Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #2075
| From | buck <buck@private.mil> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re: iptables string match |
| Date | 2013-04-01 22:36 +0000 |
| Organization | Say What? |
| Message-ID | <kjd24s0ghu@news4.newsguy.com> (permalink) |
| References | <kjcoc806d9@news4.newsguy.com> <g1cp2a-rhd.ln1@news.rtij.nl> |
Martijn Lievaart <m@rtij.nl.invlalid> wrote in news:g1cp2a-rhd.ln1@news.rtij.nl: > On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 19:49:28 +0000, buck wrote: > >> Is it possible to match a string in nat table PREROUTING? I suspect >> PREROUTING only sees new connections, so the content of the packet >> cannot be examined. > > PREROUTING sees all packets before routing, however, the nat table > sees only the first packet of each connection. > >> >> If not in nat, can mangle be used to mark packets matching a string> >> If > > Should work. > >> so, can such a marked patcket be DNATted? How? > > Yes and no. What do you want to achieve? If it is not the first packet > of a "connection", DNATting proabably does not do what you want. > > M4 Thanks! This may sound foolish, but there is very good reason for it. I run IBM OmniFInd, which is the same crawler engine as Yahoo! uses to index web pages. I need to serve a substitute robots.txt when OmniFind asks a remote host for its robots.txt. The reason is that this is the fastest and most reliable way to purge from OmniFind those links that are 404 or 410 (not found / gone). I have no control over when OmniFind requests robots.txt from that particular remote host, so debugging is difficult. What I've done is to set up a small web server on my gateway box that listens on port 1080 and serves only robots.txt (containing 559 bad links right now). I hope that something like iptables -t mangle -I PREROUTING -p tcp -m string --string robots.txt \ -j MARK --set-mark 0x2 iptables -t nat -I OUTPUT -p tcp -m mark --mark 0x2 -j REDIRECT \ --to-ports 1080 will cause the marked packets to be sent to my web server. And accomplish the objective... Note that the iptables "mangle" line above has been edited in hopes that removing a bunch of "stuff" will improve clarity with respect to what I'm trying to accomplish. -- buck
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
iptables string match buck <buck@private.mil> - 2013-04-01 19:49 +0000
Re: iptables string match Martijn Lievaart <m@rtij.nl.invlalid> - 2013-04-01 23:50 +0200
Re: iptables string match buck <buck@private.mil> - 2013-04-01 22:36 +0000
Re: iptables string match Martijn Lievaart <m@rtij.nl.invlalid> - 2013-04-02 19:52 +0200
csiph-web