Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #91992 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-09-22 20:08 +0000 |
| Last post | 2026-09-26 14:01 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 203 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-22 20:08 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-09-22 22:39 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-23 00:25 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-23 09:41 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-09-23 08:50 -0700
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-26 12:50 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-23 23:11 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-23 12:43 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-09-23 14:09 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> - 2026-09-23 11:55 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-09-23 23:00 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 01:31 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-24 10:07 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:30 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Anton Antimo <anton@safunu.org> - 2026-09-24 10:39 -0300
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-26 13:02 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-26 14:51 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-27 13:29 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-27 19:39 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-10-11 11:37 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-10-11 14:56 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 09:55 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-27 11:01 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 07:57 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-09-30 08:40 -0700
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-30 20:50 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-30 20:56 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 04:21 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-10-01 08:04 -0700
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 00:48 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 00:32 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 00:51 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 02:02 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 09:27 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 23:21 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:17 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 22:34 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 02:57 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:24 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 22:59 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 09:02 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 04:16 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-10-03 10:08 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 12:06 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 12:55 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-09-23 19:24 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-23 18:28 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-09-23 21:04 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-09-24 07:16 +1000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-09-24 12:03 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2026-09-26 17:37 +1000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 09:53 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-27 18:56 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-28 12:52 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-28 17:21 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-28 15:56 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-29 03:30 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2026-09-29 02:20 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-29 03:45 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2026-09-29 12:36 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-29 10:51 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-29 18:19 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-29 19:38 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-29 23:55 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-29 18:54 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-29 23:55 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 01:14 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-30 02:04 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Abraham <chris@gerriscorp.com> - 2026-09-30 13:27 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-30 15:47 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-30 20:17 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-30 20:33 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 04:55 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-01 02:01 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 11:08 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 00:42 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-01 23:49 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:14 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 19:33 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 20:44 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 22:13 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 08:59 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 04:11 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-03 20:00 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 09:04 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-04 23:47 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 10:06 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 13:09 +0200
[OT] US politics (was: Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 17:16 +0100
Re: [OT] US politics (was: Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-04 18:18 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:13 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 19:33 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-05 02:46 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 10:18 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:33 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 20:42 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-05 01:24 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-05 23:20 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-06 01:44 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-06 03:56 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-07 01:45 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 08:01 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-07 03:32 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:00 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-07 18:42 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 07:45 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-08 20:23 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-08 17:24 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-08 23:59 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Harold Stevens <wookie@bookworm.localdomain> - 2026-10-09 05:00 -0500
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-10-08 23:44 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:36 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-10-14 14:21 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-14 16:57 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:58 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:33 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:56 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:28 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-08 20:08 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 22:06 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-08 17:18 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 22:21 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:48 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:46 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-10-09 04:21 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 18:15 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-09 11:14 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 18:27 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-08 17:14 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 22:20 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:55 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:53 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-06 08:56 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 19:32 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 20:42 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-03 03:08 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 02:05 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 01:59 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 09:04 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-03 19:57 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 09:02 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 13:11 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-03 16:09 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 09:08 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-10-04 10:48 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:09 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 19:35 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:59 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 20:33 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-05 01:09 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 10:03 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-05 12:51 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-05 02:45 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 10:33 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:13 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 19:27 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 21:32 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 02:49 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:21 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 22:44 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 04:50 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 11:06 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 00:40 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 11:03 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Abraham <chris@gerriscorp.com> - 2026-09-29 20:15 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-29 10:46 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 11:56 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 20:00 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 02:09 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-24 00:18 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 01:24 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 11:58 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:47 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 02:13 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-24 00:21 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 05:53 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-24 03:03 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-24 12:23 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:42 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-24 21:56 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-24 23:17 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 01:00 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:39 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-24 23:17 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-25 04:36 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-25 19:14 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 04:01 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-26 14:43 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 03:51 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-24 03:52 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:43 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-25 09:17 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-25 17:58 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 04:49 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 04:15 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 09:51 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 04:03 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 09:42 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 12:03 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 10:31 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:20 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 03:41 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-26 14:01 +0000
Page 8 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 Next page →
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-04 09:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <119t17e$3n7or$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92774 |
On 03/10/2026 20:57, rbowman wrote: > On Sat, 3 Oct 2026 09:04:36 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> On 03/10/2026 06:59, c186282 wrote: >>> On 10/2/26 15:42, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Its gonna be that brainless bimbo, AOC. >>> >>> Then Xi has already won the world ...... >>> >>> Ya ain't gonna like it. >>> >>> >> Frankly, looking around most people would probably prefer Xi to Trump. > > If you get past the historical baggage I consider China to be a successful > national socialist country. The problem is, as with Heffalumps, with China, you never know. Did they lose half the population to COVID? No one knows and those that might ain't telling... Regimes whose default modus operandi is to lie, are tricky beasts to asses. Even to their own leaders (so called)... -- New Socialism consists essentially in being seen to have your heart in the right place whilst your head is in the clouds and your hand is in someone else's pocket.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-04 13:11 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nieqjhF1topU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #92729 |
On 2026-10-03 10:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 03/10/2026 06:59, c186282 wrote:
>> On 10/2/26 15:42, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Its gonna be that brainless bimbo, AOC.
>>
>> Then Xi has already won the world ......
>>
>> Ya ain't gonna like it.
>>
>
> Frankly, looking around most people would probably prefer Xi to Trump.
>
True.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-03 16:09 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <119rnd8$3aj7q$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92682 |
The Natural Philosopher wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS (fixed): > On 02/10/2026 20:32, rbowman wrote: >> On Thu, 1 Oct 2026 23:49:13 -0400, c186282 wrote: >> >>> And Trump, he's MILD. USA really needed someone even stronger than >>> him, kinda MAGA+ >> >> His grand plans keep getting shelved by activist judges, some of whom he >> appointed. >> >>> Ted Cruz ? >> >> No and hell no. > > Its gonna be that brainless bimbo, AOC. > > People will look back nostalgically on the Days of Trump. :-D That'll never happen, except for Trump's dazed followers draped in Trump regalia. > America is done for. Unfortunately, that opinion has some merit. We've had a lot of festering issues throughout America's history. -- "In my opinion, Richard Stallman wouldn't recognize terrorism if it came up and bit him on his Internet." -- Ross M. Greenberg
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-04 09:08 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <119t1h9$3n7or$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92778 |
On 03/10/2026 21:09, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > The Natural Philosopher wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS (fixed): > >> On 02/10/2026 20:32, rbowman wrote: >>> On Thu, 1 Oct 2026 23:49:13 -0400, c186282 wrote: >>> >>>> And Trump, he's MILD. USA really needed someone even stronger than >>>> him, kinda MAGA+ >>> >>> His grand plans keep getting shelved by activist judges, some of whom he >>> appointed. >>> >>>> Ted Cruz ? >>> >>> No and hell no. >> >> Its gonna be that brainless bimbo, AOC. >> >> People will look back nostalgically on the Days of Trump. > > :-D > > That'll never happen, except for Trump's dazed followers draped in > Trump regalia. > >> America is done for. > > Unfortunately, that opinion has some merit. > > We've had a lot of festering issues throughout America's history. > The overriding impression from across the pond is that the majority of Americans in the middle class are spoilt, entitled brats with enough money that they never had to grow up. The realities of life may not be sufficient to fix this. Cf 'Idiocracy'... -- New Socialism consists essentially in being seen to have your heart in the right place whilst your head is in the clouds and your hand is in someone else's pocket.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-04 10:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <6ac22f18$0$10332$426a74cc@news.free.fr> |
| In reply to | #92778 |
Le 03-10-2026, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> a écrit : > The Natural Philosopher wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS (fixed): >> People will look back nostalgically on the Days of Trump. > >:-D > > That'll never happen, except for Trump's dazed followers draped in > Trump regalia. In France we had Frédéric Dard, an author of a fun detective book, San Antonio, which was popular some decades ago, who said: « Plus le maître est con, plus le chien est fidèle. » Which could be translated by something like: "The dumber the owner, the more faithful the dog is." It's funny, but The more I see Trump and Trump followers, the more I find how accurate this sentence is. -- Si vous avez du temps à perdre : https://scarpet42.gitlab.io
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-04 18:09 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <119u17l$3glq$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92820 |
On 04/10/2026 11:48, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > In France we had Frédéric Dard, an author of a fun detective book, San > Antonio, which was popular some decades ago, who said: > « Plus le maître est con, plus le chien est fidèle. » > Which could be translated by something like: "The dumber the owner, the > more faithful the dog is." > > It's funny, but The more I see Trump and Trump followers, the more I > find how accurate this sentence is. Indeed. Voting tactically for Trump is one thing, to spite the Librals. Actually believing his bullshit is quite another A taxi driver who serves the local US airbase had a couple who assured him that 'Trump will bring back the KKK' -- Microsoft : the best reason to go to Linux that ever existed.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-04 19:35 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nifh2sF5jmcU5@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #92842 |
On 2026-10-04 19:09, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 04/10/2026 11:48, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>> In France we had Frédéric Dard, an author of a fun detective book, San
>> Antonio, which was popular some decades ago, who said:
>> « Plus le maître est con, plus le chien est fidèle. »
>> Which could be translated by something like: "The dumber the owner, the
>> more faithful the dog is."
>>
>> It's funny, but The more I see Trump and Trump followers, the more I
>> find how accurate this sentence is.
>
> Indeed. Voting tactically for Trump is one thing, to spite the Librals.
> Actually believing his bullshit is quite another
>
> A taxi driver who serves the local US airbase had a couple who assured
> him that 'Trump will bring back the KKK'
>
>
As a good thing, or as a bad thing? If you intended sarcasm, it was lost
on me, using virtual ink.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-04 18:59 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <119u45o$4v1d$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92851 |
On 04/10/2026 18:35, Carlos E. R. wrote: > On 2026-10-04 19:09, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 04/10/2026 11:48, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >>> In France we had Frédéric Dard, an author of a fun detective book, San >>> Antonio, which was popular some decades ago, who said: >>> « Plus le maître est con, plus le chien est fidèle. » >>> Which could be translated by something like: "The dumber the owner, the >>> more faithful the dog is." >>> >>> It's funny, but The more I see Trump and Trump followers, the more I >>> find how accurate this sentence is. >> >> Indeed. Voting tactically for Trump is one thing, to spite the >> Librals. Actually believing his bullshit is quite another >> >> A taxi driver who serves the local US airbase had a couple who assured >> him that 'Trump will bring back the KKK' >> >> > As a good thing, or as a bad thing? If you intended sarcasm, it was lost > on me, using virtual ink. > Oh, as a GOOD thing -- “Puritanism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.” H.L. Mencken, A Mencken Chrestomathy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-04 20:33 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nifkg9F5jmcU8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #92855 |
On 2026-10-04 19:59, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 04/10/2026 18:35, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>> On 2026-10-04 19:09, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>> On 04/10/2026 11:48, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>>>> In France we had Frédéric Dard, an author of a fun detective book, San
>>>> Antonio, which was popular some decades ago, who said:
>>>> « Plus le maître est con, plus le chien est fidèle. »
>>>> Which could be translated by something like: "The dumber the owner, the
>>>> more faithful the dog is."
>>>>
>>>> It's funny, but The more I see Trump and Trump followers, the more I
>>>> find how accurate this sentence is.
>>>
>>> Indeed. Voting tactically for Trump is one thing, to spite the
>>> Librals. Actually believing his bullshit is quite another
>>>
>>> A taxi driver who serves the local US airbase had a couple who
>>> assured him that 'Trump will bring back the KKK'
>>>
>>>
>> As a good thing, or as a bad thing? If you intended sarcasm, it was
>> lost on me, using virtual ink.
>>
> Oh, as a GOOD thing
>
Oh. A sign of the times.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-05 01:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nigbmlFoo9pU32@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #92842 |
On Sun, 4 Oct 2026 18:09:09 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > A taxi driver who serves the local US airbase had a couple who assured > him that 'Trump will bring back the KKK' Were they in favor? David Duke tried with little success. In one of those little twists he endorsed Jill Stein in 2024. She declined. One of the overlooked facets of the KKK is if a black wasn't handy a Catholic would do. They're as popular as the Masons among Catholics.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-05 10:03 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <119vp48$mtek$17@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92882 |
On 05/10/2026 02:09, rbowman wrote: > On Sun, 4 Oct 2026 18:09:09 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> A taxi driver who serves the local US airbase had a couple who assured >> him that 'Trump will bring back the KKK' > > Were they in favor? David Duke tried with little success. In one of those > little twists he endorsed Jill Stein in 2024. She declined. > They were I think gagging for it. As an aside, we get a few families off the airbases shopping here. The black families have well behaved kids, are polite to the staff and seem to fit in within the UK middle classes perfectly. I've seen generals with omelettes on their shoulders behaving appallingly arrogantly and rudely in the pubs and restaurants. I cant say it's representative of the urban poor, but the educated 'coloured folk' over here do far more to promote the USA than their over-privileged overbearing and ignorant white colleagues > One of the overlooked facets of the KKK is if a black wasn't handy a > Catholic would do. They're as popular as the Masons among Catholics. That's sad. Cathoilic girls are HOT, they can't wait to do a bit of proper sinning to see what the fuss is about -- "It was a lot more fun being 20 in the 70's that it is being 70 in the 20's" Joew Walsh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-05 12:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <11a0ki6$14d1i$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92882 |
rbowman wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS (fixed):
> On Sun, 4 Oct 2026 18:09:09 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>
>> A taxi driver who serves the local US airbase had a couple who assured
>> him that 'Trump will bring back the KKK'
>
> Were they in favor? David Duke tried with little success. In one of those
> little twists he endorsed Jill Stein in 2024. She declined.
>
> One of the overlooked facets of the KKK is if a black wasn't handy a
> Catholic would do. They're as popular as the Masons among Catholics.
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlWV0fUgLNU>
Blazing Saddles quick sand scene
--
Post-vasectomy: Tender is the nut.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-05 02:45 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <QOKdnfWWqNjs2l73nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #92842 |
On 10/4/26 13:09, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 04/10/2026 11:48, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >> In France we had Frédéric Dard, an author of a fun detective book, San >> Antonio, which was popular some decades ago, who said: >> « Plus le maître est con, plus le chien est fidèle. » >> Which could be translated by something like: "The dumber the owner, the >> more faithful the dog is." >> >> It's funny, but The more I see Trump and Trump followers, the more I >> find how accurate this sentence is. > > Indeed. Voting tactically for Trump is one thing, to spite the Librals. > Actually believing his bullshit is quite another > > A taxi driver who serves the local US airbase had a couple who assured > him that 'Trump will bring back the KKK' Eh ? Sorry, Trump has never been KKK. When he first ran for office a bunch of lefty MSM entities went LOOKING for 'racism' in his biz empires. Could NOT find it. Pissed 'em off to the extreme. Where ARE you getting your 'news' ??????? EXPAND !!!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-05 10:33 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <119vqsu$mtek$20@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92900 |
On 05/10/2026 07:45, c186282 wrote: > On 10/4/26 13:09, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 04/10/2026 11:48, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >>> In France we had Frédéric Dard, an author of a fun detective book, San >>> Antonio, which was popular some decades ago, who said: >>> « Plus le maître est con, plus le chien est fidèle. » >>> Which could be translated by something like: "The dumber the owner, the >>> more faithful the dog is." >>> >>> It's funny, but The more I see Trump and Trump followers, the more I >>> find how accurate this sentence is. >> >> Indeed. Voting tactically for Trump is one thing, to spite the >> Librals. Actually believing his bullshit is quite another >> >> A taxi driver who serves the local US airbase had a couple who assured >> him that 'Trump will bring back the KKK' > > Eh ? > > Sorry, Trump has never been KKK. > > When he first ran for office a bunch of lefty > MSM entities went LOOKING for 'racism' in his > biz empires. Could NOT find it. Pissed 'em > off to the extreme. > > Where ARE you getting your 'news' ??????? > From a taxi driver. *shrug*. I know Trump wont bring back the KKK. The point was that two american's in a taxi believed that he would, > EXPAND !!! > Piss off. Your TDS is getting boring. He is just another common or garden psychopath and narcissist who has managed to con one half of America and terrify the other half. Grow up. He is just total crap. The rest of the world has recognised him for what he is, lied to him to make him feel great, and quietly gone about disconnecting themselves from a USA whose importance on the world stage has completely diminished. By isolating the USA from world trade, Donny has thrown away half his cards. By making USA weapons effectively unavailable to his allies, his arms export trade has been devalued at a stroke to worthless. And Donny ain't got no drones. Not like Ukraine has. Guess who WE are 'doing deals' with. And by seeing that people in America actually think he is in some sense 'clever' the world opinion of Americans has suffered irreparable damage. In short, Trump and Maga are now global laughing stock. Hearing what you want to believe doesn't make it true. I don't claim our leaders are much better, but at least we are not stupid enough to actually believe them. -- "In our post-modern world, climate science is not powerful because it is true: it is true because it is powerful." Lucas Bergkamp
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-02 12:13 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <119o3k4$21k2o$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92612 |
On 02/10/2026 01:42, rbowman wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2026 11:08:18 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>
>> On 01/10/2026 01:33, c186282 wrote:
>>> Plenty bad to say about 'democracy' from Plato
>>> on up. However Churchill had maybe the best take on it ... "Worst
>>> ... except for all the others".
>>>
>>> Explicitly defined or not, the alt for 'democracy'
>>> is some form of 'royal' system of "your betters". Might be actual
>>> royal fams, but more recently it is just a bunch of extremists who
>>> like to THINK they "know better" and rule by threat and sword.
>>>
>> The European Union
>>
>>> You're safer with a plurality of Joe Averages.
>>
>> Democracy is supposed to make it hard to lock in a Trump like despot.
>
> Democracy is supposed to keep the sheep content while business goes on as
> usual.
Well that is what it has become. Engage the sheep in completely
irrelevant moral arguments over 'pro life/pro choice' whilst stripping
them of their wealth...
...however there are signs that people are beginning to suspect that
this is not actually a useful thing to be happening...
--
"Fanaticism consists in redoubling your effort when you have
forgotten your aim."
George Santayana
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-02 19:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <niaet8Fc90fU9@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #92634 |
On Fri, 2 Oct 2026 12:13:08 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > Well that is what it has become. Engage the sheep in completely > irrelevant moral arguments over 'pro life/pro choice' whilst stripping > them of their wealth... > > ...however there are signs that people are beginning to suspect that > this is not actually a useful thing to be happening... They've figured out voting harder doesn't work; the house always wins. What's next? The advantage of a monarch or dictator is you have one problem to address. In the US you have 540 elected drones and a few million unelected entrenched bureaucrats.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-02 21:32 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <cR-dnbdthaW5xl33nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #92634 |
On 10/2/26 07:13, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 02/10/2026 01:42, rbowman wrote: >> On Thu, 1 Oct 2026 11:08:18 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> On 01/10/2026 01:33, c186282 wrote: >>>> Plenty bad to say about 'democracy' from Plato >>>> on up. However Churchill had maybe the best take on it ... "Worst >>>> ... except for all the others". >>>> >>>> Explicitly defined or not, the alt for 'democracy' >>>> is some form of 'royal' system of "your betters". Might be actual >>>> royal fams, but more recently it is just a bunch of extremists who >>>> like to THINK they "know better" and rule by threat and sword. >>>> >>> The European Union >>> >>>> You're safer with a plurality of Joe Averages. >>> >>> Democracy is supposed to make it hard to lock in a Trump like despot. >> >> Democracy is supposed to keep the sheep content while business goes on as >> usual. > > Well that is what it has become. Engage the sheep in completely > irrelevant moral arguments over 'pro life/pro choice' whilst stripping > them of their wealth... Ah, politics/empire As Usual :-) This paradigm hasn't changed a whit since someone figured out how to scratch notes on clay tablets. Surely the same long before, but no documentation. And, alas, The People - they NEVER learn > ...however there are signs that people are beginning to suspect that > this is not actually a useful thing to be happening... Not enough, not consistently, not focused, not with workable solutions, not without evil actors as their 'leaders'. MAYbe the eventual super-uber-global "AI" will take over ? No empathy though, and we've trained them on petabytes of PEOPLE Stuff.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-02 02:49 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <U-6cne8ZmrhhziL3nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #92559 |
On 10/1/26 06:08, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 01/10/2026 01:33, c186282 wrote: >> Plenty bad to say about 'democracy' from Plato >> on up. However Churchill had maybe the best take >> on it ... "Worst ... except for all the others". >> >> Explicitly defined or not, the alt for 'democracy' >> is some form of 'royal' system of "your betters". >> Might be actual royal fams, but more recently it >> is just a bunch of extremists who like to THINK >> they "know better" and rule by threat and sword. >> > The European Union Yea ... fair description :-) >> You're safer with a plurality of Joe Averages. > > Democracy is supposed to make it hard to lock in a Trump like despot. > > We will see... SO far Trump is NOT a 'despot'. He'd basically have to engineer a COUP ..... NOT easy in the USA. Might not be SO upset if he DID however .... given the character of the opposition ......
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-02 12:21 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <119o43q$21k2o$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92625 |
On 02/10/2026 07:49, c186282 wrote: > SO far Trump is NOT a 'despot'. Actually, he is. He has bypassed Congress and the Senate at every possible point. He has used emergency powers when there is no emergency.. He has sacked thousands of civil servants and appointed fresh, not on the criterion of competence, but ass licking loyalty. That is not to say that the outgoing incumbents were any better, but replacing like with like is not proress > He'd basically > have to engineer a COUP ..... NOT easy in the > USA. I thought he already HAD... -- Gun Control: The law that ensures that only criminals have guns.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-10-02 22:44 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <ZZ2cnWAr5M-Z8V33nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #92637 |
On 10/2/26 07:21, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 02/10/2026 07:49, c186282 wrote: >> SO far Trump is NOT a 'despot'. > Actually, he is. He has bypassed Congress and the Senate at every > possible point. GOOD ! HAD to be done. > He has used emergency powers when there is no > emergency.. He has sacked thousands of civil servants and appointed > fresh, not on the criterion of competence, but ass licking loyalty. Lots of presidents use/(abuse?) "emergency powers". Sorry, reality doesn't have a script - all kinds of weird shit happens, often quickly. This was the one real advantage of "kings" - one person who could ACT instantly. > That is not to say that the outgoing incumbents were any better, but > replacing like with like is not proress > > > >> He'd basically >> have to engineer a COUP ..... NOT easy in the >> USA. > > I thought he already HAD... Ummm ... not even close. DO try taking off the heavily pinko-colored glasses every once in a while. Warning, may give you a headache. Remember the "Allegory Of The Cave" ? What happened if a prisoner manged to escape out into the daylight world ? :-) Anyway, don't see umpteen thousand shock troops in black with red "T" arm-bands in the streets dealing with resisters. Where IS this "coup" and its muscle ???
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 8 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web