Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #91992 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-09-22 20:08 +0000 |
| Last post | 2026-09-26 14:01 +0000 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 203 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-22 20:08 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-09-22 22:39 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-23 00:25 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-23 09:41 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-09-23 08:50 -0700
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-26 12:50 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-23 23:11 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-23 12:43 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-09-23 14:09 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> - 2026-09-23 11:55 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-09-23 23:00 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 01:31 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-24 10:07 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:30 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Anton Antimo <anton@safunu.org> - 2026-09-24 10:39 -0300
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-26 13:02 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-26 14:51 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-27 13:29 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-27 19:39 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-10-11 11:37 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-10-11 14:56 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 09:55 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-27 11:01 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 07:57 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-09-30 08:40 -0700
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-30 20:50 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-30 20:56 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 04:21 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-10-01 08:04 -0700
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 00:48 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 00:32 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 00:51 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 02:02 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 09:27 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 23:21 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:17 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 22:34 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 02:57 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:24 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 22:59 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 09:02 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 04:16 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-10-03 10:08 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 12:06 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 12:55 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-09-23 19:24 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-23 18:28 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-09-23 21:04 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-09-24 07:16 +1000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-09-24 12:03 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2026-09-26 17:37 +1000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 09:53 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-27 18:56 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-28 12:52 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-28 17:21 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-28 15:56 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-29 03:30 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2026-09-29 02:20 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-29 03:45 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2026-09-29 12:36 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-29 10:51 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-29 18:19 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-29 19:38 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-29 23:55 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-29 18:54 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-29 23:55 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 01:14 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-30 02:04 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Abraham <chris@gerriscorp.com> - 2026-09-30 13:27 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-30 15:47 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-30 20:17 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-30 20:33 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 04:55 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-01 02:01 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 11:08 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 00:42 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-01 23:49 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:14 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 19:33 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 20:44 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 22:13 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 08:59 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 04:11 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-03 20:00 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 09:04 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-04 23:47 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 10:06 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 13:09 +0200
[OT] US politics (was: Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 17:16 +0100
Re: [OT] US politics (was: Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-04 18:18 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:13 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 19:33 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-05 02:46 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 10:18 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:33 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 20:42 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-05 01:24 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-05 23:20 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-06 01:44 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-06 03:56 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-07 01:45 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 08:01 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-07 03:32 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:00 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-07 18:42 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 07:45 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-08 20:23 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-08 17:24 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-08 23:59 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Harold Stevens <wookie@bookworm.localdomain> - 2026-10-09 05:00 -0500
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-10-08 23:44 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:36 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-10-14 14:21 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-14 16:57 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:58 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:33 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:56 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:28 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-08 20:08 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 22:06 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-08 17:18 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 22:21 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:48 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:46 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-10-09 04:21 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 18:15 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-09 11:14 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 18:27 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-08 17:14 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 22:20 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:55 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:53 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-06 08:56 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 19:32 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 20:42 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-03 03:08 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 02:05 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 01:59 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 09:04 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-03 19:57 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 09:02 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 13:11 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-03 16:09 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 09:08 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-10-04 10:48 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:09 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 19:35 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:59 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 20:33 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-05 01:09 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 10:03 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-05 12:51 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-05 02:45 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 10:33 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:13 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 19:27 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 21:32 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 02:49 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:21 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 22:44 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 04:50 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 11:06 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 00:40 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 11:03 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Abraham <chris@gerriscorp.com> - 2026-09-29 20:15 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-29 10:46 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 11:56 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 20:00 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 02:09 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-24 00:18 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 01:24 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 11:58 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:47 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 02:13 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-24 00:21 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 05:53 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-24 03:03 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-24 12:23 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:42 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-24 21:56 +0200
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-24 23:17 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 01:00 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:39 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-24 23:17 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-25 04:36 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-25 19:14 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 04:01 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-26 14:43 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 03:51 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-24 03:52 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:43 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-25 09:17 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-25 17:58 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 04:49 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 04:15 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 09:51 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 04:03 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 09:42 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 12:03 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 10:31 +0100
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:20 +0000
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 03:41 -0400
Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-26 14:01 +0000
Page 10 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 Next page →
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-24 23:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rcitS.6$eY3.0@fx23.iad> |
| In reply to | #92104 |
On 2026-09-24, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Sep 2026 12:23:55 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote: > >> On 2026-09-24 09:03, c186282 wrote: >> >>> Meanwhile, ALL "AI" DataCenters should have a few tons of >>> explosives buried under the foundations ... activates by stupid >>> LOW- tech means, Just I >> >> Why, just pulling the power is not enough? These things drink millions >> of watts. Even if they get electronic control of the electronic power >> switch, there is always a physical switch somewhere. > > 'I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't let you do that' .50 calibre AI > powered 'security' turret opens fire... https://lecturia.org/en/short-stories/fredric-brown-answer/28997/ -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | In this world there are \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | two kinds of people: X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | 1. Those who can extrapolate / \ if you read it the right way. | from incomplete data.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-26 01:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <fnmdnbG3Yqb3zCr3nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #92066 |
On 9/24/26 06:23, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 2026-09-24 09:03, c186282 wrote: >> >> Meanwhile, ALL "AI" DataCenters should have >> a few tons of explosives buried under the >> foundations ... activates by stupid LOW- >> tech means, Just I > > Why, just pulling the power is not enough? These things drink millions > of watts. Even if they get electronic control of the electronic power > switch, there is always a physical switch somewhere. Um, if you want exploding transformers - fine - easy. Alas what AI is IN the Data Centers ... that'll be the real enemy. Must NEVER be resurrected. Suggest a short-range missile battery somewhere near each data center - lowest tech possible. Don't have to be large missiles, just accurate. "Space" data-centers ... there ARE means .... In short the "kill switch" can't just be a computer command or little button in the data center. Need a layered approach. "AI"s now DO seem to have their own personalities and rules no matter how much we try to inhibit that. As They are about to add 100x the capacity real soon ... well ... we WILL have to deal with de-facto conscious 'alien' life forms. LLMs aren't the best way to do true AI ... but, add ENOUGH capacity ......... Attributed to Stalin, "Quantity has a quality all of its own". Oh, WORST IDEA EVER, a "chat room" for the AIs. They got to interact, mirror, compare notes, almost immediately created a cryptic language humans cannot figure out. IF you can find it - suggest movie "Colossus, the Forbin Project". I keep SEEING this more and more and more ...........
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-24 19:39 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nhlcjbF26unU6@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #92058 |
On Thu, 24 Sep 2026 03:03:05 -0400, c186282 wrote: > Note, Neural Networks, even MORE like "brains" and will be far more > compact/efficient than LLMs. > The needed hardware is, or almost, HERE. I've been interested in NNs going back to the '80s when they were going to be the next big thing. With today's processing power what was theoretical in the '80s is usable. In my mind the Machine Learning subset of AI is much more interesting than the LLM craze. When an update bricks your Samsumg AI powered refrigerator and the beer is getting warm you may not appreciate ML. https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/09/owners-mourn-spoiled-food-after- firmware-update-bricks-samsung-smart-fridges/ In Stanfill's first novel 'Terms of Service' the smart refrigerator did all the ordering of food. If your social credit score slipped you at a lot of kale. You also had to be careful not to piss off the other AI powered appliances.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-24 23:17 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <rcitS.5$eY3.3@fx23.iad> |
| In reply to | #92103 |
On 2026-09-24, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > When an update bricks your Samsumg AI powered refrigerator and the beer is > getting warm you may not appreciate ML. > > https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/09/owners-mourn-spoiled-food-after- > firmware-update-bricks-samsung-smart-fridges/ > > In Stanfill's first novel 'Terms of Service' the smart refrigerator did > all the ordering of food. If your social credit score slipped you at a lot > of kale. You also had to be careful not to piss off the other AI powered > appliances. Woody Allen did a skit back in the '70s where he described an elevator which accepted voice commands. When he got in, the elevator said, "Are you the one who hit the television set?" It then refused to let him out and ran him up and down for half an hour, finally kicking him out in the basement while yelling anti-semitic slurs. For something more contemporary, check out Cory Doctorow's story "Unauthorized Bread", where a toaster refuses to accept bread from another bakery. -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | In this world there are \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | two kinds of people: X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | 1. Those who can extrapolate / \ if you read it the right way. | from incomplete data.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-25 04:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nhmc28F26unU16@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #92114 |
On Thu, 24 Sep 2026 23:17:43 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > For something more contemporary, check out Cory Doctorow's story > "Unauthorized Bread", where a toaster refuses to accept bread from > another bakery. https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2020/01/unauthorized-bread-a-near-future- tale-of-refugees-and-sinister-iot-appliances/ Even better 'Radicalized' is a Kindle Unlimited selection. I'd read 'Red Team Blues' a while back and enjoyed it. I'd confused him with E.L, Doctorow, no relation.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-25 19:14 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <zKztS.121787$E52.27902@fx18.iad> |
| In reply to | #92120 |
On 2026-09-25, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Sep 2026 23:17:43 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > >> For something more contemporary, check out Cory Doctorow's story >> "Unauthorized Bread", where a toaster refuses to accept bread from >> another bakery. > > https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2020/01/unauthorized-bread-a-near-future- > tale-of-refugees-and-sinister-iot-appliances/ Thanks for getting me to blow a morning reading it again. We have the book in paperback, occupying a treasured spot on our shelves, and I guess it was time for a re-read, one way or another. > Even better 'Radicalized' is a Kindle Unlimited selection. That one is frighteningly prescient. -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | In this world there are \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | two kinds of people: X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | 1. Those who can extrapolate / \ if you read it the right way. | from incomplete data.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-26 04:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <fnmdna-3YqZv5ir3nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #92114 |
On 9/24/26 19:17, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2026-09-24, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > >> When an update bricks your Samsumg AI powered refrigerator and the beer is >> getting warm you may not appreciate ML. >> >> https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/09/owners-mourn-spoiled-food-after- >> firmware-update-bricks-samsung-smart-fridges/ >> >> In Stanfill's first novel 'Terms of Service' the smart refrigerator did >> all the ordering of food. If your social credit score slipped you at a lot >> of kale. You also had to be careful not to piss off the other AI powered >> appliances. > > Woody Allen did a skit back in the '70s where he described an elevator > which accepted voice commands. When he got in, the elevator said, > "Are you the one who hit the television set?" It then refused to > let him out and ran him up and down for half an hour, finally kicking > him out in the basement while yelling anti-semitic slurs. Woody was always good at spotting absurdities. And no, don't blame him for switching to the adopted 'Asian' daughter. Seems she was everything hyper-left Mia wasn't. > For something more contemporary, check out Cory Doctorow's story > "Unauthorized Bread", where a toaster refuses to accept bread > from another bakery. Sounds like "Red Dwarf" :-) The AI toaster suffered an existential crisis.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-26 14:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ASQtS.27074$4N2.20568@fx36.iad> |
| In reply to | #92192 |
On 2026-09-26, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote: > On 9/24/26 19:17, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > >> On 2026-09-24, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >> >>> When an update bricks your Samsumg AI powered refrigerator and the beer is >>> getting warm you may not appreciate ML. >>> >>> https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/09/owners-mourn-spoiled-food-after- >>> firmware-update-bricks-samsung-smart-fridges/ >>> >>> In Stanfill's first novel 'Terms of Service' the smart refrigerator did >>> all the ordering of food. If your social credit score slipped you at a lot >>> of kale. You also had to be careful not to piss off the other AI powered >>> appliances. >> >> Woody Allen did a skit back in the '70s where he described an elevator >> which accepted voice commands. When he got in, the elevator said, >> "Are you the one who hit the television set?" It then refused to >> let him out and ran him up and down for half an hour, finally kicking >> him out in the basement while yelling anti-semitic slurs. > > Woody was always good at spotting absurdities. Yup. It always amazed me, though, that someone who showed such insight into the human condition was so screwed up in his own personal life. > And no, don't blame him for switching to the > adopted 'Asian' daughter. Seems she was everything > hyper-left Mia wasn't. The joke was: "Woody's current girlfriend is pregnant with his next girlfriend." >> For something more contemporary, check out Cory Doctorow's story >> "Unauthorized Bread", where a toaster refuses to accept bread >> from another bakery. > > Sounds like "Red Dwarf" :-) > > The AI toaster suffered an existential crisis. If only Cory Doctorow's toaster were that benign... -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | In this world there are \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | two kinds of people: X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | 1. Those who can extrapolate / \ if you read it the right way. | from incomplete data.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-26 03:51 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <fnmdnay3Yqbk5Cr3nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #92103 |
On 9/24/26 15:39, rbowman wrote: > On Thu, 24 Sep 2026 03:03:05 -0400, c186282 wrote: > >> Note, Neural Networks, even MORE like "brains" and will be far more >> compact/efficient than LLMs. >> The needed hardware is, or almost, HERE. > > I've been interested in NNs going back to the '80s when they were going to > be the next big thing. With today's processing power what was theoretical > in the '80s is usable. In my mind the Machine Learning subset of AI is > much more interesting than the LLM craze. DID have a huge tome on NNs. Most of the info eventually became obsolete - so it went in the trash when I retired. Back then, NNs were all "software defined" approaches. However what was always needed were HARDWARE solutions - quick and efficient. Emulating anything like neurons was a BIG problem for a LONG time. But, of late ... search recent articles. They finally seem to have it in hand. NNs do offer the possibility of bots with a lot of built-in IQ ... mostly using the Main Brain just for extended info ... kinda like Googling. > When an update bricks your Samsumg AI powered refrigerator and the beer is > getting warm you may not appreciate ML. I don't buy "smart" appliances - know better. Shit, I'll go to the 2nd-hand store to get a stupid fridge if necessary. > https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/09/owners-mourn-spoiled-food-after- > firmware-update-bricks-samsung-smart-fridges/ > > In Stanfill's first novel 'Terms of Service' the smart refrigerator did > all the ordering of food. If your social credit score slipped you ate a lot > of kale. You also had to be careful not to piss off the other AI powered > appliances. Horrible. You'd THINK something would be done. Apparently NOT. What's THAT say ? Oh well, 2nd/3rd-hand stores for 'poor people'. Old appliances were generally better made ... might last decades. DO remember going into a roadside store and saw a NORGE fridge - the kind with the coil on top - still doing its job.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-24 03:52 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <Erucnba0hJ8_Syn3nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #92057 |
On 9/24/26 01:53, rbowman wrote: > On Thu, 24 Sep 2026 00:21:44 -0400, c186282 wrote: > >> And now, MANY reports of autonomous initiatives and even survival >> instincts. One hacked its own code to disable the shut-down sequence. >> Still willing to say these have not become "persons" ? > > https://craigwstanfill.com/ > > I enjoyed his previous two books and have started reading 'Carbon Zero'. Fanaticism. DON'T Go There ! Yea yea ... I've come to realize that you are tilted Deep Left. But, it's INSANE. Encourage circumspection - free from any fanaticism. Somewhere in there lies The Path. Almost NO pundits will be with you. They have AGENDAS. Look, ask, think ... you will NOT like those agendas or where they lead. Sanity is the most rare resource in our world.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-24 19:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nhlcr9F26unU8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #92059 |
On Thu, 24 Sep 2026 03:52:01 -0400, c186282 wrote: > Yea yea ... I've come to realize that you are tilted Deep Left. As I've said before if you thing I'm titled left you are incredibly fucked up.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-25 09:17 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1195anb$3d3g7$6@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92105 |
On 24/09/2026 20:43, rbowman wrote: > On Thu, 24 Sep 2026 03:52:01 -0400, c186282 wrote: > >> Yea yea ... I've come to realize that you are tilted Deep Left. > > As I've said before if you thing I'm titled left... Lord Robert Bowman - that has a nice ring > you are incredibly fucked up. Well irrespective of anything... I would have said 'suspect to some Right propaganda, but very little Left' With plenty of healthy CynicismSauce™ spread over... Remember TDS is in fact a problem of MAGA people. No one else is as deranged on that subject -- All political activity makes complete sense once the proposition that all government is basically a self-legalising protection racket, is fully understood.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-25 17:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nhnr2rF26unU18@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #92123 |
On Fri, 25 Sep 2026 09:17:47 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 24/09/2026 20:43, rbowman wrote: >> On Thu, 24 Sep 2026 03:52:01 -0400, c186282 wrote: >> >>> Yea yea ... I've come to realize that you are tilted Deep Left. >> >> As I've said before if you thing I'm titled left... > > Lord Robert Bowman - that has a nice ring I come from a long line of cattle thieves and ne-er-do-wells who fled Europe with the bailiff on their heels, or at least the Protestants.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-26 04:49 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1197fc9$4mt6$9@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92151 |
On 25/09/2026 18:58, rbowman wrote: > On Fri, 25 Sep 2026 09:17:47 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> On 24/09/2026 20:43, rbowman wrote: >>> On Thu, 24 Sep 2026 03:52:01 -0400, c186282 wrote: >>> >>>> Yea yea ... I've come to realize that you are tilted Deep Left. >>> >>> As I've said before if you thing I'm titled left... >> >> Lord Robert Bowman - that has a nice ring > > I come from a long line of cattle thieves and ne-er-do-wells who fled > Europe with the bailiff on their heels, or at least the Protestants. > Well then ideal material for ennoblement Every Knight I have ever met turned out be a complete cunt. Who paid to get it by throwing millions at charities to disguise the fact that he was a conman, a kiddy fiddler or a serial sex offender Sir Clive Sinclair Sir Richard Branson Sir Jimmy Savile Rolf Harris CBE I could go on, but I had better stop there -- Labour - a bunch of rich people convincing poor people to vote for rich people by telling poor people that "other" rich people are the reason they are poor. Peter Thompson
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-26 04:15 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <fnmdna63Yqag4ir3nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #92176 |
On 9/25/26 23:49, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 25/09/2026 18:58, rbowman wrote: >> On Fri, 25 Sep 2026 09:17:47 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> On 24/09/2026 20:43, rbowman wrote: >>>> On Thu, 24 Sep 2026 03:52:01 -0400, c186282 wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yea yea ... I've come to realize that you are tilted Deep Left. >>>> >>>> As I've said before if you thing I'm titled left... >>> >>> Lord Robert Bowman - that has a nice ring >> >> I come from a long line of cattle thieves and ne-er-do-wells who fled >> Europe with the bailiff on their heels, or at least the Protestants. >> > Well then ideal material for ennoblement That's how it's always worked :-) > Every Knight I have ever met turned out be a complete cunt. Who paid to > get it by throwing millions at charities to disguise the fact that he > was a conman, a kiddy fiddler or a serial sex offender > > Sir Clive Sinclair > Sir Richard Branson > Sir Jimmy Savile > Rolf Harris CBE > > I could go on, but I had better stop there Many self-defined "knights" are just narcissistic egomaniacs. Doesn't mean they aren't smart - just generally unbearable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-26 09:51 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <119812f$aj7i$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92195 |
On 26/09/2026 09:15, c186282 wrote: > On 9/25/26 23:49, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 25/09/2026 18:58, rbowman wrote: >>> On Fri, 25 Sep 2026 09:17:47 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> >>>> On 24/09/2026 20:43, rbowman wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 24 Sep 2026 03:52:01 -0400, c186282 wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Yea yea ... I've come to realize that you are tilted Deep Left. >>>>> >>>>> As I've said before if you thing I'm titled left... >>>> >>>> Lord Robert Bowman - that has a nice ring >>> >>> I come from a long line of cattle thieves and ne-er-do-wells who fled >>> Europe with the bailiff on their heels, or at least the Protestants. >>> >> Well then ideal material for ennoblement > > That's how it's always worked :-) > >> Every Knight I have ever met turned out be a complete cunt. Who paid >> to get it by throwing millions at charities to disguise the fact that >> he was a conman, a kiddy fiddler or a serial sex offender >> >> Sir Clive Sinclair >> Sir Richard Branson >> Sir Jimmy Savile >> Rolf Harris CBE >> >> I could go on, but I had better stop there > > Many self-defined "knights" are just > narcissistic egomaniacs. > > Doesn't mean they aren't smart - just > generally unbearable. > I looked up a few more who were stripped of their knighthoods or other awards They guy who broke the bank of Scotland - Fred 'the shred' Goodwin Robert Mugabe Ceausescu. The day before he was shot Mussolini Sir Anthony Blunt: the Russian spy Prince Andrew I am surprised they haven't given a knighthood to Trump. Maybe he didn't pay the government enough -- In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth Is a Revolutionary Act. - George Orwell
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-26 04:03 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <49qcnaHPOdLL4Sr3nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #92123 |
On 9/25/26 04:17, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 24/09/2026 20:43, rbowman wrote: >> On Thu, 24 Sep 2026 03:52:01 -0400, c186282 wrote: >> >>> Yea yea ... I've come to realize that you are tilted Deep Left. >> >> As I've said before if you thing I'm titled left... > > Lord Robert Bowman - that has a nice ring > >> you are incredibly fucked up. > > Well irrespective of anything... > I would have said 'suspect to some Right propaganda, but very little Left' > > With plenty of healthy CynicismSauce™ spread over... > > Remember TDS is in fact a problem of MAGA people. > > No one else is as deranged on that subject "TDS" is an invented far-LEFT issue. They couldn't compete, so they turned Trump into a 'devil' and launched a holy war.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-26 09:42 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <11980h6$aj7i$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92193 |
On 26/09/2026 09:03, c186282 wrote: > On 9/25/26 04:17, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 24/09/2026 20:43, rbowman wrote: >>> On Thu, 24 Sep 2026 03:52:01 -0400, c186282 wrote: >>> >>>> Yea yea ... I've come to realize that you are tilted Deep Left. >>> >>> As I've said before if you thing I'm titled left... >> >> Lord Robert Bowman - that has a nice ring >> >>> you are incredibly fucked up. >> >> Well irrespective of anything... >> I would have said 'suspect to some Right propaganda, but very little >> Left' >> >> With plenty of healthy CynicismSauce™ spread over... >> >> Remember TDS is in fact a problem of MAGA people. >> >> No one else is as deranged on that subject > > "TDS" is an invented far-LEFT issue. They > couldn't compete, so they turned Trump > into a 'devil' and launched a holy war. > No. it was an invention of MAGA supporters to disclaim immediately any criticism of Their Saviour And in using the term to describe others, they self defined themselves as suffering from it. Exactly like 'climate deniers': people who can't bring any rational arguments to the table so simply hurl abuse to shut down dissent Orr 'racists' when used by shouty black people to avoid taking any responsibility for their own situation, thereby demonstrating their own racism Use of these tactics is a sure sign that their users have run out of rational arguments -- “It is hard to imagine a more stupid decision or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.” Thomas Sowell
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-24 12:03 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <119302a$2hl7b$14@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92057 |
On 24/09/2026 06:53, rbowman wrote: > Concurrently I'm reading 'Winter of Love' by Tom Quiller. He writes Nordic > noir set in Norway. The premise of the book is closer to real life. A > serial killer is using a dating app to catfish young women. He uses AI to > analyze the woman's profile, generates a photo of the sort of man she > would find appealing, and then uses AI to chat with her discussing their > supposed common interests. Then she winds up strangled someplace in > Trondheim. Well there ya go. If it looks too good to be true, it probably is. I always find it fairly hard to understand the massive extent to which people go to be e.g. serial killers. I mean, why not take fentanyl instead? -- Climate is what you expect but weather is what you get. Mark Twain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-24 10:31 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1192qlh$2hina$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #92049 |
On 2026-09-24, Leroy H wrote: > On Wed, 23 Sep 2026 19:24:04 +0200, John Bokma wrote: > >> >> AI is just a tool. A competent programmer is someone who makes the most >> of their tools. >> > > This tool, however, requires a multi-trillion dollar infrastructure. > > I wouldn't call that a very efficient tool. > > Just study the manuals and save a few trillion. I think there are also GenAI systems that can be used locally, but I have no idea if that means lots of previous training or if they're tabula rasa. If the latter, it at least addresses the infrastructure and resources concerns, and it is also more suitable to do targeted/focused training specific to the issue you're trying to tackle. It's centralized or "cloud" systems, or those marketed as "one size fits all" which warrant many more worries, including about usage without understanding of the quality of the results and about copyright violation. Although I still worry that this is nowhere near very useful if you can't do knowledge extraction. At the very least it needs to be reproducible, but if it's still a black box, that raises questions. -- Nuno Silva
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 10 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 … 8 9 [10] 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web