Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #2021
| From | Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re: IPv6 and ip6tables |
| Date | 2013-03-12 16:14 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <87r4jkoasq.fsf@violet.siamics.net> (permalink) |
| References | <dc9f63ef-02b6-47aa-8182-ad92d9443922@googlegroups.com> <87vc8xod1j.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <1d4bdfce-c0c1-4727-9176-964d2461c285@googlegroups.com> |
>>>>> geckolimo <geckolimo@gmail.com> writes: >>>>> On Monday, March 11, 2013 10:13:28 PM UTC+1, Ivan Shmakov wrote: [...] >> Is there really such an all-permitting rule? > In fact it is for loopback only (-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT) but for > some reason -L doesn't show that. That's why I'd recommend to always refer to ip6tables-save(8) (and not # ip6tables -L) output while troubleshooting. [...] > Only a few lines popped up in my log, all of them being PROTO=ICMPv6 > TYPE=135 or TYPE=136, that is neighbor advertisements and > solicitations. They were not specifically printed at the same time > than the NTP request. I tried to allow them nonetheless: [...] > Now my NTP server is reachable! > I don't know if it is related with my provider's network architecture > (I have a VPS server hosted by gandi.net) or if it is the common > behavior of NTP over IPv6. Actually, it's a common behavior of /IPv6,/ when an Ethernet-style network interface is used. (Which apparently is the case.) To note is that ICMPv6-based neighbor discovery assumes the role played by ARP in IPv4 Ethernets. > I should note I've already had ICMPv6-related issues in the past: I > had to turn on router-solicitation and router-advertisement to get a > global IPv6 address at all. It's possible to configure IPv6 address manually, thus these aren't strictly necessary. I'd recommend against such a manual configuration, however, unless there's a compelling reason to use one. > What should be enabled is still a bit arcane to me. > Anyway, everything looks fine now! -- FSF associate member #7257
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: IPv6 and ip6tables Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2013-03-11 21:13 +0000
Re: IPv6 and ip6tables geckolimo@gmail.com - 2013-03-12 08:51 -0700
Re: IPv6 and ip6tables Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> - 2013-03-12 16:14 +0000
csiph-web