Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #63096 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-12-26 08:41 -0500 |
| Last post | 2025-01-03 11:32 +0100 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 42 participants
Thread has 1322 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1322 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-26 08:41 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-26 17:13 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 10:57 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-26 19:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 11:59 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-26 20:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 12:37 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 14:26 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-27 14:41 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2024-12-27 10:42 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 16:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-28 07:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-28 15:12 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 14:51 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-29 11:14 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-29 17:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-29 14:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2024-12-29 16:00 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-29 17:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 04:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 09:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-30 08:40 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-30 23:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-30 18:18 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-31 03:04 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 11:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-31 20:08 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-31 20:29 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 08:32 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 10:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 08:53 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-31 20:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 10:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-31 06:04 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 09:39 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 17:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-31 18:56 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:21 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 19:39 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-28 13:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:22 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-27 07:56 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 08:00 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 20:52 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-27 09:25 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-27 10:08 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-27 06:34 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 00:10 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-28 08:22 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:04 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-28 17:21 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 12:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-28 12:47 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 19:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Diego Garcia <dg@chaos.rocks> - 2024-12-28 19:13 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-28 23:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 23:47 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-29 09:37 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-29 07:34 -0500
Re: GIMP (and digiKam and other photo management programs) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-29 22:02 +0000
Re: GIMP (and digiKam and other photo management programs) Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-29 18:56 -0500
Re: GIMP (and digiKam and other photo management programs) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 04:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 12:54 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-30 10:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-31 02:49 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 13:23 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 08:47 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-31 20:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 21:41 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 11:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-29 21:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lem Novantotto <Lem@none.invalid> - 2024-12-28 20:49 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 (and digiKam and showFoto) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-29 00:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 (and digiKam and showFoto) "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-29 01:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 (and digiKam and showFoto) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-29 01:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 (and digiKam and showFoto) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-29 21:53 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 (and digiKam and showFoto) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-29 14:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-29 08:15 +1000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:29 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-29 07:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 12:53 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-30 10:15 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-31 07:31 +1000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:40 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 08:55 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-31 20:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-01 01:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-01 07:53 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 21:46 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 12:49 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-01 21:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-01 21:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 23:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-02 02:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-02 12:30 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-02 20:04 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-03 01:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 03:13 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-03 12:32 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-03 11:48 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:13 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 06:44 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-03 06:58 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-03 12:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-03 08:32 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-03 14:02 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-03 11:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-03 16:43 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-03 13:37 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 01:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:13 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-04 06:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2025-01-04 10:58 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 18:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-04 15:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 23:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 23:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:06 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-05 12:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 20:52 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 00:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-05 09:14 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 22:25 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 23:54 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:21 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2025-01-05 10:17 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-04 13:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-04 15:54 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 21:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 00:11 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 22:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2025-01-05 10:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-05 13:22 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 20:57 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-06 08:49 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-06 15:02 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-06 14:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-06 19:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-06 15:54 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-06 16:20 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-06 17:37 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-06 22:57 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 08:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 09:17 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 11:26 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 11:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 13:14 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 13:30 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 13:44 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 14:07 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:00 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 09:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-07 16:35 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 17:46 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:12 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-07 21:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 12:12 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-08 09:45 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-07 22:47 +0000
Time machine backups Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-08 02:49 +0000
Re: Time machine backups vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-08 04:22 +0000
Re: Time machine backups Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-08 14:25 +0000
Re: Time machine backups D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:21 +0100
Re: Time machine backups The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 11:58 +0000
Re: Time machine backups Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-08 14:37 +0000
Re: Time machine backups Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:25 +0000
Re: Time machine backups Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2025-01-08 18:28 +0000
Re: Time machine backups Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-08 19:24 +0000
Re: Time machine backups vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-08 20:27 +0000
Re: Time machine backups D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 18:05 +0100
Re: Time machine backups "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-08 13:47 +0100
Re: Time machine backups The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 13:19 +0000
Re: Time machine backups D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:51 +0100
Re: Time machine backups The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:37 +0000
Re: Time machine backups D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:02 +0100
Re: Time machine backups The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-07 20:52 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 17:03 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:05 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 11:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-08 16:45 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 17:53 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 00:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 20:18 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 00:29 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 09:58 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-01-09 15:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 18:50 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 10:20 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 10:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 18:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-10 07:31 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-10 04:09 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-10 09:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-10 04:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-10 09:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-10 06:17 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 00:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-10 09:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-10 21:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-11 07:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-09 10:55 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 19:00 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 19:06 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 19:02 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:07 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-09 06:56 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 10:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 18:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 19:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:08 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 19:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:56 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:07 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-09 08:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-09 16:14 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 17:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-10 02:19 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-10 08:59 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-09 17:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-10 06:55 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-10 09:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-10 13:57 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-10 16:20 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-11 07:08 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-11 07:21 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-11 08:28 -0500
What change of position? YA unsubstantiated claim from luzer-v (was: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-12 06:45 -0500
Re: What change of position? YA unsubstantiated claim from luzer-v (was: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-12 07:43 -0600
TL;DR: cry harder! (was: What change of position? YA unsubstantiated claim from luzer-v) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-12 14:08 -0500
Re: TL;DR: idiot and liar claims "victory"! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-12 22:50 -0600
Climate change mitigations Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-08 02:37 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-07 16:10 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 16:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 17:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:06 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 11:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 07:19 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 13:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 08:59 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 15:37 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 11:27 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 17:04 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 13:05 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 14:47 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 23:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 18:58 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:56 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 13:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 12:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:51 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:04 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:31 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:26 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 23:02 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 12:00 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 11:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:39 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-12 23:55 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:33 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 20:45 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 01:35 +0000
Races, Tribes and other ethnicities Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-15 02:33 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2025-01-15 06:30 +0200
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 00:49 -0500
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:12 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-15 10:53 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 18:55 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-15 18:28 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 22:16 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 10:21 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:05 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 00:11 -0500
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 16:52 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 01:19 -0500
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:49 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 22:51 -0500
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 10:46 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:51 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-15 10:51 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 23:17 -0500
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 06:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 09:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-15 10:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 18:58 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 22:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 00:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 10:26 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:05 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 00:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 22:50 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 10:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 22:04 +0000
Tribes and Ethnicities Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-16 13:30 +0000
Re: Tribes and Ethnicities Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2025-01-16 20:36 +0200
Re: Tribes and Ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 18:50 +0000
Re: Tribes and Ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 21:15 +0100
Re: Tribes and Ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:41 +0000
Re: Tribes and Ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 16:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 22:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:29 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 22:02 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 11:53 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 21:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:22 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 22:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 00:57 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 21:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 10:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 21:56 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:25 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 11:52 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 21:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:21 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:43 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 23:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 10:48 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-18 19:39 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 11:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-19 18:11 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 23:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-19 13:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-19 18:42 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-16 08:08 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 21:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:26 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 10:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-13 05:14 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 04:02 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:35 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 10:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:28 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 20:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 01:37 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:00 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 04:14 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 10:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:08 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 22:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:27 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:29 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:26 +0000
Biker Gangs Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-14 17:43 +0000
Re: Biker Gangs D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 22:02 +0100
Re: Biker Gangs rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 02:11 +0000
Re: Biker Gangs D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:04 +0100
Re: Biker Gangs The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-15 10:50 +0000
Re: Biker Gangs D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 18:54 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 19:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 11:54 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:13 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:26 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 21:53 +0000
Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-14 17:40 +0000
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 01:57 +0000
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 00:29 -0500
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 06:27 +0000
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 01:51 -0500
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:11 +0100
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 23:06 +0000
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 11:56 +0100
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 23:39 -0500
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 16:51 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 19:31 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 19:39 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 20:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 11:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:15 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:26 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:13 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 18:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 13:55 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 14:00 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 14:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Beavis <beavis@corn.holio> - 2025-01-09 04:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 10:34 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 10:38 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 11:27 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 11:34 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 11:51 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-10 02:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-09 11:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 11:47 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 12:12 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 18:56 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-08 19:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 12:04 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-07 11:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-06 18:35 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-02-08 06:41 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 02:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-08 13:21 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-08 18:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-08 18:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-08 19:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 13:41 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:23 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 23:07 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-09 20:46 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 07:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:08 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 19:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:04 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 20:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-10 23:14 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 11:58 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 20:03 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 12:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 19:43 +0000
Business cultures Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-11 20:32 +0000
Re: Business cultures D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 22:11 +0100
Re: Business cultures rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:15 +0000
Re: Business cultures rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:11 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 22:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 11:35 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 20:46 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-09 12:28 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 18:18 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-08 19:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 13:55 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 14:13 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-08 20:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:43 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-11 07:23 +1000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:51 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-11 21:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 11:31 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 23:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 07:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-09 03:18 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 18:08 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-09 22:32 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-09 11:32 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 19:21 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-09 21:54 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 09:30 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-11 07:44 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 07:53 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-14 05:10 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 23:29 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 08:17 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-12 20:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 20:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 13:21 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-13 21:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 17:09 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 14:54 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-13 04:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 23:41 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-13 11:21 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-13 22:10 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 22:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:43 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-14 20:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 22:51 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-14 05:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-15 23:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-15 21:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-19 20:10 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:45 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-13 08:03 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-13 18:14 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-15 07:34 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-15 21:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-16 03:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 22:51 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-16 04:51 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-16 01:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-13 07:34 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 21:10 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-15 07:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-11 21:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-11 21:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 20:57 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 02:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 23:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 06:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 14:23 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-09 22:37 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-10 07:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:15 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:05 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 21:06 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-10 08:02 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:18 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 15:56 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:39 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 07:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:08 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 19:44 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:45 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 01:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 12:14 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 19:26 +0000
Traveling and Travel Planning Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-11 20:10 +0000
Re: Traveling and Travel Planning rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 22:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:44 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 11:37 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 19:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-02-12 19:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 22:34 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-13 03:56 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 22:34 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-12 22:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-13 22:00 +0100
Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-11 19:59 +0000
Re: Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 22:07 +0100
Re: Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:31 +0000
Re: Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 11:35 +0100
Re: Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-12 19:17 +0000
Re: Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 19:43 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:35 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 07:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 20:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 20:00 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 03:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 00:53 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 12:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 01:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 12:10 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 07:55 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 21:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 20:50 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 19:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 22:04 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 23:42 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:42 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:37 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:30 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-10 07:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:14 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-11 21:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 11:33 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 16:00 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:26 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:25 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-08 22:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-08 23:41 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 23:42 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:49 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:38 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-10 07:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:17 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 19:53 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 22:41 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 23:40 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:49 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:48 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-09 23:03 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-10 18:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 16:03 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-08 19:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-08 19:53 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-08 22:19 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 14:23 -0700
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-10 18:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 19:11 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-02-11 05:04 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-02-11 05:18 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 18:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 15:55 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 01:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 00:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 06:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 02:04 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 19:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 20:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 02:49 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 22:50 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 06:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 12:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 10:16 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-12 18:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 18:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 16:24 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 07:35 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-13 11:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-12 09:08 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 18:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 16:56 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 07:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-12 20:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 17:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-14 05:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 22:44 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:51 +0000
(Excessive?) Complexity Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-08 18:57 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-08 19:31 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 23:23 -0500
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:45 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 19:49 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:39 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:21 -0600
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-09 22:43 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:56 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:50 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 07:50 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-10 08:35 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:20 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 19:02 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:09 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 18:58 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:42 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-09 11:32 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 19:43 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 22:49 -0500
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com - 2025-02-25 19:34 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-07 11:43 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 11:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-07 19:06 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 19:29 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 01:25 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 10:54 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-08 13:52 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 13:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 09:02 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 15:34 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 11:32 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:14 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 15:00 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 20:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 00:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 10:11 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 00:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-09 11:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 12:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 00:50 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:52 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-09 17:43 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 12:42 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:51 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:33 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:26 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:17 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 12:02 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 20:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:48 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 21:54 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-14 00:48 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 21:57 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 04:15 -0500
The Joys of African (and other 3rd world) construction projects Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-12 14:15 +0000
Re: The Joys of African (and other 3rd world) construction projects D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:47 +0100
Re: The Joys of African (and other 3rd world) construction projects Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 14:17 +0000
Re: The Joys of African (and other 3rd world) construction projects D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 21:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 00:04 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-09 11:18 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-09 15:38 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-10 07:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-10 03:34 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-10 09:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 01:15 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:15 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-10 07:12 -0500
Diversity - good or bad ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-10 21:17 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-10 22:45 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-11 01:11 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2025-01-11 05:23 +0200
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 00:48 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 07:02 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 09:00 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 19:50 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 19:19 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:02 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 22:19 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 06:51 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 11:09 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 20:46 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:48 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 00:43 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 11:05 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 11:49 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? Joerg Walther <joerg.walther@magenta.de> - 2025-01-12 14:06 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:40 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-12 13:46 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 14:00 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-12 14:52 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-01-12 17:09 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:42 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-12 23:51 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:32 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 23:03 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-01-14 00:52 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-14 04:13 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 04:18 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 21:55 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 21:11 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-14 12:28 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 22:00 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-14 23:15 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:07 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-15 06:16 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-15 06:18 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:13 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 00:28 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-16 11:27 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 14:39 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 01:01 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 11:10 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 23:30 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 16:57 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 20:59 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:15 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-17 19:40 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:40 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-18 19:42 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 11:44 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 01:41 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:55 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-17 19:44 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:41 +0100
Scandinavian Humor and Other Myths Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-18 14:46 +0000
Re: Scandinavian Humor and Other Myths The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 15:03 +0000
Re: Scandinavian Humor and Other Myths D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 18:07 +0100
Re: Scandinavian Humor and Other Myths rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-18 19:36 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-01-12 18:53 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 13:06 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-01-13 16:17 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 20:51 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:23 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 13:40 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 17:08 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 00:31 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 06:33 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-01-12 17:06 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-01-12 18:53 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:16 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 10:51 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 20:48 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-01-13 16:17 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:24 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:32 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2025-01-12 21:47 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 02:41 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-01-13 03:00 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 13:47 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:56 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-12 23:29 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 06:24 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:23 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:44 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:10 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 11:53 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:03 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:56 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:13 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 09:21 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 14:58 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:44 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 11:03 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:36 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:30 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:20 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 04:32 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 12:03 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-12 23:42 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 10:38 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 13:11 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:04 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 19:52 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 19:21 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:23 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 23:00 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 06:59 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:46 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 20:54 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:44 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:39 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-10 22:15 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:06 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 20:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-11 21:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:33 +0000
The Joys of Motorola Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-12 14:40 +0000
Re: The Joys of Motorola rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 00:19 +0000
Re: The Joys of Motorola "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 03:56 -0500
Re: The Joys of Motorola rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 23:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 19:38 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 23:08 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 07:05 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-12 12:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 12:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 00:21 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 06:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 03:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-01-14 03:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-14 03:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 12:48 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:29 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 22:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-05 18:01 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-04 15:51 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 00:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 23:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 12:57 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-05 16:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-05 17:31 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 20:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-05 23:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-06 02:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-06 11:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-06 12:12 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-07 11:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 10:53 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 12:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:49 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-07 19:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-06 11:49 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-06 18:35 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-06 20:38 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-07 04:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-08 00:29 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 10:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 12:06 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:48 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:35 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 12:49 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-07 11:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 11:11 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-07 19:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-07 23:14 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:24 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 11:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:45 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 17:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-06 20:17 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-07 02:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-06 22:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-07 07:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:32 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-07 18:49 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-07 19:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 16:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 01:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-07 22:29 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 00:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-07 18:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-05 14:56 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 20:56 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-05 21:33 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-06 11:43 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-03 16:37 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:45 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:34 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:26 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 05:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:28 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 01:21 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:12 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 23:04 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-06 11:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-03 10:12 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:19 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 19:26 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot> - 2025-01-06 12:28 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-03 12:19 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 23:25 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:51 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 05:36 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-03 11:26 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 pH <wNOSPAMp@gmail.org> - 2025-01-03 19:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-03 19:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 21:37 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:43 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 02:06 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 00:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 06:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 02:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 10:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-04 18:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 20:48 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:36 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-04 07:29 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:15 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 12:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-04 10:18 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 06:08 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 02:30 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 10:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-04 18:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 21:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 12:58 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:35 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 02:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:19 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-06 22:52 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2025-01-07 13:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 18:49 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 01:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 12:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 17:25 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2025-01-08 18:34 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 18:55 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:53 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:05 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 00:51 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 00:19 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 06:08 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 02:24 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 19:15 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 19:05 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 19:53 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-04 10:05 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 22:11 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-04 23:39 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 00:43 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 19:20 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:06 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-03 20:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 02:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 02:56 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 09:39 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 10:15 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 21:04 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 00:06 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:12 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 01:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:15 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 02:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-01-05 03:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-01 17:31 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 08:21 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-01 21:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 23:26 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-02 01:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-02 01:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-02 02:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-02 04:05 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-02 12:27 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-02 10:18 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-02 12:33 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-03 01:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 08:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-03 11:32 +0100
Page 24 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 22 23 [24] 25 26 … 50 Next page →
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-12 11:31 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <0743da0b-f351-b3f2-54bd-cc9b5835f566@example.net> |
| In reply to | #65424 |
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2025-02-10, Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote: > >> D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 9 Feb 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> >>>> He thinks he is superior to people who take simple delight in cowboy hats, >>>> caps on backwards, V8 trucks and rollin' coal and listening to Lainey Wilson. >>>> And going to church on Sunday. >>>> >>>> Me? I envy them. I wish I could be that plain honest and simple. >>> >>> It's never to late to start! Although, living in the UK, people might look >>> at you in weird ways if you walk around in a cowboy hat. ;) >> >> I've got broad-brimmed hats that are about the Australian >> equivalent. I did once decide to put one back in the car while >> walking around the centre of a large city. I didn't mind the looks, >> but the dickhead shouting "hey cowboy!" from a passing car was a >> bit too much. > > On a trip to Portland some years ago I picked up a broad-brimmed hat > at the Pendleton store. It's just far enough from "cowboy" to avoid > all such comments. > > https://www.pendleton-usa.com/product/ranger-wool-felt-hat/38196Z.html?dwvar_38196Z_color=41228 > > I still get compliments on it. Very beautiful!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-08 23:36 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <g9qcnUmy1pxdrTX6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #65278 |
On 2/8/25 2:50 PM, rbowman wrote: > On Sat, 08 Feb 2025 18:17:45 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > >> My university computer science courses left me quite disillusioned. >> Between my second and third years I managed to land a summer job >> programming in a small shop in the real world. For my third year I >> arranged my schedule so that I had Thursdays off, and continued to work >> at my part-time programming job. There was no fourth year - >> I dropped out and went full-time, and have been programming ever since. > > My 'formal' computer education consisted of a FORTRAN IV course in '65. I > wasn't impressed. It took about ten years and an industry shift from > hardware controls to software to pique my interest. Aw ... I just LOVE knobs and switches ! More "human". :-) > A shot at graduate school was similar. It didn't take long to realize the > curricula had no bearing on what I was doing or ever wanted to do. As some here have noted, 'academic' computing and real-world are very different. Each kind of, oft barely, influences the other but it's really two universes. Maybe the best cross-over was Professor Wirth with Pascal/Modula. Alas it was a shorter fence to straddle back then ....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-09 07:54 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m0r59mFrbnU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #65291 |
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 23:36:12 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > Maybe the best cross-over was Professor Wirth with Pascal/Modula. > Alas it was a shorter fence to straddle back then .... Before it was adapted for the real world Pascal was known as a language that excelled at telling itself secrets. I/O was an afterthought. Lisp needed some improvement before it was useful too. Didactic computer languages tend to emphasize concepts over utility. I spent a winter a long time ago working my way through the Wizard book which used Scheme. I found the concepts interesting but the back of my mind kept saying 'Why would you ever do it this way?'
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-09 03:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <D4udnYmLBfRv-TX6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #65295 |
On 2/9/25 2:54 AM, rbowman wrote: > On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 23:36:12 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> Maybe the best cross-over was Professor Wirth with Pascal/Modula. >> Alas it was a shorter fence to straddle back then .... > > Before it was adapted for the real world Pascal was known as a language > that excelled at telling itself secrets. I/O was an afterthought. Lisp > needed some improvement before it was useful too. > > Didactic computer languages tend to emphasize concepts over utility. I > spent a winter a long time ago working my way through the Wizard book > which used Scheme. I found the concepts interesting but the back of my > mind kept saying 'Why would you ever do it this way?' For the record, I just LOVE Pascal ... still do lots of apps small and large in FPC/Lazarus. May proto in Python, but often the goal is to re-do it in Pascal. SOME languages are a little TOO much 'ideology'. Wirth managed to balance the equation. Both ideology AND very practical. I started using Pascal back with the pink-label multi-pass IBM compilers. Never went back. 'C' is Just Great - but Pascal is far more easy to *understand* and is just 'elegant'. STILL have a VM of DOS with the multi-pass Pascal compiler - and DO stuff in it from time to time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-09 11:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <f33ed14a-fc03-7df4-550d-91531d488c01@example.net> |
| In reply to | #65296 |
On Sun, 9 Feb 2025, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 2/9/25 2:54 AM, rbowman wrote: >> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 23:36:12 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> >>> Maybe the best cross-over was Professor Wirth with Pascal/Modula. >>> Alas it was a shorter fence to straddle back then .... >> >> Before it was adapted for the real world Pascal was known as a language >> that excelled at telling itself secrets. I/O was an afterthought. Lisp >> needed some improvement before it was useful too. >> >> Didactic computer languages tend to emphasize concepts over utility. I >> spent a winter a long time ago working my way through the Wizard book >> which used Scheme. I found the concepts interesting but the back of my >> mind kept saying 'Why would you ever do it this way?' > > For the record, I just LOVE Pascal ... still do > lots of apps small and large in FPC/Lazarus. May > proto in Python, but often the goal is to re-do > it in Pascal. > > SOME languages are a little TOO much 'ideology'. > > Wirth managed to balance the equation. Both > ideology AND very practical. > > I started using Pascal back with the pink-label > multi-pass IBM compilers. Never went back. 'C' > is Just Great - but Pascal is far more easy to > *understand* and is just 'elegant'. > > STILL have a VM of DOS with the multi-pass > Pascal compiler - and DO stuff in it from > time to time. > Do you like go?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-09 18:08 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m0s99mF67a6U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #65296 |
On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 03:18:54 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > For the record, I just LOVE Pascal ... still do lots of apps small > and large in FPC/Lazarus. May proto in Python, but often the goal is > to re-do it in Pascal. > > SOME languages are a little TOO much 'ideology'. > > Wirth managed to balance the equation. Both ideology AND very > practical. > > I started using Pascal back with the pink-label multi-pass IBM > compilers. Never went back. 'C' is Just Great - but Pascal is far > more easy to *understand* and is just 'elegant'. Pascal treated me well :) It was used as a didactic language at University of Maine and the Sprague Electric plant at Sanford ME tended to hire engineers from there. For whatever its virtues process control or manipulating a robot arm with 5 degrees of freedom weren't among them. I was contracted to develop modules, dlls, or whatever the Pascal term was to bridge the gap. > STILL have a VM of DOS with the multi-pass Pascal compiler - and DO > stuff in it from time to time. https://www.freepascal.org/ I did buy Borland TurboPascal for CP/M mostly because I was curious what $50 would get you. It was so much faster than the BDS C compiler I thought something went wrong with my 'hello world' attempt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-09 22:32 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <uIOcnT_7v_L27jT6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #65307 |
On 2/9/25 1:08 PM, rbowman wrote: > On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 03:18:54 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > > >> For the record, I just LOVE Pascal ... still do lots of apps small >> and large in FPC/Lazarus. May proto in Python, but often the goal is >> to re-do it in Pascal. >> >> SOME languages are a little TOO much 'ideology'. >> >> Wirth managed to balance the equation. Both ideology AND very >> practical. >> >> I started using Pascal back with the pink-label multi-pass IBM >> compilers. Never went back. 'C' is Just Great - but Pascal is far >> more easy to *understand* and is just 'elegant'. > > Pascal treated me well :) It was used as a didactic language at > University of Maine and the Sprague Electric plant at Sanford ME tended to > hire engineers from there. For whatever its virtues process control or > manipulating a robot arm with 5 degrees of freedom weren't among them. I > was contracted to develop modules, dlls, or whatever the Pascal term was > to bridge the gap. > > >> STILL have a VM of DOS with the multi-pass Pascal compiler - and DO >> stuff in it from time to time. > > https://www.freepascal.org/ > > > I did buy Borland TurboPascal for CP/M mostly because I was curious what > $50 would get you. It was so much faster than the BDS C compiler I thought > something went wrong with my 'hello world' attempt. Turbo was VERY turbo compared to anything else on the market at the time. It plus the little IDE, you could REALLY cruise through development. There is something about Pascal that makes really fast compact compilers easy. Mikroe still offers MikroPascal for its PIC/AVR development systems.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-09 11:32 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <yn0qP.587031$iNI.359829@fx14.iad> |
| In reply to | #65295 |
On 2025-02-09, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 23:36:12 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> Maybe the best cross-over was Professor Wirth with Pascal/Modula. >> Alas it was a shorter fence to straddle back then .... > > Before it was adapted for the real world Pascal was known as a language > that excelled at telling itself secrets. I/O was an afterthought. Lisp > needed some improvement before it was useful too. That was true of all the Wirthian languages, wasn't it? I've heard them referred to as "bondage and discipline" languages. I fell in love with assembly language at first sight. It was so nice to have a machine that would just do what I wanted in a couple of instructions, rather than jumping through all the hoops you had to do to coax a high-level language to do it. (Yes, you could also shoot yourself in the foot, but that's part of the learning process.) > Didactic computer languages tend to emphasize concepts over utility. I > spent a winter a long time ago working my way through the Wizard book > which used Scheme. I found the concepts interesting but the back of my > mind kept saying 'Why would you ever do it this way?' I once had a term project reviewed by the department head, who happened to be one of the Algol 68 development teams. Every so often he would pause and, in pain, say, "Why did you do it in assembly language?" Ten years later, along came C, which was a godsend. -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | Growth for the sake of \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | growth is the ideology X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | of the cancer cell. / \ if you read it the right way. | -- Edward Abbey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-09 19:21 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m0sdhgF734tU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #65304 |
On Sun, 09 Feb 2025 11:32:46 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2025-02-09, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 23:36:12 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> >>> Maybe the best cross-over was Professor Wirth with Pascal/Modula. >>> Alas it was a shorter fence to straddle back then .... >> >> Before it was adapted for the real world Pascal was known as a language >> that excelled at telling itself secrets. I/O was an afterthought. Lisp >> needed some improvement before it was useful too. > > That was true of all the Wirthian languages, wasn't it? > I've heard them referred to as "bondage and discipline" languages. Yeah, he kept 'improving' ALGOL. It's an interesting question whether C would exist in its present form had ALGOL not existed. 'ALGOL-like' covers a lot of ground. At least when Python introduced the walrus operator it did something other than simple assignment. > I fell in love with assembly language at first sight. It was so nice to > have a machine that would just do what I wanted in a couple of > instructions, rather than jumping through all the hoops you had to do to > coax a high-level language to do it. (Yes, you could also shoot > yourself in the foot, but that's part of the learning process.) It does cut to the chase. As syntactic sugar gets piled on part of my brain envisions what the processor is really doing. With the early microcontrollers you did it in assembly or you didn't do it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_Device_C_Compiler I don't know how good it is. Back then if there was a C compiler for a device it was proprietary and expensive. Even a PDP-11 cross assembler for the 8048 was pricey enough that I wrote my own on CP/M. Nothing fancy but it got the job done.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-09 21:54 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <VtWdnaJY5fz99zT6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #65304 |
On 2/9/25 6:32 AM, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2025-02-09, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 23:36:12 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> >>> Maybe the best cross-over was Professor Wirth with Pascal/Modula. >>> Alas it was a shorter fence to straddle back then .... >> >> Before it was adapted for the real world Pascal was known as a language >> that excelled at telling itself secrets. I/O was an afterthought. Lisp >> needed some improvement before it was useful too. > > That was true of all the Wirthian languages, wasn't it? > I've heard them referred to as "bondage and discipline" languages. Early ALGOL didn't even have I/O per-se. It was an educational demo, not real-world. The last versions were much more usable. Pascal/Modula ... kinda "improved ALGOL". As for "bondage" ... not sure where you heard that. Pascal - esp the later Borland-derived versions - are a great all-purpose environment and you can actually READ yer code a year later. Modula-2/3 were a little more 'stiff', but still usable. Can't find a native M3 compiler for Linux that will install correctly alas ... If you want B&D, look up little Miss ADA :-) > I fell in love with assembly language at first sight. It was so nice > to have a machine that would just do what I wanted in a couple of > instructions, rather than jumping through all the hoops you had to > do to coax a high-level language to do it. (Yes, you could also > shoot yourself in the foot, but that's part of the learning process.) Did plenty of ASM early on. Now compilers can be fairly cheap and cross to almost everything. Didn't used to be that way. For micro-controllers you were kinda stuck with ASM. >> Didactic computer languages tend to emphasize concepts over utility. I >> spent a winter a long time ago working my way through the Wizard book >> which used Scheme. I found the concepts interesting but the back of my >> mind kept saying 'Why would you ever do it this way?' Exactly ... There were (kinda still are) a lot of 'concept' languages with esoteric syntax and ways of looking at things. Can be interesting to think about, but you don't wanna use them for anything real-world. Maybe they can re-do the entire IRS database in BrainFuck ? THAT might frustrate Vlad and Xi :-) > I once had a term project reviewed by the department head, who happened > to be one of the Algol 68 development teams. Every so often he would > pause and, in pain, say, "Why did you do it in assembly language?" > > Ten years later, along came C, which was a godsend. I remember 'C' when it was new ... still have my K&R book ... and you could go almost (now more) tight with 'C' than ASM. It made everything better. But for larger stuff, I still trend towards Pascal when possible. I mean you can DO sockets in Pascal but it's a lot easier/smaller in 'C'. Someone in the groups was complaining the other day about a prob even with 'C' these days - they kinda changed the rules/defs/syntax over the years. This made large volumes of his old code into a gigantic pain. There ARE compiler switches and such to kinda bring things back to K&R assumptions but IMHO that should be the default all along. Don't remember if he was using GCC ... likely ... however there are a number of good 'C' compilers for Linux now so maybe he'd have more luck with them. Sometimes stuff that spits out many errors in GCC compiles fine with Clang/LLVM. JetBrains has a fair 'C' compiler+IDE now as well but I don't think it's entirely free. There's always TCC as well if you don't need esoteric libs. Visual ... um ... pref to stay away from M$ ....... Keep promising to learn 'D' ... never quite get around to it :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-10 09:30 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <20250210093054.00001375@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #65333 |
On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 21:54:27 -0500
"WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> wrote:
> As for "bondage" ... not sure where you heard that. Pascal - esp the
> later Borland-derived versions - are a great all-purpose environment
> and you can actually READ yer code a year later.
Turbo Pascal didn't come 'round until 1983, though - a whopping 13
years into the language's history. And some of Wirth's staggering mis-
features earned the B&D label all by themselves ("solving" bounds-
checking issues by making array size part of the type specification is
something only a truly demented brain could ever conceive of.)
Of course, there were other extended versions of the language predating
TP - but, as Brian Kernighan famously observed, they mostly just made
it look more like whatever language the implementors *really* wanted.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-11 07:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vofgo6$1p8fn$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #65358 |
John Ames wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
> On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 21:54:27 -0500
> "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> wrote:
>
>> As for "bondage" ... not sure where you heard that. Pascal - esp the
>> later Borland-derived versions - are a great all-purpose environment
>> and you can actually READ yer code a year later.
>
> Turbo Pascal didn't come 'round until 1983, though - a whopping 13
> years into the language's history. And some of Wirth's staggering mis-
> features earned the B&D label all by themselves ("solving" bounds-
> checking issues by making array size part of the type specification is
> something only a truly demented brain could ever conceive of.)
Can you say "std::array<>"?
I knew you could. :-)
> Of course, there were other extended versions of the language predating
> TP - but, as Brian Kernighan famously observed, they mostly just made
> it look more like whatever language the implementors *really* wanted.
--
You'll feel much better once you've given up hope.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-11 07:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <20250211075345.00000791@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #65399 |
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 07:44:54 -0500
Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> > Turbo Pascal didn't come 'round until 1983, though - a whopping 13
> > years into the language's history. And some of Wirth's staggering
> > mis- features earned the B&D label all by themselves ("solving"
> > bounds- checking issues by making array size part of the type
> > specification is something only a truly demented brain could ever
> > conceive of.)
>
> Can you say "std::array<>"?
>
> I knew you could. :-)
C++ never met an idea too bad to copy ;)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-14 05:10 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnvqtjfv.2up9n.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> |
| In reply to | #65401 |
John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> wrote at 15:53 this Tuesday (GMT):
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 07:44:54 -0500
> Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>
>> > Turbo Pascal didn't come 'round until 1983, though - a whopping 13
>> > years into the language's history. And some of Wirth's staggering
>> > mis- features earned the B&D label all by themselves ("solving"
>> > bounds- checking issues by making array size part of the type
>> > specification is something only a truly demented brain could ever
>> > conceive of.)
>>
>> Can you say "std::array<>"?
>>
>> I knew you could. :-)
>
> C++ never met an idea too bad to copy ;)
C++ just has too much stuff.
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-11 23:29 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <KwSdnd_yRPwhvjH6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #65399 |
On 2/11/25 7:44 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> John Ames wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
>
>> On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 21:54:27 -0500
>> "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> wrote:
>>
>>> As for "bondage" ... not sure where you heard that. Pascal - esp the
>>> later Borland-derived versions - are a great all-purpose environment
>>> and you can actually READ yer code a year later.
>>
>> Turbo Pascal didn't come 'round until 1983, though - a whopping 13
>> years into the language's history. And some of Wirth's staggering mis-
>> features earned the B&D label all by themselves ("solving" bounds-
>> checking issues by making array size part of the type specification is
>> something only a truly demented brain could ever conceive of.)
>
> Can you say "std::array<>"?
>
> I knew you could. :-)
Nothing wrong, or unique, about fixed-size arrays.
You don't want them for some stuff, do want them
for other stuff. CAN elim a lot of range-checking
code.
>> Of course, there were other extended versions of the language predating
>> TP - but, as Brian Kernighan famously observed, they mostly just made
>> it look more like whatever language the implementors *really* wanted.
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-12 08:17 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <20250212081704.00003ce1@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #65443 |
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 23:29:43 -0500 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> wrote: > Nothing wrong, or unique, about fixed-size arrays. You don't want > them for some stuff, do want them for other stuff. CAN elim a lot of > range-checking code. Nothing wrong with fixed-size arrays as a general concept, no. Treating the size as *part of the type specification* so that passing ARRAY [1..15] OF CHAR to a function expecting ARRAY [1..10] OF CHAR yields a type mismatch is what's utterly demented; a true Wirth original, that. I have never yet heard a sensible case made for a language where array sizes are known, but no FOR EACH IN (x) construct is provided. Doing it C's way at least offers you flexibility and performance in exchange for the risk of shooting yourself in the foot; offering a way to iterate transparently across arrays of arbitrary size at least gives you safety and convenience in exchange for the performance penalty of bounds- checking. Wirth's approach offers the worst of both worlds, for no material gain whatsoever - absolutely bonkers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-12 20:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnvqq09r.38buj.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> |
| In reply to | #65452 |
John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> wrote at 16:17 this Wednesday (GMT): > On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 23:29:43 -0500 > "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> wrote: > >> Nothing wrong, or unique, about fixed-size arrays. You don't want >> them for some stuff, do want them for other stuff. CAN elim a lot of >> range-checking code. > > Nothing wrong with fixed-size arrays as a general concept, no. Treating > the size as *part of the type specification* so that passing ARRAY > [1..15] OF CHAR to a function expecting ARRAY [1..10] OF CHAR yields a > type mismatch is what's utterly demented; a true Wirth original, that. > > I have never yet heard a sensible case made for a language where array > sizes are known, but no FOR EACH IN (x) construct is provided. Doing it > C's way at least offers you flexibility and performance in exchange for > the risk of shooting yourself in the foot; offering a way to iterate > transparently across arrays of arbitrary size at least gives you safety > and convenience in exchange for the performance penalty of bounds- > checking. Wirth's approach offers the worst of both worlds, for no > material gain whatsoever - absolutely bonkers. If you really need to, you can also pass by pointer? -- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-12 20:47 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m14fnaFflhnU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #65463 |
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 20:20:04 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote: > John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> wrote at 16:17 this Wednesday (GMT): >> On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 23:29:43 -0500 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" >> <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> wrote: >> >>> Nothing wrong, or unique, about fixed-size arrays. You don't want them >>> for some stuff, do want them for other stuff. CAN elim a lot of >>> range-checking code. >> >> Nothing wrong with fixed-size arrays as a general concept, no. Treating >> the size as *part of the type specification* so that passing ARRAY >> [1..15] OF CHAR to a function expecting ARRAY [1..10] OF CHAR yields a >> type mismatch is what's utterly demented; a true Wirth original, that. >> >> I have never yet heard a sensible case made for a language where array >> sizes are known, but no FOR EACH IN (x) construct is provided. Doing it >> C's way at least offers you flexibility and performance in exchange for >> the risk of shooting yourself in the foot; offering a way to iterate >> transparently across arrays of arbitrary size at least gives you safety >> and convenience in exchange for the performance penalty of bounds- >> checking. Wirth's approach offers the worst of both worlds, for no >> material gain whatsoever - absolutely bonkers. > > > If you really need to, you can also pass by pointer? Yes. It was coated with syntactic sugar in C++ but it's often convenient to malloc/calloc an array and pass around the pointer. If you run out of room you can then realloc. There are several ways to shoot yourself in the foot if you're inexperienced. A common problem is not realizing the void* pointer returned by realloc may (usually) not be the same as the original pointer so if you're hanging onto references of where the data used to be you'll probably segfault (sooner or later). Like John said newer languages try to protect you from yourself but there is no magic. Either the programmer is keeping track efficiently or the language is adding extra code to do the job.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-12 13:21 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <20250212132107.00001351@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #65463 |
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 20:20:04 -0000 (UTC) candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote: > If you really need to, you can also pass by pointer? I admit I'm not deeply familiar with this, but AFAICT Pascal pointers enforce type-safety as defined by the rest of the language, meaning that (IIUC) you can pass a function that expects a pointer to an ARRAY [1..10] OF CHAR any given ARRAY [1..10] OF CHAR, but trying to give it a pointer to an ARRAY [1..15] OF CHAR would still be a type mismatch. So what do you do, then? Refactor the function to accept a pointer to a single CHAR? Add individual wrapper functions to decompose arrays of specific sizes into individual elements, and call the actual function once per element? What if the function logic can't be serialized across individual elements? The whole thing is just braindead. C makes you do all the fancy footwork yourself if you want to support arrays of arbitrary size, but it'll at least let you *do* it; other languages like Basic or Python provide a UBound() function or for-each construct so that you can do the same thing safely and simply (if at a slight performance penalty.) Pascal (as Wirth designed it) forces you through all the rigamarole of the former without giving you the attendant flexibility, even though it already *knows* the sizes of arrays and could just as easily provide the latter. Truly demented, and worthy of a place in the B&D hall-o'-shame all by itself.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-13 21:40 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnvqspjj.251mn.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> |
| In reply to | #65465 |
John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> wrote at 21:21 this Wednesday (GMT): > On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 20:20:04 -0000 (UTC) > candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> > wrote: > >> If you really need to, you can also pass by pointer? > > I admit I'm not deeply familiar with this, but AFAICT Pascal pointers > enforce type-safety as defined by the rest of the language, meaning > that (IIUC) you can pass a function that expects a pointer to an ARRAY > [1..10] OF CHAR any given ARRAY [1..10] OF CHAR, but trying to give it > a pointer to an ARRAY [1..15] OF CHAR would still be a type mismatch. > > So what do you do, then? Refactor the function to accept a pointer to a > single CHAR? Add individual wrapper functions to decompose arrays of > specific sizes into individual elements, and call the actual function > once per element? What if the function logic can't be serialized across > individual elements? [snip] Well, as long as you CAN do [] notation on a char pointer and also pass the size as an integer, I GUESS you could do that to work around it? Still does feel stupid though. -- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 24 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 22 23 [24] 25 26 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web