Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.msdos.programmer > #2325

Re: 16 bit code

From rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge)
Newsgroups comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject Re: 16 bit code
Date 2016-11-26 22:58 +0000
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <o1d437$14dp$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <o1cv35$n1s$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


Bill Cunningham <nospam@nspam.invalid> wrote:
>    This is a disasssembly of a driver code. The ext was .sys. Which is DOS 
>is probably always a driver. Does anyone know what it's saying. There's no 
>ints called. This isn't source code. Maybe you can't get that from a 
>disassembly.

It's not valid Intel code, either in 16-bit mode or 32-bit mode.
It's probably some sort of data.

Note that you can give any file an extension of .SYS, so it's not
necessarily an MS-DOS device driver just because it has that extension.

					Ross Ridge

-- 
 l/  //	  Ross Ridge -- The Great HTMU
[oo][oo]  rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
-()-/()/  http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rridge/ 
 db  //	  

Back to comp.os.msdos.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

16 bit code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-11-26 16:34 -0500
  Re: 16 bit code Harry Potter <rose.joseph12@yahoo.com> - 2016-11-26 14:38 -0800
    Re: 16 bit code Harry Potter <rose.joseph12@yahoo.com> - 2016-11-26 14:40 -0800
  Re: 16 bit code rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2016-11-26 22:58 +0000
    Re: 16 bit code pete@nospam.demon.co.uk - 2016-11-27 07:15 +0000
    Re: 16 bit code rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge) - 2016-11-27 20:59 +0000
  Re: 16 bit code Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2016-11-26 20:08 -0500
  Re: 16 bit code "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-11-27 09:38 +0100
    Re: 16 bit code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-11-27 14:37 -0500
      Re: 16 bit code "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-11-27 21:42 +0100
      Re: 16 bit code Rod Pemberton <NeedNotReplyHere@xrsevnneqk.cem> - 2016-11-27 21:20 -0500
    Re: 16 bit code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-11-27 14:47 -0500
      Re: 16 bit code "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-11-27 21:59 +0100
        Re: 16 bit code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-11-27 16:40 -0500
          Re: 16 bit code "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2016-11-28 08:34 +0100
        Re: 16 bit code rugxulo@gmail.com - 2016-11-27 14:08 -0800
          Re: 16 bit code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-11-27 17:47 -0500
            Re: 16 bit code "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2016-11-27 17:49 -0500
      Re: 16 bit code Jim Leonard <MobyGamer@gmail.com> - 2017-01-04 11:05 -0800

csiph-web