Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #4375
| From | Theodore Heise <theise@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re: Quick question about routing |
| Date | 2019-04-27 14:28 +0000 |
| Organization | My own, such as it is |
| Message-ID | <slrnqc8poa.71s.theise@panix2.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <qa0e4d0egm@news2.newsguy.com> <qa0vg7$7av$1@saria.nerim.net> |
On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 09:14:14 +0200, Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> wrote: > Le 27/04/2019 ?? 04:17, szr a ??crit??: > > Ok, I have a LAN with the following notes: > > > > 192.168.1.254 - Main router / default gateway for LAN > > 192.168.1.4???? - Linux server (eth0) > > 192.168.1.8???? - Windows laptop > > > > Linux server (192.168.1.4) has ip(v4) forwarding enabled. > > Note : IP forwarding is not involved in your scenario. > > > As an experiment I added an ip, 10.0.0.4, as eth0:0. > > Note : use of eth0:0 alias is deprecated. You can just add > multiple addresses to eth0. > > > Then I added a static route for 10.0.0.0/8 using 192.168.1.4 > > as the gateway on the main router. > > > > After that, I ran `ping 10.0.0.4` from the Windows laptop and > > the ping was successful. > > > > While I do have plenty of networking experience and I'm not > > surprised that this worked, one thing sort of bugs me. > > > > I'm able to ping an ip in the 10.0.0.0/8 subnet from a host > > that only has an ip in the 192.168.1.0/24 subnet. I know that > > the laptop is using the route from the default gateway (the > > main router) > > No. A routing table is local. The laptop just uses its own > routing table. So does any other involved node (host or router) > in the path. > > The laptop routing table has 2 routes : > 192.168.1.0/24 direct > 0.0.0.0/0 via 192.168.1.254 > > 10.0.0.4 does not match the first route so use the default route and > send to the router. > > The router routing table has 3 routes : > 192.168.1.0/24 direct > 10.0.0.0/8 via 192.168.1.4 > 0.0.0.0/0 via some external ISP router > > 10.0.0.4 matches the second route so forward to 192.168.1.4 > (server). > > [Note : the router may also send an ICMP "redirect" message to > the laptop to inform it that 10.0.0.4 is directly reachable on > the network segment, and the laptop may update its routing > table to reflect this so that it sends subsequent packets to > 10.0.0.4 directly to the server.] > > The server routing table has 3 routes : > 192.168.1.0/24 direct > 10.0.0.0/8 direct > 0.0.0.0/0 via 192.168.1.254 > > 10.0.0.4 is assigned to a local interface so accept the packet and reply > to the source 192.168.1.8 (laptop). > 192.168.1.8 matches the first route so send directly to the laptop. Very clear explanation, thank you! -- Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> West Lafayette, IN, USA
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Quick question about routing szr <szr@sREzMOrVEoman.com> - 2019-04-26 19:17 -0700
Re: Quick question about routing William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2019-04-27 03:02 +0000
Re: Quick question about routing Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2019-04-27 09:14 +0200
Re: Quick question about routing Theodore Heise <theise@panix.com> - 2019-04-27 14:28 +0000
Re: Quick question about routing szr <szr@sREzMOrVEoman.com> - 2019-04-27 08:03 -0700
csiph-web