Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #4526

Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat

From "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.networking
Subject Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat
Date 2020-03-30 23:00 +0200
Message-ID <593alg-01p.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> (permalink)
References (16 earlier) <r5m0ga$h46$2@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> <ssr4lg-qc9.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <r5ogek$9ht$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> <a7m5lg-mqt.ln1@Telcontar.valinor> <r5qjqs$aq6$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On 29/03/2020 18.53, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 3/28/20 10:53 PM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>> I knew of separate networks that used Fidonet protocols and software, 
>> but not connected to it. But I did not know, in my country, of 
>> different protocols to form a BBS network …
> 
> Agreed.
> 
>> … except perhaps to connect a very small number of BBS, like two or 
>> three that had some areas in common.
> 
> I suspect that type of thing happened a number of places on a very small 
> scale.  There needs to be a good reason to not re-use FTN if both boards 
> support it.  The only reason that I can think of is if one of the boards 
> does not support FTN and something else must be used between them.
> 
>> Also I heard, this century, that Fidonet software was used and 
>> developed in Russia, at least for some years.
> 
> I heard it described as Russians are the predominant remaining users of 
> FidoNet (proper) and / or FTNs.  The subtext was that it's a 
> communications mechanism that survives that doesn't /depend/ on the 
> Internet.  Since the Russians are the predominant users, they are the 
> logical place for most support to come from, ergo development.

Yes.

Maybe it is more resilient to eavesdropping, unless they hack one of the 
nodes. Maybe they have added cryptography to it :-?


-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat navinpksh@gmail.com - 2020-03-26 01:18 -0700
  Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-03-26 11:41 +0000
  Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2020-03-26 14:13 +0200
  Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-26 13:55 +0100
    Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat navinpksh@gmail.com - 2020-03-26 07:05 -0700
      Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-26 22:05 +0100
      Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-26 15:59 -0600
        Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat navinpksh@gmail.com - 2020-03-27 10:15 -0700
          Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-27 13:23 -0600
          Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-27 13:34 -0600
          Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-27 21:52 +0100
            Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-27 15:52 -0600
              Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-27 23:23 +0100
                Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-27 16:59 -0600
                Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> - 2020-03-28 12:44 +0000
                Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-28 22:24 +0100
                Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-28 15:43 -0600
                Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-29 06:53 +0200
                Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2020-03-29 01:28 -0400
                Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-29 15:13 +0200
                Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-29 10:53 -0600
                Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-03-30 23:00 +0200
                Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-03-30 18:46 -0600
                Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-04-01 05:52 +0200
                Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> - 2020-04-01 10:03 -0600
                Re: Understanding Send-Q and Recv-Q by netstat "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2020-04-01 22:25 +0200

csiph-web