Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #1494 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ezequiel Birman <stormwatch@espiga4.com.ar> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-06-27 04:10 -0300 |
| Last post | 2012-06-30 21:48 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.networking
squid, bridge or gateway setup? Ezequiel Birman <stormwatch@espiga4.com.ar> - 2012-06-27 04:10 -0300
Re: squid, bridge or gateway setup? Martijn Lievaart <m@rtij.nl.invlalid> - 2012-06-30 00:49 +0200
Re: squid, bridge or gateway setup? Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2012-06-30 21:48 +0100
| From | Ezequiel Birman <stormwatch@espiga4.com.ar> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-06-27 04:10 -0300 |
| Subject | squid, bridge or gateway setup? |
| Message-ID | <87lij9qlh2.fsf@david.espiga4.com.ar> |
Hi. I'd like to set up squid (transparent) but i am not sure how. The router is Cisco RV042 v3 (same functionality as linksys RV042 v1). I think it doesn't support wccp. Should I set a bridge or is it possible to give the proxy server a fixed ip in the same subnet as the clients and configure the clients to use proxy ip as gateway (by means of dhcp)? -- Ezequiel Birman
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Martijn Lievaart <m@rtij.nl.invlalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-06-30 00:49 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <m1o1c9-7e8.ln1@news.rtij.nl> |
| In reply to | #1494 |
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 04:10:01 -0300, Ezequiel Birman wrote: > Hi. I'd like to set up squid (transparent) but i am not sure how. The > router is Cisco RV042 v3 (same functionality as linksys RV042 v1). I > think it doesn't support wccp. Should I set a bridge or is it possible > to give the proxy server a fixed ip in the same subnet as the clients > and configure the clients to use proxy ip as gateway (by means of dhcp)? Both possible. Both introduce a SPOF for non web Internet traffic. For the default gateway solution, don't forget to disable ICMP redirects on the squid box. Third solution, make the squid box the default gateway, make it a router instead of a bridge and put the Cisco behind the squid box. To avoid the SPOF, you can use a redundant squid box and use a virtual IP address (routing, default gateway) or spanning tree (bridge). There is not much to recommend one solution over the other. The default gateway solution has the disadvantage that traffic crosses the LAN twice. Unless you have a very fast Internet connection and only 100Mbit LAN, this is unlikely to be a real problem. And you can solve that with an etherchannel or a 1G port on the squid box. BTW, you do realize that people can always use some proxy on the Internet on some non standard port to bypass your proxy? And that your proxy will only work for the ports that get forwarded to it? If you want this proxy for security, a better solution is to block all traffic on the Internet connection, except for what is explicitly allowed. Allow the proxy box out, but not the workstations. Then tell people that if they want to surf the Internet, they have to use the proxy. Simpler network, better security. M4
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-06-30 21:48 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <a954c9x408.ln2@news.roaima.co.uk> |
| In reply to | #1501 |
Martijn Lievaart <m@rtij.nl.invlalid> wrote: > Then tell people that if they want to surf the Internet, they have to > use the proxy. Simpler network, better security. And this works better with certain scenarios, too, because the browser knows it's got a proxy in the chain. Chris
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.networking
csiph-web