Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.networking > #4996
| From | Marco Moock <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.networking |
| Subject | Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP |
| Date | 2021-11-07 11:09 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20211107110901.54cb4512@ryz> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <20211106193516.286599e5@ryz> <sm6mi8$5ns$1@dont-email.me> <sm6rf6$ann$1@dont-email.me> <20211107102252.1595d91e@ryz> <6187a1bf$0$8890$426a34cc@news.free.fr> |
Am Sun, 7 Nov 2021 10:51:59 +0100 schrieb Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org>: > How is that different from IPv4 CGNAT ? It results in the same, but there is no direct IPv4 connection to the provider like CG-NAT, IPv4 is being tunneled. > Dual-Stack Lite is a promising approach that takes the best of NAT464 > while avoiding its problems: It uses IPv6-only links between the > provider and the customer, but does not use NAT64 translation. When a > device in the customer network sends an IPv4 packet to an external > destination, the IPv4 packet is encapsulated in an IPv6 packet for > transport into the provider network. At the LSN, the packet is > decapsulated and NAT44 is performed (Figure 1). Tunneling IPv4 over > IPv6 is far simpler than translation, so the performance and > redundancy concerns are eliminated. https://www.networkworld.com/article/2232181/understanding-dual-stack-lite.html
Back to comp.os.linux.networking | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
incoming ssh blocked by ISP Bob Tennent <rdtennent@tennent.ca> - 2021-11-06 15:28 +0000
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2021-11-06 16:28 +0000
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Bob Tennent <rdtennent@tennent.ca> - 2021-11-06 21:33 +0000
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2021-11-06 21:54 +0000
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-11-06 23:13 +0100
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2021-11-06 19:16 -0400
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-11-07 00:28 +0100
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2021-11-07 03:03 +0000
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Marco Moock <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2021-11-07 12:44 +0100
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2021-11-06 17:57 -0400
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2021-11-06 18:01 -0400
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Bob Tennent <rdtennent@tennent.ca> - 2021-11-07 01:56 +0000
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Bob Tennent <rdtennent@tennent.ca> - 2021-11-07 21:21 +0000
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2021-11-07 19:05 -0500
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2021-11-07 22:51 -0600
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Bob Tennent <rdtennent@tennent.ca> - 2021-11-08 01:18 +0000
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2021-11-07 21:25 -0500
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Bit Twister <BitTwister@mouse-potato.com> - 2021-11-07 23:35 -0600
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2021-11-07 02:51 +0000
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-11-06 22:47 +0100
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2021-11-10 13:13 +0000
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2021-11-06 13:43 -0400
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2021-11-06 19:18 +0100
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Marco Moock <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2021-11-06 19:35 +0100
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2021-11-06 19:54 +0000
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Bob Tennent <rdtennent@tennent.ca> - 2021-11-06 21:18 +0000
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-11-06 22:47 +0100
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-11-06 23:56 +0100
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2021-11-06 23:44 +0100
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2021-11-06 23:54 +0100
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2021-11-07 10:07 +0100
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Marco Moock <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2021-11-07 10:22 +0100
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Pascal Hambourg <pascal@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2021-11-07 10:51 +0100
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Marco Moock <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2021-11-07 11:09 +0100
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Joe Beanfish <joebeanfish@nospam.duh> - 2021-11-08 14:52 +0000
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Bob Tennent <rdtennent@tennent.ca> - 2021-11-14 16:42 +0000
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> - 2021-11-14 18:01 +0100
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2021-11-14 13:08 -0500
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Bob Tennent <rdtennent@tennent.ca> - 2021-11-14 19:20 +0000
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2021-11-14 15:06 -0500
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP Bob Tennent <rdtennent@tennent.ca> - 2021-11-14 21:03 +0000
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2021-11-14 16:28 -0500
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2021-11-15 04:19 -0600
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP William Unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2021-11-15 20:18 +0000
Re: incoming ssh blocked by ISP ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2021-11-15 04:18 -0600
csiph-web