Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #70391 > unrolled thread

More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master

Started byjroot <jr@gnurocks.info>
First post2025-08-05 18:36 +0000
Last post2025-08-09 20:01 +0200
Articles 7 on this page of 27 — 15 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc


Contents

  More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master jroot <jr@gnurocks.info> - 2025-08-05 18:36 +0000
    Re: More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-05 21:34 +0200
      Re: More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-08-06 07:37 +0200
        Re: More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-06 12:18 +0200
      Re: More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-06 13:46 +0100
        Re: More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-07 22:11 +0200
          Re: More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-08-07 14:57 -0700
      Re: More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-09 10:45 +0000
    Re: More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-08-06 07:46 +0000
      Re: More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-06 03:58 -0400
        Re: More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-08-06 23:39 +0000
      It must be a troll (was: Re: More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-08-06 23:51 +0000
        Re: It must be a troll (was: Re: More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master) Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-08-07 08:00 +0000
          Re: It must be a troll (was: Re: More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master) Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-08-07 19:36 +0000
            Re: It must be a troll "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-07 15:54 -0400
              Re: It must be a troll Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-08-09 08:43 +0000
              Re: It must be a troll candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-08-11 19:40 +0000
                Re: It must be a troll rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-08-12 01:47 +0000
                Re: More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-06 06:47 +0000
            Re: It must be a troll (was: Re: More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master) Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-09 12:43 +0000
              Re: It must be a troll (was: Re: More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master) Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-08-09 12:59 +0000
                Re: It must be a troll (was: Re: More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master) Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-08-09 21:31 +0000
              Re: It must be a troll Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-09 16:20 +0100
                Re: It must be a troll "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-09 11:31 -0400
                  Re: It must be a troll Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-09 17:19 +0100
                    Re: It must be a troll "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-08-09 12:51 -0400
                    Re: It must be a troll "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-08-09 20:01 +0200

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]


#70680 — Re: It must be a troll (was: Re: More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master)

FromFarley Flud <ff@linux.rocks>
Date2025-08-09 12:59 +0000
SubjectRe: It must be a troll (was: Re: More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master)
Message-ID<pan$5e0b8$258fd9e4$b3db588f$2c6e75ac@linux.rocks>
In reply to#70676
On 09 Aug 2025 12:43:17 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

> 
>> -- but, for a personal workstation BPF is
>> totally superfluous and can be easily eliminated.
> 
> I'm not sure you know what you are talking about.
> 

But I *am* sure that you *don't* know what you are talking
about.

You waste time arguing with a supreme GNU/Linux master (that's
me) and that *proves* that you a total lackey idiot.

Now get back to you "canned" distro and do what you are told.

Pathetic slave.



-- 
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#70706 — Re: It must be a troll (was: Re: More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master)

FromStéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr>
Date2025-08-09 21:31 +0000
SubjectRe: It must be a troll (was: Re: More Horrifying Sacrilege From A GNU/Linux Master)
Message-ID<6897be30$0$28067$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
In reply to#70680
[En-tête "Followup-To:" positionné à comp.os.linux.advocacy]
Le 09-08-2025, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> a écrit :
> On 09 Aug 2025 12:43:17 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
>> 
>>> -- but, for a personal workstation BPF is
>>> totally superfluous and can be easily eliminated.
>> 
>> I'm not sure you know what you are talking about.
>
> But I *am* sure that you *don't* know what you are talking
> about.

OK, thanks for your confirmation.

> You waste time arguing with a supreme GNU/Linux master 

One never waste time arguing with a supreme Linux master. Because there
is always something good to learn.

> (that's me) 

If you were a Linux master, you wouldn't break your system when
compiling your kernel with options you don't understand. But mostly, you
wouldn't need to write the same command twice because you would know
better.

I'm not arguing with you because it would be a total waste of my time.
I'm having fun with you. It's different.

-- 
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#70689 — Re: It must be a troll

FromRichard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Date2025-08-09 16:20 +0100
SubjectRe: It must be a troll
Message-ID<wwva548wmhl.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk>
In reply to#70676
Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> writes:
> When hearing a barking dog, no sane human being would try to explain to
> it why it's wrong. For the same reason no one could teach a dog to
> understand something, no one could teach a chair and, of course, no one
> could teach you anything. So, everyone let you bark and avoid loosing
> time to explain to you the basic of computer management.

And yet you are responding to them, multiple times...

-- 
https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#70690 — Re: It must be a troll

From"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Date2025-08-09 11:31 -0400
SubjectRe: It must be a troll
Message-ID<HRJlQ.50937$k2t5.6011@fx46.iad>
In reply to#70689
On 8/9/25 11:20 AM, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> writes:

>> When hearing a barking dog, no sane human being would try to explain to
>> it why it's wrong. For the same reason no one could teach a dog to
>> understand something, no one could teach a chair and, of course, no one
>> could teach you anything. So, everyone let you bark and avoid loosing
>> time to explain to you the basic of computer management.
> 
> And yet you are responding to them, multiple times...


Yeah, because the audience should hear refutations of Larry's nutty 
bullshit.  Stéphane has the right answers.  Larry gets pwned time and 
again.  But keeps posting his stupid nonsense, endlessly.  Really pathetic.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#70691 — Re: It must be a troll

FromRichard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Date2025-08-09 17:19 +0100
SubjectRe: It must be a troll
Message-ID<wwva5481n85.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk>
In reply to#70690
"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> writes:
> On 8/9/25 11:20 AM, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
>> Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> writes:
>>> When hearing a barking dog, no sane human being would try to explain to
>>> it why it's wrong. For the same reason no one could teach a dog to
>>> understand something, no one could teach a chair and, of course, no one
>>> could teach you anything. So, everyone let you bark and avoid loosing
>>> time to explain to you the basic of computer management.
>> And yet you are responding to them, multiple times...
>
> Yeah, because the audience should hear refutations of Larry's nutty
> bullshit.

This part of ‘the audience’ disagrees.

> Stéphane has the right answers.  Larry gets pwned time and again.  But
> keeps posting his stupid nonsense, endlessly.  Really pathetic.

From my point of view the responses are just as pathetic.

Followups set. I won’t be engaging on this point any further.

-- 
https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#70692 — Re: It must be a troll

From"Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Date2025-08-09 12:51 -0400
SubjectRe: It must be a troll
Message-ID<O0LlQ.589409$S5z3.496937@fx17.iad>
In reply to#70691
On 8/9/25 12:19 PM, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> writes:
>> On 8/9/25 11:20 AM, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
>>> Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> writes:

>>>> When hearing a barking dog, no sane human being would try to explain to
>>>> it why it's wrong. For the same reason no one could teach a dog to
>>>> understand something, no one could teach a chair and, of course, no one
>>>> could teach you anything. So, everyone let you bark and avoid loosing
>>>> time to explain to you the basic of computer management.
>>> And yet you are responding to them, multiple times...
>>
>> Yeah, because the audience should hear refutations of Larry's nutty
>> bullshit.
> 
> This part of ‘the audience’ disagrees.
> 
>> Stéphane has the right answers.  Larry gets pwned time and again.  But
>> keeps posting his stupid nonsense, endlessly.  Really pathetic.
> 
>  From my point of view the responses are just as pathetic.
> 
> Followups set. I won’t be engaging on this point any further.


You're entitled to your opinion.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#70694 — Re: It must be a troll

From"Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Date2025-08-09 20:01 +0200
SubjectRe: It must be a troll
Message-ID<uvekmlxd2i.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
In reply to#70691
On 2025-08-09 18:19, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> writes:
>> On 8/9/25 11:20 AM, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
>>> Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> writes:
>>>> When hearing a barking dog, no sane human being would try to explain to
>>>> it why it's wrong. For the same reason no one could teach a dog to
>>>> understand something, no one could teach a chair and, of course, no one
>>>> could teach you anything. So, everyone let you bark and avoid loosing
>>>> time to explain to you the basic of computer management.
>>> And yet you are responding to them, multiple times...
>>
>> Yeah, because the audience should hear refutations of Larry's nutty
>> bullshit.
> 
> This part of ‘the audience’ disagrees.
> 
>> Stéphane has the right answers.  Larry gets pwned time and again.  But
>> keeps posting his stupid nonsense, endlessly.  Really pathetic.
> 
>  From my point of view the responses are just as pathetic.
> 
> Followups set. I won’t be engaging on this point any further.
> 

I appreciate confirmations that a troll is a troll.

-- 
Cheers, Carlos.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc


csiph-web