Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #90034 > unrolled thread
| Started by | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-08-18 01:44 -0400 |
| Last post | 2026-08-19 22:21 -0400 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 207 — 18 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-18 01:44 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-18 01:59 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-18 06:05 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-08-18 08:10 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-18 11:33 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-18 22:16 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 03:32 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 14:05 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-19 13:23 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 14:10 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 15:15 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 21:53 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-19 22:54 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Anton Antimo <anton@safunu.org> - 2026-08-20 10:31 -0300
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-21 13:10 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Anton Antimo <anton@safunu.org> - 2026-08-20 10:30 -0300
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-20 18:04 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 14:01 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 15:24 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 22:07 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-22 04:02 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-22 06:48 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-22 16:15 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-08-23 21:52 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-24 01:07 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-24 11:15 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-24 19:26 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 11:45 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-25 18:39 +0000
Power lines Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-25 06:48 -0700
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 15:10 +0100
Re: Power lines Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-26 18:04 -0700
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 03:23 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-27 12:09 +0100
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:15 -0400
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 03:21 +0000
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-28 02:42 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:15 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 18:40 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:37 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 20:13 +0000
Re: Power lines "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2026-08-29 21:28 +0100
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 23:23 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 22:47 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 23:20 +0100
Re: Power lines "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 13:43 +0200
Re: Power lines Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-30 15:49 +0000
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 18:40 +0000
Re: Power lines "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 21:23 +0200
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 19:36 +0000
Re: Power lines Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-31 15:50 +0000
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 02:55 -0400
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 07:41 +0000
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 03:49 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:17 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 18:24 +0000
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 01:33 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-02 11:43 +0100
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:15 +0100
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 01:32 -0400
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-02 13:55 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:12 +0100
Re: Power lines Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-01 18:14 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 19:22 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 21:06 +0000
Re: Power lines Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-01 23:40 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-02 11:32 +0100
Re: Power lines Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-01 23:40 +0000
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 01:28 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-02 11:41 +0100
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:04 +0100
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:09 +0100
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:06 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-27 14:19 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-27 15:25 +0100
Re: Power lines c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:24 -0400
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:18 +0100
Re: Power lines Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-28 05:56 -0700
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 15:33 +0100
Re: Power lines Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-08-28 16:06 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:30 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 18:51 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:39 +0100
Re: Power lines rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 20:26 +0000
Re: Power lines The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 23:25 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 01:46 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-25 11:50 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-25 18:43 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-26 04:07 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> - 2026-08-27 10:54 -0600
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-27 19:11 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> - 2026-08-27 12:57 -0600
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 12:55 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 18:25 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 00:27 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-28 00:45 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:02 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-08-28 16:13 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:32 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 19:38 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 22:57 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 06:10 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:55 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-25 23:34 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-08-26 04:27 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-26 08:57 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-27 06:30 -0700
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-27 13:57 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:22 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-28 13:16 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-28 18:36 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-28 19:42 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 10:28 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 20:04 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 23:18 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 22:50 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-30 18:03 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 18:35 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 00:43 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-31 02:21 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 12:33 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 09:22 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 13:01 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-31 03:00 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 12:47 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-31 18:36 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 02:09 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 07:11 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 03:47 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:56 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 18:00 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 19:11 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-01 18:17 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-01 18:19 +0000
[OT] Finland, and Russia (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 23:49 +0100
Re: [OT] Finland, and Russia (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-02 02:53 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 02:46 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:54 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 18:17 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 19:23 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-01 21:23 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 21:18 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 02:00 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-02 11:44 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:43 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 18:12 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Stanislav N. aka pztrn" <pztrn@oldproto.invalid> - 2026-08-30 07:55 +0500
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-30 02:08 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 06:30 +0000
[OT] Russian Federation, wars (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-30 10:04 +0100
Re: [OT] Russian Federation, wars Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-30 10:22 +0100
Re: [OT] Russian Federation, wars "Stanislav N. aka pztrn" <pztrn@oldproto.invalid> - 2026-08-30 16:13 +0500
Re: [OT] Russian Federation, wars The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-30 18:12 +0100
Re: [OT] Russian Federation, wars "Stanislav N. aka pztrn" <pztrn@oldproto.invalid> - 2026-08-30 16:47 +0500
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-29 13:58 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-29 10:11 -0700
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-29 22:20 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-29 23:06 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-30 02:14 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 06:35 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 19:28 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-31 02:15 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 22:55 +0100
Salmonella (Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-08-30 09:28 -0700
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 19:27 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 18:31 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 21:30 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-30 19:43 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-30 21:57 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-31 02:35 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-31 02:50 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-31 18:29 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-31 01:52 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-31 12:47 +0200
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-31 12:37 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-31 15:50 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-31 18:41 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 02:37 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2026-09-01 06:26 -0700
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 19:05 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 21:07 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-01 18:19 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> - 2026-08-31 17:07 -0600
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-01 01:20 -0400
[OT] Personal safety in the USA (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 10:27 +0100
[OT] Personal safety in the USA (was: Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ?) John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-09-01 08:23 -0700
Re: [OT] Personal safety in the USA Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> - 2026-09-01 10:24 -0600
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-01 13:04 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Enoch Powell <e.powell@tutanatu.kom> - 2026-09-01 11:00 -0600
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-02 01:23 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-02 11:35 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-29 22:49 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-08-27 16:32 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-27 22:44 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-19 12:57 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 14:03 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-19 22:24 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-18 22:07 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 03:42 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-19 02:14 -0400
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 14:13 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 14:14 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 15:27 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-19 16:57 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-19 14:02 +0100
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-19 13:54 +0000
Re: What's Wrong With LinuxMint ? c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-19 22:21 -0400
Page 3 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 11 Next page →
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-29 20:13 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <nfgsr9FprcuU54@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #90815 |
On Sat, 29 Aug 2026 10:37:54 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > yeah. making the same mistake as everyone else doesn't make it not a > mistake People today don't read any more. Some studies suggest the average high school graduate reads at a 6th grade level. People can't read anymore. I've known at least two people who were completely illiterate. One was a woman who was a good cook but I was always glad dog food cans had pictures of dogs on the labels and not tomatoes.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-29 21:28 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <20260829212855.f619fb506bba676006afbbec@127.0.0.1> |
| In reply to | #90840 |
On 29 Aug 2026 20:13:29 GMT rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > On Sat, 29 Aug 2026 10:37:54 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > > > yeah. making the same mistake as everyone else doesn't make it not a > > mistake People today don't read any more. > > Some studies suggest the average high school graduate reads at a 6th grade > level. People can't read anymore. I've known at least two people who were > completely illiterate. One was a woman who was a good cook but I was > always glad dog food cans had pictures of dogs on the labels and not > tomatoes. > Tain't just reedin'; it's akchooal thinkin folk kaint be bovered wiv no more; Ah, gets all I need to no from trooth soshul. -- Bah, and indeed Humbug.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-29 23:23 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <116vm5v$3j6fu$9@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90845 |
On 29/08/2026 21:28, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote: > On 29 Aug 2026 20:13:29 GMT > rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, 29 Aug 2026 10:37:54 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> yeah. making the same mistake as everyone else doesn't make it not a >>> mistake People today don't read any more. >> >> Some studies suggest the average high school graduate reads at a 6th grade >> level. People can't read anymore. I've known at least two people who were >> completely illiterate. One was a woman who was a good cook but I was >> always glad dog food cans had pictures of dogs on the labels and not >> tomatoes. >> > > Tain't just reedin'; it's akchooal thinkin folk kaint be bovered wiv no > more; Ah, gets all I need to no from trooth soshul. > Twas ever thus BUT in times gone by it wasn't those people who were applauded. When I think of the Kardashians and their vapid opinions and lifestyle choices I want to phone Dignitas... Or yet another Duck-lipped Diva trying to be an 'influencer' -- For in reason, all government without the consent of the governed is the very definition of slavery. Jonathan Swift
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-29 22:47 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <nfh5rdFprcuU65@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #90860 |
On Sat, 29 Aug 2026 23:23:59 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > Twas ever thus BUT in times gone by it wasn't those people who were > applauded. > When I think of the Kardashians and their vapid opinions and lifestyle > choices I want to phone Dignitas... Good news! You've got Milo Yappydopolis back! Please keep him this time.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-29 23:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <116vlvj$3j6fu$8@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90840 |
On 29/08/2026 21:13, rbowman wrote: > On Sat, 29 Aug 2026 10:37:54 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> yeah. making the same mistake as everyone else doesn't make it not a >> mistake People today don't read any more. > > Some studies suggest the average high school graduate reads at a 6th grade > level. People can't read anymore. I've known at least two people who were > completely illiterate. One was a woman who was a good cook but I was > always glad dog food cans had pictures of dogs on the labels and not > tomatoes. > In South Africa no one would buy the baby food in tins and bottles. When they asked the African women why they didn't buy it they said because clearly it contained cooked dead babies.. -- When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it. Frédéric Bastiat
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-30 13:43 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <nfija5F3giU8@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #90859 |
On 2026-08-30 00:20, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 29/08/2026 21:13, rbowman wrote:
>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2026 10:37:54 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>
>>> yeah. making the same mistake as everyone else doesn't make it not a
>>> mistake People today don't read any more.
>>
>> Some studies suggest the average high school graduate reads at a 6th
>> grade
>> level. People can't read anymore. I've known at least two people who were
>> completely illiterate. One was a woman who was a good cook but I was
>> always glad dog food cans had pictures of dogs on the labels and not
>> tomatoes.
>>
> In South Africa no one would buy the baby food in tins and bottles. When
> they asked the African women why they didn't buy it they said because
> clearly it contained cooked dead babies..
>
>
Oh MY! :-O
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-30 15:49 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <3iYkS.50890$Lg4.47271@fx05.iad> |
| In reply to | #90893 |
On 2026-08-30, Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote: > On 2026-08-30 00:20, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> On 29/08/2026 21:13, rbowman wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 29 Aug 2026 10:37:54 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> >>>> yeah. making the same mistake as everyone else doesn't make it not a >>>> mistake People today don't read any more. >>> >>> Some studies suggest the average high school graduate reads at a 6th >>> grade >>> level. People can't read anymore. I've known at least two people who were >>> completely illiterate. One was a woman who was a good cook but I was >>> always glad dog food cans had pictures of dogs on the labels and not >>> tomatoes. >> >> In South Africa no one would buy the baby food in tins and bottles. When >> they asked the African women why they didn't buy it they said because >> clearly it contained cooked dead babies.. >> > Oh MY! :-O I heard this described in part of a list of classic marketing blunders caused by not being familiar with local customs. Apparently it's a convention there that a picture on the label depicts what's inside. -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | In this world there are \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | two kinds of people: X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | 1. Those who can extrapolate / \ if you read it the right way. | from incomplete data.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-30 18:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <nfjbpjFprcuU74@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #90907 |
On Sun, 30 Aug 2026 15:49:19 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > I heard this described in part of a list of classic marketing blunders > caused by not being familiar with local customs. Apparently it's a > convention there that a picture on the label depicts what's inside. In the US the picture on the outside often is more appetizing than what you find inside. The Japanese take it to the Nth degree. https://www.today.com/food/trends/sampuru-japanese-art-fake-food-rcna26990
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-30 21:23 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <nfjeadF3giU9@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #90918 |
On 2026-08-30 20:40, rbowman wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2026 15:49:19 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>
>> I heard this described in part of a list of classic marketing blunders
>> caused by not being familiar with local customs. Apparently it's a
>> convention there that a picture on the label depicts what's inside.
>
> In the US the picture on the outside often is more appetizing than what
> you find inside. The Japanese take it to the Nth degree.
>
> https://www.today.com/food/trends/sampuru-japanese-art-fake-food-rcna26990
>
Wow :-D
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-30 19:36 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <nfjf2oFprcuU78@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #90921 |
On Sun, 30 Aug 2026 21:23:57 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > On 2026-08-30 20:40, rbowman wrote: >> On Sun, 30 Aug 2026 15:49:19 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote: >> >>> I heard this described in part of a list of classic marketing blunders >>> caused by not being familiar with local customs. Apparently it's a >>> convention there that a picture on the label depicts what's inside. >> >> In the US the picture on the outside often is more appetizing than what >> you find inside. The Japanese take it to the Nth degree. >> >> https://www.today.com/food/trends/sampuru-japanese-art-fake-food- rcna26990 >> > Wow :-D Very handy. When my wife visited Japan she may have lived on okonomiyaki since that was the only thing she knew by name without the point and shoot technique. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Okonomiyaki She had a Japanese pen pal and met up with her and her brother for lunch. Brother and friends walked in front, women followed behind. My wife showed constraint unusual for her, being a 'liberated' woman. Just as well since she had about 6" and 50 pounds on the average Japanese male.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-31 15:50 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <ophlS.21797$I1t6.20844@fx43.iad> |
| In reply to | #90925 |
On 2026-08-30, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > She had a Japanese pen pal and met up with her and her brother for lunch. > Brother and friends walked in front, women followed behind. My wife showed > constraint unusual for her, being a 'liberated' woman. Just as well since > she had about 6" and 50 pounds on the average Japanese male. Someone asked a Muslim woman why she always walked behind her husband. She replied, "Land mines." -- /~\ Charlie Gibbs | In this world there are \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | two kinds of people: X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | 1. Those who can extrapolate / \ if you read it the right way. | from incomplete data.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 02:55 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <KomcnSetk4pw6wv3nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #90966 |
On 8/31/26 11:50, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On 2026-08-30, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote: > >> She had a Japanese pen pal and met up with her and her brother for lunch. >> Brother and friends walked in front, women followed behind. My wife showed >> constraint unusual for her, being a 'liberated' woman. Just as well since >> she had about 6" and 50 pounds on the average Japanese male. > > Someone asked a Muslim woman why she always walked behind her husband. > She replied, "Land mines." Ok ... THAT'S funny !!! :-) And, alas, kinda TRUE in some parts of the world. NOT sure why "Moslem Women" accept such a subservient/slave role. "Tradition" ? NOT really good for them however. SOME EU/American women marry Islamist guys. Most common story - HORRIBLE, not at ALL what they were led to expect. Some have to hatch extreme schemes to escape. Many others aren't that smart. The middle-eastern religious/cultural view of women is pretty damned BAD. Islam or "Orthodox Jewish" and beyond ... basically they are viewed as sex slaves and baby factories. This goes way WAY *WAY* back. Of note : the legal texts of Sumeria ... 5000+ years old. Tablets found. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_of_Ur-Nammu Sorry, women and slaves are just "things" - not much different from cows and such.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 07:41 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <nfndtsFtomiU16@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #90990 |
On Tue, 1 Sep 2026 02:55:20 -0400, c186282 wrote: > NOT sure why "Moslem Women" accept such a subservient/slave role. > "Tradition" ? > NOT really good for them however. https://bible.usccb.org/bible/1corinthians/14 34 women should keep silent in the churches, for they are not allowed to speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says. 35 But if they want to learn anything, they should ask their husbands at home. For it is improper for a woman to speak in the church.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 03:49 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <WMecnciyfJscHgv3nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #90994 |
On 9/1/26 03:41, rbowman wrote: > On Tue, 1 Sep 2026 02:55:20 -0400, c186282 wrote: > > >> NOT sure why "Moslem Women" accept such a subservient/slave role. >> "Tradition" ? >> NOT really good for them however. > > https://bible.usccb.org/bible/1corinthians/14 > > 34 women should keep silent in the churches, for they are not allowed to > speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says. > > 35 But if they want to learn anything, they should ask their husbands at > home. For it is improper for a woman to speak in the church. Pretty fuckin' BAD. But many are NOT given any better choices.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 13:17 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <1176fp3$1o1ba$20@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90996 |
On 01/09/2026 08:49, c186282 wrote: > On 9/1/26 03:41, rbowman wrote: >> On Tue, 1 Sep 2026 02:55:20 -0400, c186282 wrote: >> >> >>> NOT sure why "Moslem Women" accept such a subservient/slave role. >>> "Tradition" ? >>> NOT really good for them however. >> >> https://bible.usccb.org/bible/1corinthians/14 >> >> 34 women should keep silent in the churches, for they are not allowed to >> speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says. >> >> 35 But if they want to learn anything, they should ask their husbands at >> home. For it is improper for a woman to speak in the church. > > Pretty fuckin' BAD. > > But many are NOT given any > better choices. > > > I mean, even today, a huge number of women are quite happy to settle back into being the one who runs the household and brings up the kids and leave all that other shit to stupid men to argue over. As long as they are valued in that rôle. -- Any fool can believe in principles - and most of them do!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 18:24 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <nfojjbFtomiU21@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #91008 |
On Tue, 1 Sep 2026 13:17:39 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > I mean, even today, a huge number of women are quite happy to settle > back into being the one who runs the household and brings up the kids > and leave all that other shit to stupid men to argue over. > > As long as they are valued in that rôle. After our divorce my ex became much more of a Christian. Years later she said we might have done better had she followed Paul's advice. I'd screwed up and hadn't taken my father's advice. 'Find a nice Polish girl. She'll cook, keep a good house, raise the kids, and not ask questions. You can mess around with the smart ones on the side.' He knew of what he spoke. My mother was not a nice Polish girl.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 01:33 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <aFydnYTmDIezKAr3nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #91008 |
On 9/1/26 08:17, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 01/09/2026 08:49, c186282 wrote: >> On 9/1/26 03:41, rbowman wrote: >>> On Tue, 1 Sep 2026 02:55:20 -0400, c186282 wrote: >>> >>> >>>> NOT sure why "Moslem Women" accept such a subservient/slave role. >>>> "Tradition" ? >>>> NOT really good for them however. >>> >>> https://bible.usccb.org/bible/1corinthians/14 >>> >>> 34 women should keep silent in the churches, for they are not allowed to >>> speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says. >>> >>> 35 But if they want to learn anything, they should ask their husbands at >>> home. For it is improper for a woman to speak in the church. >> >> Pretty fuckin' BAD. >> >> But many are NOT given any >> better choices. >> >> >> > I mean, even today, a huge number of women are quite happy to settle > back into being the one who runs the household and brings up the kids > and leave all that other shit to stupid men to argue over. > > As long as they are valued in that rôle. Given the sheer number of TV ads for 'depression' pills .... I think you're kinda wrong.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 11:43 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <1178ukr$2mjch$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #91056 |
On 02/09/2026 06:33, c186282 wrote: >> I mean, even today, a huge number of women are quite happy to settle >> back into being the one who runs the household and brings up the kids >> and leave all that other shit to stupid men to argue over. >> >> As long as they are valued in that rôle. > > Given the sheer number of TV ads for 'depression' > pills .... I think you're kinda wrong. I fail to see the connection. The USA us a brutal society that smashes it's citizens, enslaves them in a work culture and tells them they are free. And pumps them full of tranks so they don't notice -- "When one man dies it's a tragedy. When thousands die it's statistics." Josef Stalin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-01 13:15 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <1176flc$1o1ba$19@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #90994 |
On 01/09/2026 08:41, rbowman wrote: > On Tue, 1 Sep 2026 02:55:20 -0400, c186282 wrote: > > >> NOT sure why "Moslem Women" accept such a subservient/slave role. >> "Tradition" ? >> NOT really good for them however. > > https://bible.usccb.org/bible/1corinthians/14 > > 34 women should keep silent in the churches, for they are not allowed to > speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says. > > 35 But if they want to learn anything, they should ask their husbands at > home. For it is improper for a woman to speak in the church. > Jesus himself thought Mary Magdalena was the only one to understand his real teachings. The Romans took Christianity and bent it into a system of social mores that suited their empire. All the later new testament shit was written by Romans. -- Any fool can believe in principles - and most of them do!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-09-02 01:32 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Power lines |
| Message-ID | <aFydnYXmDIdvKQr3nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #91007 |
On 9/1/26 08:15, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 01/09/2026 08:41, rbowman wrote: >> On Tue, 1 Sep 2026 02:55:20 -0400, c186282 wrote: >> >> >>> NOT sure why "Moslem Women" accept such a subservient/slave role. >>> "Tradition" ? >>> NOT really good for them however. >> >> https://bible.usccb.org/bible/1corinthians/14 >> >> 34 women should keep silent in the churches, for they are not allowed to >> speak, but should be subordinate, as even the law says. >> >> 35 But if they want to learn anything, they should ask their husbands at >> home. For it is improper for a woman to speak in the church. >> > Jesus himself thought Mary Magdalena was the only one to understand his > real teachings. > > The Romans took Christianity and bent it into a system of social mores > that suited their empire. > > All the later new testament shit was written by Romans. Rome became great BEFORE Xians, went downhill AFTER Xians. Those old rude conqueror-god religions were a better foundation for 'empires'.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 3 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 … 11 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web