Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #91992 > unrolled thread

More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI

Started byLeroy H <lh@somewhere.net>
First post2026-09-22 20:08 +0000
Last post2026-09-26 14:01 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 203 — 24 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc


Contents

  More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-22 20:08 +0000
    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-09-22 22:39 +0000
      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-23 00:25 -0400
    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-23 09:41 +0100
      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-09-23 08:50 -0700
        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-26 12:50 +0000
      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-23 23:11 -0400
    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-23 12:43 +0200
      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-09-23 14:09 +0000
    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> - 2026-09-23 11:55 -0400
      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-09-23 23:00 +0000
        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 01:31 +0000
        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-24 10:07 +0100
          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:30 +0000
        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Anton Antimo <anton@safunu.org> - 2026-09-24 10:39 -0300
        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-26 13:02 +0000
          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-26 14:51 +0000
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-27 13:29 +0000
              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-27 19:39 +0000
                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-10-11 11:37 +0000
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-10-11 14:56 +0000
          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 09:55 +0100
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-27 11:01 +0000
              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 07:57 +0100
                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-09-30 08:40 -0700
                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-30 20:50 +0000
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-30 20:56 -0400
                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 04:21 +0000
                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-10-01 08:04 -0700
                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 00:48 +0000
                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 00:32 -0400
                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 00:51 +0100
                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 02:02 -0400
                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 09:27 +0100
                                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 23:21 -0400
                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:17 +0100
                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 22:34 -0400
                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 02:57 -0400
                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:24 +0100
                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 22:59 -0400
                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 09:02 +0100
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 04:16 +0000
                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-10-03 10:08 +0000
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 12:06 +0100
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 12:55 +0100
    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-09-23 19:24 +0200
      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-23 18:28 +0000
        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-09-23 21:04 +0200
          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-09-24 07:16 +1000
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-09-24 12:03 +0200
              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2026-09-26 17:37 +1000
                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 09:53 +0100
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-27 18:56 +0000
                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-28 12:52 -0400
                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-28 17:21 +0000
                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-28 15:56 -0400
                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-29 03:30 -0400
                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2026-09-29 02:20 +0000
                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-29 03:45 -0400
                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2026-09-29 12:36 +0000
                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-29 10:51 -0400
                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-29 18:19 +0000
                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-29 19:38 -0400
                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-29 23:55 +0000
                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-29 18:54 -0400
                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-29 23:55 +0000
                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 01:14 +0100
                                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-30 02:04 +0000
                                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Abraham <chris@gerriscorp.com> - 2026-09-30 13:27 -0400
                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-30 15:47 -0400
                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-30 20:17 +0000
                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-30 20:33 -0400
                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 04:55 +0000
                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-01 02:01 -0400
                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 11:08 +0100
                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 00:42 +0000
                                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-01 23:49 -0400
                                                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:14 +0100
                                                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 19:33 +0000
                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 20:44 +0100
                                                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 22:13 -0400
                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 08:59 +0100
                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 04:11 -0400
                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-03 20:00 +0000
                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 09:04 +0100
                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-04 23:47 -0400
                                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 10:06 +0100
                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 13:09 +0200
                                                        [OT] US politics (was: Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 17:16 +0100
                                                          Re: [OT] US politics (was: Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-04 18:18 +0000
                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:13 +0100
                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 19:33 +0200
                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-05 02:46 -0400
                                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 10:18 +0100
                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:33 +0000
                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 20:42 +0200
                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-05 01:24 +0000
                                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-05 23:20 +0000
                                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-06 01:44 +0000
                                                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-06 03:56 +0000
                                                                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-07 01:45 -0400
                                                                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 08:01 +0100
                                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-07 03:32 -0400
                                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:00 +0100
                                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-07 18:42 +0000
                                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 07:45 +0100
                                                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-08 20:23 +0000
                                                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-08 17:24 -0400
                                                                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-08 23:59 +0000
                                                                                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Harold Stevens <wookie@bookworm.localdomain> - 2026-10-09 05:00 -0500
                                                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-10-08 23:44 +0000
                                                                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:36 +0000
                                                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-10-14 14:21 +0100
                                                                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-14 16:57 +0000
                                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:58 +0200
                                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:33 +0100
                                                                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:56 +0200
                                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:28 +0100
                                                                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-08 20:08 +0000
                                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 22:06 +0100
                                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-08 17:18 -0400
                                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 22:21 +0100
                                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:48 +0000
                                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:46 +0000
                                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-10-09 04:21 +0000
                                                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 18:15 +0000
                                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-09 11:14 +0100
                                                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 18:27 +0000
                                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-08 17:14 -0400
                                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 22:20 +0100
                                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:55 +0000
                                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:53 +0000
                                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-06 08:56 +0100
                                                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 19:32 +0000
                                                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 20:42 +0100
                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-03 03:08 +0000
                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 02:05 -0400
                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 01:59 -0400
                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 09:04 +0100
                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-03 19:57 +0000
                                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 09:02 +0100
                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 13:11 +0200
                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-03 16:09 -0400
                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 09:08 +0100
                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-10-04 10:48 +0000
                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:09 +0100
                                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 19:35 +0200
                                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:59 +0100
                                                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 20:33 +0200
                                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-05 01:09 +0000
                                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 10:03 +0100
                                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-05 12:51 -0400
                                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-05 02:45 -0400
                                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 10:33 +0100
                                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:13 +0100
                                                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 19:27 +0000
                                                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 21:32 -0400
                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 02:49 -0400
                                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:21 +0100
                                                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 22:44 -0400
                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 04:50 +0000
                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 11:06 +0100
                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 00:40 +0000
                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 11:03 +0100
                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Abraham <chris@gerriscorp.com> - 2026-09-29 20:15 -0400
                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-29 10:46 -0400
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 11:56 +0100
              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 20:00 +0000
              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 02:09 -0400
      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-24 00:18 +0000
        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 01:24 +0000
          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 11:58 +0100
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:47 +0000
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 02:13 -0400
        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-24 00:21 -0400
          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 05:53 +0000
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-24 03:03 -0400
              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-24 12:23 +0200
                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:42 +0000
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-24 21:56 +0200
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-24 23:17 +0000
                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 01:00 -0400
              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:39 +0000
                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-24 23:17 +0000
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-25 04:36 +0000
                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-25 19:14 +0000
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 04:01 -0400
                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-26 14:43 +0000
                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 03:51 -0400
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-24 03:52 -0400
              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:43 +0000
                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-25 09:17 +0100
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-25 17:58 +0000
                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 04:49 +0100
                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 04:15 -0400
                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 09:51 +0100
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 04:03 -0400
                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 09:42 +0100
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 12:03 +0100
        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 10:31 +0100
          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:20 +0000
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 03:41 -0400
              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-26 14:01 +0000

Page 6 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 11  Next page →


#93077

Fromc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date2026-10-07 01:45 -0400
Message-ID<XuucnWXcBafrQVj3nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#92992
On 10/5/26 23:56, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On 2026-10-06, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 05 Oct 2026 23:20:43 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>>
>>> On 2026-10-05, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The late Scott Adams predicted Trump's success in 2016 when most of the
>>>> world was in the Never Trump camp. He based it on Trump's abilities as
>>>> a master manipulator rather than any presidential qualities. After the
>>>> election he did favor Trump.
>>>
>>> I got the impression that Scott Adams didn't necessarily agree with
>>> Trump's platform, but was impressed by his powers of manipulation.
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Win_Bigly
>>
>> The book was published after the election but it expanded on his blog and
>> X (Twitter) comments prior to the election. From his blog after Trump got
>> in office I think he developed respect for Trump beyond his huckster
>> abilities.
> 
> That was about when I decided that although he wrote a damned fine
> comic strip, I wouldn't want to deal with him in person.

   'RBowman', though generally bright, IS totally
   consumed by TDS. Clearly it can happen to anyone.
   Just briefly forget to check a dozen+ global
   news+ sites a day and you get hooked in to ONE
   narrow well-financed ideology.

   Trump is certainly no WORSE than the past half-dozen
   US presidents. BUT, you'd think he was the incarnation
   of Hitler+Baphomet listening to MANY sources. Anything
   THAT extreme immediately stinks of BULLSHIT/agiprop.

   Hmm ... the real 'fascists' KILLED all their major
   opposition and put goose-stepping troops on all
   the streets to clean-up all the other problems.
   Where IS that in the USA ? NOWHERE, not even close.
   99% of "political terrorism' is done by the LEFT.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#93080

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2026-10-07 08:01 +0100
Message-ID<11a4qou$2k8fk$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#93077
On 07/10/2026 06:45, c186282 wrote:
> On 10/5/26 23:56, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>> On 2026-10-06, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 05 Oct 2026 23:20:43 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2026-10-05, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The late Scott Adams predicted Trump's success in 2016 when most of 
>>>>> the
>>>>> world was in the Never Trump camp. He based it on Trump's abilities as
>>>>> a master manipulator rather than any presidential qualities. After the
>>>>> election he did favor Trump.
>>>>
>>>> I got the impression that Scott Adams didn't necessarily agree with
>>>> Trump's platform, but was impressed by his powers of manipulation.
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Win_Bigly
>>>
>>> The book was published after the election but it expanded on his blog 
>>> and
>>> X (Twitter) comments prior to the election. From his blog after Trump 
>>> got
>>> in office I think he developed respect for Trump beyond his huckster
>>> abilities.
>>
>> That was about when I decided that although he wrote a damned fine
>> comic strip, I wouldn't want to deal with him in person.
> 
>    'RBowman', though generally bright, IS totally
>    consumed by TDS. Clearly it can happen to anyone.
>    Just briefly forget to check a dozen+ global
>    news+ sites a day and you get hooked in to ONE
>    narrow well-financed ideology.
> 
>    Trump is certainly no WORSE than the past half-dozen
>    US presidents.

Oh, I think he is. While they quietly grifted away what they could they 
did at least make some attempt to appear more or less honest and to try 
to not break things.

Trump is so dumb he thinks no one will notice him grabbing everything in 
sight (and a lt covered by panties'  and smashing stuff just to see what 
happens

I mean if you have an IQ lower than his, which outs you in the below 80 
sort of level, you might still believe his bullshit, but to almost 
everyone else he is fairly transparent.

Basically  an insecure narcissist and borderline psycho with some street 
smarts and the ability to bully, bit that's it.

Which is not ok

  BUT, you'd think he was the incarnation
>    of Hitler+Baphomet listening to MANY sources. Anything
>    THAT extreme immediately stinks of BULLSHIT/agiprop.
> 
Basically actually he is...he's a psycho.

>    Hmm ... the real 'fascists' KILLED all their major
>    opposition and put goose-stepping troops on all
>    the streets to clean-up all the other problems.
>    Where IS that in the USA ? NOWHERE, not even close.
>    99% of "political terrorism' is done by the LEFT.
> 

Trump tried, but too many people are not being paid off.


-- 
    "Fanaticism consists in redoubling your effort when you have 
forgotten your aim."

  George Santayana

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#93090

Fromc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date2026-10-07 03:32 -0400
Message-ID<XuucnWLcBacVaFj3nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#93080
On 10/7/26 03:01, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 07/10/2026 06:45, c186282 wrote:
>> On 10/5/26 23:56, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>>> On 2026-10-06, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 05 Oct 2026 23:20:43 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2026-10-05, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The late Scott Adams predicted Trump's success in 2016 when most 
>>>>>> of the
>>>>>> world was in the Never Trump camp. He based it on Trump's 
>>>>>> abilities as
>>>>>> a master manipulator rather than any presidential qualities. After 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> election he did favor Trump.
>>>>>
>>>>> I got the impression that Scott Adams didn't necessarily agree with
>>>>> Trump's platform, but was impressed by his powers of manipulation.
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Win_Bigly
>>>>
>>>> The book was published after the election but it expanded on his 
>>>> blog and
>>>> X (Twitter) comments prior to the election. From his blog after 
>>>> Trump got
>>>> in office I think he developed respect for Trump beyond his huckster
>>>> abilities.
>>>
>>> That was about when I decided that although he wrote a damned fine
>>> comic strip, I wouldn't want to deal with him in person.
>>
>>    'RBowman', though generally bright, IS totally
>>    consumed by TDS. Clearly it can happen to anyone.
>>    Just briefly forget to check a dozen+ global
>>    news+ sites a day and you get hooked in to ONE
>>    narrow well-financed ideology.
>>
>>    Trump is certainly no WORSE than the past half-dozen
>>    US presidents.
> 
> Oh, I think he is. While they quietly grifted away what they could they 
> did at least make some attempt to appear more or less honest and to try 
> to not break things.
> 
> Trump is so dumb he thinks no one will notice him grabbing everything in 
> sight (and a lt covered by panties'  and smashing stuff just to see what 
> happens
> 
> I mean if you have an IQ lower than his, which outs you in the below 80 
> sort of level, you might still believe his bullshit, but to almost 
> everyone else he is fairly transparent.
> 
> Basically  an insecure narcissist and borderline psycho with some street 
> smarts and the ability to bully, bit that's it.
> 
> Which is not ok
> 
>   BUT, you'd think he was the incarnation
>>    of Hitler+Baphomet listening to MANY sources. Anything
>>    THAT extreme immediately stinks of BULLSHIT/agiprop.
>>
> Basically actually he is...he's a psycho.

   Sorry, very sorry, but now HAVE to plonk you
   and rbowman. You're no longer connected to
   reality. YOU won't think so, but then that's
   what all cultists think.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#93104

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2026-10-07 11:00 +0100
Message-ID<11a5585$2nipf$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#93090
On 07/10/2026 08:32, c186282 wrote:
> Sorry, very sorry, but now HAVE to plonk you
>    and rbowman. You're no longer connected to
>    reality. YOU won't think so, but then that's
>    what all cultists think.

Actually, you are the cultist

Who has his fingers in his ears

Come back when your idol shows up with clay feet.

-- 
All political activity makes complete sense once the proposition that 
all government is basically a self-legalising protection racket, is 
fully understood.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#93144

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2026-10-07 18:42 +0000
Message-ID<nini5dFsfnjU11@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#93090
On Wed, 7 Oct 2026 03:32:17 -0400, c186282 wrote:

>    Sorry, very sorry, but now HAVE to plonk you and rbowman. You're no
>    longer connected to reality. YOU won't think so, but then that's what
>    all cultists think.

See ya in a month. That's the default Pan sentence to the bozo bin. As I 
have said several times you do not have a fucking clue. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#93160

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2026-10-08 07:45 +0100
Message-ID<11a7e5s$3ig0l$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#93144
On 07/10/2026 19:42, rbowman wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2026 03:32:17 -0400, c186282 wrote:
> 
>>     Sorry, very sorry, but now HAVE to plonk you and rbowman. You're no
>>     longer connected to reality. YOU won't think so, but then that's what
>>     all cultists think.
> 
> See ya in a month. That's the default Pan sentence to the bozo bin. As I
> have said several times you do not have a fucking clue.

Sadly I suspect that is true.

As a Limey I had no opinion of the Great Fart at all. I waited for some 
amazing stuff to happen as was prophesied by his acolytes.
Unfortunately what I saw was all to reminiscent of other people I have 
met in business.

A loudmouthed narcissistic bully without a clue about anything beyond 
making a shitty deal that pissed all over his would be partners.

Well the rest of the world has adapted. and kept their more valuable 
toys away from the pram, so he can't throw them out.

I am no supporter of Librals, but I know a swine when I see one.


-- 
"An intellectual is a person knowledgeable in one field who speaks out 
only in others...”

Tom Wolfe

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#93198

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2026-10-08 20:23 +0000
Message-ID<niqcenFp2dnU3@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#93160
On Thu, 8 Oct 2026 07:45:16 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> As a Limey I had no opinion of the Great Fart at all. I waited for some
> amazing stuff to happen as was prophesied by his acolytes.
> Unfortunately what I saw was all to reminiscent of other people I have
> met in business.

I voted for him three times. I was guardedly optimistic in 2016 coupled 
with not having any use for the harridan he ran against. I don't care for 
it but I was familiar with the NYC style of brash bullshit. 

There was mild disappointment but to be fair he was also fighting off 
Democratic lawfare on all fronts. 2020 was a repeat. On his coherent days 
Biden was a time server and Obama manque. 2024 had Harris being thrust 
forward as Biden's dementia became impossible to conceal.

So here we are. I voted for Bush Jr in 2000 and then he attacked the wrong 
countries. Trump in his hubris underestimated Iran and I don't see a 
graceful exit. Then there are the haphazard tariffs and more 
unsubstantiated braggadocio. 

I received the voter information pamphlet yesterday. It has the argument 
for and against the state initiatives but not the candidates. I have to 
study the initiatives. As far as the candidates I'm thinking None O. Above 
write ins.

The good news is Trump sent me an email telling me my $90 check is on the 
way. I'll believe that when I see it. That should cover about half of a 
grocery trip to CostCo.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#93214

FromChris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Date2026-10-08 17:24 -0400
Message-ID<11a91s4$7qh7$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#93198
rbowman wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS (fixed):

> On Thu, 8 Oct 2026 07:45:16 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>
>> <snip>
>
> I voted for him three times.

You admit to that?!

> <snip>
>
> The good news is Trump sent me an email telling me my $90 check is on the 
> way. I'll believe that when I see it. That should cover about half of a 
> grocery trip to CostCo.

We got that, too. His message was full of German capitalization
and lying bullshit.

Still ain't getting me to vote for "pretend I'm on the ballot".

America: Trump's withdraw at any time bank account, no interest.

-- 
BOFH excuse #121:
 
halon system went off and killed the operators.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#93217

FromCharlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>
Date2026-10-08 23:59 +0000
Message-ID<e7WxS.188439$U_e2.90844@fx24.iad>
In reply to#93214
On 2026-10-08, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:

> rbowman wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS (fixed):
>
>> The good news is Trump sent me an email telling me my $90 check is on the 
>> way. I'll believe that when I see it. That should cover about half of a 
>> grocery trip to CostCo.
>
> We got that, too. His message was full of German capitalization
> and lying bullshit.

Although I know what you mean about German capitalization, I prefer
to think of Trump's usage as a variation which I call "cute caps".
That's when you Capitalize certain words because it looks Cute.
It's prevalent among many non-Germans.

And Germans don't resort to ALL CAPS for emphasis.

When I see this stuff I try to imagine it being spoken
in Seth Meyers' parody voice.

-- 
/~\  Charlie Gibbs                  |  In this world there are
\ /  <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>      |  two kinds of people:
 X   I'm really at ac.dekanfrus     |  1. Those who can extrapolate
/ \  if you read it the right way.  |  from incomplete data.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#93233

FromHarold Stevens <wookie@bookworm.localdomain>
Date2026-10-09 05:00 -0500
Message-ID<slrn11cheq4.ivk.wookie@bookworm.localdomain>
In reply to#93217
In <e7WxS.188439$U_e2.90844@fx24.iad> Charlie Gibbs:

> When I see this stuff I try to imagine it being spoken
> in Seth Meyers' parody voice.

+1

Trump would be SNL "Jane, you slut" hilarious if he wasn't so dangerously
incompetent in every regard ("What nuclear football?").

-- 
Regards, Weird (Harold Stevens) * IMPORTANT EMAIL INFO FOLLOWS *
Pardon any bogus email addresses (wookie) in place for spambots.
Really, it's (wyrd) at att, dotted with net. * DO NOT SPAM IT. *
I toss (404) GoogleGroup (404 http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#93215

FromRobert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net>
Date2026-10-08 23:44 +0000
Message-ID<slrn11cgamm.vgq.spamtrap42@one.localnet>
In reply to#93198
On 2026-10-08, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> ...
>
> The good news is Trump sent me an email telling me my $90 check is on the 
> way. I'll believe that when I see it. That should cover about half of a 
> grocery trip to CostCo.

Happened to check bank accounts shortly before starting slrn.
A $90 deposit showed up in the account today.

-- 
Robert Riches
spamtrap42@jacob21819.net
(Yes, that is one of my email addresses.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#93222

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2026-10-09 02:36 +0000
Message-ID<nir28hFp2dnU10@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#93215
On 8 Oct 2026 23:44:22 GMT, Robert Riches wrote:

> On 2026-10-08, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> The good news is Trump sent me an email telling me my $90 check is on
>> the way. I'll believe that when I see it. That should cover about half
>> of a grocery trip to CostCo.
> 
> Happened to check bank accounts shortly before starting slrn.
> A $90 deposit showed up in the account today.

Wunnerful! I don't do online banking so I'll check my next printed 
statement if I remember. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#93686

FromAndy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk>
Date2026-10-14 14:21 +0100
Message-ID<nj9duoF3rkfU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#93198
rbowman wrote:

> The good news is Trump sent me an email telling me my $90 check is on the
> way.

Where's the $5000 cheque?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#93697

FromCharlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>
Date2026-10-14 16:57 +0000
Message-ID<YvOzS.6986$R0u.3761@fx07.iad>
In reply to#93686
On 2026-10-14, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:

> rbowman wrote:
>
>> The good news is Trump sent me an email telling me my
>> $90 check is on the way.
>
> Where's the $5000 cheque?

You'll have to wait until next month for him to break that promise.

-- 
/~\  Charlie Gibbs                  |  In this world there are
\ /  <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>      |  two kinds of people:
 X   I'm really at ac.dekanfrus     |  1. Those who can extrapolate
/ \  if you read it the right way.  |  from incomplete data.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#93102

From"Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Date2026-10-07 11:58 +0200
Message-ID<nimjegF7onkU3@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#93080
On 2026-10-07 09:01, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> Basically actually he is...he's a psycho.

+1

-- 
Cheers,
        Carlos E.R.
        ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#93116

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2026-10-07 11:33 +0100
Message-ID<11a576m$2nipf$8@dont-email.me>
In reply to#93102
On 07/10/2026 10:58, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> On 2026-10-07 09:01, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> Basically actually he is...he's a psycho.
> 
> +1
> 
Golly. We agree on something.

Having rather more experience of the Trump type than most people - you 
find them a lot in small businesses - he really is a classic NPD type, 
at least a sociopath and probably a full blown psychopath.

That is not of itself necessarily a bad thing, NPD people  are very 
driven and can achieve things - occasionally good things -  but always 
for the wrong reasons.

The problem is reigning them in once they get off the reservation

Fortunately in Trumps case he seems to be dying.

-- 
Microsoft : the best reason to go to Linux that ever existed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#93100

From"Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid>
Date2026-10-07 11:56 +0200
Message-ID<nimjb3F7onkU2@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#93077
On 2026-10-07 07:45, c186282 wrote:
> On 10/5/26 23:56, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>> On 2026-10-06, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

>    Trump is certainly no WORSE than the past half-dozen
>    US presidents. BUT, you'd think he was the incarnation
>    of Hitler+Baphomet listening to MANY sources. Anything
>    THAT extreme immediately stinks of BULLSHIT/agiprop.

Just heard him yesterday, claiming about voting fraud. The newspaper 
girl asked for sources of that data, and Trump just accused her of being 
a bad person spreading fake news.

Enough said.



-- 
Cheers,
        Carlos E.R.
        ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#93115

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2026-10-07 11:28 +0100
Message-ID<11a56sn$2nipf$7@dont-email.me>
In reply to#93100
On 07/10/2026 10:56, Carlos E. R. wrote:
> On 2026-10-07 07:45, c186282 wrote:
>> On 10/5/26 23:56, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>>> On 2026-10-06, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> 
>>    Trump is certainly no WORSE than the past half-dozen
>>    US presidents. BUT, you'd think he was the incarnation
>>    of Hitler+Baphomet listening to MANY sources. Anything
>>    THAT extreme immediately stinks of BULLSHIT/agiprop.
> 
> Just heard him yesterday, claiming about voting fraud. The newspaper 
> girl asked for sources of that data, and Trump just accused her of being 
> a bad person spreading fake news.
> 
> Enough said.
> 
One of the more amusing 10 minutes was finding a you tube video where 
various AIs were fed with Trumps speech transcripts - 30,000 of them - 
and asked to assess his personality and IQ.

All of them said similar things
Streetwise, adept at saying nothing, oscillating between making wild 
claims about himself and calling his enemies out as 'false news vendors' 
showing a strong need for validation by others and inner paranoia and 
insecurity, and together with a very limited vocabulary and inability to 
show any sign of abstract reasoning, a rather below average intelligence.



-- 
“It is not the truth of Marxism that explains the willingness of 
intellectuals to believe it, but the power that it confers on 
intellectuals, in their attempts to control the world. And since...it is 
futile to reason someone out of a thing that he was not reasoned into, 
we can conclude that Marxism owes its remarkable power to survive every 
criticism to the fact that it is not a truth-directed but a 
power-directed system of thought.”
Sir Roger Scruton

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#93196

FromCharlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>
Date2026-10-08 20:08 +0000
Message-ID<KKSxS.2340$RoRb.67@fx21.iad>
In reply to#93077
On 2026-10-07, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:

>    Hmm ... the real 'fascists' KILLED all their major
>    opposition and put goose-stepping troops on all
>    the streets to clean-up all the other problems.
>    Where IS that in the USA ? NOWHERE, not even close.

Trump has done trial runs with his ICE storm troopers in
various cities, particularly Minneapolis.  If he manages
to consolidate his power next month and in 2028, expect
some very bad things to happen.

-- 
/~\  Charlie Gibbs                  |  In this world there are
\ /  <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>      |  two kinds of people:
 X   I'm really at ac.dekanfrus     |  1. Those who can extrapolate
/ \  if you read it the right way.  |  from incomplete data.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#93205

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2026-10-08 22:06 +0100
Message-ID<11a90kg$73vs$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#93196
On 08/10/2026 21:08, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On 2026-10-07, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
> 
>>     Hmm ... the real 'fascists' KILLED all their major
>>     opposition and put goose-stepping troops on all
>>     the streets to clean-up all the other problems.
>>     Where IS that in the USA ? NOWHERE, not even close.
> 
> Trump has done trial runs with his ICE storm troopers in
> various cities, particularly Minneapolis.  If he manages
> to consolidate his power next month and in 2028, expect
> some very bad things to happen.
> 
Do you think he will be alive in 2028?

A lot of people in the geriatric business think his days are very numbered

I would imagine like Adolf that has has a cocktail of drugs for breakfast

-- 
"And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch".

Gospel of St. Mathew 15:14

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 6 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 4 5 [6] 7 8 … 11  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc


csiph-web