Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #17142 > unrolled thread

Question for the 1024 bit key sky is falling tampon tester

Started by"Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at>
First post2016-03-31 11:38 +0200
Last post2016-04-05 10:39 +1000
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc


Contents

  Question for the 1024 bit key sky is falling tampon tester "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at> - 2016-03-31 11:38 +0200
    Re:Question for the 1024 bit key sky is falling tampon tester dlbendigo  <laidlaws@hotkey.net.au> - 2016-04-05 10:39 +1000

#17142 — Question for the 1024 bit key sky is falling tampon tester

From"Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at>
Date2016-03-31 11:38 +0200
SubjectQuestion for the 1024 bit key sky is falling tampon tester
Message-ID<7a843b267b26bddcaccc0499a5dacf10@remailer.privacy.at>
If it takes a super computer with 10.51 petaflops 1 billion 
billion years to brute force crack 128 bits AES, how long will 
it take to crack that 1024 bit key?

Should we use Linux, Unix, Windows or a kiddie toy like a mac to 
do it?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#17148

Fromdlbendigo <laidlaws@hotkey.net.au>
Date2016-04-05 10:39 +1000
Message-ID<sPDMy.32130$gC.30239@fx07.fr7>
In reply to#17142
"Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmaster@remailer.privacy.at>
 Wrote in message:
> 
> If it takes a super computer with 10.51 petaflops 1 billion 
> billion years to brute force crack 128 bits AES, how long will 
> it take to crack that 1024 bit key?
> 
> Should we use Linux, Unix, Windows or a kiddie toy like a mac to 
> do it?
> 
> 

If you are right about 128 bit, why do we need anything better?
-- 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc


csiph-web