Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #4095 > unrolled thread
| Started by | keithbruni1@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-10-09 09:11 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-10-23 14:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 8 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.networking
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: ifconfig equivalent for Windows? keithbruni1@gmail.com - 2017-10-09 09:11 -0700
Re: ifconfig equivalent for Windows? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2017-10-10 00:43 +0200
Re: ifconfig equivalent for Windows? "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-10-09 22:21 -0400
Re: ifconfig equivalent for Windows? Ziggi <Ziggy@vimuster.you> - 2017-10-10 18:19 +0000
Re: ifconfig equivalent for Windows? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2017-10-10 20:43 +0200
Re: ifconfig equivalent for Windows? "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2017-10-10 16:33 -0400
Re: ifconfig equivalent for Windows? Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2017-10-22 17:39 +0200
Re: ifconfig equivalent for Windows? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2017-10-23 14:50 +0200
| From | keithbruni1@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-10-09 09:11 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: ifconfig equivalent for Windows? |
| Message-ID | <d5a3ea92-da14-4588-bfed-9b9a0837ae68@googlegroups.com> |
On Wednesday, March 12, 2008 at 3:54:02 PM UTC-3, buck wrote: > I have been searching for hours trying to find a utility for Windows > that will return the same information as ifconfig regarding overruns, > frame, carrier, Etc. and I find nothing at all. > > The problem is that we have a mixed network of Linux and Windows boxes > and my main Linux machine's internal facing NIC is showing > RX packets:86272246 errors:3084 dropped:821 overruns:3084 frame:0 > TX packets:80610778 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:4 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > RX bytes:4145544363 (3953.4 Mb) TX bytes:3168716203 (3021.9 Mb) > > and I need to find the Bad Boy that is causing all those overruns. > Short of booting a live Linux distro on each Windows box, is there > some tool available for detecting the source of the RX overruns? > -- > buck
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-10-10 00:43 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nkatae-oos.ln1@minas-tirith.valinor> |
| In reply to | #4095 |
On 2017-10-09 18:11, keithbruni1@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 12, 2008 at 3:54:02 PM UTC-3, buck wrote:
>> I have been searching for hours trying to find a utility for Windows
>> that will return the same information as ifconfig regarding overruns,
>> frame, carrier, Etc. and I find nothing at all.
It is called "ipconfig" and runs in a "shell".
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-10-09 22:21 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.y7vfiwgka3w0dxdave@hodgins.homeip.net> |
| In reply to | #4096 |
On Mon, 09 Oct 2017 18:43:03 -0400, Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > On 2017-10-09 18:11, keithbruni1@gmail.com wrote: >> On Wednesday, March 12, 2008 at 3:54:02 PM UTC-3, buck wrote: >>> I have been searching for hours trying to find a utility for Windows >>> that will return the same information as ifconfig regarding overruns, >>> frame, carrier, Etc. and I find nothing at all. > > It is called "ipconfig" and runs in a "shell". Any particular reason for replying to an article posted over 11 years ago? Regards, Dave Hodgins -- Change dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org to davidwhodgins@teksavvy.com for email replies.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ziggi <Ziggy@vimuster.you> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-10-10 18:19 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnotq3p5.225.Ziggy@vimuster.you> |
| In reply to | #4097 |
On 2017-10-10, David W. Hodgins wrote: > On Mon, 09 Oct 2017 18:43:03 -0400, Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > > Any particular reason for replying to an article posted over 11 years ago? > > Regards, Dave Hodgins > Better Late than never. -- :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-10-10 20:43 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <sugvae-oga.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #4097 |
On 2017-10-10 04:21, David W. Hodgins wrote: > On Mon, 09 Oct 2017 18:43:03 -0400, Carlos E. R. <> wrote: > >> On 2017-10-09 18:11, keithbruni1@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Wednesday, March 12, 2008 at 3:54:02 PM UTC-3, buck wrote: >>>> I have been searching for hours trying to find a utility for Windows >>>> that will return the same information as ifconfig regarding overruns, >>>> frame, carrier, Etc. and I find nothing at all. >> >> It is called "ipconfig" and runs in a "shell". > > Any particular reason for replying to an article posted over 11 years ago? The article I replied to was posted yesterday. I did not notice that it was a reply to a way old article. You should have told that to "keithbruni1", not me. -- Cheers, Carlos.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-10-10 16:33 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.y7wt2jgpa3w0dxdave@hodgins.homeip.net> |
| In reply to | #4099 |
On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 14:43:08 -0400, Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > On 2017-10-10 04:21, David W. Hodgins wrote: >> On Mon, 09 Oct 2017 18:43:03 -0400, Carlos E. R. <> wrote: >> >>> On 2017-10-09 18:11, keithbruni1@gmail.com wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, March 12, 2008 at 3:54:02 PM UTC-3, buck wrote: >>>>> I have been searching for hours trying to find a utility for Windows >>>>> that will return the same information as ifconfig regarding overruns, >>>>> frame, carrier, Etc. and I find nothing at all. >>> >>> It is called "ipconfig" and runs in a "shell". >> >> Any particular reason for replying to an article posted over 11 years ago? > > The article I replied to was posted yesterday. I did not notice that it > was a reply to a way old article. > > You should have told that to "keithbruni1", not me. Oops!. Just like when pointing out spellling errrorrs, the comment almost always includes a mistake. Regards, Dave Hodgins -- Change dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org to davidwhodgins@teksavvy.com for email replies.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-10-22 17:39 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <59ecbbb5$0$826$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> |
| In reply to | #4096 |
On 10-10-17 00:43, Carlos E. R. wrote: > On 2017-10-09 18:11, keithbruni1@gmail.com wrote: >> On Wednesday, March 12, 2008 at 3:54:02 PM UTC-3, buck wrote: >>> I have been searching for hours trying to find a utility for Windows >>> that will return the same information as ifconfig regarding overruns, >>> frame, carrier, Etc. and I find nothing at all. > > It is called "ipconfig" and runs in a "shell". > no 'overruns' are shown..... C:\WINDOWS\system32>ipconfig /all | findstr /i run C:\WINDOWS\system32>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-10-23 14:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1651ce-lpn.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #4101 |
On 2017-10-22 17:39, Luuk wrote: > On 10-10-17 00:43, Carlos E. R. wrote: >> On 2017-10-09 18:11, keithbruni1@gmail.com wrote: >>> On Wednesday, March 12, 2008 at 3:54:02 PM UTC-3, buck wrote: >>>> I have been searching for hours trying to find a utility for Windows >>>> that will return the same information as ifconfig regarding overruns, >>>> frame, carrier, Etc. and I find nothing at all. >> >> It is called "ipconfig" and runs in a "shell". >> > > no 'overruns' are shown..... > > C:\WINDOWS\system32>ipconfig /all | findstr /i run > > C:\WINDOWS\system32> Well, it is not the same tool, it is bound to be different. -- Cheers, Carlos.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.networking
csiph-web