Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #74027 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2025-09-13 12:57 +0000 |
| Last post | 2025-09-14 13:18 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 220 — 32 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2025-09-13 12:57 +0000
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2025-09-13 13:23 +0000
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Jacek Marcin Jaworski <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-09-13 15:28 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-13 22:00 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-09-14 08:26 +1000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-13 23:04 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-14 09:01 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-14 21:17 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-15 02:13 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-09-15 00:50 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-15 12:38 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-09-15 09:52 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-15 08:19 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-09-15 10:49 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-15 09:03 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-09-15 12:04 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-15 22:29 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-09-16 08:23 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-16 08:53 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-16 12:54 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-16 20:07 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-16 21:42 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-16 22:12 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-09-17 06:52 +0200
E-mail server-side attachment deduplication (was: Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-17 12:02 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-09-17 06:52 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-15 12:44 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-15 22:35 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-16 02:09 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-16 01:12 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-09-16 05:47 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-16 05:48 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-16 12:57 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-17 05:56 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-17 11:15 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-17 09:31 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-09-15 10:01 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam1118@zugschl.us> - 2025-09-15 12:06 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-15 13:13 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-11 23:38 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-12 02:59 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-12 03:23 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-14 14:18 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-14 19:43 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-14 22:20 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-12 05:11 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 06:29 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-12 06:46 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-12 14:14 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-13 02:06 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-13 02:14 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-13 11:01 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-13 13:39 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-14 14:20 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-15 20:50 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-15 22:08 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-16 05:40 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-16 11:05 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-17 01:33 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-20 22:23 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-11-20 14:59 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-20 23:54 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-21 00:44 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-11-21 14:33 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-22 00:16 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-22 00:20 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-22 03:20 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-11-22 14:17 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-22 14:39 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-22 20:08 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? tom nossen <news@nossen.org> - 2025-11-26 22:07 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-26 21:50 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? tom nossen <news@nossen.org> - 2025-11-27 12:18 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-27 21:26 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-11-22 18:56 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 09:06 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 12:10 -0500
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 09:29 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-24 23:15 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 15:35 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-25 00:21 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-23 03:19 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-23 05:20 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 09:26 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 18:27 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-24 23:23 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-02 20:13 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-03 08:39 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-03 19:42 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-03 22:03 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-12-03 22:36 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-04 03:05 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-12-04 14:24 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-04 14:35 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-04 08:21 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-04 18:05 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-04 10:09 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-04 19:09 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-04 11:11 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-04 19:55 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-19 01:22 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-12-18 20:45 -0500
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-19 10:54 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-12-19 09:11 -0500
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-19 15:02 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-12-19 10:38 -0500
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-12-19 11:03 -0500
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-19 18:14 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-19 08:09 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-19 21:56 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-20 05:56 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-20 10:52 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-20 15:03 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-20 14:50 +0000
Ozempic (and Mounjaro, Zepbound, etc) Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2025-12-20 15:04 +0000
Re: Ozempic (and Mounjaro, Zepbound, etc) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-12-20 17:21 -0600
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-12-20 20:45 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Sump <sumpusent@outlook.com> - 2025-12-20 22:02 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-21 01:56 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Sump <sumpusent@outlook.com> - 2025-12-21 02:10 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-21 02:13 +0000
Re: Big Pharma (was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-21 02:09 +0000
Re: Big Pharma (was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) Sump <sumpusent@outlook.com> - 2025-12-21 02:38 +0000
Re: Big Pharma (was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-21 05:00 +0000
Re: Big Pharma (was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-21 10:57 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-21 04:47 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-21 04:43 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-20 15:01 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-20 14:47 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare( was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-21 02:11 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare( was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-21 04:34 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare( was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) Bob Tennent <rdtennent@tennent.ca> - 2025-12-22 02:17 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare( was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-22 04:43 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare( was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) Bob Tennent <rdtennent@tennent.ca> - 2025-12-22 15:53 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare( was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-22 01:54 -0500
Re: Marxist Healthcare( was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) Bob Tennent <rdtennent@tennent.ca> - 2025-12-22 15:57 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare( was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-12-22 08:49 -0800
Re: Marxist Healthcare( was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-22 19:16 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare (was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-22 21:24 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare( was Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-22 19:47 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-23 11:02 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2025-12-23 11:38 -0800
Re: Marxist Healthcare The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-23 20:23 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-23 22:41 +0000
Re: Marxist Healthcare The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-24 12:23 +0000
OT: Post-infection syndromes (was: Re: Marxist Healthcare) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-01-24 09:24 +0000
Re: OT: Post-infection syndromes The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-01-24 11:16 +0000
Re: OT: Post-infection syndromes "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-01-24 14:14 +0100
Re: OT: Post-infection syndromes Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-01-24 08:43 -0800
Re: Marxist Healthcare rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-23 23:42 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-12-20 08:33 -0500
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-21 04:40 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-12-21 19:59 -0500
Ozempic... "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-26 22:24 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-04 22:47 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-12-05 00:15 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-04 22:48 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-12-05 00:14 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-04 22:47 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-12-05 00:16 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-03 14:41 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-04 03:05 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2025-12-07 04:01 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-08 02:32 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2025-12-08 04:36 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2025-12-08 14:30 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-12-08 23:21 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-09 10:01 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-10 01:37 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-12-10 18:13 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-12-10 20:06 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-12 07:44 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-12-12 22:39 +1100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-12 12:18 +0000
SYSCALL "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-10 14:01 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-10 01:37 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-20 23:01 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-21 09:58 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-23 03:19 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-23 05:21 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-23 19:01 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-23 23:23 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-23 23:41 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 00:39 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-11-23 23:46 -0500
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 15:45 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-24 20:59 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? ALB <alb@lupinedb.org> - 2025-11-25 19:38 -0500
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-26 13:35 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-26 15:12 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-26 15:10 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-16 15:14 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 02:56 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-16 05:40 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-16 15:13 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-20 22:23 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-21 13:05 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-21 15:35 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-23 03:19 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-23 05:16 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-23 23:23 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 00:33 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-11-23 03:19 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-11-23 22:05 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-11-24 02:24 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-09-14 00:04 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-09-14 06:34 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jaworski1978@adres.pl> - 2025-09-14 06:48 +0200
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-09-14 06:37 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-09-14 08:00 -0500
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-09-13 22:24 +0000
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-09-14 13:38 +0200
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-14 12:53 +0000
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-09-13 11:02 -0400
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-09-13 17:02 +0000
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2025-09-13 18:23 +0000
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-09-14 00:12 +0000
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-09-14 08:45 +0000
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-09-14 05:01 -0400
Re: What Thinks Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2025-09-14 13:18 +0000
Page 8 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 Next page →
| From | Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-23 11:02 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Marxist Healthcare |
| Message-ID | <10idssl$6nea$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #79695 |
On 2025-12-22, Bobbie Sellers wrote: > On 12/22/25 07:57, Bob Tennent wrote: >> On Mon, 22 Dec 2025 01:54:45 -0500, c186282 wrote: >> > On 12/21/25 21:17, Bob Tennent wrote: >> >> On Sun, 21 Dec 2025 02:11:38 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >> >> > On Sat, 20 Dec 2025 14:47:21 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> That alone makes it way better than privately insured and delivered. >> >> >> health services. >> >> > >> >> > But ... but ... how can *anything* Government-run *possibly* be better >> >> > than a private for-profit service?!!?? Doesn’t that go against >> >> > everything that America Stands For??!?? >> >> >> >> Health care in Canada isn't "government-run". It's run >> >> by doctors and hospitals. Government *pays* doctors and >> >> hospitals but doesn't "run" them. >> > >> > Still doesn't do much good though ... subsidizing >> > incompetence doesn't IMPROVE things. >> >> American health costs are higher than anywhere in the world >> because of insurance administration. Yet outcomes are worse. >> Doesn't sound like incompetence to me. > > Sounds like in the USA we need to socialize, not medicine and patient > care, but insurance and take the profit to the insurers out of it. More likely the USA need to get rid of health insurance. Sadly, that thing is getting adopted in some other countries. And we need only look at the USA to see what the future might have in store... You can have private health care, but when the whole industry is designed around the business of health insurance, and "fixes" for it need to account for the insurance business, that seems to be when things go really wrong. > But then in the US Military Services health care is free to > service members > and their families. It is paid for out of the budget of the Defense > Department. > If that is not the situation we want to enjoy then we should keep > things as they > are. If it sounds desirable maybe everyone should enlist or just vote > to pay > some more taxes if we are working to pay for healthcare for everyone. Some people have a hard time grasping the concept of a non-anarchy state with taxes. Which may be particularly funny when/if that comes from the country that keeps several "taxation without representation" territories, so where taxation is even more prevalent than representative democracy. :-P https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4c/Us_reg_dc_2872.JPG > Oh and we have a movement called Medicare for All that you might > want to learn more about. I have Medicare and at 88 have to report > that in 2025 it has repaired my ankle and kept me in rehab facility for > about 2.5 months. I got out of the hospital on April 11tg. Then I noted > a bump on my nose that would not heal and it was basal cell carcinoma > and I had to go to a Dermatological Surgeon and she worked very hard > to make sure that all the cancer was gone. Right now I have a bunch > of stitches in my face and on my nose where a skin graft from my face > was done. Not one bit of fun in a long long day of cut, check the slice > for cancer and then slice again, then stitch up the whole mess, with > tons of local anesthetic injections. All on Medicare which is socialized > insurance for old folks like myself. I hope you're doing better nowadays and that all is well! -- Nuno Silva
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-23 11:38 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Marxist Healthcare |
| Message-ID | <10ier3o$h16g$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #79723 |
On 12/23/25 03:02, Nuno Silva wrote: > On 2025-12-22, Bobbie Sellers wrote: > Big snip > > I hope you're doing better nowadays and that all is well! > I wish I could say that i am doing better but it seems that the whole day of surgery and repair has exhaberated my Chronic Exhaustion and I am so, so worn out by the activities of daily living that it is a relief to sit down and type for a bit. Usually when I have over-exerted myself I get sick with influenza like symptoms but I am just so tired that it is hard to believe. If you every have a 'flu like illness and find that your get tired on resuming your normal activities for the sake of your health get more rest and be very careful of exertion. This may or may not prevent the post virual fatigue syndrome but I had never heard of such a problem in my years of nursing. So I went out and started to exercise again and soon I was reduced to very little activity. That was when I was 46 yoa and I am now 88 yoa and can barely take care of myself. bliss
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-23 20:23 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Marxist Healthcare |
| Message-ID | <10ietof$hobl$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #79735 |
On 23/12/2025 19:38, Bobbie Sellers wrote: > > > On 12/23/25 03:02, Nuno Silva wrote: >> On 2025-12-22, Bobbie Sellers wrote: >> > Big snip >> >> I hope you're doing better nowadays and that all is well! >> > I wish I could say that i am doing better but it seems that the > whole day of surgery and repair has exhaberated my Chronic Exhaustion > and I am so, so worn out by the activities of daily living that it is a > relief to sit down and type for a bit. > Usually when I have over-exerted myself I get sick with influenza > like symptoms but I am just so tired that it is hard to believe. > BTDTGTTS... My last operation fucked me up for over a year with similar symptoms. > If you every have a 'flu like illness and find that your get tired on > resuming your normal activities for the sake of your health get more > rest and be very careful of exertion. This may or may not prevent the > post virual fatigue syndrome but I had never heard of such a problem > in my years of nursing. So I went out and started to exercise again and > soon I was reduced to very little activity. That was when I was 46 yoa > and I am now 88 yoa and can barely take care of myself. > > bliss You may have some undiagnosed viral illness or even a depressed immune system due to some cancer or other. -- “But what a weak barrier is truth when it stands in the way of an hypothesis!” Mary Wollstonecraft
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-23 22:41 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Marxist Healthcare |
| Message-ID | <wwvy0mslt2e.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> |
| In reply to | #79738 |
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes: > On 23/12/2025 19:38, Bobbie Sellers wrote: >> I wish I could say that i am doing better but it seems that the >> whole day of surgery and repair has exhaberated my Chronic Exhaustion >> and I am so, so worn out by the activities of daily living that it is a >> relief to sit down and type for a bit. >> Usually when I have over-exerted myself I get sick with influenza >> like symptoms but I am just so tired that it is hard to believe. >> > BTDTGTTS... > > My last operation fucked me up for over a year with similar symptoms. > >> If you every have a 'flu like illness and find that your get tired on >> resuming your normal activities for the sake of your health get more >> rest and be very careful of exertion. This may or may not prevent the >> post virual fatigue syndrome but I had never heard of such a problem >> in my years of nursing. So I went out and started to exercise again and >> soon I was reduced to very little activity. That was when I was 46 yoa >> and I am now 88 yoa and can barely take care of myself. >> bliss > > You may have some undiagnosed viral illness or even a depressed immune > system due to some cancer or other. I think the long-term impacts of viral infections are becoming clearer and clearer. Post-polio syndrome has been reported since at least the 1980s. Long COVID is well known. Epstein-Barr virus has been statistically connected to MS (although I don’t think anyone’s figured out what the mechanism is yet) and more recently Lupus. Personally I’ve got lucky so far. But I know four people with MS and one of my coworkers spent years struggling with long COVID, with Bobbie’s description above matching their experience. (Another coworker went long-term sick around the same time but I don’t have the inside track on what’s up with them.) -- https://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-24 12:23 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Marxist Healthcare |
| Message-ID | <10igm0v$1086g$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #79751 |
On 23/12/2025 22:41, Richard Kettlewell wrote: > The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes: >> On 23/12/2025 19:38, Bobbie Sellers wrote: >>> I wish I could say that i am doing better but it seems that the >>> whole day of surgery and repair has exhaberated my Chronic Exhaustion >>> and I am so, so worn out by the activities of daily living that it is a >>> relief to sit down and type for a bit. >>> Usually when I have over-exerted myself I get sick with influenza >>> like symptoms but I am just so tired that it is hard to believe. >>> >> BTDTGTTS... >> >> My last operation fucked me up for over a year with similar symptoms. >> >>> If you every have a 'flu like illness and find that your get tired on >>> resuming your normal activities for the sake of your health get more >>> rest and be very careful of exertion. This may or may not prevent the >>> post virual fatigue syndrome but I had never heard of such a problem >>> in my years of nursing. So I went out and started to exercise again and >>> soon I was reduced to very little activity. That was when I was 46 yoa >>> and I am now 88 yoa and can barely take care of myself. >>> bliss >> >> You may have some undiagnosed viral illness or even a depressed immune >> system due to some cancer or other. > > I think the long-term impacts of viral infections are becoming clearer > and clearer. Post-polio syndrome has been reported since at least the > 1980s. Long COVID is well known. Epstein-Barr virus has been > statistically connected to MS (although I don’t think anyone’s figured > out what the mechanism is yet) and more recently Lupus. > > Personally I’ve got lucky so far. But I know four people with MS and > one of my coworkers spent years struggling with long COVID, with > Bobbie’s description above matching their experience. (Another coworker > went long-term sick around the same time but I don’t have the inside > track on what’s up with them.) > I had a friend who had all those symptoms for years. Eventually he died of undiagnosed cancer. There were literally no signs apart from fatigue, at all, until his back exploded in pain and they found bowel cancer cells everywhere inside his body - except his bowels. Don't ask me how that one works. The problem seems to be that fatigue is the body's way of saying its not well, and that is it. It might be a rotten tooth, it might be a virus, it might be cancer, or (just a) compromised immune system, Or you might just be tired of life... -- "It was a lot more fun being 20 in the 70's that it is being 70 in the 20's" Joew Walsh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-01-24 09:24 +0000 |
| Subject | OT: Post-infection syndromes (was: Re: Marxist Healthcare) |
| Message-ID | <10l2359$le95$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #79751 |
On 2025-12-23, Richard Kettlewell wrote: > The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes: >> On 23/12/2025 19:38, Bobbie Sellers wrote: >>> I wish I could say that i am doing better but it seems that the >>> whole day of surgery and repair has exhaberated my Chronic Exhaustion >>> and I am so, so worn out by the activities of daily living that it is a >>> relief to sit down and type for a bit. >>> Usually when I have over-exerted myself I get sick with influenza >>> like symptoms but I am just so tired that it is hard to believe. >>> >> BTDTGTTS... >> >> My last operation fucked me up for over a year with similar symptoms. >> >>> If you every have a 'flu like illness and find that your get tired on >>> resuming your normal activities for the sake of your health get more >>> rest and be very careful of exertion. This may or may not prevent the >>> post virual fatigue syndrome but I had never heard of such a problem >>> in my years of nursing. So I went out and started to exercise again and >>> soon I was reduced to very little activity. That was when I was 46 yoa >>> and I am now 88 yoa and can barely take care of myself. >>> bliss >> >> You may have some undiagnosed viral illness or even a depressed immune >> system due to some cancer or other. > > I think the long-term impacts of viral infections are becoming clearer > and clearer. Post-polio syndrome has been reported since at least the > 1980s. Long COVID is well known. Epstein-Barr virus has been > statistically connected to MS (although I don’t think anyone’s figured > out what the mechanism is yet) and more recently Lupus. > > Personally I’ve got lucky so far. But I know four people with MS and > one of my coworkers spent years struggling with long COVID, with > Bobbie’s description above matching their experience. (Another coworker > went long-term sick around the same time but I don’t have the inside > track on what’s up with them.) I do get the impression that there are some patterns arising out of "Long COVID" that seem to match what I've seen before SARS-CoV-2 was a thing, and that there might be something out there. Now COVID-19 could have been a good excuse not only to improve societies' reaction to illness (mask when sick, improve sick leave, and so on), but also to understand these post-infection scenarios better and at least take them into account somehow. Sadly, we know this was grabbed by political extremists that are undoing the little advances that were achieved during the early years of the pandemic. (I'm happy to move this to alt.unix.geeks if there's any reply.) -- Nuno Silva
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-01-24 11:16 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Post-infection syndromes |
| Message-ID | <10l29mh$o3kj$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #81585 |
On 24/01/2026 09:24, Nuno Silva wrote: > Now COVID-19 could have been a good excuse not only to improve > societies' reaction to illness (mask when sick, improve sick leave, and > so on), but also to understand these post-infection scenarios better and > at least take them into account somehow. > > Sadly, we know this was grabbed by political extremists that are undoing > the little advances that were achieved during the early years of the > pandemic. politicians today are far more interested in controlling populations than tending to them and as for educating them? Heaven forfend! Would any educated person vote for any of them? -- "Corbyn talks about equality, justice, opportunity, health care, peace, community, compassion, investment, security, housing...." "What kind of person is not interested in those things?" "Jeremy Corbyn?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-01-24 14:14 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Post-infection syndromes |
| Message-ID | <i6te4mx2th.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #81585 |
[Note Followup-To: alt.unix.geeks, since this has nothing to do with Linux] On 2026-01-24 10:24, Nuno Silva wrote: > On 2025-12-23, Richard Kettlewell wrote: > >> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes: >>> On 23/12/2025 19:38, Bobbie Sellers wrote: >>>> I wish I could say that i am doing better but it seems that the >>>> whole day of surgery and repair has exhaberated my Chronic Exhaustion >>>> and I am so, so worn out by the activities of daily living that it is a >>>> relief to sit down and type for a bit. >>>> Usually when I have over-exerted myself I get sick with influenza >>>> like symptoms but I am just so tired that it is hard to believe. >>>> >>> BTDTGTTS... >>> >>> My last operation fucked me up for over a year with similar symptoms. >>> >>>> If you every have a 'flu like illness and find that your get tired on >>>> resuming your normal activities for the sake of your health get more >>>> rest and be very careful of exertion. This may or may not prevent the >>>> post virual fatigue syndrome but I had never heard of such a problem >>>> in my years of nursing. So I went out and started to exercise again and >>>> soon I was reduced to very little activity. That was when I was 46 yoa >>>> and I am now 88 yoa and can barely take care of myself. >>>> bliss >>> >>> You may have some undiagnosed viral illness or even a depressed immune >>> system due to some cancer or other. >> >> I think the long-term impacts of viral infections are becoming clearer >> and clearer. Post-polio syndrome has been reported since at least the >> 1980s. Long COVID is well known. Epstein-Barr virus has been >> statistically connected to MS (although I don’t think anyone’s figured >> out what the mechanism is yet) and more recently Lupus. >> >> Personally I’ve got lucky so far. But I know four people with MS and >> one of my coworkers spent years struggling with long COVID, with >> Bobbie’s description above matching their experience. (Another coworker >> went long-term sick around the same time but I don’t have the inside >> track on what’s up with them.) > > I do get the impression that there are some patterns arising out of > "Long COVID" that seem to match what I've seen before SARS-CoV-2 was a > thing, and that there might be something out there. > > Now COVID-19 could have been a good excuse not only to improve > societies' reaction to illness (mask when sick, improve sick leave, and > so on), but also to understand these post-infection scenarios better and > at least take them into account somehow. > > Sadly, we know this was grabbed by political extremists that are undoing > the little advances that were achieved during the early years of the > pandemic. > > (I'm happy to move this to alt.unix.geeks if there's any reply.) Here we had an early flu season, early and strong, and suddenly masks were again mandatory in clinics and health centres. People just accepted it without complaint, but many were not aware and did not have a mask, had to be supplied one on the spot. Me, I still have a mask or two in my bag. In the far east, people with flu have the courtesy of wearing a mask on the street. Since before Covid, I think. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-01-24 08:43 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: OT: Post-infection syndromes |
| Message-ID | <10l2ssa$v0e5$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #81593 |
On 1/24/26 05:14, Carlos E.R. wrote: > > [Note Followup-To: alt.unix.geeks, since this has nothing to do with > Linux] It has a lot to do with some Linux Users. > > On 2026-01-24 10:24, Nuno Silva wrote: >> On 2025-12-23, Richard Kettlewell wrote: >> >>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes: >>>> On 23/12/2025 19:38, Bobbie Sellers wrote: >>>>> I wish I could say that i am doing better but it seems that the >>>>> whole day of surgery and repair has exhaberated my Chronic Exhaustion >>>>> and I am so, so worn out by the activities of daily living that it >>>>> is a >>>>> relief to sit down and type for a bit. >>>>> Usually when I have over-exerted myself I get sick with >>>>> influenza >>>>> like symptoms but I am just so tired that it is hard to believe. >>>>> >>>> BTDTGTTS... >>>> >>>> My last operation fucked me up for over a year with similar symptoms. >>>> >>>>> If you every have a 'flu like illness and find that your get >>>>> tired on >>>>> resuming your normal activities for the sake of your health get more >>>>> rest and be very careful of exertion. This may or may not prevent the >>>>> post virual fatigue syndrome but I had never heard of such a problem >>>>> in my years of nursing. So I went out and started to exercise >>>>> again and >>>>> soon I was reduced to very little activity. That was when I was 46 yoa >>>>> and I am now 88 yoa and can barely take care of myself. >>>>> bliss >>>> >>>> You may have some undiagnosed viral illness or even a depressed immune >>>> system due to some cancer or other. I don't think I have cancer but I have age as well as my SAID. Most people after the age of 42 suffer immune systems decline. >>> >>> I think the long-term impacts of viral infections are becoming clearer >>> and clearer. Post-polio syndrome has been reported since at least the >>> 1980s. Long COVID is well known. Epstein-Barr virus has been >>> statistically connected to MS (although I don’t think anyone’s figured >>> out what the mechanism is yet) and more recently Lupus. >>> >>> Personally I’ve got lucky so far. But I know four people with MS and >>> one of my coworkers spent years struggling with long COVID, with >>> Bobbie’s description above matching their experience. (Another coworker >>> went long-term sick around the same time but I don’t have the inside >>> track on what’s up with them.) >> >> I do get the impression that there are some patterns arising out of >> "Long COVID" that seem to match what I've seen before SARS-CoV-2 was a >> thing, and that there might be something out there. >> >> Now COVID-19 could have been a good excuse not only to improve >> societies' reaction to illness (mask when sick, improve sick leave, and >> so on), but also to understand these post-infection scenarios better and >> at least take them into account somehow. >> >> Sadly, we know this was grabbed by political extremists that are undoing >> the little advances that were achieved during the early years of the >> pandemic. >> >> (I'm happy to move this to alt.unix.geeks if there's any reply.) > > Here we had an early flu season, early and strong, and suddenly masks > were again mandatory in clinics and health centres. People just accepted > it without complaint, but many were not aware and did not have a mask, > had to be supplied one on the spot. Me, I still have a mask or two in my > bag. > > > In the far east, people with flu have the courtesy of wearing a mask on > the street. Since before Covid, I think. Quite a while before Covid-19. I saw them on the streets when I was on Taiwan in the 1950s. Not just with influenza but with any upper respiratory illness that might be spread by coughing, sneezing, or merely breathing a bit hard. I have multiple allegies and sensitivities and am subject to coughing spells. Since I have to use the buses to go places when i am away from my apartment I am almost always wearing a mask. Back in 2020 when they announced that people could have Covid without symptoms I started weating a doubled surgical mask and now kn95 masks. Under aegis of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. who may be just a grifter we have a spreading effusion of measles and he has had to reverse his stance against the use of the measles, mumps and rubella. He is hoping to infect lots of infants with Hepatitis by removing that vaccine from the list of scheduled shots for infants. I was born before we had the MMR vaccine or the Hepatitis vaccine and have had most of those some as I was working as a nurse. The Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disease that I became aware of when i was 46 followed not only numerous viral infections but physical stress due to surgical blood loss. Some people have similar problems with malformation of the orifice in the skull that permits connection of the brain the spinal cord. Those can also be due to trauma. Then we had one man in the CFIDS support group online who eventually learned his brain was being attacked by late stage syphillis. Others find themselves being attacked by mold spores. My point is that there are lots of causes including parasitism of the sufferer by various organisms from those causing malaria to more exotic little things that make your immune system their playground. bliss
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-23 23:42 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Marxist Healthcare |
| Message-ID | <mr0nmcFluk9U9@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #79723 |
On Tue, 23 Dec 2025 11:02:45 +0000, Nuno Silva wrote: > More likely the USA need to get rid of health insurance. Sadly, that > thing is getting adopted in some other countries. And we need only look > at the USA to see what the future might have in store... That would be the real answer but it isn't going to happen. When I was a kid we didn't have health insurance. The closest we came was when my father had a hernia repair in a VA hospital since he was a veteran. Otoh, a visit to the doctor was something you could afford to pay out of pocket. The insurance companies operate like Las Vegas. A percentage of the money passing through their hands sticks to their fingers. Vegas casinos don't care about individual winners and losers, just the churn. For health insurance there is no, if not negative, incentive to control costs.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-20 08:33 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <69474af0$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #79520 |
On 2025-12-19 3:56 p.m., Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 2025-12-19 02:45, CrudeSausage wrote: >> On 2025-12-18 8:22 p.m., Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >>> On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 18:05:17 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> >>>> I'm no Marxist chum >>> >>> Do you benefit from a Socialist-style state-funded health service? >>> >>> That would be considered “Marxist” in certain quarters ... >> >> We have a Socialist-style state-funded health service here in Canada >> and it is so successful that the government happily offers medical >> assistance in dying because most people would rather die. >> >> Glenn Beck just paid to have a Canadian woman fly to the US to get >> surgery for her rare thyroid issue. The Canadian system failed her so >> miserably that she had chosen to die. <https://nationalpost.com/news/ >> canada/saskatchewan-jolene-van-alstine-maid> >> >> That's the only thing socialism does: fail miserably wherever and >> however it is applied. > > Like having Ozempic for free? To allow obese people to take shortcuts to proper fitness? Or to counter the effects of having had a terrible nutrition your entire life? If that's how you want your tax money spent, that's fine. I am aware that diabetes is also genetic, but those people aren't the ones the people behind Ozempic are selling to anymore. -- CrudeSausage John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-21 04:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <mqpc1sFf5tvU10@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #79607 |
On Sat, 20 Dec 2025 08:33:32 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: > I am aware that diabetes is also genetic, but those people aren't the > ones the people behind Ozempic are selling to anymore. Technically using Ozempic strictly for weight loss is off label. It is a medication for Type 2 diabetes. Wegovy is the same shit in a higher dosage and is used to treat obesity. The catch is the former is covered by most insurance plans, the latter isn't. Can you see the potential for abuse?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-21 19:59 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <694897e1$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #79637 |
On 2025-12-20 11:40 p.m., rbowman wrote: > On Sat, 20 Dec 2025 08:33:32 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> I am aware that diabetes is also genetic, but those people aren't the >> ones the people behind Ozempic are selling to anymore. > > Technically using Ozempic strictly for weight loss is off label. It is a > medication for Type 2 diabetes. > > Wegovy is the same shit in a higher dosage and is used to treat obesity. > The catch is the former is covered by most insurance plans, the latter > isn't. Can you see the potential for abuse? I do. I imagine that there are tons of pigs in Canada abusing our health care system to cheat on their weight loss. -- CrudeSausage John 14:6
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-26 22:24 +0100 |
| Subject | Ozempic... |
| Message-ID | <r0b32mx29d.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> |
| In reply to | #79637 |
On 2025-12-21 05:40, rbowman wrote: > On Sat, 20 Dec 2025 08:33:32 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> I am aware that diabetes is also genetic, but those people aren't the >> ones the people behind Ozempic are selling to anymore. > > Technically using Ozempic strictly for weight loss is off label. It is a > medication for Type 2 diabetes. > > Wegovy is the same shit in a higher dosage and is used to treat obesity. > The catch is the former is covered by most insurance plans, the latter > isn't. Can you see the potential for abuse? I was thinking of diabetes. There are also people that can't help been obese. And people in both groups. -- Cheers, Carlos. ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-04 22:47 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <XnsB3ABB51108C55HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5> |
| In reply to | #78288 |
John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> news:20251204082129.000038cc@gmail.com Thu, 04 Dec 2025 16:21:29 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote: > On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 14:35:52 +0000 > The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> > You do this often -- argue against bizarre straw men you create. >> > And you do so out of your own hatred and personal issues. Try to do >> > better! >> >> Clearly a Marxist. > > The irony here is palpable. > ROFL, isn't it though. Brock McNuggets is also known as Snit aka Michael Glasser the prescott computer guy. . These links should help you out: >> <https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11> -- Liar, lawyer; mirror show me, what's the difference? Kangaroo done hung the guilty with the innocent Liar, lawyer; mirror for ya', what's the difference? Kangaroo be stoned. He's guilty as the government
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-05 00:15 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <69322414$2$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #78302 |
On Dec 4, 2025 at 3:47:58 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB3ABB51108C55HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
> John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> news:20251204082129.000038cc@gmail.com
> Thu, 04 Dec 2025 16:21:29 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 4 Dec 2025 14:35:52 +0000
>> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>> You do this often -- argue against bizarre straw men you create.
>>>> And you do so out of your own hatred and personal issues. Try to do
>>>> better!
>>>
>>> Clearly a Marxist.
>>
>> The irony here is palpable.
>>
>
> ROFL, isn't it though.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
* Gremlin got confused over Preference files and profiles on macOS.
<XnsACA2266D9357HT1@b61h2qa58gRz40SbioSFbq.6IDI>:
-----
Did he really tell you that after deleting your profile for the
photos program (when it's not running - I shouldn't have to make
sure you understand that, but, you are David Brooks and well, you
aren't exactly the brightest bulb in the pack.) you should restart
your machine to be sure the effect worked? David, y2k called and
they'd like their technology back if that's really the case. rofl.
Ensure no processes are running that program uses, ensure the
program itself isn't running, whack your profile. Start the
program, don't restart your machine or logoff/login again to 'fix'
it without first seeing if it's okay after whacking the profile.
-----
<XnsACA22716D09FHT1@b61h2qa58gRz40SbioSFbq.6IDI>
-----
Do you have anything you care about under that profile
that you want to retain? If you do, and this includes any
customizations you've made to the GUI then you have to
determine if it's worth retaining, or just scrapping and
starting over. Do you have any user data specifically tied
to that account that would be lost if you purged it?
-----
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-04 22:48 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <XnsB3ABB512155AEHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5> |
| In reply to | #78286 |
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> news:10gs688$bvup$2@dont-email.me Thu, 04 Dec 2025 14:35:52 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote: > On 04/12/2025 14:24, Brock McNuggets wrote: >> You do this often -- argue against bizarre straw men you create. And >> you do so out of your own hatred and personal issues. Try to do better! > > Clearly a Marxist. ROFL! Try not to take all of the jenkem snit likes to share at once, ok? >> <https://tinyurl.com/WhatIsSnit> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitliesmethods> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snit-Reviews> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitwhopperlie> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snit-teddybear> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitonduck> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitongoogle> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse1> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse2> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse3> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse4> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse5> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse6> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse7> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse8> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse9> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse10> >> <https://tinyurl.com/Snitdrugabuse11> He's projecting and trying *very hard* to excuse the fact he fucked up in a big way in this thread when he responded to me mostly using ChatGPT to help him because he knows fuckall about low level code of any kind. In case you are a bit, slow, Brock McNuggets is Snit. Also known as Michael Lee Glasser of Prescott Arizona. The presscott computer guy. ROFLMFAO! Don't be a such a tool going forward, bro! :) -- Liar, lawyer; mirror show me, what's the difference? Kangaroo done hung the guilty with the innocent Liar, lawyer; mirror for ya', what's the difference? Kangaroo be stoned. He's guilty as the government
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-05 00:14 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <693223ff$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #78303 |
On Dec 4, 2025 at 3:48:00 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB3ABB512155AEHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
> The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
> news:10gs688$bvup$2@dont-email.me Thu, 04 Dec 2025 14:35:52 GMT in
> comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:
>
>> On 04/12/2025 14:24, Brock McNuggets wrote:
>>> You do this often -- argue against bizarre straw men you create. And
>>> you do so out of your own hatred and personal issues. Try to do better!
>>
>> Clearly a Marxist.
>
> ROFL! Try not to take all of the jenkem snit likes to share at once, ok?
You really are in a trolling mode. LOL! Time to help you remember how clueless
you are. Keep in mind I do this IN RESPONSE to your trolling lies. :)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
* Gremlin thought Unicode letter-like symbols were a different font.
<XnsAB71E34305C94HT1@5X40MEzgnn1982sRxYGhQ1dvm7V9MV2Z64U.TM6M5Igc40qPeP.gaV5b
5>
-----
And unlike your silly code tests you've tried to do
recently, AZ doesn't require any specific fonts, ...
-----
----------------------------------------------------------------------
* Gremlin got confused over what degrees he says he has and what
they mean.
* You have two degrees, both in CS and you did not know IT was different.
* You have two degrees, both in IT.
* You have two degrees, one in IT and one in CS.
* You blame me for you confusing IT with IS though you offer no evidence.
* You cannot decide if you have "two" degrees or "several".
* They’re "honorary" except when you "did the work and took the tests."
* You project your confusion and dishonesty onto me.
All trivial to show:
Diesel / Gremlin <XnsAB593FA1DFBDHT1@MjEwUG.BDMbgpk>:
-----
Well, I have two Masters myself, but they are in CS I
wasn't aware CS and I.T were/are seperate entities now.
-----
Diesel / Gremlin <XnsAC703AA7A6220HT1@tkRp4lHo04W6T4lOY83W.tuvxq31.7>:
-----
Unlike yourself snit, I hold two honorary masters in IT
-----
Diesel / Gremlin <XnsAC703AA7A6220HT1@tkRp4lHo04W6T4lOY83W.tuvxq31.7>:
-----
We discussed at length previously his masters in IS, and
mine in IT and the differences between them. He was quite
adamant that he had a masters in IS, *not* IT as is mine.
-----
Diesel / Gremlin <XnsAC75C8B08FCD2HT1@dcFn0WjC2iFiA86fj2h.35Y>:
-----
One is in CS, the other is in IT.
-----
Diesel / Gremlin <XnsB31E2432CF33FHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
-----
I have several honorary degrees,
-----
Diesel / Gremlin <XnsB31E2432CF33FHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
-----
I actually did the work and took the tests to earn them
-----
And the most ironic accusation of yours:
Diesel / Gremlin <XnsAC703AA7A6220HT1@tkRp4lHo04W6T4lOY83W.tuvxq31.7>:
-----
I'd also like to know how Snit could be so confused
concerning which degree he has.
-----
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-04 22:47 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <XnsB3ABB50F457B1HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5> |
| In reply to | #78285 |
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> news:6931999a$6$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Thu, 04 Dec 2025 14:24:26 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote: > On Dec 3, 2025 at 8:05:22 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote > <XnsB3AAE0B49172CHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>: > >> Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> >> news:6930bb75$7$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Wed, 03 Dec 2025 >> 22:36:37 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote: >> >>> On Dec 3, 2025 at 3:03:12 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote >>> <XnsB3AAAD7A1C510HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>: >>> Most of what you're describing is technically possible under DOS, but >>> the way you're framing it doesn’t match how real software of the era >>> operated. >> >> All of what I described (buffer overrun specifically) works under DOS, >> os/2warp, Windows, Linux and MacOS. > > Nobody said otherwise. Seriously, not one person ever did. Certainly not > me. Yes, you did. You didn't understand what I was describing and misattributed my comments to have been about viruses specifically when they weren't. My original post: MID: <XnsB3AAAD7A1C510HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5> Why muck around with byte for byte reads and writes when you can have the OS give you much bigger chunks at once right? It's assembler speed without actually doing it in asm. It's not slow. Which is why I said previously that you could save considerable time by doing a quick looksee at the file before you opted to scan the entire damn thing. The only limit to how many bytes that could be read/written in one go was the size of your allocated memory. Using straight up interrupt calls, just like you would have in pure assembly is going to be faster than whatever file i/o functions your HLL language of choice had available to you. Your completely bypassing the fluff. The drawback is that you are entirely on your own if you go this route. You could for example, screwup and ask to read more bytes than you allocated memory for. If you do this, you will overwrite some other region of memory with the extra bytes. which usually leads to a crash scenario. But, if you're creative and understand how your executable is built, you can take advantage of that and instead of a crash cause code execution instead - those extra bytes are executable machine code that you intended to load this way. That's a sneaky, but very old, method of getting around hueristics that might check to see what you're doing. They assume it's a standard interrupt call to read bytes, not considering that you're also using it to jmp to another location in memory with additional code it doesn't presently see because that special code isn't already in your main program. Snits response: MID: <6931999a$6$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> Your interrupt calls seem legit, but "reading past a buffer to trigger execution" is more movie-hacker than real-world practice; DOS viruses mostly used explicit jumps, not accidental overreads. A followup by me attempting to educate Snit; that what I described is not movie-hacker but is infact real life and well known: MID: <XnsB3AAE0B49172CHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffer_overflow If you actually comprehended what I wrote, you would have known that I was describing a buffer overflow exploit. Since you didn't have a clue, because you don't comprehend what you read well at all (sorry bud, but this is well documented going back decades with you) that's why you relied on AI and shared what it told you. Which isn't correct, btw. :) Since you assumed I was discussing viruses specifically though, I do know of several viruses and worms from the late 80s and 90s that did use the technique. The Morris worm (which is a subset of a computer virus) was the earliest one I remember doing it. There were others, though. Just not as popular due to them either being proof of concept or having other issues which prevented their long term survival in the wild. There was nothing 'accidental' about those over reads. As I wrote previously, it was intentional and required you to be very familiar with the final executable structure of your program as it would be processed internally - not necessarily on disk. .COM files execute as is on disk in memory; what you see is what you get. .EXE files do not by default, but, if properly crafted, they can as well. It's *very easy* due to the nature of the files internals and executable layout to convert a .COM into an .EXE; it only requires a small header. I actually demonstrated that little 'trick' years ago to Pooh who claimed he was something he wasn't and like you, tried to talk out of turn. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffer_overflow It would benefit you greatly to read the contents of that URL. Specifically for *comprehension* so that you don't expose the severe lack of actual knowledge and understanding you have on the subject of writing low level code. You really *don't know* what the fuck you're talking about on this subject, Snit. > Please try to read for comprehension and not just attack. It would help > you a lot. ROFL! Stop projecting, you tech illiterate shithead. And why didn't you try using chatgpt again with this: Those calls are all legit. You can cross reference any of them with Ralph Browns interrupt list. You really shouldn't rely on ChatGPT or any other AI to participate in this discussion. It's piss easy to fool them. Especially now that I know you're using AI to participate in the first place. I've left a great example of that in this reply. Just to drive the point home. byebye: ax=&hexfa02 dx=&hex5945 bx=rofl int86(&hex16,ax,bx,cx,dx,na,na,na,na,na) code &hexb8,&hex02,&hexfe,&hexbe,&hex41,&hex4e,&hexbf,&hex55,&hex4e,&hexcd,&hex2f return Chatgpt can only let you fake knowledge you don't actually have upto a point. Without the original label and my comments, ChatGPT has no idea what that code does. I also took the time to feed it to googles gemini. Geminis results are more useful from a technical breakdown, but, it doesn't know what's going on either. When I fed it the original source code without any snipping of my comments and using the original label, They were both mostly able to tell me what the code was doing. These AIs are not as reliable as you seem to think they are, bud. They both relied on my label and my comments - neither of them were able to properly identify what the code is doing without them. These AI things do not actually 'think' Snit. You think that by not including it in your reply that it goes away or something? ROFL!!! Chatgpt couldn't help you fake it this time, bud. Any guesses then as to what that code does? I'll share the original and you can run it thru chatgpt if you'd like. ROFLMFAO! It's real code, it actually does something, very specific. But you are totally fucking clueless without Chatgpts help - because you know NOTHING of writing low level code. You should have stayed in your lane, fucktard. -- Liar, lawyer; mirror show me, what's the difference? Kangaroo done hung the guilty with the innocent Liar, lawyer; mirror for ya', what's the difference? Kangaroo be stoned. He's guilty as the government
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-12-05 00:16 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Message-ID | <69322441$0$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> |
| In reply to | #78301 |
On Dec 4, 2025 at 3:47:56 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB3ABB50F457B1HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>: > Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> > news:6931999a$6$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Thu, 04 Dec 2025 14:24:26 > GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote: > >> On Dec 3, 2025 at 8:05:22 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote >> <XnsB3AAE0B49172CHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>: >> >>> Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> >>> news:6930bb75$7$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Wed, 03 Dec 2025 >>> 22:36:37 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote: >>> >>>> On Dec 3, 2025 at 3:03:12 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote >>>> <XnsB3AAAD7A1C510HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>: >>>> Most of what you're describing is technically possible under DOS, but >>>> the way you're framing it doesn’t match how real software of the era >>>> operated. >>> >>> All of what I described (buffer overrun specifically) works under DOS, >>> os/2warp, Windows, Linux and MacOS. >> >> Nobody said otherwise. Seriously, not one person ever did. Certainly not >> me. > > Yes, you did. But you cannot quote it. Which means you just got confused again. I never said, suggested, hinted, or implied what you attributed to me. Learn to read! ... -- It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web