Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #91992 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-09-22 20:08 +0000 |
| Last post | 2026-09-26 14:01 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 203 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-22 20:08 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-09-22 22:39 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-23 00:25 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-23 09:41 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-09-23 08:50 -0700
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-26 12:50 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-23 23:11 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-23 12:43 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-09-23 14:09 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> - 2026-09-23 11:55 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-09-23 23:00 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 01:31 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-24 10:07 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:30 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Anton Antimo <anton@safunu.org> - 2026-09-24 10:39 -0300
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-26 13:02 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-26 14:51 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-27 13:29 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-27 19:39 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-10-11 11:37 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-10-11 14:56 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 09:55 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-27 11:01 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 07:57 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-09-30 08:40 -0700
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-30 20:50 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-30 20:56 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 04:21 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-10-01 08:04 -0700
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 00:48 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 00:32 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 00:51 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 02:02 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 09:27 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 23:21 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:17 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 22:34 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 02:57 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:24 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 22:59 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 09:02 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 04:16 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-10-03 10:08 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 12:06 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 12:55 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-09-23 19:24 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-23 18:28 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-09-23 21:04 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-09-24 07:16 +1000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-09-24 12:03 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2026-09-26 17:37 +1000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 09:53 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-27 18:56 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-28 12:52 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-28 17:21 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-28 15:56 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-29 03:30 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2026-09-29 02:20 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-29 03:45 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2026-09-29 12:36 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-29 10:51 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-29 18:19 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-29 19:38 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-29 23:55 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-29 18:54 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-29 23:55 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 01:14 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-30 02:04 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Abraham <chris@gerriscorp.com> - 2026-09-30 13:27 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-30 15:47 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-30 20:17 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-30 20:33 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 04:55 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-01 02:01 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 11:08 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 00:42 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-01 23:49 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:14 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 19:33 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 20:44 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 22:13 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 08:59 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 04:11 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-03 20:00 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 09:04 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-04 23:47 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 10:06 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 13:09 +0200
[OT] US politics (was: Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 17:16 +0100
Re: [OT] US politics (was: Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-04 18:18 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:13 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 19:33 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-05 02:46 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 10:18 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:33 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 20:42 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-05 01:24 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-05 23:20 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-06 01:44 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-06 03:56 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-07 01:45 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 08:01 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-07 03:32 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:00 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-07 18:42 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 07:45 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-08 20:23 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-08 17:24 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-08 23:59 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Harold Stevens <wookie@bookworm.localdomain> - 2026-10-09 05:00 -0500
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-10-08 23:44 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:36 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-10-14 14:21 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-14 16:57 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:58 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:33 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:56 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:28 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-08 20:08 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 22:06 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-08 17:18 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 22:21 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:48 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:46 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-10-09 04:21 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 18:15 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-09 11:14 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 18:27 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-08 17:14 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 22:20 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:55 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:53 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-06 08:56 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 19:32 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 20:42 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-03 03:08 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 02:05 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 01:59 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 09:04 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-03 19:57 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 09:02 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 13:11 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-03 16:09 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 09:08 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-10-04 10:48 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:09 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 19:35 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:59 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 20:33 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-05 01:09 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 10:03 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-05 12:51 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-05 02:45 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 10:33 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:13 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 19:27 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 21:32 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 02:49 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:21 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 22:44 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 04:50 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 11:06 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 00:40 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 11:03 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Abraham <chris@gerriscorp.com> - 2026-09-29 20:15 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-29 10:46 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 11:56 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 20:00 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 02:09 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-24 00:18 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 01:24 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 11:58 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:47 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 02:13 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-24 00:21 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 05:53 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-24 03:03 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-24 12:23 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:42 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-24 21:56 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-24 23:17 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 01:00 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:39 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-24 23:17 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-25 04:36 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-25 19:14 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 04:01 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-26 14:43 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 03:51 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-24 03:52 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:43 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-25 09:17 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-25 17:58 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 04:49 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 04:15 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 09:51 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 04:03 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 09:42 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 12:03 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 10:31 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:20 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 03:41 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-26 14:01 +0000
Page 5 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 11 Next page →
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-02 22:13 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <cR-dnbZthaUt-V33nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #92635 |
On 10/2/26 07:14, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 02/10/2026 04:49, c186282 wrote: >> And Trump, he's MILD. > > ITYM MOULD. Rotten, corrupt and smelling really bad. > > I cant recall anyone more stupid since Jane Fonda Looking through a heavily-colored glass there ... But do agree about Hanoi Jane. CONSISTENT sucker for the propaganda of dictators, despots and deadly loons. If it is anti-USA/west she LOVES it. IS high-IQ, but clearly that's no shield against dreadful propaganda. The perfect "useful idiot". Trump has never been anything BUT smart. Carefully-crafted image and empire for many many years. Pretty good at biz too. Seems to 'get' politics and political strategy. His approach is simply "unconventional", which was needed. You don't have to like him, but don't imply he's stupid.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-03 08:59 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <119qcka$2qdqt$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92698 |
On 03/10/2026 03:13, c186282 wrote: > Trump has never been anything BUT smart. > Carefully-crafted image and empire for > many many years. Pretty good at biz too. Do you *really* believe that? Or did you just believe *him* when he said it. If its smart to lose money, get bailed out by Russia and pretend you made it all through being smart, I guess maybe it is. Just not in the way you think. But none of his actions on the international stage show any sign of being smart or being able to cut a deal. The reverse in fact, He hasn't stopped any wars. He's started one. He hasn't made America great again, he (and by association, America that elected him) is treated universally with contempt and amusement. Even Iran is laughing at him He hasn't cut any great deals, His idiotic tariff regime has simply lost trading partners to trade with other parts of the world. His refusal to live up to his commitments to Europe and to let Ukraine use US manufactured and serviced weapons over Russian territory has simply caused Europe to start manufacturing cheaper weapons that they have control over. And stop buying US ones. I fail to see a single smart thing he has done, apart from easing back on 'renewable energy' But even that was all for the wrong reasons -- "Corbyn talks about equality, justice, opportunity, health care, peace, community, compassion, investment, security, housing...." "What kind of person is not interested in those things?" "Jeremy Corbyn?"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-03 04:11 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <QOycnS_T5ZktJV33nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #92727 |
On 10/3/26 03:59, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 03/10/2026 03:13, c186282 wrote: >> Trump has never been anything BUT smart. >> Carefully-crafted image and empire for >> many many years. Pretty good at biz too. > > Do you *really* believe that? Seen it. > Or did you just believe *him* when he said it. > > If its smart to lose money, get bailed out by Russia and pretend you > made it all through being smart, I guess maybe it is. Just not in the > way you think. > > But none of his actions on the international stage show any sign of > being smart or being able to cut a deal. The reverse in fact, > > He hasn't stopped any wars. He's started one. A necessary, but delayed-almost-TOO-long, war. Reagan should have blasted Iran. Sentiment would have been VERY for it then. Anyway, clearly you always see the worst in Trump. It's not so, but I can't heal your TDS alas. That'd take years of therapy. There IS a ODS - Obama Derangement Syndrome - group as well. Just a (bad) sign that everything is being taken to EXTREMES these days.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-03 20:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nid56bFoo9pU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #92698 |
On Fri, 2 Oct 2026 22:13:02 -0400, c186282 wrote: > Trump has never been anything BUT smart. > Carefully-crafted image and empire for many many years. Pretty good > at biz too. I suppose if you start enough ventures some of them might succeed and keep you afloat.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-04 09:04 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <119t1ao$3n7or$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92775 |
On 03/10/2026 21:00, rbowman wrote: > On Fri, 2 Oct 2026 22:13:02 -0400, c186282 wrote: > >> Trump has never been anything BUT smart. >> Carefully-crafted image and empire for many many years. Pretty good >> at biz too. > > I suppose if you start enough ventures some of them might succeed and keep > you afloat. Especially if Russian oligarchs step in and buy your product at twice market price in return for 'favours'... AS bent as a $3 bill? -- New Socialism consists essentially in being seen to have your heart in the right place whilst your head is in the clouds and your hand is in someone else's pocket.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-04 23:47 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <cpWdne4fD_tHgF73nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #92804 |
On 10/4/26 04:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 03/10/2026 21:00, rbowman wrote: >> On Fri, 2 Oct 2026 22:13:02 -0400, c186282 wrote: >> >>> Trump has never been anything BUT smart. >>> Carefully-crafted image and empire for many many years. Pretty good >>> at biz too. >> >> I suppose if you start enough ventures some of them might succeed and >> keep >> you afloat. > > Especially if Russian oligarchs step in and buy your product at twice > market price in return for 'favours'... > > AS bent as a $3 bill? Actually I don't have that much against the so-called "oligarchs" - good capitalists, business-people. VLAD, on the other hand ......
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-05 10:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <119vpak$mtek$18@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92889 |
On 05/10/2026 04:47, c186282 wrote: > Actually I don't have that much against the > so-called "oligarchs" - good capitalists, > business-people. ROFLMAO! They are not 'business people' they are Mafiosi. Silk suits and slicked back hair and a Glock in each pocket They got where they are by blackmail, murder, bribery and corruption. Donny loves all that shit, He admires it. I've met their sons and daughters. Euthanasia is too good for them -- Gun Control: The law that ensures that only criminals have guns.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-04 13:09 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nieqftF1topU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #92698 |
On 2026-10-03 04:13, c186282 wrote:
> On 10/2/26 07:14, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> On 02/10/2026 04:49, c186282 wrote:
>>> And Trump, he's MILD.
>>
>> ITYM MOULD. Rotten, corrupt and smelling really bad.
>>
>> I cant recall anyone more stupid since Jane Fonda
>
> Looking through a heavily-colored glass there ...
>
> But do agree about Hanoi Jane. CONSISTENT
> sucker for the propaganda of dictators,
> despots and deadly loons. If it is
> anti-USA/west she LOVES it. IS high-IQ,
> but clearly that's no shield against
> dreadful propaganda. The perfect "useful
> idiot".
>
> Trump has never been anything BUT smart.
> Carefully-crafted image and empire for
> many many years. Pretty good at biz too.
> Seems to 'get' politics and political
> strategy. His approach is simply
> "unconventional", which was needed.
>
> You don't have to like him, but don't
> imply he's stupid.
There is no doubt he is stupid beyond measure.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-04 17:16 +0100 |
| Subject | [OT] US politics (was: Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI) |
| Message-ID | <119tu4l$29eg$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92825 |
> On 2026-10-03 04:13, c186282 wrote: > >> Trump has never been anything BUT smart. :-D (Although he can probably count to two better than Susan Collins...) -- Nuno Silva
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-04 18:18 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: [OT] US politics (was: Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI) |
| Message-ID | <nifjkbFoo9pU20@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #92840 |
On Sun, 04 Oct 2026 17:16:20 +0100, Nuno Silva wrote: >> On 2026-10-03 04:13, c186282 wrote: >> >>> Trump has never been anything BUT smart. > > :-D > > (Although he can probably count to two better than Susan Collins...) I think old Sue may have more time to spend with her family shortly. No big loss. Maine had to have a bit of drama with Platner before finding a willing Democrat. Snowe was never of much use either. I lived in southern Maine for a couple of years so nothing surprises me. Stephen King doesn't write novels rather than altering Maine life with mild fictionalizing.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-04 18:13 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <119u1fg$3glq$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92825 |
On 04/10/2026 12:09, Carlos E. R. wrote: > On 2026-10-03 04:13, c186282 wrote: >> On 10/2/26 07:14, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> On 02/10/2026 04:49, c186282 wrote: >>>> And Trump, he's MILD. >>> >>> ITYM MOULD. Rotten, corrupt and smelling really bad. >>> >>> I cant recall anyone more stupid since Jane Fonda >> >> Looking through a heavily-colored glass there ... >> >> But do agree about Hanoi Jane. CONSISTENT >> sucker for the propaganda of dictators, >> despots and deadly loons. If it is >> anti-USA/west she LOVES it. IS high-IQ, >> but clearly that's no shield against >> dreadful propaganda. The perfect "useful >> idiot". >> >> Trump has never been anything BUT smart. >> Carefully-crafted image and empire for >> many many years. Pretty good at biz too. >> Seems to 'get' politics and political >> strategy. His approach is simply >> "unconventional", which was needed. >> >> You don't have to like him, but don't >> imply he's stupid. > > There is no doubt he is stupid beyond measure. > > One doesn't have to imply it. He simply is "thicker than two short planks and twice as wide", as the saying goes. It's the twice as wide bit that makes stupid people think he is smart... "In slang, the word "wide" primarily functions as part of the British term "wide boy," which describes a clever, street-smart person who makes a living through shady deals, petty scams, or hustling" -- Microsoft : the best reason to go to Linux that ever existed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-04 19:33 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nifgvlF5jmcU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #92843 |
On 2026-10-04 19:13, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 04/10/2026 12:09, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>> On 2026-10-03 04:13, c186282 wrote:
>>> On 10/2/26 07:14, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>> On 02/10/2026 04:49, c186282 wrote:
>>>>> And Trump, he's MILD.
>>>>
>>>> ITYM MOULD. Rotten, corrupt and smelling really bad.
>>>>
>>>> I cant recall anyone more stupid since Jane Fonda
>>>
>>> Looking through a heavily-colored glass there ...
>>>
>>> But do agree about Hanoi Jane. CONSISTENT
>>> sucker for the propaganda of dictators,
>>> despots and deadly loons. If it is
>>> anti-USA/west she LOVES it. IS high-IQ,
>>> but clearly that's no shield against
>>> dreadful propaganda. The perfect "useful
>>> idiot".
>>>
>>> Trump has never been anything BUT smart.
>>> Carefully-crafted image and empire for
>>> many many years. Pretty good at biz too.
>>> Seems to 'get' politics and political
>>> strategy. His approach is simply
>>> "unconventional", which was needed.
>>>
>>> You don't have to like him, but don't
>>> imply he's stupid.
>>
>> There is no doubt he is stupid beyond measure.
>>
>>
> One doesn't have to imply it. He simply is "thicker than two short
> planks and twice as wide", as the saying goes.
I'm not that rich on English sayings
> It's the twice as wide bit that makes stupid people think he is smart...
>
> "In slang, the word "wide" primarily functions as part of the British
> term "wide boy," which describes a clever, street-smart person who makes
> a living through shady deals, petty scams, or hustling"
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-05 02:46 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <QOKdnfSWqNhA2l73nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #92843 |
On 10/4/26 13:13, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 04/10/2026 12:09, Carlos E. R. wrote: >> On 2026-10-03 04:13, c186282 wrote: >>> On 10/2/26 07:14, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>> On 02/10/2026 04:49, c186282 wrote: >>>>> And Trump, he's MILD. >>>> >>>> ITYM MOULD. Rotten, corrupt and smelling really bad. >>>> >>>> I cant recall anyone more stupid since Jane Fonda >>> >>> Looking through a heavily-colored glass there ... >>> >>> But do agree about Hanoi Jane. CONSISTENT >>> sucker for the propaganda of dictators, >>> despots and deadly loons. If it is >>> anti-USA/west she LOVES it. IS high-IQ, >>> but clearly that's no shield against >>> dreadful propaganda. The perfect "useful >>> idiot". >>> >>> Trump has never been anything BUT smart. >>> Carefully-crafted image and empire for >>> many many years. Pretty good at biz too. >>> Seems to 'get' politics and political >>> strategy. His approach is simply >>> "unconventional", which was needed. >>> >>> You don't have to like him, but don't >>> imply he's stupid. >> >> There is no doubt he is stupid beyond measure. >> >> > One doesn't have to imply it. He simply is "thicker than two short > planks and twice as wide", as the saying goes. > > It's the twice as wide bit that makes stupid people think he is smart... > > "In slang, the word "wide" primarily functions as part of the British > term "wide boy," which describes a clever, street-smart person who makes > a living through shady deals, petty scams, or hustling" I'm *so* disappointed ...... Like with Jane, another case where IQ does NOT immunize against propaganda and lies.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-05 10:18 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <119vq1p$mtek$19@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92901 |
On 05/10/2026 07:46, c186282 wrote: > On 10/4/26 13:13, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 04/10/2026 12:09, Carlos E. R. wrote: >>> On 2026-10-03 04:13, c186282 wrote: >>>> On 10/2/26 07:14, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>> On 02/10/2026 04:49, c186282 wrote: >>>>>> And Trump, he's MILD. >>>>> >>>>> ITYM MOULD. Rotten, corrupt and smelling really bad. >>>>> >>>>> I cant recall anyone more stupid since Jane Fonda >>>> >>>> Looking through a heavily-colored glass there ... >>>> >>>> But do agree about Hanoi Jane. CONSISTENT >>>> sucker for the propaganda of dictators, >>>> despots and deadly loons. If it is >>>> anti-USA/west she LOVES it. IS high-IQ, >>>> but clearly that's no shield against >>>> dreadful propaganda. The perfect "useful >>>> idiot". >>>> >>>> Trump has never been anything BUT smart. >>>> Carefully-crafted image and empire for >>>> many many years. Pretty good at biz too. >>>> Seems to 'get' politics and political >>>> strategy. His approach is simply >>>> "unconventional", which was needed. >>>> >>>> You don't have to like him, but don't >>>> imply he's stupid. >>> >>> There is no doubt he is stupid beyond measure. >>> >>> >> One doesn't have to imply it. He simply is "thicker than two short >> planks and twice as wide", as the saying goes. >> >> It's the twice as wide bit that makes stupid people think he is smart... >> >> "In slang, the word "wide" primarily functions as part of the British >> term "wide boy," which describes a clever, street-smart person who >> makes a living through shady deals, petty scams, or hustling" > > > I'm *so* disappointed ...... > > Like with Jane, another case where IQ does > NOT immunize against propaganda and lies. > Well in your case I agree. But I am not sure your IQ is that high to begin with. I've seen dozens of Donald's in my life, I've worked with them, I've been stiffed for millions by them. They succeed because they are psychopaths, and psychopaths have no conscience, no empathy, and absolutely no relationship with truth at all. All they care about is winning. Everything is a game, and the only respite from their inner emptiness is to be noticed and to appear to be winning. They will abandon any promise the moment its convenient, they always lie because they have no idea what the truth is - only what people want to hear. The only way to win with them is not to play. Because they will break all the rules and think its 'smart' In the end no one will do business with them unless they have them totally compromised. They do not respond to conscience or reason, They only respond to superior force. Donny is a classic. So is Putin. The problem with them is that they are incapable of creating anything. They are always destructive. Sometimes that's useful. Mostly it isn't Putin has destroyed the Oligarch's Russia. Trump has destroyed America's international reputation. Perhaps both needed doing -- Gun Control: The law that ensures that only criminals have guns.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-04 18:33 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <HZwwS.28722$plMb.19133@fx42.iad> |
| In reply to | #92825 |
On 2026-10-04, Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > On 2026-10-03 04:13, c186282 wrote: > > >> You don't have to like him, but don't >> imply he's stupid. > > There is no doubt he is stupid beyond measure. In many ways, yes. But when it comes to fleecing people out of billions of dollars, he is a master. Never underestimate your enemy. -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | In this world there are \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | two kinds of people: X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | 1. Those who can extrapolate / \ if you read it the right way. | from incomplete data.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-04 20:42 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nifl0hF5jmdU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #92863 |
On 2026-10-04 20:33, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On 2026-10-04, Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 2026-10-03 04:13, c186282 wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You don't have to like him, but don't
>>> imply he's stupid.
>>
>> There is no doubt he is stupid beyond measure.
>
> In many ways, yes. But when it comes to fleecing
> people out of billions of dollars, he is a master.
>
> Never underestimate your enemy.
He has a large military under his command, to convince others to part
with their money. That doesn't mean he is clever, just that he has the
power to bully others.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-05 01:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nigci0Foo9pU33@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #92863 |
On Sun, 04 Oct 2026 18:33:11 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2026-10-04, Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > >> On 2026-10-03 04:13, c186282 wrote: >> >> >>> You don't have to like him, but don't imply he's stupid. >> >> There is no doubt he is stupid beyond measure. > > In many ways, yes. But when it comes to fleecing people out of billions > of dollars, he is a master. > > Never underestimate your enemy. The late Scott Adams predicted Trump's success in 2016 when most of the world was in the Never Trump camp. He based it on Trump's abilities as a master manipulator rather than any presidential qualities. After the election he did favor Trump. Ann Coulter was another early supporter but fired up her acid tongue when the Big Beautiful Wall never happened. On the AI theme, here is her latest snark: https://anncoulter.com/2026/09/24/the-secrets-out-its-actually-artificial- stupidity/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-05 23:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <fhWwS.8350$ITPb.655@fx05.iad> |
| In reply to | #92883 |
On 2026-10-05, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > The late Scott Adams predicted Trump's success in 2016 when most of the > world was in the Never Trump camp. He based it on Trump's abilities as a > master manipulator rather than any presidential qualities. After the > election he did favor Trump. I got the impression that Scott Adams didn't necessarily agree with Trump's platform, but was impressed by his powers of manipulation. -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | In this world there are \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | two kinds of people: X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | 1. Those who can extrapolate / \ if you read it the right way. | from incomplete data.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-06 01:44 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nij245Foo9pU47@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #92977 |
On Mon, 05 Oct 2026 23:20:43 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2026-10-05, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > >> The late Scott Adams predicted Trump's success in 2016 when most of the >> world was in the Never Trump camp. He based it on Trump's abilities as >> a master manipulator rather than any presidential qualities. After the >> election he did favor Trump. > > I got the impression that Scott Adams didn't necessarily agree with > Trump's platform, but was impressed by his powers of manipulation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Win_Bigly The book was published after the election but it expanded on his blog and X (Twitter) comments prior to the election. From his blog after Trump got in office I think he developed respect for Trump beyond his huckster abilities.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-06 03:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <Aj_wS.2713$mWLb.555@fx41.iad> |
| In reply to | #92986 |
On 2026-10-06, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > On Mon, 05 Oct 2026 23:20:43 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > >> On 2026-10-05, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >> >>> The late Scott Adams predicted Trump's success in 2016 when most of the >>> world was in the Never Trump camp. He based it on Trump's abilities as >>> a master manipulator rather than any presidential qualities. After the >>> election he did favor Trump. >> >> I got the impression that Scott Adams didn't necessarily agree with >> Trump's platform, but was impressed by his powers of manipulation. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Win_Bigly > > The book was published after the election but it expanded on his blog and > X (Twitter) comments prior to the election. From his blog after Trump got > in office I think he developed respect for Trump beyond his huckster > abilities. That was about when I decided that although he wrote a damned fine comic strip, I wouldn't want to deal with him in person. -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | In this world there are \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | two kinds of people: X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | 1. Those who can extrapolate / \ if you read it the right way. | from incomplete data.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 5 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 3 4 [5] 6 7 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web