Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #74027 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-09-13 12:57 +0000 |
| Last post | 2025-09-14 13:18 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 220 — 32 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2025-09-13 12:57 +0000
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2025-09-13 13:23 +0000
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Jacek Marcin Jaworski <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-09-13 15:28 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-13 22:00 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-09-14 08:26 +1000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-13 23:04 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-14 09:01 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-14 21:17 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-15 02:13 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-09-15 00:50 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-15 12:38 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-09-15 09:52 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-15 08:19 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-09-15 10:49 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-15 09:03 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-09-15 12:04 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-15 22:29 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-09-16 08:23 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-16 08:53 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-16 12:54 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-16 20:07 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-16 21:42 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-16 22:12 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-09-17 06:52 +0200
E-mail server-side attachment deduplication (was: Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-17 12:02 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-09-17 06:52 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-15 12:44 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-15 22:35 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-16 02:09 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-16 01:12 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-09-16 05:47 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-16 05:48 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-16 12:57 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-17 05:56 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-17 11:15 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-17 09:31 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-15 10:01 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-09-15 12:06 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-15 13:13 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-11 23:38 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-12 02:59 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-12 03:23 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-14 14:18 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-14 19:43 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-14 22:20 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-12 05:11 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 06:29 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-12 06:46 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 14:14 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-13 02:06 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-13 02:14 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-13 11:01 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-13 13:39 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-14 14:20 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-15 20:50 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-15 22:08 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-16 05:40 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-16 11:05 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-17 01:33 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-20 22:23 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-11-20 14:59 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-20 23:54 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-21 00:44 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-11-21 14:33 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-22 00:16 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-22 00:20 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-22 03:20 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-11-22 14:17 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-22 14:39 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-22 20:08 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? tom nossen <news@nossen.org> - 2025-11-26 22:07 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-26 21:50 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? tom nossen <news@nossen.org> - 2025-11-27 12:18 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-27 21:26 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-22 18:56 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 09:06 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 12:10 -0500
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 09:29 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-24 23:15 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 15:35 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-25 00:21 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-23 03:19 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-23 05:20 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 09:26 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 18:27 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-24 23:23 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-02 20:13 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-03 08:39 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-03 19:42 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-03 22:03 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-12-03 22:36 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-04 03:05 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-12-04 14:24 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-04 14:35 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-04 08:21 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-04 18:05 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-04 10:09 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-04 19:09 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-04 11:11 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-04 19:55 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-19 01:22 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-12-18 20:45 -0500
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-19 10:54 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-12-19 09:11 -0500
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-19 15:02 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-12-19 10:38 -0500
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-12-19 11:03 -0500
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-19 18:14 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-19 08:09 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-19 21:56 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-20 05:56 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-20 10:52 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-20 15:03 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-20 14:50 +0000
Ozempic (and Mounjaro, Zepbound, etc) Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2025-12-20 15:04 +0000
Re: Ozempic (and Mounjaro, Zepbound, etc) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-12-20 17:21 -0600
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-12-20 20:45 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Sump <sumpusent@outlook.com> - 2025-12-20 22:02 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-21 01:56 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Sump <sumpusent@outlook.com> - 2025-12-21 02:10 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-21 02:13 +0000
Re: Big Pharma (was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-21 02:09 +0000
Re: Big Pharma (was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) Sump <sumpusent@outlook.com> - 2025-12-21 02:38 +0000
Re: Big Pharma (was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-21 05:00 +0000
Re: Big Pharma (was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-21 10:57 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-21 04:47 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-21 04:43 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-20 15:01 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-20 14:47 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare( was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-21 02:11 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare( was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-21 04:34 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare( was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) Bob Tennent <rdtennent@tennent.ca> - 2025-12-22 02:17 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare( was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-22 04:43 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare( was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) Bob Tennent <rdtennent@tennent.ca> - 2025-12-22 15:53 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare( was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-22 01:54 -0500
Re: Marxist Healthcare( was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) Bob Tennent <rdtennent@tennent.ca> - 2025-12-22 15:57 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare( was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-12-22 08:49 -0800
Re: Marxist Healthcare( was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-22 19:16 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare (was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-22 21:24 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare( was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-22 19:47 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-23 11:02 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-12-23 11:38 -0800
Re: Marxist Healthcare The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-23 20:23 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-23 22:41 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-24 12:23 +0000
OT: Post-infection syndromes (was: Re: Marxist Healthcare) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-01-24 09:24 +0000
Re: OT: Post-infection syndromes The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-01-24 11:16 +0000
Re: OT: Post-infection syndromes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-01-24 14:14 +0100
Re: OT: Post-infection syndromes Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-01-24 08:43 -0800
Re: Marxist Healthcare rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-23 23:42 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-12-20 08:33 -0500
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-21 04:40 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-12-21 19:59 -0500
Ozempic... "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-26 22:24 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-04 22:47 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-12-05 00:15 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-04 22:48 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-12-05 00:14 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-04 22:47 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-12-05 00:16 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-03 14:41 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-04 03:05 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2025-12-07 04:01 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-08 02:32 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2025-12-08 04:36 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2025-12-08 14:30 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-12-08 23:21 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-09 10:01 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-10 01:37 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-12-10 18:13 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-12-10 20:06 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-12 07:44 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-12-12 22:39 +1100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-12 12:18 +0000
SYSCALL "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-10 14:01 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-10 01:37 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-20 23:01 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-21 09:58 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-23 03:19 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-23 05:21 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-23 19:01 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-23 23:23 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-23 23:41 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 00:39 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 23:46 -0500
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 15:45 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-24 20:59 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? ALB <alb@lupinedb.org> - 2025-11-25 19:38 -0500
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-26 13:35 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-26 15:12 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-26 15:10 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-16 15:14 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 02:56 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-16 05:40 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-16 15:13 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-20 22:23 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-21 13:05 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-21 15:35 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-23 03:19 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-23 05:16 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-23 23:23 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 00:33 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-23 03:19 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-23 22:05 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 02:24 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-09-14 00:04 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-09-14 06:34 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-09-14 06:48 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-14 06:37 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-09-14 08:00 -0500
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-09-13 22:24 +0000
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-14 13:38 +0200
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-14 12:53 +0000
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-09-13 11:02 -0400
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-09-13 17:02 +0000
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-13 18:23 +0000
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-09-14 00:12 +0000
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-09-14 08:45 +0000
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-09-14 05:01 -0400
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2025-09-14 13:18 +0000
Page 6 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 11 Next page →
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-19 01:22 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <10i29co$qv6q$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #78289 |
On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 18:05:17 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > I'm no Marxist chum Do you benefit from a Socialist-style state-funded health service? That would be considered “Marxist” in certain quarters ...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-18 20:45 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <6944ae27$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #79455 |
On 2025-12-18 8:22 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 18:05:17 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> I'm no Marxist chum > > Do you benefit from a Socialist-style state-funded health service? > > That would be considered “Marxist” in certain quarters ... We have a Socialist-style state-funded health service here in Canada and it is so successful that the government happily offers medical assistance in dying because most people would rather die. Glenn Beck just paid to have a Canadian woman fly to the US to get surgery for her rare thyroid issue. The Canadian system failed her so miserably that she had chosen to die. <https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/saskatchewan-jolene-van-alstine-maid> That's the only thing socialism does: fail miserably wherever and however it is applied. -- CrudeSausage John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-19 10:54 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <10i3asg$138v9$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #79456 |
On 19/12/2025 01:45, CrudeSausage wrote: > On 2025-12-18 8:22 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >> On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 18:05:17 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> I'm no Marxist chum >> >> Do you benefit from a Socialist-style state-funded health service? >> >> That would be considered “Marxist” in certain quarters ... > > We have a Socialist-style state-funded health service here in Canada and > it is so successful that the government happily offers medical > assistance in dying because most people would rather die. > > Glenn Beck just paid to have a Canadian woman fly to the US to get > surgery for her rare thyroid issue. The Canadian system failed her so > miserably that she had chosen to die. > <https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/saskatchewan-jolene-van-alstine-maid> > > That's the only thing socialism does: fail miserably wherever and > however it is applied. > Well no it doesn't. If a funded-through-general-tax health service is defined as socialism. Sure you can always pay for special treatment and a new unique way to die of medical intervention, but you only need to look at the data of say the USA versus European health care to see which is better value for money and more likely to prolong life. -- It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. Mark Twain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-19 09:11 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <69455d2b$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #79480 |
On 2025-12-19 5:54 a.m., The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 19/12/2025 01:45, CrudeSausage wrote: >> On 2025-12-18 8:22 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >>> On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 18:05:17 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> >>>> I'm no Marxist chum >>> >>> Do you benefit from a Socialist-style state-funded health service? >>> >>> That would be considered “Marxist” in certain quarters ... >> >> We have a Socialist-style state-funded health service here in Canada >> and it is so successful that the government happily offers medical >> assistance in dying because most people would rather die. >> >> Glenn Beck just paid to have a Canadian woman fly to the US to get >> surgery for her rare thyroid issue. The Canadian system failed her so >> miserably that she had chosen to die. <https://nationalpost.com/news/ >> canada/saskatchewan-jolene-van-alstine-maid> >> >> That's the only thing socialism does: fail miserably wherever and >> however it is applied. >> > Well no it doesn't. > > If a funded-through-general-tax health service is defined as socialism. > > Sure you can always pay for special treatment and a new unique way to > die of medical intervention, but you only need to look at the data of > say the USA versus European health care to see which is better value for > money and more likely to prolong life. If I can spare some money, I know that I can be saved in the United States. In Canada, even if I have the money, they would rather just let me die. We don't have a two-tier system here at all. It's public or nothing, and public is awful. Besides, socialism is not only why people are dying before even getting to a hospital, it's responsible for allowing illegal migrants to enter without any sort of prohibition. It is why women are getting raped without a hope for rescue. It's why those same victims of rape get 17 years in prison for defending themselves from their rapists with a knife. Socialism is an ideology created by Satan to enrich his followers at the expense of everyone else. Anyone who supports it is a complete and utter moron. -- CrudeSausage John 14:6 Windows is fine.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-19 15:02 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <10i3pe4$17vsc$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #79486 |
On 19/12/2025 14:11, CrudeSausage wrote: > Socialism is an ideology created by Satan to enrich his followers at the > expense of everyone else. Anyone who supports it is a complete and utter > moron. Ah, Another 'Honk for Jesus' fruitcake... -- Canada is all right really, though not for the whole weekend. "Saki"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-19 10:38 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <6945715d$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #79494 |
On 2025-12-19 10:02 a.m., The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 19/12/2025 14:11, CrudeSausage wrote: >> Socialism is an ideology created by Satan to enrich his followers at >> the expense of everyone else. Anyone who supports it is a complete and >> utter moron. > Ah, Another 'Honk for Jesus' fruitcake... Remember you said this when you get to your destination. -- CrudeSausage John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-19 11:03 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <WGe1R.10703$Zqk9.2033@fx08.iad> |
| In reply to | #79495 |
On 12/19/25 10:38 AM, CrudeSausage wrote: > On 2025-12-19 10:02 a.m., The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 19/12/2025 14:11, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> Socialism is an ideology created by Satan to enrich his followers at >>> the expense of everyone else. Anyone who supports it is a complete >>> and utter moron. >> Ah, Another 'Honk for Jesus' fruitcake... > > Remember you said this when you get to your destination. You are the one following Satan, white-nationalist phobe. You have confused that with "Christianity", as is common. "Christian" can be outright demonic. -- Joel W. Crump
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-19 18:14 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <10i44lr$1bv4d$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #79495 |
On 19/12/2025 15:38, CrudeSausage wrote:
> On 2025-12-19 10:02 a.m., The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> On 19/12/2025 14:11, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>> Socialism is an ideology created by Satan to enrich his followers at
>>> the expense of everyone else. Anyone who supports it is a complete
>>> and utter moron.
>> Ah, Another 'Honk for Jesus' fruitcake...
>
> Remember you said this when you get to your destination.
>
I am already there.
--
"Strange as it seems, no amount of learning can cure stupidity, and
higher education positively fortifies it."
- Stephen Vizinczey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-19 08:09 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <20251219080907.000018a7@gmail.com> |
| In reply to | #79494 |
On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 15:02:28 +0000 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > > Socialism is an ideology created by Satan to enrich his followers > > at the expense of everyone else. Anyone who supports it is a > > complete and utter moron. > > Ah, Another 'Honk for Jesus' fruitcake... It's also, uh, theologically questionable :/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-19 21:56 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <9pqg1mxbau.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #79456 |
On 2025-12-19 02:45, CrudeSausage wrote: > On 2025-12-18 8:22 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >> On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 18:05:17 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> I'm no Marxist chum >> >> Do you benefit from a Socialist-style state-funded health service? >> >> That would be considered “Marxist” in certain quarters ... > > We have a Socialist-style state-funded health service here in Canada and > it is so successful that the government happily offers medical > assistance in dying because most people would rather die. > > Glenn Beck just paid to have a Canadian woman fly to the US to get > surgery for her rare thyroid issue. The Canadian system failed her so > miserably that she had chosen to die. <https://nationalpost.com/news/ > canada/saskatchewan-jolene-van-alstine-maid> > > That's the only thing socialism does: fail miserably wherever and > however it is applied. Like having Ozempic for free? -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-20 05:56 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <mqms47F2n74U7@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #79520 |
On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 21:56:41 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: > Like having Ozempic for free? TANSTAAFL
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-20 10:52 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <10i5v52$1s24h$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #79543 |
On 20/12/2025 05:56, rbowman wrote: > On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 21:56:41 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: > >> Like having Ozempic for free? > > TANSTAAFL > Yes. Obesity exists because of the way food is produced and marketed. And lifestyles in a post industrial age are sedentary Throwing Ozemopic on top of that is a bit of an unkown. -- "Socialist governments traditionally do make a financial mess. They always run out of other people's money. It's quite a characteristic of them" Margaret Thatcher
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-20 15:03 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <rumi1mx40j.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #79564 |
On 2025-12-20 11:52, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 20/12/2025 05:56, rbowman wrote: >> On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 21:56:41 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> >>> Like having Ozempic for free? >> >> TANSTAAFL >> > > Yes. Obesity exists because of the way food is produced and marketed. > And lifestyles in a post industrial age are sedentary > > Throwing Ozemopic on top of that is a bit of an unkown. > > Ozempic is prescribed for diabetes. But it was just an example of an expensive treatment, there are others. And obesity exist for many reasons. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-20 14:50 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <10i6d3b$21m67$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #79577 |
On 20/12/2025 14:03, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 2025-12-20 11:52, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 20/12/2025 05:56, rbowman wrote: >>> On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 21:56:41 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> >>>> Like having Ozempic for free? >>> >>> TANSTAAFL >>> >> >> Yes. Obesity exists because of the way food is produced and marketed. >> And lifestyles in a post industrial age are sedentary >> >> Throwing Ozemopic on top of that is a bit of an unkown. >> >> > > Ozempic is prescribed for diabetes. But it was just an example of an > expensive treatment, there are others. > > And obesity exist for many reasons. > Not really. You don't find obesity at all in certain cultures. Ultimately it represents a huge excess of calories in over calories out. And that is consistent with a very high starch intake, as is type II diabetes -- For in reason, all government without the consent of the governed is the very definition of slavery. Jonathan Swift
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-20 15:04 +0000 |
| Subject | Ozempic (and Mounjaro, Zepbound, etc) |
| Message-ID | <slrn10kdeog.1mj8g.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> |
| In reply to | #79577 |
["Followup-To:" header set to alt.unix.geeks] On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 21:56:41 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>> Like having Ozempic for free? On 20/12/2025 05:56, rbowman wrote: >>> TANSTAAFL On 2025-12-20 11:52, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> Yes. Obesity exists because of the way food is produced and marketed. >> And lifestyles in a post industrial age are sedentary >> >> Throwing Ozemopic on top of that is a bit of an unkown. On 2025-12-20, Carlos E.R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > Ozempic is prescribed for diabetes. But it was just an example of an > expensive treatment, there are others. > > And obesity exist for many reasons. When I was young, I was a scrawny kid. As a young geek, sleeping irregular hours, working 11 to 20:30 and eating at random times, I was still scrawny. After I got married, I started to slowly gain weight; but I was still pretty active, so it was slow. After my divorce, I was depressed, and much less active, and eventually reached 270 pounds. With a medically supervised calorie reduction program, I made it back to 195 pounds, but it was not a sustainable diet, and after I remarried, it crept back up to 230 lbs. With what I considered strict discipline, I made it down to 205, but was stuck oscilating between 205 and 215. Zepbound has been a revelation for me. I pay USD 500/month direct from EliLilly with monthly monitoring appointments with my doctor. The price illustrates our ridiculous US healthcare system. 1) If I was a lot more obese (290 lbs?) or my type 2 diabetes was less well managed, I would pay USD 30/month as my copay, and Medicare would pay the rest. 2) If I went to one of the shadier compound pharmacies with internet sales (that import the compounds directly from China), with imaginary medical supervision from their "virtual doctor". 3) If I took the risk of importing the compounds from China myself, I learned from an NYT article that I could get a 10 month supply for USD 150. So the difference between $15/month and $500/month is the quality control performed by the pharma company and the heavy TV advertising. With Zepbound I am experienccing for the first time in my life that I can go to lunch with a group of men and feel full when half the meal is still on the plate, and have them box up the rest for me. So this is what it's like for those people who are effortlessly slim without contorting themselves to be hungry all the time! No wonder they think I am just undisciplined. -- Lars Poulsen - an old geek in Santa Barbara, California
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-20 17:21 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Ozempic (and Mounjaro, Zepbound, etc) |
| Message-ID | <fkbekkhmp792brb6q4hkl1gu34bum7u1e9@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #79581 |
Lars Poulsen wrote: >When I was young, I was a scrawny kid. As a young geek, sleeping >irregular hours, working 11 to 20:30 and eating at random times, I was >still scrawny. After I got married, I started to slowly gain weight; >but I was still pretty active, so it was slow. After my divorce, >I was depressed, and much less active, and eventually reached 270 >pounds. With a medically supervised calorie reduction program, I made it >back to 195 pounds, but it was not a sustainable diet, and after I >remarried, it crept back up to 230 lbs. With what I considered strict >discipline, I made it down to 205, but was stuck oscilating between 205 >and 215. It's best to not put on the weight in the first place. Your body raises its "set point" of where it wants to be, and anything below that feels like you're starving. >Zepbound has been a revelation for me. I pay USD 500/month direct from >EliLilly with monthly monitoring appointments with my doctor. Hidiosly expensive drugs, that we all now have to pay for. And they must be taken for life! As if medical insurance wasn't costly enough already!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-20 20:45 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <YVD1R.397$WOOa.50@fx41.iad> |
| In reply to | #79564 |
On 2025-12-20, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 20/12/2025 05:56, rbowman wrote: > >> On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 21:56:41 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> >>> Like having Ozempic for free? >> >> TANSTAAFL > > Yes. Obesity exists because of the way food is produced and marketed. > And lifestyles in a post industrial age are sedentary > > Throwing Ozemopic on top of that is a bit of an unkown. "One pill makes you larger and one pill makes you small..." It's a good growth industry for Big Pharma, anyway. -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | Growth for the sake of \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | growth is the ideology X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | of the cancer cell. / \ if you read it the right way. | -- Edward Abbey
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sump <sumpusent@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-20 22:02 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <l57ekkt06g6s2qn2pv3l8kae4fdkab5q13@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #79599 |
On Sat, 20 Dec 2025 20:45:44 GMT, Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote: >On 2025-12-20, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> On 20/12/2025 05:56, rbowman wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 21:56:41 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> >>>> Like having Ozempic for free? >>> >>> TANSTAAFL >> >> Yes. Obesity exists because of the way food is produced and marketed. >> And lifestyles in a post industrial age are sedentary >> >> Throwing Ozemopic on top of that is a bit of an unkown. > >"One pill makes you larger and one pill makes you small..." > >It's a good growth industry for Big Pharma, anyway. So, the two pills manage to move a large thing to a smaller thing...which makes it a large thing... For how long? -- Sump
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-21 01:56 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <10i7k4o$2dvlm$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #79603 |
On 20/12/2025 22:02, Sump wrote: > On Sat, 20 Dec 2025 20:45:44 GMT, Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote: > >> On 2025-12-20, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> On 20/12/2025 05:56, rbowman wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 21:56:41 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>> >>>>> Like having Ozempic for free? >>>> >>>> TANSTAAFL >>> >>> Yes. Obesity exists because of the way food is produced and marketed. >>> And lifestyles in a post industrial age are sedentary >>> >>> Throwing Ozemopic on top of that is a bit of an unkown. >> >> "One pill makes you larger and one pill makes you small..." >> >> It's a good growth industry for Big Pharma, anyway. > > So, the two pills manage to move a large thing to a smaller thing...which makes it a large thing... For how long? > In the case of the original story about 6 hours. -- “Progress is precisely that which rules and regulations did not foresee,” – Ludwig von Mises
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sump <sumpusent@outlook.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-21 02:10 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <fklekkt4k9s15m60l1ob9q9331mbha8itn@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #79613 |
On Sun, 21 Dec 2025 01:56:40 +0000, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: >On 20/12/2025 22:02, Sump wrote: >> >> So, the two pills manage to move a large thing to a smaller thing...which makes it a large thing... For how long? >> >In the case of the original story about 6 hours. So a pillar of the community? -- Sump
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 6 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web