Groups > comp.os.msdos.programmer > #739

Re: INT 09h hooking issues

From	"Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm>
Newsgroups	comp.os.msdos.programmer
Subject	Re: INT 09h hooking issues
Date	2012-08-12 04:29 -0400
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<k07pdn$2a1$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <k01jce$jvs$1@speranza.aioe.org> <2bb5ac1d-d9b1-43ec-9a27-a634fdd3c0b8@googlegroups.com> <k02gfo$jlj$1@speranza.aioe.org> <ed0143f4-3e00-4ee5-a3f1-502f78abe86e@googlegroups.com> <1344755920snz@nospam.demon.co.uk>

Show all headers | View raw

<pete@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1344755920snz@nospam.demon.co.uk...
...

> I find that astonishing; *every* pc that I have used since the late
> 1980s has supported int15/4F.

Personally, my suspicions are aroused.  He seemed to avoid answering my
question about what PC.  He also seems to be "avoiding" solutions which
seem reasonable to me or us.

Perhaps, it's one of these:

1) original IBM PC
2) original IBM XT
3) an early clone
4) non-standard laptop
5) "foreign" machines (e.g., Russian)
6) 8086 based terminal
7) a embedded 8086 device
8) custom hardware and/or software
9) Int 0x15 routine installed on wrong interrupt
10) hacking an emulator or virtual machine for zero-day exploits

Although, I have run into various BIOS issues.  A Compaq laptop and a Dell
with a Phoenix BIOS both had problems.  So, maybe he has a BIOS issue...
That would sort of imply the machines he tested are all of the same type
though.


Rod Pemberton

Thread

INT 09h hooking issues jacks <jacks.1785@gmail.com> - 2012-08-08 07:52 -0700
  Re: INT 09h hooking issues "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-08-08 20:49 -0400
    Re: INT 09h hooking issues pete@nospam.demon.co.uk - 2012-08-09 05:32 +0000
      Re: INT 09h hooking issues "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-08-09 04:39 -0400
        Re: INT 09h hooking issues Bogus@Embarq.com (Steve) - 2012-08-09 11:44 +0000
          Re: INT 09h hooking issues "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-08-09 20:09 -0400
            Re: INT 09h hooking issues jacks <jacks.1785@gmail.com> - 2012-08-09 23:20 -0700
              Re: INT 09h hooking issues "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-08-10 04:26 -0400
                Re: INT 09h hooking issues Bogus@Embarq.com (Steve) - 2012-08-10 12:08 +0000
                Re: INT 09h hooking issues jacks <jacks.1785@gmail.com> - 2012-08-11 23:10 -0700
                Re: INT 09h hooking issues pete@nospam.demon.co.uk - 2012-08-12 07:18 +0000
                Re: INT 09h hooking issues "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-08-12 04:29 -0400
                Re: INT 09h hooking issues jacks <jacks.1785@gmail.com> - 2012-08-14 05:40 -0700
                Re: INT 09h hooking issues Jim Leonard <MobyGamer@gmail.com> - 2012-08-14 08:29 -0700
                Re: INT 09h hooking issues jacks <jacks.1785@gmail.com> - 2012-08-15 20:14 -0700
                Re: INT 09h hooking issues jacks <jacks.1785@gmail.com> - 2012-08-14 05:30 -0700
                Re: INT 09h hooking issues "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-08-12 04:01 -0400
        Re: INT 09h hooking issues pete@nospam.demon.co.uk - 2012-08-10 05:27 +0000
      Re: INT 09h hooking issues jacks <jacks.1785@gmail.com> - 2012-08-09 08:41 -0700
        Re: INT 09h hooking issues "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-08-09 19:54 -0400
          Re: INT 09h hooking issues jacks <jacks.1785@gmail.com> - 2012-08-10 00:11 -0700
            Re: INT 09h hooking issues "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-08-10 04:27 -0400

csiph-web