Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #3802 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-08 19:44 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-07-08 20:58 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.networking
traceroute question, where do the tim differences come from? Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2016-07-08 19:44 +0200
Re: traceroute question, where do the tim differences come from? Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2016-07-08 19:47 +0200
Re: traceroute question, where do the tim differences come from? Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com> - 2016-07-08 18:10 +0000
Re: traceroute question, where do the tim differences come from? Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2016-07-08 18:20 +0000
Re: traceroute question, where do the tim differences come from? Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2016-07-08 20:58 +0200
| From | Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-08 19:44 +0200 |
| Subject | traceroute question, where do the tim differences come from? |
| Message-ID | <577fe667$0$5811$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> |
I have setup a system with network like this:
luuk@ubuntu1:~$ route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
default 192.168.178.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
10.0.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
192.168.178.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
And created a script like this:
luuk@ubuntu1:~$ cat doit.sh
#!/bin/bash
i="0"
while [ $i -lt 4 ]
do
traceroute 192.168.178.250
sleep $1
i=$[$i+1]
done
Why dooes traceroute behave bad with shor pauses?:
luuk@ubuntu1:~$ ./doit.sh 4
traceroute to 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250), 30 hops max, 60 byte
packets
1 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250) 0.937 ms 1.316 ms 1.695 ms
traceroute to 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250), 30 hops max, 60 byte
packets
1 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250) 0.917 ms 1.329 ms 1.741 ms
traceroute to 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250), 30 hops max, 60 byte
packets
1 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250) 0.980 ms 1.406 ms 1.820 ms
traceroute to 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250), 30 hops max, 60 byte
packets
1 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250) 0.892 ms 1.324 ms 1.731 ms
luuk@ubuntu1:~$ ./doit.sh 1
traceroute to 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250), 30 hops max, 60 byte
packets
1 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250) 0.932 ms 1.355 ms 1.773 ms
traceroute to 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250), 30 hops max, 60 byte
packets
1 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250) 0.608 ms * *
traceroute to 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250), 30 hops max, 60 byte
packets
1 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250) 0.879 ms 1.301 ms 1.712 ms
traceroute to 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250), 30 hops max, 60 byte
packets
1 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250) 0.804 ms * *
luuk@ubuntu1:~$
and it gets awfull with 0:
luuk@ubuntu1:~$ ./doit.sh 0
traceroute to 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250), 30 hops max, 60 byte
packets
1 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250) 0.658 ms 1.073 ms 1.481 ms
traceroute to 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250), 30 hops max, 60 byte
packets
1 * * *
2 * * *
3 * * *
4 * * *
5 * * *
6 * 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250) 0.735 ms 1.145 ms
traceroute to 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250), 30 hops max, 60 byte
packets
1 * * *
2 * * *
3 * * *
4 * * *
5 * * *
6 * 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250) 0.766 ms 1.184 ms
traceroute to 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250), 30 hops max, 60 byte
packets
1 * * *
2 * * *
3 * * *
4 * * *
5 * * *
6 * 192.168.178.250 (192.168.178.250) 1.301 ms 1.704 ms
luuk@ubuntu1:~$
luuk@ubuntu1:~$ uname -a
Linux ubuntu1 4.2.0-41-generic #48~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jun 24
17:09:15 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
luuk@ubuntu1:~$
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-08 19:47 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <577fe705$0$5811$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> |
| In reply to | #3802 |
On 08-07-16 19:44, Luuk wrote: > Why dooes traceroute behave bad with short pauses?: disabling eth1 did not do the trick...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hpe.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-08 18:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nloqb2$21o$1@news.hpeswlab.net> |
| In reply to | #3802 |
Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> wrote: > Why dooes traceroute behave bad with shor pauses?: Perhaps 192.168.178.250 is rate-limiting its ICMP responses to the packets being sent by traceroute. You might consider checking the statistics on 192.168.178.25 (perhaps it keeps a stat, perhaps a logging entry), and taking packet traces on it, and your sending system. rick jones -- oxymoron n, commuter in a gas-guzzling luxury SUV with an American flag these opinions are mine, all mine; HPE might not want them anyway... :) feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hpe.com but NOT BOTH...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-08 18:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnnnvrn3.92d.BitTwister@wb.home.test> |
| In reply to | #3802 |
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 19:44:38 +0200, Luuk wrote:
> I have setup a system with network like this:
>
> luuk@ubuntu1:~$ route
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> default 192.168.178.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
> 10.0.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
> 192.168.178.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
>
> And created a script like this:
>
> luuk@ubuntu1:~$ cat doit.sh
> #!/bin/bash
>
> i="0"
>
> while [ $i -lt 4 ]
> do
> traceroute 192.168.178.250
> sleep $1
> i=$[$i+1]
> done
>
>
> Why dooes traceroute behave bad with shor pauses?:
Because that node has been setup to not return your inquiry.
It may help somewhat if you add the -In switch to traceroute.
traceroute -In 192.168.178.250
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-08 20:58 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <577ff7c8$0$5845$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> |
| In reply to | #3805 |
On 08-07-16 20:20, Bit Twister wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 19:44:38 +0200, Luuk wrote: >> I have setup a system with network like this: >> >> luuk@ubuntu1:~$ route >> Kernel IP routing table >> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface >> default 192.168.178.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 >> 10.0.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 >> 192.168.178.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 >> >> And created a script like this: >> >> luuk@ubuntu1:~$ cat doit.sh >> #!/bin/bash >> >> i="0" >> >> while [ $i -lt 4 ] >> do >> traceroute 192.168.178.250 >> sleep $1 >> i=$[$i+1] >> done >> >> >> Why dooes traceroute behave bad with shor pauses?: > > Because that node has been setup to not return your inquiry. > > It may help somewhat if you add the -In switch to traceroute. > traceroute -In 192.168.178.250 > This works (the '-I' option) Still have to do some reading about the cause of this ;) Thanks
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.networking
csiph-web