Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #91992 > unrolled thread

More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI

Started byLeroy H <lh@somewhere.net>
First post2026-09-22 20:08 +0000
Last post2026-09-26 14:01 +0000
Articles 20 on this page of 203 — 24 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc


Contents

  More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-22 20:08 +0000
    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-09-22 22:39 +0000
      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-23 00:25 -0400
    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-23 09:41 +0100
      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-09-23 08:50 -0700
        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-26 12:50 +0000
      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-23 23:11 -0400
    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-23 12:43 +0200
      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2026-09-23 14:09 +0000
    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI jayjwa <jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid> - 2026-09-23 11:55 -0400
      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) - 2026-09-23 23:00 +0000
        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 01:31 +0000
        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-09-24 10:07 +0100
          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:30 +0000
        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Anton Antimo <anton@safunu.org> - 2026-09-24 10:39 -0300
        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-26 13:02 +0000
          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-26 14:51 +0000
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-27 13:29 +0000
              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-27 19:39 +0000
                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-10-11 11:37 +0000
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-10-11 14:56 +0000
          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 09:55 +0100
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-09-27 11:01 +0000
              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 07:57 +0100
                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-09-30 08:40 -0700
                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-30 20:50 +0000
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-30 20:56 -0400
                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 04:21 +0000
                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2026-10-01 08:04 -0700
                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 00:48 +0000
                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 00:32 -0400
                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 00:51 +0100
                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 02:02 -0400
                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 09:27 +0100
                                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 23:21 -0400
                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:17 +0100
                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 22:34 -0400
                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 02:57 -0400
                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:24 +0100
                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 22:59 -0400
                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 09:02 +0100
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 04:16 +0000
                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-10-03 10:08 +0000
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 12:06 +0100
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 12:55 +0100
    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-09-23 19:24 +0200
      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-23 18:28 +0000
        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-09-23 21:04 +0200
          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2026-09-24 07:16 +1000
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-09-24 12:03 +0200
              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2026-09-26 17:37 +1000
                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-27 09:53 +0100
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-27 18:56 +0000
                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-28 12:52 -0400
                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-28 17:21 +0000
                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-28 15:56 -0400
                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-29 03:30 -0400
                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2026-09-29 02:20 +0000
                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-29 03:45 -0400
                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> - 2026-09-29 12:36 +0000
                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-29 10:51 -0400
                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-29 18:19 +0000
                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-29 19:38 -0400
                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-29 23:55 +0000
                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-29 18:54 -0400
                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-29 23:55 +0000
                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-30 01:14 +0100
                                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-30 02:04 +0000
                                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Abraham <chris@gerriscorp.com> - 2026-09-30 13:27 -0400
                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-30 15:47 -0400
                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-30 20:17 +0000
                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-30 20:33 -0400
                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 04:55 +0000
                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-01 02:01 -0400
                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 11:08 +0100
                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 00:42 +0000
                                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-01 23:49 -0400
                                                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:14 +0100
                                                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 19:33 +0000
                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 20:44 +0100
                                                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 22:13 -0400
                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 08:59 +0100
                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 04:11 -0400
                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-03 20:00 +0000
                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 09:04 +0100
                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-04 23:47 -0400
                                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 10:06 +0100
                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 13:09 +0200
                                                        [OT] US politics (was: Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 17:16 +0100
                                                          Re: [OT] US politics (was: Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-04 18:18 +0000
                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:13 +0100
                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 19:33 +0200
                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-05 02:46 -0400
                                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 10:18 +0100
                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:33 +0000
                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 20:42 +0200
                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-05 01:24 +0000
                                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-05 23:20 +0000
                                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-06 01:44 +0000
                                                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-06 03:56 +0000
                                                                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-07 01:45 -0400
                                                                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 08:01 +0100
                                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-07 03:32 -0400
                                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:00 +0100
                                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-07 18:42 +0000
                                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 07:45 +0100
                                                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-08 20:23 +0000
                                                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-08 17:24 -0400
                                                                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-08 23:59 +0000
                                                                                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Harold Stevens <wookie@bookworm.localdomain> - 2026-10-09 05:00 -0500
                                                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-10-08 23:44 +0000
                                                                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:36 +0000
                                                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2026-10-14 14:21 +0100
                                                                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-14 16:57 +0000
                                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:58 +0200
                                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:33 +0100
                                                                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:56 +0200
                                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-07 11:28 +0100
                                                                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-10-08 20:08 +0000
                                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 22:06 +0100
                                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-08 17:18 -0400
                                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 22:21 +0100
                                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:48 +0000
                                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:46 +0000
                                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2026-10-09 04:21 +0000
                                                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 18:15 +0000
                                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-09 11:14 +0100
                                                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 18:27 +0000
                                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-08 17:14 -0400
                                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-08 22:20 +0100
                                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:55 +0000
                                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-09 02:53 +0000
                                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-06 08:56 +0100
                                                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 19:32 +0000
                                                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 20:42 +0100
                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-03 03:08 +0000
                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 02:05 -0400
                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-03 01:59 -0400
                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-03 09:04 +0100
                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-03 19:57 +0000
                                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 09:02 +0100
                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 13:11 +0200
                                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-03 16:09 -0400
                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 09:08 +0100
                                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> - 2026-10-04 10:48 +0000
                                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:09 +0100
                                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 19:35 +0200
                                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-04 18:59 +0100
                                                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-10-04 20:33 +0200
                                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-05 01:09 +0000
                                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 10:03 +0100
                                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-10-05 12:51 -0400
                                                            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-05 02:45 -0400
                                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-05 10:33 +0100
                                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:13 +0100
                                                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 19:27 +0000
                                                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 21:32 -0400
                                              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 02:49 -0400
                                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-02 12:21 +0100
                                                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-10-02 22:44 -0400
                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-01 04:50 +0000
                                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 11:06 +0100
                                          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-10-02 00:40 +0000
                                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-10-01 11:03 +0100
                                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Abraham <chris@gerriscorp.com> - 2026-09-29 20:15 -0400
                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2026-09-29 10:46 -0400
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 11:56 +0100
              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 20:00 +0000
              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 02:09 -0400
      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Leroy H <lh@somewhere.net> - 2026-09-24 00:18 +0000
        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 01:24 +0000
          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 11:58 +0100
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:47 +0000
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 02:13 -0400
        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-24 00:21 -0400
          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 05:53 +0000
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-24 03:03 -0400
              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-24 12:23 +0200
                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:42 +0000
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2026-09-24 21:56 +0200
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-24 23:17 +0000
                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 01:00 -0400
              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:39 +0000
                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-24 23:17 +0000
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-25 04:36 +0000
                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-25 19:14 +0000
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 04:01 -0400
                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2026-09-26 14:43 +0000
                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 03:51 -0400
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-24 03:52 -0400
              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:43 +0000
                Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-25 09:17 +0100
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-25 17:58 +0000
                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 04:49 +0100
                      Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 04:15 -0400
                        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 09:51 +0100
                  Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 04:03 -0400
                    Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-26 09:42 +0100
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 12:03 +0100
        Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2026-09-24 10:31 +0100
          Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-24 19:20 +0000
            Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2026-09-26 03:41 -0400
              Re: More Lazy(?) Programmers Are Seduced By AI rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2026-09-26 14:01 +0000

Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11  Next page →


#92430

FromChris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Date2026-09-29 10:51 -0400
Message-ID<119gj94$3cc1c$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#92422
Roger Blake wrote this screed in ALL-CAPS (fixed):

> On 2026-09-29, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
>>    Oooooh ! You remember Firesign !  :-)
>
> I still have the original vinyl albums bought back
> in the day.
>
>>    "Waiting For The Electrician - Or
>>    Someone Like Him", a fave :-)
>
> That's a great one! I also love "How Time Flys" as well
> as "I Think We're All Bozos on This Bus" which gave us
> Dr. Memory. Then there's "How Can You Be in Two Places
> At Once...".
>
> Another favorite is "Everything You Know Is Wrong", which
> is a great, and surprisingly accurate, sendup of the postwar
> flying saucer/paranormal community. Remember, there's a
> seeker born every minute!
>
>>    You just don't SEE this kind of stuff anymore.
>
> That's for sure...
>
> https://youtu.be/N-4YF7S7rHo?t=53
>
> (I'm surprised that clip has not been purged from youtube.)

My favorite from that album:

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFdBxMTPDrc>

    Firesign Theatre ~ Ralf Spoilsport Drug Dealer Ship

>>    Hmm ... not too many years ago I was out 'in the
>>    field' and my boss called and asked what I was doing.
>>    My reply ...... :-)
>
> I still find myself using 'Firesignisms' all the time, though
> they tend to go right over the heads of most fellow old
> codgers, let alone younger people.

"It's nice out!"
"I think I'll leave it out."

> That type of comedy and satire was of course a product of
> its time. R.I.P. Phil Austin and Peter Bergman.

-- 
Hodie natus est radici frater.
 
[ Unto the root is born a brother ]

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#92443

FromCharlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>
Date2026-09-29 18:19 +0000
Message-ID<KiTuS.290$M0U7.74@fx10.iad>
In reply to#92422
On 2026-09-29, Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> wrote:

> On 2026-09-29, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
>
>>    Oooooh ! You remember Firesign !  :-)
>
> I still have the original vinyl albums bought back
> in the day.

Me too.  Gave them all a listen a while back -
they're as good as ever.

> Another favorite is "Everything You Know Is Wrong", which
> is a great, and surprisingly accurate, sendup of the postwar
> flying saucer/paranormal community. Remember, there's a
> seeker born every minute!

Gas music from Jupiter indeed!

-- 
/~\  Charlie Gibbs                  |  In this world there are
\ /  <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>      |  two kinds of people:
 X   I'm really at ac.dekanfrus     |  1. Those who can extrapolate
/ \  if you read it the right way.  |  from incomplete data.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#92456

Fromc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date2026-09-29 19:38 -0400
Message-ID<CBSdnScWMJ9G1iH3nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#92443
On 9/29/26 14:19, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On 2026-09-29, Roger Blake <rogblake@iname.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> On 2026-09-29, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
>>
>>>     Oooooh ! You remember Firesign !  :-)
>>
>> I still have the original vinyl albums bought back
>> in the day.
> 
> Me too.  Gave them all a listen a while back -
> they're as good as ever.
> 
>> Another favorite is "Everything You Know Is Wrong", which
>> is a great, and surprisingly accurate, sendup of the postwar
>> flying saucer/paranormal community. Remember, there's a
>> seeker born every minute!
> 
> Gas music from Jupiter indeed!

   Heh ... but now we have military films of
   the "Tic-Tacs" and related. Seems "They"
   are here after all - but don't want much
   to do with us hairless monkey people :-)

   My greatest fear isn't the UFO people ... it is
   what OUR people will DO with certain knowledge,
   but little else. Multiple "UFO religions" are
   sure to spring up, each convinced they KNOW
   what the saucer-people want/demand we do and
   think. Entire 'bibles' will be writ around each
   premise. Then the factions will go to war with
   each other and crush all infidels .......

   Oh well, at least it'll be a change-up from
   the Same Old Shit .......

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#92458

FromCharlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>
Date2026-09-29 23:55 +0000
Message-ID<ZdYuS.46$IrH6.41@fx05.iad>
In reply to#92456
On 2026-09-29, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:

>    My greatest fear isn't the UFO people ... it is
>    what OUR people will DO with certain knowledge,
>    but little else. Multiple "UFO religions" are
>    sure to spring up, each convinced they KNOW
>    what the saucer-people want/demand we do and
>    think. Entire 'bibles' will be writ around each
>    premise. Then the factions will go to war with
>    each other and crush all infidels .......
>
>    Oh well, at least it'll be a change-up from
>    the Same Old Shit .......

Not really.  They'll just be wearing different costumes.

You can't tell the players without a pogrom.

-- 
/~\  Charlie Gibbs                  |  In this world there are
\ /  <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>      |  two kinds of people:
 X   I'm really at ac.dekanfrus     |  1. Those who can extrapolate
/ \  if you read it the right way.  |  from incomplete data.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#92455

Fromc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date2026-09-29 18:54 -0400
Message-ID<12qdnUq1zboD3CH3nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#92422
On 9/29/26 08:36, Roger Blake wrote:
> On 2026-09-29, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
>>     Oooooh ! You remember Firesign !  :-)
> 
> I still have the original vinyl albums bought back
> in the day.
> 
>>     "Waiting For The Electrician - Or
>>     Someone Like Him", a fave :-)
> 
> That's a great one! I also love "How Time Flys" as well
> as "I Think We're All Bozos on This Bus" which gave us
> Dr. Memory. Then there's "How Can You Be in Two Places
> At Once...".
> 
> Another favorite is "Everything You Know Is Wrong", which
> is a great, and surprisingly accurate, sendup of the postwar
> flying saucer/paranormal community. Remember, there's a
> seeker born every minute!
> 
>>     You just don't SEE this kind of stuff anymore.
> 
> That's for sure...
> 
> https://youtu.be/N-4YF7S7rHo?t=53
> 
> (I'm surprised that clip has not been purged from youtube.)

   Too old, they have slipped under the radar.
   The firemen may never find them.

>>     Hmm ... not too many years ago I was out 'in the
>>     field' and my boss called and asked what I was doing.
>>     My reply ...... :-)
> 
> I still find myself using 'Firesignisms' all the time, though
> they tend to go right over the heads of most fellow old
> codgers, let alone younger people.
> 
> That type of comedy and satire was of course a product of
> its time. R.I.P. Phil Austin and Peter Bergman.

   Alas, don't expect to see anything much like
   it for quite awhile. The latter gens do not
   seem literate, or smart, enough. Some smart
   bizarre stuff does show up late-night, but
   typically as 'cartoons'.

   Finally, the 50s are GONE. The 60s are GONE.
   the 70s are GONE. The gigantic sociopolitical
   webs for each were unique, and were then
   swept out of the corners. Can't go back.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#92457

FromCharlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>
Date2026-09-29 23:55 +0000
Message-ID<YdYuS.45$IrH6.37@fx05.iad>
In reply to#92455
On 2026-09-29, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:

>    Finally, the 50s are GONE. The 60s are GONE.
>    the 70s are GONE. The gigantic sociopolitical
>    webs for each were unique, and were then
>    swept out of the corners. Can't go back.

Unfortunately, the '80s, with its culture of greed,
is gaining momentum.

-- 
/~\  Charlie Gibbs                  |  In this world there are
\ /  <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>      |  two kinds of people:
 X   I'm really at ac.dekanfrus     |  1. Those who can extrapolate
/ \  if you read it the right way.  |  from incomplete data.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#92463

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2026-09-30 01:14 +0100
Message-ID<119hk8u$3ovfn$5@dont-email.me>
In reply to#92457
On 30/09/2026 00:55, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On 2026-09-29, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
> 
>>     Finally, the 50s are GONE. The 60s are GONE.
>>     the 70s are GONE. The gigantic sociopolitical
>>     webs for each were unique, and were then
>>     swept out of the corners. Can't go back.
> 
> Unfortunately, the '80s, with its culture of greed,
> is gaining momentum.
> 

No. This is millennial. The triumph of total bullshit over reality.

Urban people have completely lost touch with reality and act entirely on 
some internal fantasy that they have been indoctrinated with featuring 
'Good Librals' and 'bad far right fascists, racists and Nazis' etc etc. 
And so idiotic have they been that rural people voted in the greatest 
badliest  far right fascists, racists and Nazis aka MAGA, to show them 
what it really looks like.

 From a distance, it's very hard to discern who is in fact more stupid.

And really it all comes of America simply having more money than sense, 
whilst hardworking Asian countries simply haven't got time for all that 
shit, and will take over the world.



-- 
"Anyone who believes that the laws of physics are mere social 
conventions is invited to try transgressing those conventions from the 
windows of my apartment. (I live on the twenty-first floor.) "

Alan Sokal

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#92470

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2026-09-30 02:04 +0000
Message-ID<ni390pFsunhU35@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#92463
On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 01:14:22 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> And so idiotic have they been that rural people voted in the greatest
> badliest  far right fascists, racists and Nazis aka MAGA, to show them
> what it really looks like.

MAGA is a long way from the far right -- and I don't say that to defend 
MAGA. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#92506

FromChris Abraham <chris@gerriscorp.com>
Date2026-09-30 13:27 -0400
Message-ID<b7194e0d-fc61-8bf9-098c-99f3177ede81@gerriscorp.com>
In reply to#92470
On Tue, 30 Sep 2026, rbowman wrote:
> MAGA is a long way from the far right -- and I don't say that to defend
> MAGA.

I see MAGA as a populist coalition using the Republican ticket to gain 
presidential power.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#92515

Fromc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date2026-09-30 15:47 -0400
Message-ID<fYucnXQJfvzf-iD3nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#92506
On 9/30/26 13:27, Chris Abraham wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Sep 2026, rbowman wrote:
>> MAGA is a long way from the far right -- and I don't say that to defend
>> MAGA.
> 
> I see MAGA as a populist coalition using the Republican ticket to gain 
> presidential power.

   It is a large number of people who, more or less,
   agree on some basic perspectives and goals to
   improve the USA. The GOP is far more into the
   same kinds of ideas as MAGA.

   Oh, and 'populism', what The People want, is
   kind of THE def of 'democracy'.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#92516

FromCharlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>
Date2026-09-30 20:17 +0000
Message-ID<77evS.21$cuS6.18@fx02.iad>
In reply to#92515
On 2026-09-30, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:

> On 9/30/26 13:27, Chris Abraham wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2026, rbowman wrote:
>>
>>> MAGA is a long way from the far right -- and I don't say that to defend
>>> MAGA.
>> 
>> I see MAGA as a populist coalition using the Republican ticket to gain 
>> presidential power.
>
>    It is a large number of people who, more or less,
>    agree on some basic perspectives and goals to
>    improve the USA. The GOP is far more into the
>    same kinds of ideas as MAGA.
>
>    Oh, and 'populism', what The People want, is
>    kind of THE def of 'democracy'.

    Democracy is the theory that the common people
    know what they want, and deserve to get it
    good and hard.
      -- H.L. Mencken

-- 
/~\  Charlie Gibbs                  |  In this world there are
\ /  <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid>      |  two kinds of people:
 X   I'm really at ac.dekanfrus     |  1. Those who can extrapolate
/ \  if you read it the right way.  |  from incomplete data.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#92526

Fromc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date2026-09-30 20:33 -0400
Message-ID<f7adnUzRVOntNyD3nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#92516
On 9/30/26 16:17, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On 2026-09-30, c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote:
> 
>> On 9/30/26 13:27, Chris Abraham wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2026, rbowman wrote:
>>>
>>>> MAGA is a long way from the far right -- and I don't say that to defend
>>>> MAGA.
>>>
>>> I see MAGA as a populist coalition using the Republican ticket to gain
>>> presidential power.
>>
>>     It is a large number of people who, more or less,
>>     agree on some basic perspectives and goals to
>>     improve the USA. The GOP is far more into the
>>     same kinds of ideas as MAGA.
>>
>>     Oh, and 'populism', what The People want, is
>>     kind of THE def of 'democracy'.
> 
>      Democracy is the theory that the common people
>      know what they want, and deserve to get it
>      good and hard.
>        -- H.L. Mencken


   Plenty bad to say about 'democracy' from Plato
   on up. However Churchill had maybe the best take
   on it ... "Worst ... except for all the others".

   Explicitly defined or not, the alt for 'democracy'
   is some form of 'royal' system of "your betters".
   Might be actual royal fams, but more recently it
   is just a bunch of extremists who like to THINK
   they "know better" and rule by threat and sword.

   You're safer with a plurality of Joe Averages.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#92545

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2026-10-01 04:55 +0000
Message-ID<ni67deFhjk6U15@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#92526
On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 20:33:49 -0400, c186282 wrote:

>    Explicitly defined or not, the alt for 'democracy'
>    is some form of 'royal' system of "your betters". Might be actual
>    royal fams, but more recently it is just a bunch of extremists who
>    like to THINK they "know better" and rule by threat and sword.
> 
>    You're safer with a plurality of Joe Averages.

I'd rather have a Friedrich II. NOT Friedrich der Grosse. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#92547

Fromc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date2026-10-01 02:01 -0400
Message-ID<bNGdndgjQvauaiD3nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#92545
On 10/1/26 00:55, rbowman wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2026 20:33:49 -0400, c186282 wrote:
> 
>>     Explicitly defined or not, the alt for 'democracy'
>>     is some form of 'royal' system of "your betters". Might be actual
>>     royal fams, but more recently it is just a bunch of extremists who
>>     like to THINK they "know better" and rule by threat and sword.
>>
>>     You're safer with a plurality of Joe Averages.
> 
> I'd rather have a Friedrich II. NOT Friedrich der Grosse.

   Fred is Dead.

   NOW we get sociopolitical EXTREMISTS who
   are just CONVINCED they are the "betters".
   "WE know what you want/need ... and if you
   disagree you'll be DISAPPEARED !".

   Alas humans seriously gravitate toward
   "leader" figures - even IF they're full
   of shit. Wired-in from the veldt-roving
   days for sure if not earlier. Humans, like
   LOTS of creatures, are 'pecking-order'
   beings. All worship the biggest loudest
   savior-sage !!!

   That'd be AOC/Omar/Bernie for Americans :-)

   "You gave me fortune, You gave me fame,
   You gave me power in your god's name"

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#92559

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2026-10-01 11:08 +0100
Message-ID<119lbei$11uku$8@dont-email.me>
In reply to#92526
On 01/10/2026 01:33, c186282 wrote:
> Plenty bad to say about 'democracy' from Plato
>    on up. However Churchill had maybe the best take
>    on it ... "Worst ... except for all the others".
> 
>    Explicitly defined or not, the alt for 'democracy'
>    is some form of 'royal' system of "your betters".
>    Might be actual royal fams, but more recently it
>    is just a bunch of extremists who like to THINK
>    they "know better" and rule by threat and sword.
> 
The European Union

>    You're safer with a plurality of Joe Averages.

Democracy is supposed to make it hard to lock in a Trump like despot.

We will see...
-- 
Climate Change: Socialism wearing a lab coat.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#92612

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2026-10-02 00:42 +0000
Message-ID<ni8cvmF1a8lU7@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#92559
On Thu, 1 Oct 2026 11:08:18 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> On 01/10/2026 01:33, c186282 wrote:
>> Plenty bad to say about 'democracy' from Plato
>>    on up. However Churchill had maybe the best take on it ... "Worst
>>    ... except for all the others".
>> 
>>    Explicitly defined or not, the alt for 'democracy'
>>    is some form of 'royal' system of "your betters". Might be actual
>>    royal fams, but more recently it is just a bunch of extremists who
>>    like to THINK they "know better" and rule by threat and sword.
>> 
> The European Union
> 
>>    You're safer with a plurality of Joe Averages.
> 
> Democracy is supposed to make it hard to lock in a Trump like despot.

Democracy is supposed to keep the sheep content while business goes on as 
usual.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#92618

Fromc186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date2026-10-01 23:49 -0400
Message-ID<U-6cnfYZmrgltCL3nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com>
In reply to#92612
On 10/1/26 20:42, rbowman wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2026 11:08:18 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> 
>> On 01/10/2026 01:33, c186282 wrote:
>>> Plenty bad to say about 'democracy' from Plato
>>>     on up. However Churchill had maybe the best take on it ... "Worst
>>>     ... except for all the others".
>>>
>>>     Explicitly defined or not, the alt for 'democracy'
>>>     is some form of 'royal' system of "your betters". Might be actual
>>>     royal fams, but more recently it is just a bunch of extremists who
>>>     like to THINK they "know better" and rule by threat and sword.
>>>
>> The European Union
>>
>>>     You're safer with a plurality of Joe Averages.
>>
>> Democracy is supposed to make it hard to lock in a Trump like despot.
> 
> Democracy is supposed to keep the sheep content while business goes on as
> usual.

   Gee, such CYNICS !!!

   And Trump, he's MILD. USA really needed
   someone even stronger than him, kinda
   MAGA+

   Ted Cruz ?

   The commiesocialists aren't mild - bold
   visions of a total Big Brother existence ...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#92635

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2026-10-02 12:14 +0100
Message-ID<119o3mv$21k2o$3@dont-email.me>
In reply to#92618
On 02/10/2026 04:49, c186282 wrote:
> And Trump, he's MILD.

ITYM MOULD. Rotten, corrupt and smelling really bad.

I cant recall anyone more stupid since Jane Fonda

-- 
    "Fanaticism consists in redoubling your effort when you have 
forgotten your aim."

  George Santayana

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#92678

Fromrbowman <bowman@montana.com>
Date2026-10-02 19:33 +0000
Message-ID<niaf7gFc90fU11@mid.individual.net>
In reply to#92635
On Fri, 2 Oct 2026 12:14:39 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> On 02/10/2026 04:49, c186282 wrote:
>> And Trump, he's MILD.
> 
> ITYM MOULD. Rotten, corrupt and smelling really bad.
> 
> I cant recall anyone more stupid since Jane Fonda

Kamala Harris?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#92683

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2026-10-02 20:44 +0100
Message-ID<119p1ia$2crcd$11@dont-email.me>
In reply to#92678
On 02/10/2026 20:33, rbowman wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2026 12:14:39 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> 
>> On 02/10/2026 04:49, c186282 wrote:
>>> And Trump, he's MILD.
>>
>> ITYM MOULD. Rotten, corrupt and smelling really bad.
>>
>> I cant recall anyone more stupid since Jane Fonda
> 
> Kamala Harris?

She wasn't so much stupid as simply...invisible. A non-person. A nebbish.
Trump is actively stupid. Kamala was passively inept.

-- 
"Strange as it seems, no amount of learning can cure stupidity, and 
higher education positively fortifies it."

    - Stephen Vizinczey

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 4 of 11 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 … 11  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc


csiph-web