Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #1203
| From | Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re: IPv6 SLAAC-Adresse herunterpriorisieren? |
| Date | 2012-03-24 20:41 +0100 |
| Organization | Plouf ! |
| Message-ID | <jkl815$b2c$1@saria.nerim.net> (permalink) |
| References | <jkhh6u$udm$1@news1.tnib.de> <jkk7ea$30on$1@saria.nerim.net> <slrnjmrjsi.1ls.grahn+nntp@frailea.sa.invalid> |
Jorgen Grahn a écrit : > On Sat, 2012-03-24, Pascal Hambourg wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Marc Haber a écrit : >> (automatic translation from german as I do not speak the language) > > Thanks! > >>> Can I somehow through local configuration or configuration >>> ensure the radvd on the router that the same address SLAAC >>> is taught as "deprecated", making it suitable for outgoing connections >>> the statically configured address does? Unfortunately, can nagios' >>> check_ssh plugin not set the source address. > > Unfortunately, it still doesn't make sense to me. Sure, some words are out of order, but it makes sense to me. What about this : "Can I somehow, through local configuration or configuration of radvd on the router, ensure that the SLAAC address is taught as "deprecated", making the statically configured address suitable for outgoing connections ? Unfortunately, nagios check_ssh plugin cannot set the source address." >> IME, IPv6 static addresses are preferred over autoconfigured addresses. > > Why? I set it up with radvd here some time ago, and I found it rather > elegant. The only drawback I can see is long addresses Maybe there is a misunderstanding in the meaning of "preferred". I did not mean it as "recommended practice". I just mean that in my experience, when a Linux host has both statically assigned and autoconfigured IPv6 addresses in the same prefix, the IPv6 stack always select the statically assigned address by default. This makes sense to me, because through static assignment the administrator wants the host to use that specific address.
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
IPv6 SLAAC-Adresse herunterpriorisieren? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2012-03-23 10:53 +0100
Re: IPv6 SLAAC-Adresse herunterpriorisieren? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-03-24 11:25 +0100
Re: IPv6 SLAAC-Adresse herunterpriorisieren? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-03-24 13:43 +0000
Re: IPv6 SLAAC-Adresse herunterpriorisieren? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2012-03-24 20:41 +0100
Re: IPv6 SLAAC-Adresse herunterpriorisieren? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2012-03-24 21:49 +0000
Re: IPv6 SLAAC-Adresse herunterpriorisieren? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2012-04-02 22:10 +0200
Re: IPv6 SLAAC-Adresse herunterpriorisieren? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2012-04-02 22:08 +0200
Re: IPv6 SLAAC-Adresse herunterpriorisieren? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2012-04-02 22:07 +0200
Re: IPv6 SLAAC-Adresse herunterpriorisieren? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2012-03-26 06:50 +0200
Reduce priority of an IPv6 SLAAC adderss (was: IPv6 SLAAC-Adresse herunterpriorisieren?) Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2012-03-26 06:55 +0200
csiph-web