Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #90034 > unrolled thread
| Started by | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-08-18 01:44 -0400 |
| Last post | 2026-08-19 22:21 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 212 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-18 01:44 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-18 01:59 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-18 06:05 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-08-18 08:10 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-18 11:33 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-18 22:16 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 03:32 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 14:05 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-19 13:23 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 14:10 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 15:15 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 21:53 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-19 22:54 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Anton Antimo <anton@safunu.org> - 2026-08-20 10:31 -0300
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-21 13:10 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Anton Antimo <anton@safunu.org> - 2026-08-20 10:30 -0300
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-20 18:04 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 14:01 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 15:24 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 22:07 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-22 04:02 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-22 06:48 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-22 16:15 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-08-23 21:52 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-24 01:07 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-24 11:15 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-24 19:26 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 11:45 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-25 18:39 +0000
Power lines Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-25 06:48 -0700
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 15:10 +0100
Re: Power lines Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-26 18:04 -0700
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 03:23 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-27 12:09 +0100
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:15 -0400
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 03:21 +0000
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-28 02:42 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:15 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 18:40 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:37 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 20:13 +0000
Re: Power lines "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2026-08-29 21:28 +0100
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 23:23 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 22:47 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 23:20 +0100
Re: Power lines "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 13:43 +0200
Re: Power lines Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-30 15:49 +0000
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 18:40 +0000
Re: Power lines "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 21:23 +0200
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 19:36 +0000
Re: Power lines Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-31 15:50 +0000
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 02:55 -0400
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 07:41 +0000
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 03:49 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:17 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 18:24 +0000
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 01:33 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-02 11:43 +0100
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:15 +0100
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 01:32 -0400
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-02 13:55 +0000
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 22:30 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:12 +0100
Re: Power lines Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-01 18:14 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 19:22 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 21:06 +0000
Re: Power lines Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-01 23:40 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-02 11:32 +0100
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 23:40 -0400
Re: Power lines Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-01 23:40 +0000
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 01:28 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-02 11:41 +0100
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-03 00:05 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-03 11:56 +0100
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:04 +0100
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:09 +0100
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:06 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-27 14:19 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-27 15:25 +0100
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:24 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:18 +0100
Re: Power lines Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-28 05:56 -0700
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 15:33 +0100
Re: Power lines Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-08-28 16:06 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:30 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 18:51 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:39 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 20:26 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 23:25 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 01:46 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 11:50 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-25 18:43 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-26 04:07 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> - 2026-08-27 10:54 -0600
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-27 19:11 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> - 2026-08-27 12:57 -0600
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 12:55 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 18:25 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 00:27 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-28 00:45 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:02 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-08-28 16:13 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:32 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 19:38 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 22:57 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 06:10 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:55 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 23:34 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-08-26 04:27 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-26 08:57 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-27 06:30 -0700
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-27 13:57 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:22 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:16 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 18:36 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-28 19:42 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:28 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 20:04 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 23:18 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 22:50 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-30 18:03 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 18:35 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 00:43 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-31 02:21 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 12:33 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 09:22 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 13:01 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-31 03:00 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 12:47 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-31 18:36 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 02:09 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 07:11 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 03:47 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:56 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 18:00 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 19:11 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-01 18:17 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-01 18:19 +0000
[OT] Finland, and Russia (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 23:49 +0100
Re: [OT] Finland, and Russia (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-02 02:53 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 02:46 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:54 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 18:17 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 19:23 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-01 21:23 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 21:18 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 02:00 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-02 11:44 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:43 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 18:12 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Stanislav N. aka pztrn" <pztrn@oldproto.invalid> - 2026-08-30 07:55 +0500
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-30 02:08 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 06:30 +0000
[OT] Russian Federation, wars (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-30 10:04 +0100
Re: [OT] Russian Federation, wars Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-30 10:22 +0100
Re: [OT] Russian Federation, wars "Stanislav N. aka pztrn" <pztrn@oldproto.invalid> - 2026-08-30 16:13 +0500
Re: [OT] Russian Federation, wars The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-30 18:12 +0100
Re: [OT] Russian Federation, wars "Stanislav N. aka pztrn" <pztrn@oldproto.invalid> - 2026-08-30 16:47 +0500
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-29 13:58 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-29 10:11 -0700
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-29 22:20 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 23:06 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-30 02:14 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 06:35 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 19:28 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-31 02:15 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 22:55 +0100
Salmonella (Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-30 09:28 -0700
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 19:27 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 18:31 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 21:30 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 19:43 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 21:57 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-31 02:35 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-31 02:50 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-31 18:29 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-31 01:52 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-31 12:47 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 12:37 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-31 15:50 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-31 18:41 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 02:37 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-09-01 06:26 -0700
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 19:05 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 21:07 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 18:19 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> - 2026-08-31 17:07 -0600
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 01:20 -0400
[OT] Personal safety in the USA (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 10:27 +0100
[OT] Personal safety in the USA (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-09-01 08:23 -0700
Re: [OT] Personal safety in the USA Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> - 2026-09-01 10:24 -0600
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:04 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> - 2026-09-01 11:00 -0600
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 01:23 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-02 11:35 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-03 02:53 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 22:49 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-27 16:32 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:44 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-19 12:57 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 14:03 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-19 22:24 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-18 22:07 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 03:42 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-19 02:14 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 14:13 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 14:14 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 15:27 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-19 16:57 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 14:02 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 13:54 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-19 22:21 -0400
Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11 Next page →
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 13:55 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <nfqo79Fmnm5U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #91055 |
On Wed, 2 Sep 2026 01:32:04 -0400, c186282 wrote: > Rome became great BEFORE Xians, went downhill AFTER Xians. Julian the Apostate tried. Like others invading Persia didn't work out well.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 22:30 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <4TqdnV_sstJRRgX3nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #91076 |
On 9/2/26 09:55, rbowman wrote: > On Wed, 2 Sep 2026 01:32:04 -0400, c186282 wrote: > >> Rome became great BEFORE Xians, went downhill AFTER Xians. > > Julian the Apostate tried. Like others invading Persia didn't work out > well. Persia has been pretty kick-ass at various times. Alexander squished Persia - but had no success with Hindustan. Persia would LIKE to be a big scary all-controlling jihadi nuclear power right now. Does that sound good for everyone else ? Anyway, power/capability shifts between nations and regions all the time. Human nature, anyplace that thinks it's superior at the moment WILL try to take over everywhere else. Seems built into our brains, the 'dominance hierarchy' thing taken to the next level. He who pecks the most heads WINS.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 13:12 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <1176ffm$1o1ba$18@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90990 |
On 01/09/2026 07:55, c186282 wrote: > On 8/31/26 11:50, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> On 2026-08-30, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >> >>> She had a Japanese pen pal and met up with her and her brother for >>> lunch. >>> Brother and friends walked in front, women followed behind. My wife >>> showed >>> constraint unusual for her, being a 'liberated' woman. Just as well >>> since >>> she had about 6" and 50 pounds on the average Japanese male. >> >> Someone asked a Muslim woman why she always walked behind her husband. >> She replied, "Land mines." > > Ok ... THAT'S funny !!! :-) > > And, alas, kinda TRUE in some parts > of the world. > > NOT sure why "Moslem Women" accept such > a subservient/slave role. "Tradition" ? > NOT really good for them however. > Because, as one Jewish GF advised me. 'so they know where they stand' All this social freedom is simply too much for many people. They want to be told what to do and provided with enough money to do it and then they can relax switch off and cease to become individuals. > SOME EU/American women marry Islamist guys. > Most common story - HORRIBLE, not at ALL > what they were led to expect. Some have to > hatch extreme schemes to escape. Many others > aren't that smart. > > The middle-eastern religious/cultural view > of women is pretty damned BAD. Islam or > "Orthodox Jewish" and beyond ... basically > they are viewed as sex slaves and baby > factories. > I would refer you to this cartoon. (I never bothered to register for https, but its benign) http://vps.templar.co.uk/Cartoons%20and%20Politics/Male-Culture.jpg > This goes way WAY *WAY* back. > > Of note : the legal texts of Sumeria ... > 5000+ years old. Tablets found. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_of_Ur-Nammu > > Sorry, women and slaves are just "things" - not > much different from cows and such. > It's all a function of what works in the current stable economic society. Various mores arise because in a given context they 'work' The problem comes when they are transferred to a culture where they do not. -- "If you don’t read the news paper, you are un-informed. If you read the news paper, you are mis-informed." Mark Twain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 18:14 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <JBElS.84847$Rhua.2479@fx24.iad> |
| In reply to | #91006 |
On 2026-09-01, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 01/09/2026 07:55, c186282 wrote: > >> NOT sure why "Moslem Women" accept such >> a subservient/slave role. "Tradition" ? >> NOT really good for them however. > > Because, as one Jewish GF advised me. 'so they know where they stand' > > All this social freedom is simply too much for many people. They want to > be told what to do and provided with enough money to do it and then they > can relax switch off and cease to become individuals. Yes, I've seen the groups of U.S. women who can't wait to give up the vote. >> SOME EU/American women marry Islamist guys. >> Most common story - HORRIBLE, not at ALL >> what they were led to expect. Some have to >> hatch extreme schemes to escape. Many others >> aren't that smart. >> >> The middle-eastern religious/cultural view >> of women is pretty damned BAD. Islam or >> "Orthodox Jewish" and beyond ... basically >> they are viewed as sex slaves and baby >> factories. > > I would refer you to this cartoon. (I never bothered to register for > https, but its benign) > > http://vps.templar.co.uk/Cartoons%20and%20Politics/Male-Culture.jpg Good one. :-) > It's all a function of what works in the current stable economic society. > > Various mores arise because in a given context they 'work' > > The problem comes when they are transferred to a culture where they do not. One solution is to transform the culture. This is now happening in the U.S. -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | In this world there are \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | two kinds of people: X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | 1. Those who can extrapolate / \ if you read it the right way. | from incomplete data.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 19:22 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <1177552$226dr$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #91020 |
On 01/09/2026 19:14, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> The problem comes when they are transferred to a culture where they do not. > One solution is to transform the culture. This is now happening in the U.S However, as insurance statistics show, people who 'put their trust in Jesus'. or say 'In'shallah' every time they pull out in front of a truck, do not improve the durability of the culture they seek to subvert -- “Some people like to travel by train because it combines the slowness of a car with the cramped public exposure of an airplane.” Dennis Miller
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 21:06 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <nfot1oFtomiU27@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #91026 |
On Tue, 1 Sep 2026 19:22:26 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > However, as insurance statistics show, people who 'put their trust in > Jesus'. or say 'In'shallah' every time they pull out in front of a > truck, > do not improve the durability of the culture they seek to subvert I was hiking up Wheeler Peak in Nevada and was close to the summit but there was a line of thunderstorms moving in across the valley. I chose to get the hell of the mountain. A woman coming up the trail asked how far it was the summit and I said I wasn't sure since I hadn't went to the summit. 'Jesus is my lord and savior and he will protect me.' 'Honey, I roll with Wotan and he's got no time for fools.' I had just made it down to the treeline when the wind, rain, hail, and lightning hit. I assume Jesus girl had a lot of fun.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 23:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <MnJlS.1622$oQ_6.1570@fx11.iad> |
| In reply to | #91034 |
On 2026-09-01, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > On Tue, 1 Sep 2026 19:22:26 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> However, as insurance statistics show, people who 'put their trust in >> Jesus'. or say 'In'shallah' every time they pull out in front of a >> truck, >> do not improve the durability of the culture they seek to subvert > > I was hiking up Wheeler Peak in Nevada and was close to the summit but > there was a line of thunderstorms moving in across the valley. I chose to > get the hell of the mountain. A woman coming up the trail asked how far it > was the summit and I said I wasn't sure since I hadn't went to the summit. > 'Jesus is my lord and savior and he will protect me.' 'Honey, I roll with > Wotan and he's got no time for fools.' > > I had just made it down to the treeline when the wind, rain, hail, and > lightning hit. I assume Jesus girl had a lot of fun. Reminds me of a scene from "Caddyshack"... -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | In this world there are \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | two kinds of people: X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | 1. Those who can extrapolate / \ if you read it the right way. | from incomplete data.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 11:32 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <1178u0l$2mjch$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #91034 |
On 01/09/2026 22:06, rbowman wrote: > On Tue, 1 Sep 2026 19:22:26 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> However, as insurance statistics show, people who 'put their trust in >> Jesus'. or say 'In'shallah' every time they pull out in front of a >> truck, >> do not improve the durability of the culture they seek to subvert > > I was hiking up Wheeler Peak in Nevada and was close to the summit but > there was a line of thunderstorms moving in across the valley. I chose to > get the hell of the mountain. A woman coming up the trail asked how far it > was the summit and I said I wasn't sure since I hadn't went to the summit. > 'Jesus is my lord and savior and he will protect me.' 'Honey, I roll with > Wotan and he's got no time for fools.' > > I had just made it down to the treeline when the wind, rain, hail, and > lightning hit. I assume Jesus girl had a lot of fun. Its all part of God Swill. -- I was brought up to believe that you should never give offence if you can avoid it; the new culture tells us you should always take offence if you can. There are now experts in the art of taking offence, indeed whole academic subjects, such as 'gender studies', devoted to it. Sir Roger Scruton
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 23:40 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <4TqdnVvsstLLcQX3nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #91071 |
On 9/2/26 06:32, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 01/09/2026 22:06, rbowman wrote: >> On Tue, 1 Sep 2026 19:22:26 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> However, as insurance statistics show, people who 'put their trust in >>> Jesus'. or say 'In'shallah' every time they pull out in front of a >>> truck, >>> do not improve the durability of the culture they seek to subvert >> >> I was hiking up Wheeler Peak in Nevada and was close to the summit but >> there was a line of thunderstorms moving in across the valley. I chose to >> get the hell of the mountain. A woman coming up the trail asked how >> far it >> was the summit and I said I wasn't sure since I hadn't went to the >> summit. >> 'Jesus is my lord and savior and he will protect me.' 'Honey, I roll with >> Wotan and he's got no time for fools.' >> >> I had just made it down to the treeline when the wind, rain, hail, and >> lightning hit. I assume Jesus girl had a lot of fun. > > Its all part of God Swill. Hmm ... plenty of times I did NOT make it downhill before the storms hit. Spectacular view from the tree-line :-) There's a REASON it's the "tree-line" ... because everything above gets BLASTED TO SPLINTERS by the lightning storms. Anyway, favor Thor and you should be OK :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 23:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <NnJlS.1624$oQ_6.1160@fx11.iad> |
| In reply to | #91026 |
On 2026-09-01, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote: > On 01/09/2026 19:14, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > >>> The problem comes when they are transferred to a culture where they do not. >> >> One solution is to transform the culture. This is now happening in the U.S > > However, as insurance statistics show, people who 'put their trust in > Jesus'. or say 'In'shallah' every time they pull out in front of a > truck, do not improve the durability of the culture they seek to subvert Perhaps, but they're just the shock troops. There's plenty more where they came from. That's probably why the leaders want to get the birth rate up. -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | In this world there are \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | two kinds of people: X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | 1. Those who can extrapolate / \ if you read it the right way. | from incomplete data.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 01:28 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <9i-dnRFXrsZrLgr3nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #91006 |
On 9/1/26 08:12, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 01/09/2026 07:55, c186282 wrote: >> On 8/31/26 11:50, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >>> On 2026-08-30, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: >>> >>>> She had a Japanese pen pal and met up with her and her brother for >>>> lunch. >>>> Brother and friends walked in front, women followed behind. My wife >>>> showed >>>> constraint unusual for her, being a 'liberated' woman. Just as well >>>> since >>>> she had about 6" and 50 pounds on the average Japanese male. >>> >>> Someone asked a Muslim woman why she always walked behind her husband. >>> She replied, "Land mines." >> >> Ok ... THAT'S funny !!! :-) >> >> And, alas, kinda TRUE in some parts >> of the world. >> >> NOT sure why "Moslem Women" accept such >> a subservient/slave role. "Tradition" ? >> NOT really good for them however. >> > > Because, as one Jewish GF advised me. 'so they know where they stand' > > All this social freedom is simply too much for many people. They want to > be told what to do and provided with enough money to do it and then they > can relax switch off and cease to become individuals. Sounds like a paraphrasing of the speech "Loki" gave in that movie ...... >> SOME EU/American women marry Islamist guys. >> Most common story - HORRIBLE, not at ALL >> what they were led to expect. Some have to >> hatch extreme schemes to escape. Many others >> aren't that smart. >> >> The middle-eastern religious/cultural view >> of women is pretty damned BAD. Islam or >> "Orthodox Jewish" and beyond ... basically >> they are viewed as sex slaves and baby >> factories. >> > I would refer you to this cartoon. (I never bothered to register for > https, but its benign) > > http://vps.templar.co.uk/Cartoons%20and%20Politics/Male-Culture.jpg > >> This goes way WAY *WAY* back. >> >> Of note : the legal texts of Sumeria ... >> 5000+ years old. Tablets found. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_of_Ur-Nammu >> >> Sorry, women and slaves are just "things" - not >> much different from cows and such. >> > It's all a function of what works in the current stable economic society. > > Various mores arise because in a given context they 'work' > > The problem comes when they are transferred to a culture where they do not. Those 'mores' are more a function of total asshole men who crave to be total masters of someone. The women tend to be easier targets. Got one name for Moslem women "Lorena Bobbit" :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 11:41 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <1178ug7$2mjch$9@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #91054 |
On 02/09/2026 06:28, c186282 wrote: > Those 'mores' are more a function of total asshole > men who crave to be total masters of someone. The > women tend to be easier targets. > It's really not that simple. IN a tribal world, women depend on the men for safety. They walk three steps behind for safety. They are covered to avoid arousing male penises. Arranged marriages prevent irregular behaviour or - heaven forfend - marrying outside the tribe. So marry your cousin, and stop raping other women, and rape her instead. All in the family. It's the way Allah intended it, so STFU or get beaten > Got one name for Moslem women "Lorena Bobbit" 🙂 But where would they GO? Being cut off from ones family, ones tribe, is very very hard. Ask the people who left Mormonism etc. -- When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it. Frédéric Bastiat
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-03 00:05 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <4TqdnVrsstKybwX3nZ2dnZfqnPYAAAAA@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #91073 |
On 9/2/26 06:41, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 02/09/2026 06:28, c186282 wrote: >> Those 'mores' are more a function of total asshole >> men who crave to be total masters of someone. The >> women tend to be easier targets. >> > It's really not that simple. People - it's NEVER "simple" ... but you CAN find certain patterns, common elements. > IN a tribal world, women depend on the men for safety. They walk three > steps behind for safety. They are covered to avoid arousing male > penises. Arranged marriages prevent irregular behaviour or - heaven > forfend - marrying outside the tribe. So marry your cousin, and stop > raping other women, and rape her instead. All in the family. Umm ... 'covered' was a more northern invention. And maybe the boners were not entirely unwanted a lot of the time :-) See what you did - applied relatively modern 'morals' and assumptions about "What Women Want" to the entire world across 300,000+ years. SO easy to do ... Even now, central Africa and jungle Amazonia, plenty of butt-nekked people. Too fuckin' hot for anything else. Any 'who is with whom', if any, is organized other ways. > It's the way Allah intended it, so STFU or get beaten "Beaten" is the least of it ... >> Got one name for Moslem women "Lorena Bobbit" 🙂 > > But where would they GO? Being cut off from ones family, ones tribe, is > very very hard. Unless 'The Tribe' becomes TOO horrible ... > Ask the people who left Mormonism etc. Mormons CAN be kinda vengeful ... but not nearly so much as Scientologists. A major POINT in 'religions' is that only YOU know what's going on and why and exactly what to DO. All others are idiots at minimum - intolerable distractions/enemies/devils often. The "One True Way" is the ONE True Way. Again, this seems to just 'wired' in humans. Anyway, for fun, the CIA should infiltrate the Lorena Bobbit legend into Iran and Afghanistan. Doesn't matter if a single woman is interested, the hyper-dominant MEN will get all paranoid, thus much worse, thus soon BREAK their societies.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-03 11:56 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <117bjpd$3k1mu$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #91092 |
On 03/09/2026 05:05, c186282 wrote: > Anyway, for fun, the CIA should infiltrate the > Lorena Bobbit legend into Iran and Afghanistan. > Doesn't matter if a single woman is interested, > the hyper-dominant MEN will get all paranoid, > thus much worse, thus soon BREAK their societies. You really do not understand about Muslim women do you? In the end family loyalty, honour, and tribalism trumps everything else, including individual freedom And, without that tribalism, they cannot survive in their original contexts. -- "I guess a rattlesnake ain't risponsible fer bein' a rattlesnake, but ah puts mah heel on um jess the same if'n I catches him around mah chillun".
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 13:04 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <1176f08$1o1ba$17@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90966 |
On 31/08/2026 16:50, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2026-08-30, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > >> She had a Japanese pen pal and met up with her and her brother for lunch. >> Brother and friends walked in front, women followed behind. My wife showed >> constraint unusual for her, being a 'liberated' woman. Just as well since >> she had about 6" and 50 pounds on the average Japanese male. > > Someone asked a Muslim woman why she always walked behind her husband. > She replied, "Land mines." > Lol! -- "If you don’t read the news paper, you are un-informed. If you read the news paper, you are mis-informed." Mark Twain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-28 13:09 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <116rtpb$28guo$17@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90719 |
On 28/08/2026 04:21, rbowman wrote: > On Thu, 27 Aug 2026 22:15:12 -0400, c186282 wrote: > >> On 8/27/26 07:09, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> On 27/08/2026 08:23, c186282 wrote: >>>> Shit, an insulation breech.. >>> >>> ...breAch >> >> I see it spelled both ways. A "breech" is a 'gap', a 'breach' is an >> 'opening' that has presented itself. > > https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/breech > > The firearms usage is understandable since you are shoving the cartridge > up its ass. Exactly so. Those vulgar gunners when faced with loading the gun from the other end, coined the term... Look up 'kissing the gunners daughter' for a bit of random naval history... -- There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact. Mark Twain
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-28 13:06 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <116rtkk$28guo$16@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90710 |
On 28/08/2026 03:15, c186282 wrote: > On 8/27/26 07:09, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 27/08/2026 08:23, c186282 wrote: >>> Shit, an insulation breech.. >> >> ...breAch > > I see it spelled both ways. A "breech" is > a 'gap', a 'breach' is an 'opening' that > has presented itself. > A breech is not a gap. It is the arse end of a gun, or a human. As in breech loader, or breech birth where the babies shithole comes first. It is also an archaic name for trousers (pants to you) modified in US englsish to 'britches' rather than 'breeches' and in northern UK dialects to 'breeks' Breach is a *break*. Juts because no gives a shit about spelling or ever looks it up doesn't magfically change the etymology of a word. And brakes are not breaks, either. -- In todays liberal progressive conflict-free education system, everyone gets full Marx.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-27 14:19 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <nfavc5FprcuU20@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #90665 |
On Thu, 27 Aug 2026 03:23:57 -0400, c186282 wrote: > Shit, an insulation breech and anybody walking by DROPS DEAD on the > spot ! There are a couple of places where a trail follows a high voltage transmission line for a while. I'm not real comfortable with the humming and occasional crackling sounds.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-27 15:25 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <116phd0$1hq1d$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90683 |
On 27/08/2026 15:19, rbowman wrote: > On Thu, 27 Aug 2026 03:23:57 -0400, c186282 wrote: > >> Shit, an insulation breech and anybody walking by DROPS DEAD on the >> spot ! > > There are a couple of places where a trail follows a high voltage > transmission line for a while. I'm not real comfortable with the humming > and occasional crackling sounds. Had it run over my garden here, too low to put up a second storey. Paid a lot to get it underground, but it trebled the property value and enabled me to build a much larger house. -- "And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch". Gospel of St. Mathew 15:14
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-27 22:24 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <zX6dnaSqj-fYbA33nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #90683 |
On 8/27/26 10:19, rbowman wrote: > On Thu, 27 Aug 2026 03:23:57 -0400, c186282 wrote: > >> Shit, an insulation breech and anybody walking by DROPS DEAD on the >> spot ! > > There are a couple of places where a trail follows a high voltage > transmission line for a while. I'm not real comfortable with the humming > and occasional crackling sounds. Humming is normal. "Crackling" is NOT ! Walk further away.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web