73021@web.de> (permalink)
References <99a57186-cf9f-47ee-8955-07df1ce2b126@b21g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <288515a0-5802-4f15-949c-38a901af2fa8@r11g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <c66aeae2-aac5-40b0-ba90-8836c6c5cb45@m10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <6f742fb4-cb39-4b56-b062-4eeb1e51ebdb@h25g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <3806a754-4ec5-4e71-be4d-318db1760557@u24g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
Reply-To terekhov@web.de
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Injection-Info mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="MCbSEzW5qwGLFMNXJh39IQ"; logging-data="14961"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18f4Ka9nouo+w2U+IFzpphIbbo4tLLxlrk="
X-Mailer Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language en
Cancel-Lock sha1:2/hyQ/tS8CDMvxayAa9YKueWIXM=
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.programming.threads:438

Show key headers only | View raw

David Schwartz wrote:
[...]
> If your coding POSIX threads, you need CAS or mutexes or atomic
> operations because POSIX says so. It is also interesting in some cases

Apart from mutexes, CAS and other atomics trigger undefined behaviour
under POSIX due to XBD 4.10.

regards,
alexander.

Back to comp.programming.threads | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Interlocked operations, volatile Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> - 2011-07-13 09:43 -0700
  Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-07-13 20:03 +0200
  Re: Interlocked operations, volatile David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> - 2011-07-13 15:24 -0700
    Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> - 2011-07-14 00:13 -0700
    Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> - 2011-07-14 00:17 -0700
    Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> - 2011-07-14 00:37 -0700
    Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> - 2011-07-14 00:41 -0700
    Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> - 2011-07-14 00:44 -0700
    Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> - 2011-07-14 00:31 -0700
    Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> - 2011-07-14 00:52 -0700
      Re: Interlocked operations, volatile David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> - 2011-07-14 03:06 -0700
        Re: Interlocked operations, volatile David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> - 2011-07-14 06:16 -0700
          Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-07-14 17:20 +0200
            Re: Interlocked operations, volatile David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> - 2011-07-14 09:19 -0700
          Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> - 2011-07-14 08:52 -0700
            Re: Interlocked operations, volatile David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> - 2011-07-14 10:51 -0700
              Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> - 2011-07-14 23:05 +0200
          Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> - 2011-07-14 08:49 -0700
    Re: Interlocked operations, volatile Andrew Che <libera.ventis@gmail.com> - 2011-07-14 00:48 -0700
  Re: Interlocked operations, volatile frege <gottlobfrege@gmail.com> - 2011-07-20 22:13 -0700

csiph-web