Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #5302 > unrolled thread

Re: difference between telnetd and in.telnetd?

Started byxiang Lin <myd.xia@gmail.com>
First post2023-05-16 19:04 -0700
Last post2023-05-17 21:14 +0200
Articles 5 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.networking

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: difference between telnetd and in.telnetd? xiang Lin <myd.xia@gmail.com> - 2023-05-16 19:04 -0700
    Re: difference between telnetd and in.telnetd? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-05-17 12:38 +0200
      Re: difference between telnetd and in.telnetd? Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2023-05-17 11:34 +0000
      Re: difference between telnetd and in.telnetd? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2023-05-17 15:59 +0200
        Re: difference between telnetd and in.telnetd? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2023-05-17 21:14 +0200

#5302 — Re: difference between telnetd and in.telnetd?

Fromxiang Lin <myd.xia@gmail.com>
Date2023-05-16 19:04 -0700
SubjectRe: difference between telnetd and in.telnetd?
Message-ID<d5ee84d5-6fe2-47ba-aaaf-a7daf3e984c2n@googlegroups.com>
在 2002年10月6日星期日 UTC+8 11:39:10,<ls0f> 写道:
> "Donald MacQueen" <dm...@erols.com> wrote in message
> news:ankb9l$dt2$1...@bob.news.rcn.net...
> > i installed rh 7.3 and my telnet file in /etc/xinetd.d looks like this:
> >
> > service telnet
> > {
> > flags = REUSE
> > socket_type = stream
> > wait = no
> > user = root
> > server = /usr/sbin/in.telnetd
> > log_on_failure += USERID
> > disable = no
> > }
> >
> > i have telnetd installed but not in.telnetd. what is the difference?
> >
> > is in.telnetd just a renamed copy of telnetd?
> >
> > if not, how do i install it?
> >
> > a google groups search was no help.
> >
> > thanks in advance.
> >
> >
> >
> mainly the gnu telnetd was named telnetd and the netkit telnetd was
> in.telnetd
in.telnetd seems for inetd only, inetd pass remote client's connected socket to in.telnetd's STDIN_FILENO,  telnetd is a single deamon listen on port and accept connect, then process client by itself.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#5303

From"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Date2023-05-17 12:38 +0200
Message-ID<renejjxtof.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
In reply to#5302
On 2023-05-17 04:04, xiang Lin wrote:
> 在 2002年10月6日星期日 UTC+8 11:39:10,<ls0f> 写道:

Please! Didn't you notice that you are replying to a post from year 
2002? More than two decades ago?


>> "Donald MacQueen" <dm...@erols.com> wrote in message
>> news:ankb9l$dt2$1...@bob.news.rcn.net...
>>> i installed rh 7.3 and my telnet file in /etc/xinetd.d looks like this:
>>>
>>> service telnet
>>> {
>>> flags = REUSE
>>> socket_type = stream
>>> wait = no
>>> user = root
>>> server = /usr/sbin/in.telnetd
>>> log_on_failure += USERID
>>> disable = no
>>> }
>>>
>>> i have telnetd installed but not in.telnetd. what is the difference?
>>>
>>> is in.telnetd just a renamed copy of telnetd?
>>>
>>> if not, how do i install it?
>>>
>>> a google groups search was no help.
>>>
>>> thanks in advance.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> mainly the gnu telnetd was named telnetd and the netkit telnetd was
>> in.telnetd
> in.telnetd seems for inetd only, inetd pass remote client's connected socket to in.telnetd's STDIN_FILENO,  telnetd is a single deamon listen on port and accept connect, then process client by itself.

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#5304

FromDan Purgert <dan@djph.net>
Date2023-05-17 11:34 +0000
Message-ID<slrnu69evn.t5.dan@djph.net>
In reply to#5303
On 2023-05-17, Carlos E.R. wrote:
> On 2023-05-17 04:04, xiang Lin wrote:
>> 在 2002年10月6日星期日 UTC+8 11:39:10,<ls0f> 写道:
>
> Please! Didn't you notice that you are replying to a post from year 
> 2002? More than two decades ago?

The post just made it through the great firewall :)


-- 
|_|O|_|
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1  E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#5305

FromMarc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us>
Date2023-05-17 15:59 +0200
Message-ID<u42mjs$2unav$1@news1.tnib.de>
In reply to#5303
"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
>On 2023-05-17 04:04, xiang Lin wrote:
>> ? 2002?10?6???? UTC+8 11:39:10?<ls0f> ???
>
>Please! Didn't you notice that you are replying to a post from year 
>2002? More than two decades ago?

Known UX issue with google groups. google doesn't care.

-- 
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber         |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany  |     Beginning of Wisdom "     | 
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#5306

From"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Date2023-05-17 21:14 +0200
Message-ID<emlfjjxt1g.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
In reply to#5305
On 2023-05-17 15:59, Marc Haber wrote:
> "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
>> On 2023-05-17 04:04, xiang Lin wrote:
>>> ? 2002?10?6???? UTC+8 11:39:10?<ls0f> ???
>>
>> Please! Didn't you notice that you are replying to a post from year
>> 2002? More than two decades ago?
> 
> Known UX issue with google groups. google doesn't care.

I know it is google groups, but unless we tell the posters committing 
this crime, they will never know and continue doing it.

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.networking


csiph-web