Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.vms > #58574 > unrolled thread
| Started by | David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-18 23:51 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-06-22 07:18 -0700 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 43 — 12 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.vms
Alpha V8.4-2 distribution David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> - 2016-06-18 23:51 -0400
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution Steven Schweda <sms.antinode@gmail.com> - 2016-06-18 21:17 -0700
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> - 2016-06-19 01:31 -0400
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution helbig@asclothestro.multivax.de (Phillip Helbig (undress to reply)) - 2016-06-19 08:00 +0000
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-19 13:14 +0000
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution Hans Vlems <hvlems@freenet.de> - 2016-06-19 08:49 -0700
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-06-20 01:43 +0000
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2016-06-20 04:57 +0200
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution Steven Schweda <sms.antinode@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 21:15 -0700
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> - 2016-06-20 01:02 -0400
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution Steven Schweda <sms.antinode@gmail.com> - 2016-06-19 23:51 -0700
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution Simon Clubley <clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP> - 2016-06-20 19:25 +0000
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> - 2016-06-20 19:07 -0400
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution Simon Clubley <clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP> - 2016-06-21 12:57 +0000
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution lawrencedo99@gmail.com - 2016-06-26 20:22 -0700
Alpha V8.4-2 distribution Hans Vlems <hvlems@freenet.de> - 2016-06-18 23:35 -0700
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution helbig@asclothestro.multivax.de (Phillip Helbig (undress to reply)) - 2016-06-19 07:58 +0000
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution Jan-Erik Soderholm <jan-erik.soderholm@telia.com> - 2016-06-19 11:09 +0200
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> - 2016-06-19 22:39 -0400
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> - 2016-06-20 01:04 -0400
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution Jan-Erik Soderholm <jan-erik.soderholm@telia.com> - 2016-06-20 09:29 +0200
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> - 2016-06-20 12:17 -0400
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution Jan-Erik Soderholm <jan-erik.soderholm@telia.com> - 2016-06-20 21:00 +0200
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> - 2016-06-20 19:10 -0400
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution Steven Schweda <sms.antinode@gmail.com> - 2016-06-20 13:54 -0700
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> - 2016-06-20 19:13 -0400
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> - 2016-06-21 22:12 -0400
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution Steven Schweda <sms.antinode@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 19:47 -0700
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution Hans Vlems <hvlems@freenet.de> - 2016-06-22 11:00 -0700
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution Jan-Erik Soderholm <jan-erik.soderholm@telia.com> - 2016-06-22 11:11 +0200
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> - 2016-06-22 16:08 -0400
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution Jan-Erik Soderholm <jan-erik.soderholm@telia.com> - 2016-06-23 01:21 +0200
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution Stephen Hoffman <seaohveh@hoffmanlabs.invalid> - 2016-06-23 08:32 -0400
RE: Alpha DVD (was: Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution) Stephen Hoffman <seaohveh@hoffmanlabs.invalid> - 2016-06-22 09:11 -0400
Re: Alpha DVD Eberhard Heuser <eberhard.heuser@chemie.uni-konstanz.de> - 2016-06-22 16:56 +0200
Re: Alpha DVD Stephen Hoffman <seaohveh@hoffmanlabs.invalid> - 2016-06-22 11:52 -0400
Re: Alpha DVD David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> - 2016-06-22 16:09 -0400
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution Hans Vlems <hvlems@freenet.de> - 2016-06-20 14:47 -0700
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution dgordonatvsi@gmail.com - 2016-06-21 10:26 -0700
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> - 2016-06-21 14:48 -0400
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution Steven Schweda <sms.antinode@gmail.com> - 2016-06-21 14:11 -0700
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> - 2016-06-21 18:42 -0400
Re: Alpha V8.4-2 distribution Steven Schweda <sms.antinode@gmail.com> - 2016-06-22 07:18 -0700
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
| From | David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-18 23:51 -0400 |
| Subject | Alpha V8.4-2 distribution |
| Message-ID | <nk54r8$r72$1@dont-email.me> |
It's Saturday night, or I'd ask VSI. So it's your lucky day to consider my question. Got the Alpha 8.4-2 evaluation kit. Unzipped it on my Alpha, got an iso image, which I was able to mount using LD. The kit will work as an upgrade to V8.3, or later, but will not (according to the release notes) install on an empty disk. No problem, made an image copy of my 8.3 system disk. Now, it's been a LONGGGG time since I did any installations / upgrades, and I'm not sure what can be done. What I remember is you boot off the distribution media and use the menu to install or upgrade. Can't boot off an LD container, since it needs VMS up before LD works. Chicken and egg issues .... What I think I need to do is backup /image the LD container onto a spare disk. Can't use the optical drive. The local crumudgen got a good laugh when I told him I was trying to read a DVD and finally realized the Alpha had a CD drive. Gonna attempt to fix that next week. Don't think the distribution will fit on a CD. Anyway, yeah, I'll get around to it, my question. Can I upgrade VMS while running on a system disk, or do I need to have distribution media I can boot from?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Schweda <sms.antinode@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-18 21:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7c3bfbd2-2213-4994-aef6-2a005058c90c@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #58574 |
> [...] What I remember [...] How does that compare with what's in the Upgrade and Installation Manual? > Don't think the distribution will fit on a CD. If you disclosed the size of the disc image, then an informed opinion might be easier to obtain.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-19 01:31 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nk5an8$7qh$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #58577 |
Steven Schweda wrote:
>> [...] What I remember [...]
>
> How does that compare with what's in the Upgrade and
> Installation Manual?
Only as a last resort RTFM ...
:-)
>> Don't think the distribution will fit on a CD.
>
> If you disclosed the size of the disc image, then an
> informed opinion might be easier to obtain.
It won't fit. The TCP/IP is separate. But, I took out the CD drive anyway. I
got plenty of 36 GB disks. Easiest to just put the distribution, bootable, on one.
The VMS stuff is just over about a GB, un-zipped.
ALPHAX842.IMG;1 2000000/2000000 [1,1] (RWED,RWED,RE,)
ALPHAX842.ZIPEXE;1 1151413/1151416 [1,1] (RWED,RWED,RE,)
PAK.TXT;1 5/8 [1,1] (RWED,RWED,RE,)
V84_IG.PDF;1 14616/14616 [1,1] (RWED,RWED,RE,)
V84_IG.ZIP;1 11931/11936 [1,1] (RWED,RWED,RE,)
VSI-AXPVMS-TCPIP-V0507-13ECO5-1.PCSI$COMPRESSED;1
109029/109040 [1,1] (RWED,RWED,RE,)
VSI-AXPVMS-TCPIP-V0507-13ECO5-1.PCSI$COMPRESSED_VNC;1
2/16 [1,1] (RWED,RWED,RE,)
VSI-AXPVMS-TCPIP-V0507-13ECO5.ZIPEXE;1
94921/94928 [1,1] (RWED,RWED,RE,)
Don't know why they made the IG a PDF, I don't have that capability on my VMS
systems. Guess I'll move it to weendoze to read it.
I also don't have a clue why there is 272 directories, SYS0, SYS1, SYS??, and so
on. Haven't looked yet to see if any have files.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | helbig@asclothestro.multivax.de (Phillip Helbig (undress to reply)) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-19 08:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nk5je4$2j53$3@news.kjsl.com> |
| In reply to | #58583 |
In article <nk5an8$7qh$1@dont-email.me>, David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> writes: > I also don't have a clue why there is 272 directories, SYS0, SYS1, > SYS??, and so on. Haven't looked yet to see if any have files. 272? Really? There should be 0 through FF. The idea is that you can boot from any root for the upgrade.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-19 13:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nk65s3$n7i$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #58592 |
helbig@asclothestro.multivax.de (Phillip Helbig (undress to reply)) writes: >In article <nk5an8$7qh$1@dont-email.me>, David Froble ><davef@tsoft-inc.com> writes: >> I also don't have a clue why there is 272 directories, SYS0, SYS1, >> SYS??, and so on. Haven't looked yet to see if any have files. >272? Really? There should be 0 through FF. The idea is that you can >boot from any root for the upgrade. What's amusing is I noticed a long time ago that one of the 0-FF roots is actually missing. They're all clones of each other ($ SET FILE/ENTER) so the upgrade will happen no matter which root is your default (unless it's the missing one).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hans Vlems <hvlems@freenet.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-19 08:49 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <142565cc-8fa5-4df0-8ee4-5923925e1413@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #58602 |
Which one,[SYS0E.]?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-20 01:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nk7hnn$rtn$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #58610 |
Hans Vlems <hvlems@freenet.de> writes: >Which one,[SYS0E.]? If I remember, it was [SYSD.] I don't have an upgrade disk to check at the moment, I'll check tomorrow if nobody else beats me to it. I believe that in CI VAX days root F was reserved for upgrades, E for standalone backup. I don't know if D or anything else was reserved perhaps making this deliberate.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-20 04:57 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <8m2k3d-9gh.ln1@news.chingola.ch> |
| In reply to | #58632 |
On 2016-06-20, Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote: > Hans Vlems <hvlems@freenet.de> writes: > >>Which one,[SYS0E.]? > > If I remember, it was [SYSD.] I don't have an upgrade disk to check at > the moment, I'll check tomorrow if nobody else beats me to it. On the ALPHA084.ISO image I received as part of the Hobbyist kit in May-2015: $ dir SYS% Directory DUC0:<000000> SYS0.DIR;1 SYS1.DIR;1 SYS2.DIR;1 SYS3.DIR;1 SYS4.DIR;1 SYS5.DIR;1 SYS6.DIR;1 SYS7.DIR;1 SYS8.DIR;1 SYS9.DIR;1 SYSA.DIR;1 SYSB.DIR;1 SYSC.DIR;1 SYSE.DIR;1 SYSF.DIR;1 Total of 15 files. SYSD it is. > I believe that in CI VAX days root F was reserved for upgrades, E for > standalone backup. I don't know if D or anything else was reserved > perhaps making this deliberate. Correct. I'd speculate that D was 'reserved for use by Digital' rather than being an omission. From VAX/VMS V7.3 STABACKIT.COM $ ! P1 - Target device $ ! P2 - Target directory, defaults to <SYS0.SYSEXE>. If target $ ! device is SYS$SYSDEVICE:, the directory is forced to $ ! <SYSE.SYSEXE> and the <SYSE> directory will be given $ ! a SYSCOMMON root which points to common system files $ ! (i.e. points to SYS$TOPSYS for normal systems and to $ ! existing SYSCOMMON for shared system disks). Forced to $ ! <SYS0.SYSEXE> for small media. $ ! P3 - Source device and directory, defaults to SYS$SYSROOT:<SYSEXE> $ ! P4 - Application kit type, one of [BACKUP, BAD] (Forced to $ ! BACKUP for V5.0) !*bad* $ ! P5 - If run from VMSKITBLD, do not INITIALIZE tape or large disk. $ ! This parameter is unsupported, for internal use only. I don't recall using P4=BAD at any stage. -- There are two hard things in computer science, and they are cache invalidation, naming, and off-by-one errors.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Schweda <sms.antinode@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-19 21:15 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <aaa26430-8ec6-4997-a6cb-c2f164a0771e@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #58638 |
> [...] I'd speculate that D was 'reserved for use by > Digital' [...] In the old days (which continue in the local antique collection), [SYSD] is where I put the MicroVAX Diagnostic Monitor files. It's easy to remember, and I don't remember ever seeing it used for anything else.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-20 01:02 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nk7tdu$u9c$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #58638 |
Paul Sture wrote: > On 2016-06-20, Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote: >> Hans Vlems <hvlems@freenet.de> writes: >> >>> Which one,[SYS0E.]? >> If I remember, it was [SYSD.] I don't have an upgrade disk to check at >> the moment, I'll check tomorrow if nobody else beats me to it. > > On the ALPHA084.ISO image I received as part of the Hobbyist kit in May-2015: > > $ dir SYS% > > Directory DUC0:<000000> > > SYS0.DIR;1 SYS1.DIR;1 SYS2.DIR;1 SYS3.DIR;1 > SYS4.DIR;1 SYS5.DIR;1 SYS6.DIR;1 SYS7.DIR;1 > SYS8.DIR;1 SYS9.DIR;1 SYSA.DIR;1 SYSB.DIR;1 > SYSC.DIR;1 SYSE.DIR;1 SYSF.DIR;1 > > Total of 15 files. > > SYSD it is. > >> I believe that in CI VAX days root F was reserved for upgrades, E for >> standalone backup. I don't know if D or anything else was reserved >> perhaps making this deliberate. > > Correct. I'd speculate that D was 'reserved for use by Digital' rather > than being an omission. > > From VAX/VMS V7.3 STABACKIT.COM > > $ ! P1 - Target device > $ ! P2 - Target directory, defaults to <SYS0.SYSEXE>. If target > $ ! device is SYS$SYSDEVICE:, the directory is forced to > $ ! <SYSE.SYSEXE> and the <SYSE> directory will be given > $ ! a SYSCOMMON root which points to common system files > $ ! (i.e. points to SYS$TOPSYS for normal systems and to > $ ! existing SYSCOMMON for shared system disks). Forced to > $ ! <SYS0.SYSEXE> for small media. > $ ! P3 - Source device and directory, defaults to SYS$SYSROOT:<SYSEXE> > $ ! P4 - Application kit type, one of [BACKUP, BAD] (Forced to > $ ! BACKUP for V5.0) !*bad* > $ ! P5 - If run from VMSKITBLD, do not INITIALIZE tape or large disk. > $ ! This parameter is unsupported, for internal use only. > > I don't recall using P4=BAD at any stage. > The following is something I wasn't quite ready for .... Directory LDA1:[000,000] 000000.DIR;1 AVAIL_MAN_BASE.DIR;1 DECNET_PHASE_IV_ALPHA0842.DIR;1 DWMOTIF_SUPPORT_ALPHA0842.DIR;1 KITS.DIR;1 SYS0.DIR;1 SYS1.DIR;1 SYS10.DIR;1 SYS11.DIR;1 SYS12.DIR;1 SYS13.DIR;1 SYS14.DIR;1 SYS15.DIR;1 SYS16.DIR;1 SYS17.DIR;1 SYS18.DIR;1 SYS19.DIR;1 SYS1A.DIR;1 SYS1B.DIR;1 SYS1C.DIR;1 SYS1D.DIR;1 SYS1E.DIR;1 SYS1F.DIR;1 SYS2.DIR;1 SYS20.DIR;1 SYS21.DIR;1 SYS22.DIR;1 SYS23.DIR;1 SYS24.DIR;1 SYS25.DIR;1 SYS26.DIR;1 SYS27.DIR;1 SYS28.DIR;1 SYS29.DIR;1 SYS2A.DIR;1 SYS2B.DIR;1 SYS2C.DIR;1 SYS2D.DIR;1 SYS2E.DIR;1 SYS2F.DIR;1 SYS3.DIR;1 SYS30.DIR;1 SYS31.DIR;1 SYS32.DIR;1 SYS33.DIR;1 SYS34.DIR;1 SYS35.DIR;1 SYS36.DIR;1 SYS37.DIR;1 SYS38.DIR;1 SYS39.DIR;1 SYS3A.DIR;1 SYS3B.DIR;1 SYS3C.DIR;1 SYS3D.DIR;1 SYS3E.DIR;1 SYS3F.DIR;1 SYS4.DIR;1 SYS40.DIR;1 SYS41.DIR;1 SYS42.DIR;1 SYS43.DIR;1 SYS44.DIR;1 SYS45.DIR;1 SYS46.DIR;1 SYS47.DIR;1 SYS48.DIR;1 SYS49.DIR;1 SYS4A.DIR;1 SYS4B.DIR;1 SYS4C.DIR;1 SYS4D.DIR;1 SYS4E.DIR;1 SYS4F.DIR;1 SYS5.DIR;1 SYS50.DIR;1 SYS51.DIR;1 SYS52.DIR;1 SYS53.DIR;1 SYS54.DIR;1 SYS55.DIR;1 SYS56.DIR;1 SYS57.DIR;1 SYS58.DIR;1 SYS59.DIR;1 SYS5A.DIR;1 SYS5B.DIR;1 SYS5C.DIR;1 SYS5D.DIR;1 SYS5E.DIR;1 SYS5F.DIR;1 SYS6.DIR;1 SYS60.DIR;1 SYS61.DIR;1 SYS62.DIR;1 SYS63.DIR;1 SYS64.DIR;1 SYS65.DIR;1 SYS66.DIR;1 SYS67.DIR;1 SYS68.DIR;1 SYS69.DIR;1 SYS6A.DIR;1 SYS6B.DIR;1 SYS6C.DIR;1 SYS6D.DIR;1 SYS6E.DIR;1 SYS6F.DIR;1 SYS7.DIR;1 SYS70.DIR;1 SYS71.DIR;1 SYS72.DIR;1 SYS73.DIR;1 SYS74.DIR;1 SYS75.DIR;1 SYS76.DIR;1 SYS77.DIR;1 SYS78.DIR;1 SYS79.DIR;1 SYS7A.DIR;1 SYS7B.DIR;1 SYS7C.DIR;1 SYS7D.DIR;1 SYS7E.DIR;1 SYS7F.DIR;1 SYS8.DIR;1 SYS80.DIR;1 SYS81.DIR;1 SYS82.DIR;1 SYS83.DIR;1 SYS84.DIR;1 SYS85.DIR;1 SYS86.DIR;1 SYS87.DIR;1 SYS88.DIR;1 SYS89.DIR;1 SYS8A.DIR;1 SYS8B.DIR;1 SYS8C.DIR;1 SYS8D.DIR;1 SYS8E.DIR;1 SYS8F.DIR;1 SYS9.DIR;1 SYS90.DIR;1 SYS91.DIR;1 SYS92.DIR;1 SYS93.DIR;1 SYS94.DIR;1 SYS95.DIR;1 SYS96.DIR;1 SYS97.DIR;1 SYS98.DIR;1 SYS99.DIR;1 SYS9A.DIR;1 SYS9B.DIR;1 SYS9C.DIR;1 SYS9D.DIR;1 SYS9E.DIR;1 SYS9F.DIR;1 SYSA.DIR;1 SYSA0.DIR;1 SYSA1.DIR;1 SYSA2.DIR;1 SYSA3.DIR;1 SYSA4.DIR;1 SYSA5.DIR;1 SYSA6.DIR;1 SYSA7.DIR;1 SYSA8.DIR;1 SYSA9.DIR;1 SYSAA.DIR;1 SYSAB.DIR;1 SYSAC.DIR;1 SYSAD.DIR;1 SYSAE.DIR;1 SYSAF.DIR;1 SYSB.DIR;1 SYSB0.DIR;1 SYSB1.DIR;1 SYSB2.DIR;1 SYSB3.DIR;1 SYSB4.DIR;1 SYSB5.DIR;1 SYSB6.DIR;1 SYSB7.DIR;1 SYSB8.DIR;1 SYSB9.DIR;1 SYSBA.DIR;1 SYSBB.DIR;1 SYSBC.DIR;1 SYSBD.DIR;1 SYSBE.DIR;1 SYSBF.DIR;1 SYSC.DIR;1 SYSC0.DIR;1 SYSC1.DIR;1 SYSC2.DIR;1 SYSC3.DIR;1 SYSC4.DIR;1 SYSC5.DIR;1 SYSC6.DIR;1 SYSC7.DIR;1 SYSC8.DIR;1 SYSC9.DIR;1 SYSCA.DIR;1 SYSCB.DIR;1 SYSCC.DIR;1 SYSCD.DIR;1 SYSCE.DIR;1 SYSCF.DIR;1 SYSD0.DIR;1 SYSD1.DIR;1 SYSD2.DIR;1 SYSD3.DIR;1 SYSD4.DIR;1 SYSD5.DIR;1 SYSD6.DIR;1 SYSD7.DIR;1 SYSD8.DIR;1 SYSD9.DIR;1 SYSDA.DIR;1 SYSDB.DIR;1 SYSDC.DIR;1 SYSDD.DIR;1 SYSDE.DIR;1 SYSDF.DIR;1 SYSE.DIR;1 SYSE0.DIR;1 SYSE1.DIR;1 SYSE2.DIR;1 SYSE3.DIR;1 SYSE4.DIR;1 SYSE5.DIR;1 SYSE6.DIR;1 SYSE7.DIR;1 SYSE8.DIR;1 SYSE9.DIR;1 SYSEA.DIR;1 SYSEB.DIR;1 SYSEC.DIR;1 SYSED.DIR;1 SYSEE.DIR;1 SYSEF.DIR;1 SYSF.DIR;1 SYSF0.DIR;1 SYSF1.DIR;1 SYSF2.DIR;1 SYSF3.DIR;1 SYSF4.DIR;1 SYSF5.DIR;1 SYSF6.DIR;1 SYSF7.DIR;1 SYSF8.DIR;1 SYSF9.DIR;1 SYSFA.DIR;1 SYSFB.DIR;1 SYSFC.DIR;1 SYSFD.DIR;1 SYSFE.DIR;1 SYSFF.DIR;1 VMS$COMMON.DIR;1 Total of 261 files.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Schweda <sms.antinode@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-19 23:51 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <edab74a0-0b03-4f67-92e5-dece943bb6ca@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #58644 |
> The following is something I wasn't quite ready for .... Where's the surprise? How does this stuff differ from any other Alpha VMS installation CD (other than the VMS version numbers)? > Directory LDA1:[000,000] Why waste the effort on the comma? I tend to specify /EXCLUDE = SYS*.* when using DIRECTORY on these things, so that I can get more useful stuff onto a screen. On my spare/experimental XP1000, which also has a Tru64 disk, the default boot flags specify "a" (for Tru64), so SYSA, at least, has been useful for me. (The VMS system disks on that system have a SYSA which is linked to SYS0, so that I can leave the flags at "a" for VMS, too.)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Simon Clubley <clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-20 19:25 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nk9fv6$5cr$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #58649 |
On 2016-06-20, Steven Schweda <sms.antinode@gmail.com> wrote: >> The following is something I wasn't quite ready for .... > > Where's the surprise? How does this stuff differ from any > other Alpha VMS installation CD (other than the VMS version > numbers)? > >> Directory LDA1:[000,000] > > Why waste the effort on the comma? > Maybe David misses his RSTS/E days ? :-) Simon. -- Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-20 19:07 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nk9t03$smq$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #58681 |
Simon Clubley wrote: > On 2016-06-20, Steven Schweda <sms.antinode@gmail.com> wrote: >>> The following is something I wasn't quite ready for .... >> Where's the surprise? How does this stuff differ from any >> other Alpha VMS installation CD (other than the VMS version >> numbers)? Really, does recent distribution have all those directories? >>> Directory LDA1:[000,000] >> Why waste the effort on the comma? >> > > Maybe David misses his RSTS/E days ? :-) > > Simon. > Well, if you were to pay attention to details .... AS800> syh OpenVMS V8.4-2 on node AS800 20-JUN-2016 19:01:29.55 Uptime 0 00:38:02 AS800> dir lda1:[0,0] Directory LDA1:[0,0] 000000.DIR;1 AVAIL_MAN_BASE.DIR;1 BACKUP.SYS;1 BADBLK.SYS;1 BADLOG.SYS;1 BITMAP.SYS;1 You will note that in the original post, there is no "$" or even "AS800>" prompt in front of ">>> Directory LDA1:[000,000]", so, it was the output of the directory command that used the comma. I may have wasted the comma, but it wasn't what was commented upon. RSTS/E was fun. No, I don't miss TKB ....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Simon Clubley <clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-21 12:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nkbdk5$uvo$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #58687 |
On 2016-06-20, David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> wrote: > > Well, if you were to pay attention to details .... > Oh I was, because I know the only time you get that style output for [000000] is when you use a comma in the directory specification for the dir command. :-) > AS800> syh > OpenVMS V8.4-2 on node AS800 20-JUN-2016 19:01:29.55 Uptime 0 00:38:02 > > AS800> dir lda1:[0,0] > > Directory LDA1:[0,0] > > 000000.DIR;1 AVAIL_MAN_BASE.DIR;1 BACKUP.SYS;1 > BADBLK.SYS;1 BADLOG.SYS;1 BITMAP.SYS;1 > > You will note that in the original post, there is no "$" or even "AS800>" prompt > in front of ">>> Directory LDA1:[000,000]", so, it was the output of the > directory command that used the comma. I may have wasted the comma, but it > wasn't what was commented upon. > > RSTS/E was fun. No, I don't miss TKB .... You mean you don't miss the wonders of overlays ? Don't worry, I don't miss faffing around with them either. :-) Simon. -- Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | lawrencedo99@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-26 20:22 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <2cc01e66-deb1-4bc4-8c95-ecf74156a156@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #58632 |
On Monday, June 20, 2016 at 1:44:02 PM UTC+12, Michael Moroney wrote: > I don't know if D or anything else was reserved perhaps > making this deliberate. D = 13?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hans Vlems <hvlems@freenet.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-18 23:35 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <8c1d0a0f-f56f-44b9-8b76-e6621992b937@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #58574 |
I upgraded a DS20E some time ago. I put the iso file on an rx2600, connected it to an LD device. Next, copy the bootloader to mom$system. The rx2600 eas already configured for LAD and InfoServer services. The DS20E was booted via a gigabit ethernet controller and after selecting the appropriate service the upgrade went without a hitch. It took less than 15 minutes. If you've got ECO13 installed of the latest tcp/ip kit and have installed the telnet patch then you'd better deinstall that telnet patch. I didn't and uncovered a PCSI bug.. Hans
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | helbig@asclothestro.multivax.de (Phillip Helbig (undress to reply)) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-19 07:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nk5jbu$2j53$2@news.kjsl.com> |
| In reply to | #58574 |
In article <nk54r8$r72$1@dont-email.me>, David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.comwrites: > Got the Alpha 8.4-2 evaluation kit. Unzipped it on my Alpha, got an iso > image, which I was able to mount using LD. The kit will work as an > upgrade to V8.3, or later, but will not (according to the release notes) > install on an empty disk. No problem, made an image copy of my 8.3 > system disk. > > Now, it's been a LONGGGG time since I did any installations / upgrades, > and I'm not sure what can be done. What I remember is you boot off the > distribution media and use the menu to install or upgrade. Can't boot > off an LD container, since it needs VMS up before LD works. Chicken and > egg issues .... > > What I think I need to do is backup /image the LD container onto a spare > disk. A while back, I installed 8.4 from the hobbyist distribution. Downloaded the image, mounted a disk /FOREIGN, copied the image to it, then booted off of this. Note: COPY, not BACKUP.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jan-Erik Soderholm <jan-erik.soderholm@telia.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-19 11:09 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nk5ng1$c87$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #58574 |
Den 2016-06-19 kl. 05:51, skrev David Froble: > It's Saturday night, or I'd ask VSI. So it's your lucky day to consider my > question. > > Got the Alpha 8.4-2 evaluation kit. Unzipped it on my Alpha, got an iso > image, which I was able to mount using LD. The kit will work as an upgrade > to V8.3, or later, but will not (according to the release notes) install on > an empty disk. No problem, made an image copy of my 8.3 system disk. > > Now, it's been a LONGGGG time since I did any installations / upgrades, and > I'm not sure what can be done. What I remember is you boot off the > distribution media and use the menu to install or upgrade. Can't boot off > an LD container, since it needs VMS up before LD works. Chicken and egg > issues .... > > What I think I need to do is backup /image the LD container onto a spare > disk. Can't use the optical drive. The local crumudgen got a good laugh > when I told him I was trying to read a DVD and finally realized the Alpha > had a CD drive. Gonna attempt to fix that next week. Don't think the > distribution will fit on a CD. The original download did not fit on a CD since there was a large file stored in the ISO as two copies by mistake. I took that away and re-built the ISO and my ISO did then fit on a CD. VSI also release an updated ISO shortly after this error was reported, and it is now "589.5 MB" according to the download page. Do you still have the origanal ISO? That was around 1 GB, I think... If so, just fetch the latest copy from VSI. Anyway... If you have a spare disk you can copy the ISO to that one and boot from it. Philip described that in another post. And you should be able to either INSTALL or UPGRADE using this dist, either from a spare disk or from a CD. Regards, Jan-Erik. > > Anyway, yeah, I'll get around to it, my question. Can I upgrade VMS while > running on a system disk, or do I need to have distribution media I can > boot from?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-19 22:39 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nk7l19$c72$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #58593 |
Jan-Erik Soderholm wrote: > Den 2016-06-19 kl. 05:51, skrev David Froble: >> It's Saturday night, or I'd ask VSI. So it's your lucky day to >> consider my >> question. >> >> Got the Alpha 8.4-2 evaluation kit. Unzipped it on my Alpha, got an iso >> image, which I was able to mount using LD. The kit will work as an >> upgrade >> to V8.3, or later, but will not (according to the release notes) >> install on >> an empty disk. No problem, made an image copy of my 8.3 system disk. >> >> Now, it's been a LONGGGG time since I did any installations / >> upgrades, and >> I'm not sure what can be done. What I remember is you boot off the >> distribution media and use the menu to install or upgrade. Can't boot >> off >> an LD container, since it needs VMS up before LD works. Chicken and egg >> issues .... >> >> What I think I need to do is backup /image the LD container onto a spare >> disk. Can't use the optical drive. The local crumudgen got a good laugh >> when I told him I was trying to read a DVD and finally realized the Alpha >> had a CD drive. Gonna attempt to fix that next week. Don't think the >> distribution will fit on a CD. > > The original download did not fit on a CD since there was a large file > stored in the ISO as two copies by mistake. I took that away and re-built > the ISO and my ISO did then fit on a CD. > > VSI also release an updated ISO shortly after this error was reported, > and it is now "589.5 MB" according to the download page. > > Do you still have the origanal ISO? That was around 1 GB, I think... > If so, just fetch the latest copy from VSI. I just got this from VSI on Friday. > Anyway... > > If you have a spare disk you can copy the ISO to that one and boot from > it. Philip described that in another post. > > And you should be able to either INSTALL or UPGRADE using this dist, > either from a spare disk or from a CD. Well, I don't know what you CAN do, but the info from VSI is that you cannot install, only upgrade V8.4 or later. PAK is good only until September. > Regards, Jan-Erik. > > > > >> >> Anyway, yeah, I'll get around to it, my question. Can I upgrade VMS >> while >> running on a system disk, or do I need to have distribution media I can >> boot from? >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Froble <davef@tsoft-inc.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-20 01:04 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <nk7tgs$u9c$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #58634 |
David Froble wrote: > Well, I don't know what you CAN do, but the info from VSI is that you > cannot install, only upgrade V8.4 or later. PAK is good only until > September. Should read "upgrade V8.3 or later"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 1 of 3 [1] 2 3 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.vms
csiph-web