Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #1759
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.mixmin.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!newsfeed.pionier.net.pl!pwr.wroc.pl!news.wcss.wroc.pl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | orcus@pwr.wroc.pl |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re: 192.168 |
| Date | Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:54:34 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | Politechnika Wroclawska |
| Lines | 14 |
| Message-ID | <slrnk838b8.idd.orcus@orcus.wcss.wroc.pl> (permalink) |
| References | <6058c85a-c77d-4853-9ca0-7e2b7f875bf9@googlegroups.com> <h9Jfs.16577$vv4.13491@newsfe02.iad> <876268i40f.fsf@araminta.anjou.terraraq.org.uk> <k5qpom$72q$1@node1.news.atman.pl> <k5r98m$is7$1@dont-email.me> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | orcus.wcss.wroc.pl |
| X-Trace | z-news.wcss.wroc.pl 1350672874 1157 156.17.1.3 (19 Oct 2012 18:54:34 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@news.pwr.wroc.pl |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:54:34 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | slrn/pre1.0.0-18 (Linux) |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.os.linux.networking:1759 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2012-10-19, Noob <root@127.0.0.1> wrote: >> IMHO there's no such thing like non-routable IP address range, > > The address ranges defined in RFC1918 are non-routable by definition. > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1918 Usage of term "non-routable" is misleading. If you want you can set up routes for private addresses. Every subnet using "non-routable" addresses has routing set up for them(default gateway or on-link routes at least). -- Regards orcus
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
192.168 bob@coolfone.comze.com - 2012-10-17 08:37 -0700
Re: 192.168 Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2012-10-17 16:40 +0100
Re: 192.168 ein <ein@no.spam> - 2012-10-17 20:04 +0200
Re: 192.168 Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2012-10-17 21:23 +0200
Re: 192.168 ein <ein@no.spam> - 2012-10-17 22:37 +0200
Re: 192.168 Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2012-10-18 18:29 +0200
Re: 192.168 ein <ein@no.spam> - 2012-10-19 07:54 +0200
Re: 192.168 Maurizio Loreti <mlo@foobar.it> - 2012-10-17 20:37 +0200
Re: 192.168 unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2012-10-18 01:43 +0000
Re: 192.168 Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2012-10-18 09:22 +0100
Re: 192.168 ein <ein@no.spam> - 2012-10-19 07:51 +0200
Re: 192.168 Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2012-10-19 12:16 +0200
Re: 192.168 orcus@pwr.wroc.pl - 2012-10-19 18:54 +0000
Re: 192.168 Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-10-20 06:51 +0000
Re: 192.168 orcus@pwr.wroc.pl - 2012-10-20 07:46 +0000
Re: 192.168 Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-10-20 08:00 +0000
Re: 192.168 orcus@pwr.wroc.pl - 2012-10-20 13:43 +0000
Re: 192.168 Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-10-20 14:15 +0000
Re: 192.168 orcus@pwr.wroc.pl - 2012-10-20 14:54 +0000
Re: 192.168 Moe Trin <ibuprofin@painkiller.example.tld.invalid> - 2012-10-20 15:21 -0500
Re: 192.168 Moe Trin <ibuprofin@painkiller.example.tld.invalid> - 2012-10-20 15:20 -0500
Re: 192.168 Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-10-20 13:55 +0200
Re: 192.168 unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2012-10-21 00:33 +0000
Re: 192.168 orcus@pwr.wroc.pl - 2012-10-21 10:22 +0000
Re: 192.168 Markus Koßmann <mkossmann_n1@gmx.de> - 2012-10-21 15:53 +0200
Re: 192.168 GangGreene <GangGreene@example.com> - 2012-10-21 07:06 -0400
Re: 192.168 Vanni <Vanniz@nospam.thanks> - 2012-10-18 07:56 +0200
Re: 192.168 Johann Klammer <klammerj@NOSPAM.a1.net> - 2012-10-18 06:40 +0200
csiph-web