Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #33235 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Andrei Z." <no-email@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2021-09-19 17:47 +0300 |
| Last post | 2021-09-21 23:59 -0400 |
| Articles | 5 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
Linux Executables Deployed as Stealth Windows Loaders "Andrei Z." <no-email@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-19 17:47 +0300
Re: Linux Executables Deployed as Stealth Windows Loaders SolutionsViaDIY <NoSpamJunkMailAtAll@NoSpam.com> - 2021-09-19 13:08 -0400
Re: Linux Executables Deployed as Stealth Windows Loaders "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> - 2021-09-19 13:24 -0400
Re: Linux Executables Deployed as Stealth Windows Loaders "Andrei Z." <no-email@invalid.invalid> - 2021-09-19 20:41 +0300
Re: Linux Executables Deployed as Stealth Windows Loaders SevenOverSix <hae274c.net> - 2021-09-21 23:59 -0400
| From | "Andrei Z." <no-email@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-19 17:47 +0300 |
| Subject | Linux Executables Deployed as Stealth Windows Loaders |
| Message-ID | <si7iim$1pb2$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
No Longer Just Theory: Black Lotus Labs Uncovers Linux Executables Deployed as Stealth Windows Loaders https://blog.lumen.com/no-longer-just-theory-black-lotus-labs-uncovers-linux-executables-deployed-as-stealth-windows-loaders/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SolutionsViaDIY <NoSpamJunkMailAtAll@NoSpam.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-19 13:08 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <2jrekg9thekhkrmo72uol4q9q34ld88u4v@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #33235 |
On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 17:47:50 +0300, "Andrei Z." <no-email@invalid.invalid> wrote: >No Longer Just Theory: Black Lotus Labs Uncovers Linux Executables >Deployed as Stealth Windows Loaders > >https://blog.lumen.com/no-longer-just-theory-black-lotus-labs-uncovers-linux-executables-deployed-as-stealth-windows-loaders/ For those of us who are not techies, what does this mean, exactly? I read the article but not sure I understand completely. Does it mean we think we're installing Linux but we're getting nasty Windows, instead??? Unless it's specifically this Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL) which can't be accidentally installed as Linux by mistake? Sorry, I'm really not a techie ... (And in case of yes to the above [???], how can a layperson know the difference?) -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "David W. Hodgins" <dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-19 13:24 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <op.09y9a6jka3w0dxdave@hodgins.homeip.net> |
| In reply to | #33236 |
On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 13:08:01 -0400, SolutionsViaDIY <NoSpamJunkMailAtAll@nospam.com> wrote: > On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 17:47:50 +0300, "Andrei Z." > <no-email@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> No Longer Just Theory: Black Lotus Labs Uncovers Linux Executables >> Deployed as Stealth Windows Loaders >> >> https://blog.lumen.com/no-longer-just-theory-black-lotus-labs-uncovers-linux-executables-deployed-as-stealth-windows-loaders/ > > > For those of us who are not techies, what does this mean, exactly? I > read the article but not sure I understand completely. Does it mean > we think we're installing Linux but we're getting nasty Windows, > instead??? Unless it's specifically this Windows Subsystem for Linux > (WSL) which can't be accidentally installed as Linux by mistake? > > Sorry, I'm really not a techie ... (And in case of yes to the above > [???], how can a layperson know the difference?) It's strictly the windows subsystem for linux. As usual, m$ puts out something that sort of works on the market, with no concern for security. Regards, Dave Hodgins -- Change dwhodgins@nomail.afraid.org to davidwhodgins@teksavvy.com for email replies.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Andrei Z." <no-email@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-19 20:41 +0300 |
| Message-ID | <si7soh$u28$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #33236 |
SolutionsViaDIY wrote: > On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 17:47:50 +0300, "Andrei Z." > <no-email@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> No Longer Just Theory: Black Lotus Labs Uncovers Linux Executables >> Deployed as Stealth Windows Loaders >> >> https://blog.lumen.com/no-longer-just-theory-black-lotus-labs-uncovers-linux-executables-deployed-as-stealth-windows-loaders/ > > > For those of us who are not techies, what does this mean, exactly? I > read the article but not sure I understand completely. Does it mean > we think we're installing Linux but we're getting nasty Windows, > instead??? Unless it's specifically this Windows Subsystem for Linux > (WSL) which can't be accidentally installed as Linux by mistake? > > Sorry, I'm really not a techie ... (And in case of yes to the above > [???], how can a layperson know the difference?) > > Researchers have recorded a new way to compromise computers running Windows that uses malicious Linux binary files created for Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL).
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | SevenOverSix <hae274c.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2021-09-21 23:59 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <VeydnQBIVoiEN9f8nZ2dnUU7-S3NnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #33238 |
On 9/19/21 1:41 PM, Andrei Z. wrote: > SolutionsViaDIY wrote: >> On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 17:47:50 +0300, "Andrei Z." >> <no-email@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> No Longer Just Theory: Black Lotus Labs Uncovers Linux Executables >>> Deployed as Stealth Windows Loaders >>> >>> https://blog.lumen.com/no-longer-just-theory-black-lotus-labs-uncovers-linux-executables-deployed-as-stealth-windows-loaders/ >>> >> >> >> For those of us who are not techies, what does this mean, exactly? I >> read the article but not sure I understand completely. Does it mean >> we think we're installing Linux but we're getting nasty Windows, >> instead??? Unless it's specifically this Windows Subsystem for Linux >> (WSL) which can't be accidentally installed as Linux by mistake? >> >> Sorry, I'm really not a techie ... (And in case of yes to the above >> [???], how can a layperson know the difference?) >> >> > Researchers have recorded a new way to compromise computers running > Windows that uses malicious Linux binary files created for Windows > Subsystem for Linux (WSL). I was looking into WSL/WSL2 just last week. Went with a Virtualbox solution instead. Click icon, REAL Linux VM (mx19) starts. MUCH better. Fine control. Anything MS has touched since W98 should be considered "contaminated". Oh, for fun, search the W2k registry for "NSA" :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web