Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #1648 > unrolled thread

Re. Is this another September wave ?!

Started byno.top.post@gmail.com
First post2012-09-17 22:38 +0000
Last post2012-09-18 10:03 +0300
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.networking


Contents

  Re. Is this another September wave ?! no.top.post@gmail.com - 2012-09-17 22:38 +0000
    Re: Re. Is this another September wave ?! "Robert Blair" <nobody@nowhere.not> - 2012-09-18 00:49 -0500
    Re: Re. Is this another September wave ?! Eric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name> - 2012-09-18 10:03 +0300

#1648 — Re. Is this another September wave ?!

Fromno.top.post@gmail.com
Date2012-09-17 22:38 +0000
SubjectRe. Is this another September wave ?!
Message-ID<k388ov$n87$1@dont-email.me>
How's this for a possible scam:
they send emails to victims re. <we are updating your 
system; you must 'clik' this URL else your service will be stopped
in 10 days>.

For those who refuse the 'fill in the form', there an extra incentive:
by arranging a DOS on the ISP, the scammers make the victims 
BELIEVE that their problem is caused by NOT 'fill in the form' ?
And they tell their friends "you better fill in the form".

It's been a while since I last telneted a pop, but by just copying
my old logs, I tried this on my ISP2 which is NOW also failing pop:-
->  nc -v -w 60  mail.neomail.co.za  110
DNS fwd/rev mismatch: mail.neomail.co.za != www.neomail.co.za
mail.neomail.co.za [41.168.1.37] 110 (pop3) open
+OK Microsoft Exchange Server 2007 POP3 service ready
USER 0110246665@neomail.co.za  <-- waits, but no echo ?!
PASS ******
-ERR Protocol error. Connection is closed. 10
----------------
IIRC, you should get a reply to:
USER <somestring>

Or?

== TIA

BTW this neomail originally had a crappy web-based interface
and I was hppy to find pop/smtp access; so can I do that with
gmail?  What's their URL's?  Lately I've been using `links` to get
into my-gmail, but when I tried to abort [instead of logging out]
and log-in to the second account, it just went back to the first.
So thinking it may be cause by a cache effect, I did
`lynx gmail.com` which wouldn't use the cache of `links`.

What a load-of-crap: it just kept going back-and-forth
about <cookies and get the certificate> until I just pulled
out the wireless-modems plug.

It's getting worse by the day. How are other users finding it?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1649

From"Robert Blair" <nobody@nowhere.not>
Date2012-09-18 00:49 -0500
Message-ID<TECQXhvKj0FX-pn2-NcnZmWGzdFN3@SATURN.home>
In reply to#1648
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:38:24 UTC, no.top.post@gmail.com wrote:

> It's getting worse by the day. How are other users finding it?

I don't see anything referencing sendmail just complaining about an ISP.  So 
why are you here?

I have no problems with email but then I use a reliable hosting service to 
handle my email.  You might want to do the same.


-- 
Robert Blair

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1650

FromEric Pozharski <whynot@pozharski.name>
Date2012-09-18 10:03 +0300
Message-ID<slrnk5g72t.dg2.whynot@orphan.zombinet>
In reply to#1648
["Followup-To:" header set to comp.os.linux.networking.]
with <k388ov$n87$1@dont-email.me> no.top.post@gmail.com wrote:
*SKIP*

> BTW this neomail originally had a crappy web-based interface
> and I was hppy to find pop/smtp access; so can I do that with
> gmail?  What's their URL's?

	pop.gmail.com

BTW, you should look for manual configuration settings in web-mail user
help;  it may require so digging though.  And, no, that so called
linux-shop doesn't suggests fetchmailrc line, how ironic.

*SKIP*
> It's getting worse by the day. How are other users finding it?

It *is* for years.

-- 
Torvalds' goal for Linux is very simple: World Domination
Stallman's goal for GNU is even simpler: Freedom

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.networking


csiph-web