Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #89055 > unrolled thread
| Started by | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-07-26 01:09 -0400 |
| Last post | 2026-07-27 20:04 +0200 |
| Articles | 20 on this page of 234 — 24 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc
Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-26 01:09 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-26 07:22 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-26 20:37 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-27 01:16 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late John McCue <jmclnx@gmail.com.invalid> - 2026-07-26 20:00 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-26 22:40 +0200
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-26 21:10 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-07-26 21:24 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-27 01:02 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-07-27 02:59 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-26 23:18 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Epherma <epherma@remort.app.invalid> - 2026-07-26 20:31 -0700
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-07-27 04:35 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-27 06:37 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-27 23:45 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-28 18:10 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-07-28 19:52 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-07-28 15:17 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-28 16:22 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-07-27 11:51 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-07-27 16:22 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-07-29 08:25 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-07-29 08:04 -0700
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-29 16:09 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-29 20:33 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-29 23:35 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-29 19:08 +0200
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-07-29 10:32 -0700
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-29 20:10 +0200
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-29 18:46 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-07-29 12:32 -0700
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-07-29 18:47 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-29 23:41 -0400
Flawed stereotypical joke (was: Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-31 12:31 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam2616@zugschl.us> - 2026-07-29 22:54 +0200
Re: Not Much Linux Stuff of Late Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-07-29 23:30 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-31 12:37 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-31 14:37 +0200
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-31 19:32 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-08-01 21:11 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-01 21:54 +0000
Re: Not Much Linux Stuff of Late Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-01 23:46 +0000
Re: Not Much Linux Stuff of Late Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-02 01:34 +0000
Re: Not Much Linux Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-01 23:40 -0400
Re: Not Much Linux Stuff of Late Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-02 08:52 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-01 23:57 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-02 00:52 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam2616@zugschl.us> - 2026-08-02 06:03 +0200
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-02 05:23 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-02 01:38 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam2616@zugschl.us> - 2026-08-02 08:41 +0200
Re: Not Much Linux Stuff of Late Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-08-02 09:44 +0000
Re: Not Much Linux Stuff of Late Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam2616@zugschl.us> - 2026-08-02 15:29 +0200
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-29 18:42 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-29 23:38 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-30 04:04 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-30 12:33 +0200
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-30 19:03 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Stanislav N. aka pztrn" <no@email.please> - 2026-07-31 01:54 +0500
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-07-30 21:13 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-07-30 23:47 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-31 04:53 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-31 01:11 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-31 14:47 +0200
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-31 14:47 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-01 14:22 +0200
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-01 14:15 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-01 19:07 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-02 11:14 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-02 20:02 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-08-01 23:46 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-02 11:25 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-31 19:47 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-31 04:45 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-31 01:00 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Stanislav N. aka pztrn" <no@email.please> - 2026-07-31 10:30 +0500
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-31 07:44 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2026-07-30 23:30 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-31 05:02 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Stanislav N. aka pztrn" <no@email.please> - 2026-07-31 10:33 +0500
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-31 07:56 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-31 12:28 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Stanislav N. aka pztrn" <no@email.please> - 2026-07-31 17:23 +0500
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-31 20:27 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Stanislav N. aka pztrn" <no@email.please> - 2026-08-01 02:02 +0500
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-01 14:29 +0200
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-01 14:17 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-01 18:59 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-01 23:15 +0200
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-08-01 21:54 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-02 11:20 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-02 20:25 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-01 18:51 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-02 11:12 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-02 20:21 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Stanislav N. aka pztrn" <no@email.please> - 2026-08-01 23:54 +0500
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-01 23:39 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Stanislav N. aka pztrn" <pztrn@oldproto.invalid> - 2026-08-02 16:45 +0500
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-02 14:41 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-31 20:06 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-31 14:41 +0200
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-31 19:42 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-01 14:30 +0200
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-07-30 12:34 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-30 19:11 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-30 21:11 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Anton Antimo <anton@safunu.org> - 2026-07-30 14:05 -0300
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-31 05:04 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-31 01:31 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-07-30 14:51 -0700
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-31 12:21 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-31 19:35 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-07-31 12:54 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-31 19:50 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-08-01 07:53 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-01 14:12 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-01 18:35 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-01 21:32 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-02 11:26 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-31 19:05 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-29 16:07 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-07-27 04:42 +0000
Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread (was: Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-27 08:48 +0100
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-27 17:19 +0100
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-07-27 16:40 +0000
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-27 21:22 +0000
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-07-27 14:44 -0700
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-27 23:37 +0000
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-07-27 21:47 +0000
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-07-28 00:24 +0000
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-28 04:23 +0000
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-27 23:46 +0000
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-28 10:07 +0100
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-07-29 01:50 +0000
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-07-29 07:58 -0700
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-07-29 18:11 +0000
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-29 19:16 +0100
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-29 19:21 +0000
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-29 21:54 +0200
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-29 23:43 +0000
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-07-29 21:36 +0000
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-29 23:51 +0000
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-07-29 02:32 +0000
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-07-27 17:57 -0400
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-28 00:03 +0000
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-07-28 04:11 +0000
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-07-28 04:38 +0000
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-28 18:19 +0000
Re: Another XLibre and/or Wayland subthread Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-07-29 08:19 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-07-27 16:11 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-27 18:27 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-27 04:46 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-07-27 15:47 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-27 23:45 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-28 18:03 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-27 06:35 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-07-27 16:12 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-27 21:07 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-26 21:19 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-07-27 03:08 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-26 23:19 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-07-27 03:30 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-27 15:07 +0200
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-07-27 15:48 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-27 18:27 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-07-28 01:02 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-28 10:10 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-28 00:01 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-28 10:19 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-28 11:37 +0200
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-28 17:43 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-08-01 18:00 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late FF <fflud@linux.rocks> - 2026-08-01 19:09 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-08-02 11:15 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-08-02 14:23 +0200
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-08-02 20:09 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-08-01 22:00 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam2616@zugschl.us> - 2026-07-27 16:22 +0200
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-07-27 23:07 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-28 00:10 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-07-28 04:20 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-07-28 04:40 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-28 23:00 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-29 09:37 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> - 2026-07-29 18:24 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam2616@zugschl.us> - 2026-07-28 10:48 +0200
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-07-28 22:29 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-28 23:02 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam2616@zugschl.us> - 2026-07-29 08:36 +0200
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-28 22:57 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam2616@zugschl.us> - 2026-07-28 10:24 +0200
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-28 10:24 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-28 17:22 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-28 17:16 +0000
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2026-07-26 22:51 +0000
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2026-07-26 23:27 +0000
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-26 21:23 -0400
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-27 04:42 +0000
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-27 23:43 -0400
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-28 11:57 +0200
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-28 11:06 +0100
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2026-07-28 15:22 +0000
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-29 19:13 +0200
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-29 18:17 +0100
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-29 20:07 +0200
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-29 19:15 +0100
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-29 18:18 +0000
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-07-29 18:59 +0000
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-29 21:59 +0200
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-29 18:15 +0000
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-29 19:20 +0100
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-29 20:51 +0200
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-27 09:00 +0100
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-27 23:47 -0400
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-28 10:18 +0100
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-28 17:11 +0000
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-29 19:18 +0200
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-29 18:23 +0000
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-29 20:52 +0200
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-27 01:10 +0000
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> - 2026-07-27 15:45 +0200
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-07-27 16:16 +0000
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-27 18:24 +0100
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-27 19:55 +0200
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-28 09:59 +0100
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-28 11:59 +0200
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-28 11:25 +0100
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-28 17:07 +0000
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-28 22:48 +0200
Re: Open-Source Armchair Critics At It Again rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-28 17:00 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-07-27 00:59 +0000
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-07-27 08:54 +0100
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-07-26 21:08 -0400
Re: Not Much LINUX Stuff of Late "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-07-27 20:04 +0200
Page 9 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 Next page →
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-26 23:19 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <DHudnYyoAbTAU_v3nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #89084 |
On 7/26/26 23:08, Farley Flud wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2026 21:19:53 -0400, c186282 wrote: > >> >> Aww ... I like systemd in many respects. It's >> not like the Winders registry, don't see any >> INTENTIONAL evil. >> > > You "don't see" because you are a deluded, and lazy, idiot. Ah, 40 years in the industry and I'm an "idiot". PLONK !
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-27 03:30 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <18c607f4bba83062$20480$821642$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> |
| In reply to | #89086 |
On Sun, 26 Jul 2026 23:19:40 -0400, c186282 wrote: > > Ah, 40 years in the industry and I'm an "idiot". > I did not realize that a snowflake could possibly survive that long. -- Gentoo/LFS: Is there any-fucking-thing else?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-27 15:07 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ncp3gbFtql1U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #89086 |
On 2026-07-27 05:19, c186282 wrote:
> On 7/26/26 23:08, Farley Flud wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Jul 2026 21:19:53 -0400, c186282 wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Aww ... I like systemd in many respects. It's
>>> not like the Winders registry, don't see any
>>> INTENTIONAL evil.
>>>
>>
>> You "don't see" because you are a deluded, and lazy, idiot.
>
> Ah, 40 years in the industry and I'm an "idiot".
>
> PLONK !
>
He is a known "character". He hates all distributions, and says people
using a distribution is stupid, or "a deluded, and lazy, idiot". He is
the only clever guy because he doesn't use any.
We simply ignore him.
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-27 15:48 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <18c6303ab70a3521$15333$967852$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> |
| In reply to | #89099 |
On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 15:07:23 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > > He is a known "character". > And you are a known boorish dago. -- Gentoo/LFS: Is there any-fucking-thing else?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-27 18:27 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <11484dc$3c3hi$9@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #89104 |
On 27/07/2026 16:48, Farley Flud wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 15:07:23 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > >> >> He is a known "character". >> > > And you are a known boorish dago. > > Unnecessarily offensive with no meaningful content. A dago, yes, but boorish, no. Just has a misguided faith in Socialism which replaces the catholic church in the Latin mind > -- Climate Change: Socialism wearing a lab coat.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-28 01:02 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <18c64e6c9e6cbfd4$11597$754419$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> |
| In reply to | #89115 |
On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 18:27:08 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >> And you are a known boorish dago. >> >> > Unnecessarily offensive > Offensiveness always separates the men from the mamma's boys. -- Gentoo/LFS: Is there any-fucking-thing else?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-28 10:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1149rms$3tkg5$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #89131 |
On 28/07/2026 02:02, Farley Flud wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 18:27:08 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >>> >>> And you are a known boorish dago. >>> >>> >> Unnecessarily offensive >> > > Offensiveness always separates the men from the mamma's boys. > > Indeed it does. How IS your momma? > > > -- If I had all the money I've spent on drink... ..I'd spend it on drink. Sir Henry (at Rawlinson's End)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-28 00:01 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <W4udnfwJyew-tPX3nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #89099 |
On 7/27/26 09:07, Carlos E. R. wrote: > On 2026-07-27 05:19, c186282 wrote: >> On 7/26/26 23:08, Farley Flud wrote: >>> On Sun, 26 Jul 2026 21:19:53 -0400, c186282 wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Aww ... I like systemd in many respects. It's >>>> not like the Winders registry, don't see any >>>> INTENTIONAL evil. >>>> >>> >>> You "don't see" because you are a deluded, and lazy, idiot. >> >> Ah, 40 years in the industry and I'm an "idiot". >> >> PLONK ! >> > > He is a known "character". He hates all distributions, and says people > using a distribution is stupid, or "a deluded, and lazy, idiot". He is > the only clever guy because he doesn't use any. > > We simply ignore him. I simply plonked him once and for all. Now there ARE some people who CAN pretty much write their own OS from scratch. This is not a bad thing at all, we NEED those kind of people. But when they expect EVERYBODY to have such skills and obsession or they're "no good/useless" then ... now we're into deep 'spectrum' or 'narcissism'. Hmmm ... once came across an episode of "Young Sheldon" where he went to the university prez and declared that "education" ONLY meant vast skill at math/sci and nobody else should get a diploma. Quantum mechanics or NOTHING. None others were 'smart' or 'educated' :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-28 10:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1149s73$3tkg5$7@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #89135 |
On 28/07/2026 05:01, c186282 wrote: > > Hmmm ... once came across an episode of "Young > Sheldon" where he went to the university prez > and declared that "education" ONLY meant vast > skill at math/sci and nobody else should get > a diploma. Quantum mechanics or NOTHING. None > others were 'smart' or 'educated' :-) > There is an element of truth in that. -- "An intellectual is a person knowledgeable in one field who speaks out only in others...” Tom Wolfe
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-28 11:37 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ncrbj2F9t46U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #89135 |
On 2026-07-28 06:01, c186282 wrote:
> On 7/27/26 09:07, Carlos E. R. wrote:
>> On 2026-07-27 05:19, c186282 wrote:
>>> On 7/26/26 23:08, Farley Flud wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 26 Jul 2026 21:19:53 -0400, c186282 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Aww ... I like systemd in many respects. It's
>>>>> not like the Winders registry, don't see any
>>>>> INTENTIONAL evil.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You "don't see" because you are a deluded, and lazy, idiot.
>>>
>>> Ah, 40 years in the industry and I'm an "idiot".
>>>
>>> PLONK !
>>>
>>
>> He is a known "character". He hates all distributions, and says people
>> using a distribution is stupid, or "a deluded, and lazy, idiot". He is
>> the only clever guy because he doesn't use any.
>>
>> We simply ignore him.
>
> I simply plonked him once and for all.
Beware that he uses several identities. You have to watch out for his
traits.
>
> Now there ARE some people who CAN pretty much
> write their own OS from scratch. This is not a
> bad thing at all, we NEED those kind of people.
>
> But when they expect EVERYBODY to have such skills
> and obsession or they're "no good/useless" then ...
> now we're into deep 'spectrum' or 'narcissism'.
>
> Hmmm ... once came across an episode of "Young
> Sheldon" where he went to the university prez
> and declared that "education" ONLY meant vast
> skill at math/sci and nobody else should get
> a diploma. Quantum mechanics or NOTHING. None
> others were 'smart' or 'educated' :-)
>
Heh :-)
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-28 17:43 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ncs814FovvdU46@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #89135 |
On Tue, 28 Jul 2026 00:01:28 -0400, c186282 wrote: > Hmmm ... once came across an episode of "Young Sheldon" where he went > to the university prez and declared that "education" ONLY meant vast > skill at math/sci and nobody else should get a diploma. Quantum > mechanics or NOTHING. None others were 'smart' or 'educated' I've seen that IRL. At a school that billed itself as a 'technological university' there was a feeling among the 'science' departments that the engineers weren't the sharpest knives in the drawer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-01 18:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <6a6e3436$0$985$426a74cc@news.free.fr> |
| In reply to | #89084 |
Le 27-07-2026, Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> a écrit : > On Sun, 26 Jul 2026 21:19:53 -0400, c186282 wrote: > >> >> Aww ... I like systemd in many respects. It's >> not like the Winders registry, don't see any >> INTENTIONAL evil. >> > > You "don't see" because you are a deluded, and lazy, idiot. You see because you are a deluded, and lazy, idiot. It's far easier to refuse everything than trying to understand and learn something. > You, as well as most other GNU/Linux users, have never performed > any serious research into the true origins, purpose, and goals of > systemd, even though you have had many years to so so. Everything you say about systemd history proves you never understood anything about what you have read. > FOSS requires a lot more than just innocent bystanders. OK, you are useless, but it's all the BEST for FOSS. If you ever try to do anything, it would become a disaster. > Each and every user must become involved in some way, however > small. The only involvement you can provide is by staying as far away as possible from FOSS projects. -- Si vous avez du temps à perdre : https://scarpet42.gitlab.io
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | FF <fflud@linux.rocks> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-01 19:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <18c7c41b6a734f73$22745$754419$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> |
| In reply to | #89397 |
On 01 Aug 2026 18:00:22 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >> >>> Aww ... I like systemd in many respects. It's not like the Winders >>> registry, don't see any INTENTIONAL evil. >>> > > > It's far easier to refuse everything than trying to understand and learn > something. > Your distro supplies systemd. You could not use anything else. Unless your distro supplies it then you are completely lost and helpless. You could never implement your own init system. Never. You support systemd because you could never implement anything else. Never. You are stuck with systemd and you are stuck with everything else that your distro provides. Poor dumb bastard.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-02 11:15 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <114n5co$ccdc$10@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #89407 |
On 01/08/2026 20:09, FF wrote: > On 01 Aug 2026 18:00:22 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > >>> >>>> Aww ... I like systemd in many respects. It's not like the Winders >>>> registry, don't see any INTENTIONAL evil. >>>> >> >> >> It's far easier to refuse everything than trying to understand and learn >> something. >> > > Your distro supplies systemd. Correct > You could not use anything else. False > Unless > your distro supplies it then you are completely lost and helpless. > False > You could never implement your own init system. Never. > False > You support systemd because you could never implement anything else. > Never. > False. > You are stuck with systemd and you are stuck with everything else that > your distro provides. > No. I accept it, because I want to use my time for other things that farting around with linux. > Poor dumb bastard. > You are. -- For in reason, all government without the consent of the governed is the very definition of slavery. Jonathan Swift
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-02 14:23 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <nd8r6aFdbe6U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #89458 |
On 2026-08-02 12:15, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 01/08/2026 20:09, FF wrote:
>> On 01 Aug 2026 18:00:22 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>>> Aww ... I like systemd in many respects. It's not like the Winders
>>>>> registry, don't see any INTENTIONAL evil.
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It's far easier to refuse everything than trying to understand and learn
>>> something.
>>>
>>
>> Your distro supplies systemd.
> Correct
>
>> You could not use anything else.
>
> False
>
>> Unless
>> your distro supplies it then you are completely lost and helpless.
>>
> False
>> You could never implement your own init system. Never.
>>
> False
>
>> You support systemd because you could never implement anything else.
>> Never.
>>
> False.
>> You are stuck with systemd and you are stuck with everything else that
>> your distro provides.
>>
> No. I accept it, because I want to use my time for other things that
> farting around with linux.
That's true for many of us.
>
>> Poor dumb bastard.
>>
> You are.
>
>
--
Cheers,
Carlos E.R.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-02 20:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <nd9mfiF4198U15@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #89465 |
On Sun, 2 Aug 2026 14:23:38 +0200, Carlos E. R. wrote: > On 2026-08-02 12:15, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 01/08/2026 20:09, FF wrote: >>> On 01 Aug 2026 18:00:22 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>> Aww ... I like systemd in many respects. It's not like the >>>>>> Winders registry, don't see any INTENTIONAL evil. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> It's far easier to refuse everything than trying to understand and >>>> learn something. >>>> >>>> >>> Your distro supplies systemd. >> Correct >> >>> You could not use anything else. >> >> False >> >>> Unless your distro supplies it then you are completely lost and >>> helpless. >>> >> False >>> You could never implement your own init system. Never. >>> >> False >> >>> You support systemd because you could never implement anything else. >>> Never. >>> >> False. >>> You are stuck with systemd and you are stuck with everything else that >>> your distro provides. >>> >> No. I accept it, because I want to use my time for other things that >> farting around with linux. > > That's true for many of us. I decided long ago to accept some stuff as magic and get on with my interests. An example is the recent network discussion. I can maintain distros but the less attention I have to pay to the OS, the better. For that matter almost everything I do on Linux could be done on Windows and vice-versa. That makes me an agnostic rather than a True Believer.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-01 22:00 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <KR-dnZWVRtWaOPP3nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #89397 |
On 8/1/26 14:00, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote: > Le 27-07-2026, Farley Flud <ff@gnulinux.rocks> a écrit : >> On Sun, 26 Jul 2026 21:19:53 -0400, c186282 wrote: >> >>> >>> Aww ... I like systemd in many respects. It's >>> not like the Winders registry, don't see any >>> INTENTIONAL evil. >>> >> >> You "don't see" because you are a deluded, and lazy, idiot. > > You see because you are a deluded, and lazy, idiot. > > It's far easier to refuse everything than trying to understand and > learn something. Unnecessary, though MAYbe not undeserved, meanness ! I've looked into what systemd does and, as much as possible, how/why. It's NOT the Winders registry, no "NSA Backdoor"s like I saw a far back as Win2k. (really ! check it !) I mostly use systemd because it will start/watchdog my daemons. Then I don't need to write my own watchdogs. Anyway, systemd love/hate has become almost a fanatical religion these days. IMHO, neither extreme is even close to the (current) Truth. In theory major evil COULD be put into systemd ... but at the same time there are always a lot of people crawling into every crevice of the code for their own needs and interests ... so it'd be FOUND really really quick. >> You, as well as most other GNU/Linux users, have never performed >> any serious research into the true origins, purpose, and goals of >> systemd, even though you have had many years to so so. > > Everything you say about systemd history proves you never understood > anything about what you have read. > >> FOSS requires a lot more than just innocent bystanders. > > OK, you are useless, but it's all the BEST for FOSS. If you ever try to > do anything, it would become a disaster. > >> Each and every user must become involved in some way, however >> small. > > The only involvement you can provide is by staying as far away as > possible from FOSS projects. Now now ... don't demonize FOSS the same way others demonize systemd ! :-) In long experience, almost everyone in the Linux sphere is TRYING to Do Their Best. Sometimes they score, sometimes they don't, mostly it all falls in-between somewhere. The more complex Linux and add-ons become the harder is is to keep track of EVERY thing, EVERY possible interaction. Oh well, you CAN run CP/M-86 using VirtualBox ... got one of those VMs stashed somewhere ...... may take another look ........ WOULD suggest a DOS-3.x VM however - proper compilers for 'C', FORTRAN, COBOL and Pascal can be had for that. Turbo Pascal will work too. I *think* the (very) good old Aztec 'C' compiler works in CP/M, so there are options if you want "ultra-simple". Look around and I'm sure you can find VERY old Linux systems too that might still boot, or run in a VM. SOMEWHERE in The Heap I still have Red Hat - on FLOPPIES. So, if the modern world isn't "pure" enough ...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marc Haber <mh+usenetspam2616@zugschl.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-27 16:22 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <1147pi8$1cr17$1@news1.tnib.de> |
| In reply to | #89080 |
c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote: > Look at MX and a few others ... the start-up options > allow you to run a systemd or sysV version. I am very interested in knowing who wastes weeks of their lifetime to write initscripts for Debian packages. Those people must be real fanatics. >> The GNU project needs to make their Hurd kernel a top >> priority as the future of Linux is total corporate >> domination with a lack of freedom. > > We need alt development streams. I think we don't even have enough personpower for ONE decent development stream. Greetings Marc -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Rhein-Neckar, DE | Beginning of Wisdom " | Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-27 23:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <1148obf$3jt5q$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #89101 |
On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 16:22:00 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > I am very interested in knowing who wastes weeks of their lifetime > to write initscripts for Debian packages. Those people must be real > fanatics. Whoever said “the Unix philosophy is to do one thing and do it well” never spent any time writing sysvinit scripts ...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-07-28 00:10 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <W4udnf8JyewvtvX3nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> |
| In reply to | #89101 |
On 7/27/26 10:22, Marc Haber wrote: > c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote: >> Look at MX and a few others ... the start-up options >> allow you to run a systemd or sysV version. > > I am very interested in knowing who wastes weeks of their lifetime to > write initscripts for Debian packages. Those people must be real > fanatics. Hey, we NEED those fanatics ! A good init script is worth its weight in gold. READ one sometime ... dozens, hundreds, of steps and checks and tweaks just to install one stupid little utility. The energy/skill to do ALL that by hand from memory ... it barely exists. Actually, that it's SO difficult to install said stupid little utilities these days - doesn't give me a good feeling for the future. Maybe CP/M wasn't so bad after all :-) >>> The GNU project needs to make their Hurd kernel a top >>> priority as the future of Linux is total corporate >>> domination with a lack of freedom. >> >> We need alt development streams. > > I think we don't even have enough personpower for ONE decent > development stream. You may be right, alas. The enthusiasm for 'free' OS/software isn't what it used to be - and there's more MONEY writing evil JS spyware for browsers. This is kinda why I've been looking into the BSDs more of late. They're a bit more driven by 'academic' types. There's always been good and bad in that, but for the near future the 'good' may very useful.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 9 of 12 — ← Prev page 1 … 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web